1
|
Odone A, Dallagiacoma G, Frascella B, Signorelli C, Leask J. Current understandings of the impact of mandatory vaccination laws in Europe. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:559-575. [PMID: 33896302 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1912603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Vaccinations are among the most successful preventive tools to protect collective health. In response to alarming vaccines preventable diseases (VPDs) outbreaks resurgence, decreased vaccination coverage and vaccine refusal, several European countries have recently revised their vaccination policies introducing or extending mandatory vaccinations. This review examines the health, political and ethical aspects of mandatory vaccination.The authors first clarify terms and definitions and propose a conceptual framework of mandatory policies. Second, they describe the current status of mandatory childhood immunization programmes in Europe, assessing selected mandatory laws. Third, as the authors conduct a systematic review of the literature (retrieving from Medline 17 relevant records between 2010 and 2020), they take an analytical approach to measure the impact of mandatory vaccination policies on both VPDs control and immunization coverage, but also on population attitudes toward vaccines. 40% of European countries currently have mandatory vaccination policies; however, policies vary widely and, although there is evidence of increased vaccine uptake, their impact on informed adherence to preventive behaviors is scant.Although mandatory vaccination policies might be needed to protect collective health in times of emergency, public health goals of VPD prevention and health promotion should primarily be pursued through health education and population empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Dallagiacoma
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Signorelli
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Julie Leask
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery. Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
How Public Health Professionals View Mandatory Vaccination in Italy-A Cross-Sectional Survey. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9060580. [PMID: 34205959 PMCID: PMC8228801 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9060580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In response to the decline in child vaccination coverage and the subsequent occurrence of large vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks, in 2017 Italy introduced a new law that made ten vaccines mandatory for children aged 0-16 years. The policy change initiated an ongoing debate among the general public, as well as in the political arena and the scientific community, over this major public health concern. Hence, we conducted a survey aimed at assessing Italian public health professionals' attitudes towards and opinions on mandatory vaccination. A validated online questionnaire was administered to 1350 members of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Among the 1044 responders (response rate 77%), a large majority were in favour of the Italian mandatory vaccination law (91%) and against its repeal (74%). Nevertheless, according to our sample, maintaining a high level of vaccination coverage without the need to mandate would be preferable, and thus efforts to promote vaccine confidence and proactive vaccine uptake are still needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Verger P, Dualé C, Scronias D, Lenzi N, Pulcini C, Launay O. Attitudes of hospital physicians toward childhood mandatory vaccines in France: A cross-sectional survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 18:1870393. [PMID: 33616464 PMCID: PMC8920152 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1870393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to a decades-long crisis of confidence in vaccination, in 2017 France extended the number of mandatory early childhood vaccines from 3 to 11. Aims To describe the opinions of hospital staff physicians (HSPs) regarding this measure, quantify the proportion who would have preferred measures based on education, and study the factors associated with the latter opinion. Methods Cross-sectional nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire in 2018–2019 among HSPs in 14 French public hospitals. The factors associated with HSPs’ preference for education and persuasion over mandatory vaccination were analyzed with simple and multiple Poisson regressions. Results The analyses included 1,795 HSPs (participation rate of 86%). Among them, 84% considered the extension of mandatory childhood vaccination essential given the epidemiological context at the time; in a later question, 40% would have preferred education and persuasion. Multiple regressions showed that the latter tended to be younger and less trustful of sources of information about vaccination. They were more likely to think that information on the rationale behind the national vaccination policy lacked clarity and that the extension of mandatory vaccines was not essential, even in the current epidemiologic situation. Conclusion Although most HSPs agreed that the extension of mandatory childhood vaccines was essential, some were ambivalent about its coercive philosophy. Further research is necessary to better understand the reasons of this ambivalence. A fraction did not understand the French vaccination strategy well. Efforts to explain its details to HSPs and an overhaul of their initial training on vaccination are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Verger
- Research Department, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional De La Santé Paca), Marseille, France.,INSERM, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in VACcinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France
| | - Christian Dualé
- INSERM, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in VACcinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France.,Centre Hospitalo-universitaire, Clermont-Ferrand, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Dimitri Scronias
- Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Nezha Lenzi
- INSERM, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in VACcinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France.,Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Céline Pulcini
- PEMAC, équipe MICS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.,Infectious Diseases Department, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Odile Launay
- INSERM, F-CRIN, Innovative Clinical Research Network in VACcinology (I-REIVAC), Paris, France.,Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, Université de Paris, Paris, France.,INSERM, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|