Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents

Facilitators of and barriers to hip protector acceptance and adherence in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hip protectors represent an attractive strategy for reducing hip fractures among high-risk fallers in long-term care facilities. However, clinical studies yield conflicting results regarding their clinical value. This is mainly due to poor acceptance and adherence among users in wearing these devices. As a result, there is an urgent need to identify potential barriers and facilitators to initial acceptance and continued adherence with hip protector use.

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize available research evidence to identify factors that influence acceptance and adherence among older adults living in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

A key word search was conducted for studies published in English between 2000 and 2013 that employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research designs. Two independent reviewers evaluated each article for inclusion, with a third reviewer when needed to resolve discrepancies.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight articles met our inclusion criteria, and facilitators and barriers were clustered into 4 socio-ecological levels: system (eg, facility commitment, staff shortages), caregiver (eg, belief in the efficacy of protectors, negative perceptions), resident (eg, clinical risk factors for falls and related fractures, acute illness), and product (eg, soft shell, discomfort).

DISCUSSION

The outcomes provide decision makers, health professionals, and caregivers with a greater awareness of strategies to improve compliance with the use of hip protectors. Furthermore, researchers can use this information to design clinical trials that yield high acceptance and adherence.

Autonomy, choice, patient-centered care, and hip protectors: the experience of residents and staff in long-term care

The purpose of this study was to examine long-term care (LTC) resident and staff perceptions on the decision to use hip protectors and identify the factors that influence attitudes toward hip protector use. Staff (N = 39) and residents (N = 27) at two residential care facilities in British Columbia, Canada were invited to participate in focus groups on fall prevention and hip protector use. A total of 11 focus groups were conducted. Using framework analysis results show that residents and staff shared concerns on aesthetic and comfort issues with hip protectors. Residents also generally felt they did not need, or want to use, hip protectors. However, they also had desire to be cooperative within the LTC environment. Staff underscored their role in advocating for hip protector use and their desire to protect residents from harm. Practice considerations for facilities wishing to promote hip protectors within a patient centered framework are highlighted.

Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures among elderly adults

Prevention of fractures in the elderly consists of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, prevention of falling and prevention of fractures using injury-site protection. Since the majority of hip fractures in elderly people are caused by a sideways fall with direct impact on the greater trochanter of the proximal femur, one option to prevent the fracture is a biomechanically effective external hip protector. The biomechanical test results of an energy-shunting and energy-absorbing hip protector have demonstrated that this type of hip protector can provide an effective impact force attenuation in typical falling conditions of older adults by reducing the initial force down to the seventh part. Recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews combining findings of all different types of hip protectors suggest that in care homes and institutions with high rates of hip fracture, the use of hip protectors might help to reduce the risk of fracture to 20–60%, but there is no evidence of a public health level benefit from hip protectors for lower-risk (usually home-dwelling) elderly people.