Subclinical crystal arthropathy: a silent contributor to inflammation and functional disability in knees with osteoarthritis-an ultrasound study

The association between articular calcium crystal deposition and knee osteoarthritis, joint pain and inflammation: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To explore in a cross-sectional fashion if overweight individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and intraarticular calcium crystal (CaC) deposits experience more knee joint inflammation and knee pain compared with individuals without CaC deposits.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We used pre-randomization imaging data from an RCT, the LOSE-IT trial. Participants with knee OA (clinical diagnosis of knee OA and KLG 1-3) had CT and 3 T MRI of the index knee. CaCs were assessed on CT using the Boston University Calcium Knee Score (BUCKS). The pain subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to assess knee pain and to estimate joint inflammation we used static and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. An independent sample t-test was used to test for a significant difference in KOOS-pain and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models to test for differences in the static and DCE-MRI variables between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 158 participants with KOOS-pain available, 19 (12%) had CaC deposits, and of the 115 participants with MRI available, 13 (11.3%) had CaC deposits. We did not find a significant difference in mean KOOS-pain between the two groups; the mean difference was - 2.2 points (95%CI, - 10.86, 6.45). None of the MRI variables were associated with the presence of CaC deposits. Between-group differences were small for all MRI variables, with standardized mean differences ranging from small to medium (0.31-0.56).

CONCLUSION

In individuals with knee OA, we did not find an association between intraarticular CaC deposits and an increase in knee joint inflammation or knee pain.

Impact of ultrasonography detected quadriceps calcific tendinopathy on pain and function in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis

Calcific tendinopathy is most commonly seen around the shoulder joint. Only a few cases of quadriceps calcific tendinopathy (QCT) were reported. This study compares pain, function, clinical examination results, and ultrasonographic findings among primary knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients with or without ultrasonography-detected QCT. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 214 patients with knee OA. Ultrasonography (US) of knee joints was performed according to the EULAR guidelines. Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grading was used to score OA. Pain and functional status were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Health Assessment Questionnaire-II (HAQ-II), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). QCT was detected in 50 out of 428 knees (11.6%), i.e. in 46 out of 214 patients (21.49%). Most cases of QCT were detected in the following sites: 36 in the vastus lateralis (72%), 10 in the vastus intermedius (20%), and only 4 in the vastus medialis (8%). QCT was found mainly in advanced KOA stages: 44 cases of QCT were found in patients with grade 4 KOA and 6 cases in grade 3 KOA. The presence of QCT showed a statistically significant association (p<0.05) with VAS, HAQ-II, WOMAC subscales, synovitis, and effusion detected by US. In knees with ultrasound-detected QCT, ultrasonographic features of CPPD were found in 31 knees (62%). QCT was found in cases with advanced KOA and mainly with ultrasonographic findings of CPPD disease. QCT could be considered an independent poor prognostic finding regarding pain, functional activity, and response to NSAIDs.

The diagnostic value of conventional radiography and musculoskeletal ultrasonography in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine and compare the accuracy of conventional radiography (CR) and musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals deposition disease (CPPD).

DESIGN

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane), conference abstracts and reference lists was undertaken. Studies which evaluated the accuracy of CR and/or US in the diagnosis of CPPD, using synovial fluid analysis (SFA), histology or classification criteria as reference tests were included. Subgroup analyses by anatomic site and by reference test were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included. Using SFA/histology as reference test, CR and US showed an excellent (CR AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.811-0.967) and an outstanding (US AUC = 0.954, 95%CI = 0.907-1.0) diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, US showed a higher sensitivity (0.85, 95%CI = 0.79-0.90 vs 0.47, 95%CI = 0.40-0.55) and only a little lower specificity (0.87, 95%CI = 0.83-0.91 vs 0.95, 95%CI = 0.92-0.97) than CR. A considerable heterogeneity between the studies was found, with adopted reference test being the main source of heterogeneity. In fact, subgroup analysis showed a significant change in the diagnostic accuracy of CR, but not of US, using Ryan and McCarty criteria or SFA/histology as reference test (CR: AUC = 0.956, 95%CI = 0.925-1.0 vs AUC = 0.889, 95%CI = 0.828-0.950, respectively, p < 0.01) (US: AUC = 0.922, 95%CI = 0.842-1.0 vs AUC = 0.957, 95%CI = 0.865-1.0, respectively, p = 0.08) CONCLUSIONS: Although US is more sensitive and a little less specific than CR for identifying CPP crystals, both these two techniques showed a great diagnostic accuracy and should be regarded as complementary to each other in the diagnostic work-up of patients with CPPD.

Turning the Page in Osteoarthritis Assessment with the Use of Ultrasound

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review summarizes the last 5 years of published, peer-reviewed research on the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) in osteoarthritis (OA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple features relevant to OA can be visualized on US, including synovitis, erosion, enthesitis, osteophytes, cartilage damage, meniscal extrusion, and popliteal cysts. US can be used to confirm a diagnosis of OA or make an alternate diagnosis in the clinical setting. When a standardized protocol is used, US is a reliable modality for assessment of the features of OA. Findings on US can predict progression and response to therapy in OA of the hand and knee and can allow characterization of risk factors in a cost-effective, non-invasive, repeatable manner. US is becoming more widely used in OA imaging and has clear value in addition to radiography and clinical assessment. US will likely prove useful in defining phenotypes and providing treatment guidance in OA.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: imaging

OBJECTIVE

To provide a narrative review of original articles on osteoarthritis (OA) imaging published between April 1, 2018 and March 30, 2019.

METHODS

All original research articles on OA imaging published in English between April 1, 2018 and March 30, 2019 were identified using a PubMed database search. The search terms of "Osteoarthritis" or "OA" were combined with the search terms "Radiography", "X-Rays", "Magnetic Resonance Imaging", "MRI", "Ultrasound", "US", "Computed Tomography", "Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry", "DXA", "DEXA", "CT", "Nuclear Medicine", "Scintigraphy", "Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography", "SPECT", "Positron Emission Tomography", "PET", "PET-CT", or "PET-MRI". Articles were reviewed to determine relevance based upon the following criteria: 1) study involved human subjects with OA or risk factors for OA and 2) study involved imaging to evaluate OA disease status or OA treatment response. Relevant articles were ranked according to scientific merit, with the best publications selected for inclusion in the narrative report.

RESULTS

The PubMed search revealed a total of 1257 articles, of which 256 (20.4%) were considered relevant to OA imaging. Two-hundred twenty-six (87.1%) articles involved the knee joint, while 195 (76.2%) articles involved the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The proportion of published studies involving the use of MRI was higher than previous years. An increasing number of articles were also published on imaging of subjects with joint injury and on deep learning application in OA imaging.

CONCLUSION

MRI and other imaging modalities continue to play an important role in research studies designed to better understand the pathogenesis, progression, and treatment of OA.