Acoustic structure quantification (ASQ): a new tool in sonographic examination of liver lesions in hepatic alveolar echinococcosis

Assessment of the frequency dependence of acoustic properties on material, composition, and scatterer size of the medium

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate the frequency dependence of the speed of sound (SoS) and attenuation coefficients in phantoms with controlled attenuation properties (scatterer density, scatterer size, absorption control material) and rat livers.

METHODS

The frequency dependence of SoS and attenuation coefficients were evaluated with ultrasound (1-15 MHz) by observing multiple phantoms with different scatterer sizes, densities, and presence or absence of evaporated milk as absorbing media. Normal and fatty model rat livers were examined with the same protocol.

RESULTS

The phantom results revealed that the scatterer density and SoS of the base media were the dominant factors causing the changes in SoS. Frequency dependence was not observed in SoS. Assessment of the attenuation coefficient showed that the frequency dependence was mainly affected by absorption attenuation when the scatterer was as small as a hepatocyte (i.e. ≤ 10 µm). Scattering attenuation was also observed to affect frequency dependence when the scatterer was as large as lipid droplets (i.e. ≤ 40 µm).

CONCLUSION

Assuming a consistent size of the main scatterers in the evaluation medium, the frequency dependence of the SoS and attenuation coefficients may provide insight into the scatterer density and the contribution of absorption and scattering attenuation. Further studies in the higher frequency band (up to about 50 MHz) are expected to advance the clinical application of high-frequency ultrasound.

Basic concept and clinical applications of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technologies

In the field of clinical ultrasound, the full digitalization of diagnostic equipment in the 2000s enabled the technological development of quantitative ultrasound (QUS), followed by multiple diagnostic technologies that have been put into practical use in recent years. In QUS, tissue characteristics are quantified and parameters are calculated by analyzing the radiofrequency (RF) echo signals returning to the transducer. However, the physical properties (and pathological level structure) of the biological tissues responsible for the imaging features and QUS parameters have not been sufficiently verified as there are various conditions for observing living tissue with ultrasound and inevitable discrepancies between theoretical and actual measurements. A major issue of QUS in clinical application is that the evaluation results depend on the acquisition conditions of the RF echo signal as the source of the image information, and also vary according to the model of the diagnostic device. In this paper, typical examples of QUS techniques for evaluating attenuation, speed of sound, amplitude envelope characteristics, and backscatter coefficient in living tissues are introduced. Exemplary basic research and clinical applications related to these technologies, and initiatives currently being undertaken to establish the QUS method as a true tissue characterization technology, are also discussed.

Acoustic Structure Quantification Versus Point Shear Wave Speed Measurement for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Viral Hepatitis B

This study was conducted to evaluate the value of acoustic structure quantification (ASQ) technology versus that of point shear wave speed measurement (PSWSM) imaging technology for the assessment of liver fibrosis stage. A total of 104 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 30 healthy control patients underwent ASQ and PSWSM examinations. Seven quantitative parameters were obtained from ASQ, and a principal component analysis was used to establish the integrative indicators. A quantitative parameter, known as the shear wave speed (SWS, m/s), was obtained from the PSWSM. The METAVIR scores for the assessment of pathologic liver fibrosis were used as a benchmark. Liver fibrosis stages exhibited a good correlation with the integrative indicators and SWS (r = 0.682, p <0.001; r = 0.651, p <0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for ASQ and PSWSM were 0.705 and 0.854 for mild liver fibrosis (F ≥ 1, p = 0.045), 0.813 and 0.743 for significant liver fibrosis (F ≥ 2, p = 0.115), 0.839 and 0.857 for severe liver fibrosis (F ≥ 3, p = 0.417) and 0.874 and 0.971 for liver cirrhosis (F = 4, p = 0.016), respectively. In conclusion, both ASQ and PSWSM were promising ultrasonic methods for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with CHB; however, PSWSM was more valuable for identifying mild liver fibrosis (F ≥ 1) and cirrhosis (F = 4) than ASQ, and the combination of PSWSM and ASQ improved the accuracy of diagnosing severe liver fibrosis (F ≥ 3).