Dense adhesions between the uterus and anterior abdominal wall: a unique complication of Cesarean delivery

Surgical Outcomes between Routes of Hysterectomy in Patients with a Previous Cesarean Section

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the difference in surgical complications for patients with a previous cesarean section (CS) undergoing abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic hysterectomy.

DESIGN

A population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Province of Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

10 300 patients with at least 1 CS between July 1, 1991, and February 17, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Benign, nongravid hysterectomy between Apr 1, 2002, and March 31, 2018.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was a composite of all surgical complications within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes were rate of genitourinary complications, readmission to hospital, and emergency department visit occurring within 30 days of surgery. Of 10 300 patients who had at least one previous CS, who underwent subsequent hysterectomy for a benign indication, 7370 underwent an abdominal hysterectomy (71.55%), 813 (7.9%) had a vaginal hysterectomy, and 2117 (20.55%) underwent a laparoscopic hysterectomy. The adjusted odds of any surgical complication from hysterectomy was significantly lower when performed by the vaginal approach than the laparoscopic approach (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.51; p <.0001). There was no difference in the odds of surgical complication between abdominal and laparoscopic approaches (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.37; p = .45).

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective population-based study demonstrates that, after previous CS, patients selected to undergo vaginal hysterectomy experienced lower risk than either abdominal or laparoscopic approaches. This suggests that CS alone should not be a contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy.

Incidence and sites of pelvic adhesions in women with post-caesarean infertility

This cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate the incidences and sites of pelvic adhesions in women with post-caesarean unexplained infertility. This study was conducted at the Tanta University Hospitals in the period from August 1 2015 to July 31 2016. The enrolled patients were assessed by a diagnostic laparoscopy for the presence and sites of abdominal and pelvic adhesions. Pelvic adhesions were found in 98 cases (73.13%) and the remaining 36 cases (26.87%) were free of adhesions. Adhesions were tubal in 55.10%, ovarian in 20.40%, combined tubo-ovarian and omental adhesions in 11.22%, uterine adhesions in 6.12% and a frozen pelvis was found in 7.14%. There was no correlation between the severity of the adhesions and the number of previous caesarean sections (CS). The data of this study led us to conclude that pelvic adhesions are common in patients with unexplained infertility following a caesarean delivery. Tubal and ovarian adhesions to the lateral pelvic wall represent a pathognomonic feature in post-caesarean infertility. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Adhesions following a caesarean delivery have been assessed by many studies at the time of the next caesarean delivery. These adhesions have not been studied well in the patients with unexplained infertility. What the results of this study add? The results of this study specify the incidences and the sites of the adhesions which are considered to be pathognomonic for caesarean section. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings should be applied when the cases of post-caesarean infertility are evaluated in order to shorten the duration and burdens of infertility.