Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using Sonazoid(®) is useful for diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with Doppler ultrasound

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis

In the diagnosis of gynecological tumors, determining the benign or malignant nature of adnexal masses is a crucial and complex issue. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively novel and increasingly used diagnostic method. Therefore, this study evaluated the diagnostic value of CEUS in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses through meta-analysis and systematic review. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 2024 regarding the use of CEUS in diagnosing benign and malignant adnexal masses. STATA 14.0 software was used for data analysis, pooling the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of eligible studies. After initial screening, 305 studies were identified, 13 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and DOR of CEUS for the diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93), 8.00 (95% CI: 5.00-12.90), 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14), and 91.00 (95% CI: 45.00-185.00), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). CEUS is a noninvasive, nonradiative imaging modality with high accuracy and reliability in the diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses. To provide an effective adjunct tool in the clinic, future studies can further explore the specific application value of CEUS and its performance in different populations.

Application Value of Color Doppler Ultrasound and Ultrasound Contrast in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian tumor

Objective:

To study the value of color Doppler ultrasound and ultrasound contrast in differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Methods:

Ninety-six patients with ovarian tumors who were treated in our hospital from May 2017 to July 2018 and confirmed by pathological examination were selected as the research subjects. All patients were examined by color Doppler ultrasound and ultrasound contrast. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the two methods were compared, and the parameters of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors were observed and compared.

Results:

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors were higher than those of color Doppler ultrasound (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the time of initiation enhancement, time to peak and perfusion intensity in the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions by ultrasound contrast (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

In the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors, ultrasound contrast has more advantages than color Doppler ultrasound in displaying the blood perfusion information of tumors. It has high diagnostic accuracy and clinical application value.