Development of imaging biomarker for esophageal cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion MRI

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating preoperative staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma : Evaluation of preoperative stage of primary tumour and prediction of lymph node metastases from esophageal cancer using IVIM: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this research is to prospectively investigate the diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) using the integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming (iShim) technique in staging primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and predicting presence of lymph node metastases from ESCC.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with ESCC were prospectively enrolled from April 2016 to April 2019. MR and IVIM using iShim technique (b = 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 s/mm2) were performed on 3.0T MRI system before operation. Primary tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM parameters, including true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), pseudodiffusion fraction (f) were measured by two independent radiologists. The differences in D, D*, f and ADC values of different T and N stages were assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate the interobserver agreement between two readers. The diagnostic performances of D, D*, f and ADC values in primary tumour staging and prediction of lymph node metastasis of ESCC were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The inter-observer consensus was excellent for IVIM parameters and ADC (D: ICC = 0.922; D*: ICC = 0.892; f: ICC = 0.948; ADC: ICC = 0.958). The ADC, D, D* and f values of group T1 + T2 were significantly higher than those of group T3 + T4a [ADC: (2.55 ± 0.43) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (2.27 ± 0.40) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t = 2.670, P = 0.010; D: (1.82 ± 0.39) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (1.53 ± 0.33) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t = 3.189, P = 0.002; D*: 46.45 (30.30,55.53) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. 32.30 (18.60,40.95) ×10- 3 mm2/s, z=-2.408, P = 0.016; f: 0.45 ± 0.12 vs. 0.37 ± 0.12, t = 2.538, P = 0.014]. The ADC, D and f values of the lymph nodes-positive (N+) group were significantly lower than those of lymph nodes-negative (N0) group [ADC: (2.10 ± 0.33) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (2.55 ± 0.40) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t=-4.564, P < 0.001; D: (1.44 ± 0.30) ×10- 3 mm2/s vs. (1.78 ± 0.37) ×10- 3 mm2/s, t=-3.726, P < 0.001; f: 0.32 ± 0.10 vs. 0.45 ± 0.11, t=-4.524, P < 0.001]. The combination of D, D* and f yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.814) in distinguishing group T1 + T2 from group T3 + T4a. D combined with f provided the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.849) in identifying group N + and group N0 of ESCC.

CONCLUSIONS

IVIM may be used as an effective functional imaging technique to evaluate preoperative stage of primary tumour and predict presence of lymph node metastases from ESCC.

Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognosis, and Therapeutics of Esophageal Cancers

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the deadliest cancer worldwide, with a 92% annual mortality rate per incidence. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are the two major types of ECs, with EAC having one of the worst prognoses in oncology. Limited screening techniques and a lack of molecular analysis of diseased tissues have led to late-stage presentation and very low survival durations. The five-year survival rate of EC is less than 20%. Thus, early diagnosis of EC may prolong survival and improve clinical outcomes. Cellular and molecular biomarkers are used for diagnosis. At present, esophageal biopsy during upper endoscopy and histopathological analysis is the standard screening modality for both ESCC and EAC. However, this is an invasive method that fails to yield a molecular profile of the diseased compartment. To decrease the invasiveness of the procedures for diagnosis, researchers are proposing non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis and point-of-care screening options. Liquid biopsy involves the collection of body fluids (blood, urine, and saliva) non-invasively or with minimal invasiveness. In this review, we have critically discussed various biomarkers and specimen retrieval techniques for ESCC and EAC.

Predicting Grade of Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma: Can Stretched Exponential Model-Based DWI Perform Better Than Bi-Exponential and Mono-Exponential Model?

Background

To evaluate and compare the potential performance of various diffusion parameters obtained from mono-exponential model (MEM)-, bi-exponential model (BEM)-, and stretched exponential model (SEM)-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in grading of esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESC).

Methods

Eighty-two patients with pathologically confirmed ESC without treatment underwent multi-b-value DWI scan with 13 b values (0~12,00 s/mm²). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) deriving from the MEM; the pure molecular diffusion (ADC_slow), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (ADC_fast), perfusion, and fraction (f) deriving from the BEM; and the distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (α) deriving from the SEM were calculated and compared between poorly differentiated and well/moderately differentiated ESC, respectively. The prediction parameters and diagnostic efficiency were compared by drawing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The ADC, ADC_slow, ADC_fast, and DDC in poorly ESC were significantly lower than those in well/moderately differentiated ones. By using only one parameter, ADC_slow, DDC had the moderate diagnostic efficiency and the areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.758 and 0.813 in differentiating ESC. The DDC had the maximum AUC with sensitivity (88.00%) and specificity (68.42%). Combining ADC with ADC_fast, ADC_slow, and DDC and combining ADC_slow with ADC_fast can provide a higher diagnostic accuracy with AUC ranging from 0.756, 0.771, 0.816, and 0.793, respectively.

Conclusion

Various parameters derived from different DWI models including MEM, BEM, and SEM were potentially helpful in grading ESC. DDC obtained from SEM was the most promising diffusion parameter for predicting the grade of ESC.