Early Recurrence After Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Primary Extremity Melanoma: A Comparison With Elective Lymph Node Dissection

Intraoperative imaging guidance for sentinel node biopsy in melanoma using a mobile gamma camera

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity and clinical utility of intraoperative mobile gamma camera (MGC) imaging in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma.

BACKGROUND

The false-negative rate for SLNB for melanoma is approximately 17%, for which failure to identify the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is a major cause. Intraoperative imaging may aid in detection of SLN near the primary site, in ambiguous locations, and after excision of each SLN. The present pilot study reports outcomes with a prototype MGC designed for rapid intraoperative image acquisition. We hypothesized that intraoperative use of the MGC would be feasible and that sensitivity would be at least 90%.

METHODS

From April to September 2008, 20 patients underwent Tc99 sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, and SLNB was performed with use of a conventional fixed gamma camera (FGC), and gamma probe followed by intraoperative MGC imaging. Sensitivity was calculated for each detection method. Intraoperative logistical challenges were scored. Cases in which MGC provided clinical benefit were recorded.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for detecting SLN basins was 97% for the FGC and 90% for the MGC. A total of 46 SLN were identified: 32 (70%) were identified as distinct hot spots by preoperative FGC imaging, 31 (67%) by preoperative MGC imaging, and 43 (93%) by MGC imaging pre- or intraoperatively. The gamma probe identified 44 (96%) independent of MGC imaging. The MGC provided defined clinical benefit as an addition to standard practice in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. Mean score for MGC logistic feasibility was 2 on a scale of 1-9 (1 = best).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MGC imaging provides additional information when standard techniques fail or are ambiguous. Sensitivity is 90% and can be increased. This pilot study has identified ways to improve the usefulness of an MGC for intraoperative imaging, which holds promise for reducing false negatives of SLNB for melanoma.

[Ultrasonographic findings validity in the identification of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma]

BACKGROUND/AIM. Early identification of lymph node (LN) metastases has both therapeutic and prognostic significance in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ultrasonographic (US) examination of LN morphological characteristics and US of LN morphological and vascular characteristics are diagnostic methods used in identification of regional LN metastases, thus rendering a base for lymphonododisection indication. The aim of this study was to determine validity of these two US diagnostic methods and eventual statistically significant difference between them. METHODS. The study included the two groups of the patients with clinical stage III melanoma. The group I included 31 patients followed up by the use of US of LN morphological characteristics due to the fact that US findings described them only. The group II included 30 patients in whom morphological and vascular LN characteristics were followed up. The patients of both groups were examined in the Institute for Radiology, Military Medical Academy using an ultrasonographic unit type Akuson Sequoia Model 2000. After that, therapeutic and elective radical disections were performed. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US examination of LN were checked by histopathological examination.

RESULTS

The presence of LN metastases in the group I was suggested by LN enlargement and its extent, while in the group II it was suggested by the ratio of LN length and width in 83.3% of the patients, echogenicity of LN center in 76.7% of the patients, LN resistance index in 73.3% of the patients, pathologic LN vascularization in 86.7%, and pathologic intranodal arborization in 83.3% of the patients. In 67.7% of the patients in the group I and in 93.3% of the patients in the group II matastatic changes of LN were diagnosed by pathohistology. A difference between validities of the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LN size without other US morphological and vascular characteristics of LN does not provide enough valid US finding for a reliable preoperative identification of LN with metastatic changes in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Microscopic satellitosis in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: implications for nodal basin staging

BACKGROUND

Microscopic satellitosis in melanoma is uncommon. The role of regional basin staging/therapy in patients with this high-risk feature has not been well defined.

METHODS

Patients presenting from 1996 to 2005 with clinically localized melanoma containing microscopic satellitosis were identified from a prospective, single-institution database. Multiple factors were analyzed to determine their predictive value for recurrence. The management of the draining nodal basin was evaluated to determine its impact on recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients presented to our institution during this time period with clinically localized melanoma containing microscopic satellitosis. The 5-year overall and disease-free survivals in these patients were 34% and 18%, respectively. Sixty-eight percent had pathologically involved regional nodal metastases. With median follow-up of 21 months, 68% recurred, with a median time to recurrence of 9 months. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.01), tumor regression (p = 0.04), and positive regional lymph nodes (p = 0.02) were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Of the 31 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, 22 had metastasis in the SLN (71%). Fifteen of these patients underwent completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) and seven were observed. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), or overall survival (OS) between these groups (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological lymph node metastases were more prevalent (68%) than in any group previously defined. Regional nodal status predicted recurrence but not nodal recurrence. In SLN-positive patients, CLND did not improve DFS, DSS, or OS, although the number of patients was small. Further studies are needed to determine the utility of regional nodal staging/therapy in these high-risk patients.

Follow-up schedules after treatment for malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Existing follow-up guidelines after treatment for melanoma are based largely on dated literature and historical precedent. This study aimed to calculate recurrence rates and establish prognostic factors for recurrence to help redesign a follow-up schedule.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database for all patients with a single primary melanoma and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-II disease, who had received their first treatment between 1959 and 2002. Recurrence rates, timing and survival were recorded by substage, and predictive factors were analysed.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 18.9 per cent (895 of 4748) of patients overall, 5.2 per cent (95 of 1822) of those with stage IA disease, 18.4 per cent (264 of 1436) with IB, 28.7 per cent (215 of 750) with IIA, 40.6 per cent (213 of 524) with IIB and 44.3 per cent (86 of 194) with IIC disease. Overall, the median disease-free survival time was 2.6 years, but there were marked differences between AJCC subgroups. Primary tumour thickness, ulceration and tumour mitotic rate were important predictors of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

A new follow-up schedule was proposed: stage I annually, stage IIA 6-monthly for 2 years and then annually, stage IIB-IIC 4-monthly for 2 years, 6-monthly in the third year and annually thereafter.

Prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy in 327 prospective melanoma patients from a single institution

AIM

To confirm the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) procedure and its morbidity, and to investigate predictive factors for SN status and prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1997 and December 2004, 327 consecutive patients in one centre with clinically node-negative primary skin melanoma underwent an SNB by the triple technique, i.e. lymphoscintigraphy, blue-dye and gamma-probe. Multivariate logistic regression analyses as well as the Kaplan-Meier were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three percent of the patients had at least one metastatic SN, which was significantly associated with Breslow thickness (p<0.001). The success rate of SNB was 99.1% and its morbidity was 7.6%. With a median follow-up of 33 months, the 5-year DFS/DSS were 43%/49% for patients with positive SN and 83.5%/87.4% for patients with negative SN, respectively. The false-negative rate of SNB was 8.6% and sensitivity 91.4%. On multivariate analysis, DFS was significantly worsened by Breslow thickness (RR=5.6, p<0.001), positive SN (RR=5.0, p<0.001) and male sex (RR=2.9, p=0.001). The presence of a metastatic SN (RR=8.4, p<0.001), male sex (RR=6.1, p<0.001), Breslow thickness (RR=3.2, p=0.013) and ulceration (RR=2.6, p=0.015) were significantly associated with a poorer DSS.

CONCLUSION

SNB is a reliable procedure with high sensitivity (91.4%) and low morbidity. Breslow thickness was the only statistically significant parameter predictive of SN status. DFS was worsened in decreasing order by Breslow thickness, metastatic SN and male gender. Similarly DSS was significantly worsened by a metastatic SN, male gender, Breslow thickness and ulceration. These data reinforce the SN status as a powerful staging procedure.

Confirmation of sentinel lymph node identity by analysis of fine-needle biopsy samples using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

Background

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique is a reliable means of determining the tumor-harboring status of regional lymph nodes in melanoma patients. When technetium 99 m-labeled antimony trisulfide colloid (^99 mTc-Sb₂S₃) particles are used to perform preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for SLN identification, they are retained in the SLN but are absent or present in only tiny amounts in non-SLNs. The present study investigated the potential for a novel means of assessing the accuracy of surgical identification of SLNs. This involved the use of inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to analyze antimony concentrations in fine-needle biopsy (FNB) samples from surgically procured lymph nodes.

Methods

A total of 47 FNB samples from surgically excised lymph nodes (32 SLNs and 15 non-SLNs) were collected. The SLNs were localized by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy that used ^99 mTc-Sb₂S_3, blue dye, and gamma probe techniques. The concentrations of antimony were measured in the FNB samples by ICP-MS.

Results

The mean and median antimony concentrations (in parts per billion) were .898 and .451 in the SLNs, and .015 and .068 in the non-SLNs, the differences being highly statistically significant (P < .00005).

Conclusions

Our results show that ICP-MS analysis of antimony concentrations in FNB specimens from lymph nodes can accurately confirm the identity of SLNs. Used in conjunction with techniques such as proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the nonsurgical evaluation of SLNs, ICP-MS analysis of antimony concentrations in FNB samples could potentially serve as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery and histopathologic evaluation to objectively classify a given node as sentinel or nonsentinel and determine its tumor-harboring status.

Regional node dissection for melanoma: techniques and indication

Because virtually all microscopic nodal disease left untreated in melanoma patients will progress to clinically apparent macroscopic nodal disease, there is worse prognosis with macroscopic nodal disease, and ineffective systemic treatment currently exists, one must be cautious in favoring an observation approach to the regional basin in patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) in the hopes of avoiding the potential morbidity of a therapeutic node dissection. In the few patients with untreated microscopic nodal disease, the prognosis will be significantly worsened. Until further data are available, melanoma patients with a positive SLN by H&E analysis should proceed to a complete lymph node dissection.

Sentinel Node Mapping for Melanoma: Results of Trials and Current Applications

The value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy as a staging procedure and as a guide to prognosis with patients who have melanoma is now clearly established. As well, there is recent clinical trial evidence suggesting a survival benefit for patients found to be SN positive who have an immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND), compared with those with nodal disease not treated by CLND until it becomes clinically apparent. Clinical trials are ongoing to determine whether CLND is necessary in all patients who are found to be SN positive.

Survival analysis and clinicopathological factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the outcomes and factors associated with false-negative (FN) results of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma. SLN biopsy failure rate was defined as nodal recurrence in the biopsied regional basin without previous local or in-transit recurrence.

METHODS

Between April 1997 and December 2004, a total of 1207 patients with cutaneous melanoma with a median Breslow thickness of 2.4 mm underwent SLN biopsy by preoperative and intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with dye injection. In 228 cases, we found positive SLNs; of these, 220 underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

The SLN biopsy failure rate was 5.8% (57 of 979 SLN negative). Median time to occurrence of FN relapse after SLN biopsy was 16 months (range, 3-74 months). The FN SLN biopsy results correlated with primary tumor thickness >4 mm (P = .0012), primary tumor ulceration (P = .0002), primary tumor level of invasion Clark stage IV/V (P = .0005), and nodular melanoma histological type (P = .0375). Five-year overall survival, calculated from the date of primary tumor excision, in the FN group was 53.7%, which was not statistically significantly worse than the CLND group (56.8%; P = .9). The FN group was characterized by a higher ratio of two or more metastatic nodes and extracapsular involvement of lymph nodes after LND compared with the CLND group (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively). Additional detailed pathological review of FN SLN revealed metastatic disease in 14 patients, which decreased the SLN biopsy failure rate to 4.4% (43 of 979).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with FN results of SLN biopsy does not differ statistically significantly from that of patients undergoing CLND, although it is slightly lower. The SLN biopsy failure rate is approximately 5.0% in long-term follow-up and is associated mainly with the same factors that indicate a poor prognosis in primary melanoma.

Factors Predicting the Risk of In-Transit Recurrence After Sentinel Lymphonodectomy in Patients With Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

BACKGROUND

In-transit metastasis is an important morbidity factor after sentinel lymphonodectomy (SLNE). So far, factors posing an increased risk after SLNE have not been adequately analyzed.

METHODS

Using Kaplan-Meier estimations and the Cox proportional hazards model, we analyzed the risk of developing in-transit metastases after SLNE for 328 consecutive patients (median tumor thickness, 2.0 mm; median follow-up period, 40 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year probability of developing in-transit metastases as a first recurrence was 11.2%. After negative and positive SLNE, the probabilities were 6.3% and 24%, respectively. Patients in whom satellite metastases were excised concurrently with the primary tumor had a probability of recurrence with in-transit metastases of 41%. In sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients with primary tumors having a thickness of more than 4 mm, the probability was 22.1%. Among the group of SLN-positive patients, significantly increased in-transit probabilities were observed in those with primary tumors that were thicker than 4 mm (41.8%), with tumors located on the distal extremities (42.1%), and with penetration of the nodal metastasis of >1 mm into the SLN (36%) and in patients with capsular breakthrough (63.3%). By using multifactorial analysis, the SLN status (P = .005), Breslow thickness (P = .0009), and extremity location of the primary melanoma (P = .005) significantly predicted the risk of in-transit recurrence. Satellite metastasis (P < .089), Clark level, and ulceration did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroups of patients can be identified who seem to have an increased risk of developing in-transit metastases as a first recurrence after SLNE. Individualized therapeutic strategies should be developed for these patients.

Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is considered the standard of care in melanoma patients found to have sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. However, the therapeutic utility of CLND is not known. The natural history of patients with positive SLNs who do not undergo CLND is undefined. This multi-institutional study was undertaken to characterize patterns of failure and survival rates in these patients and to compare results with those of positive-SLN patients who underwent CLND.

METHODS

Surgeons from 16 centers contributed data on 134 positive-SLN patients who did not undergo CLND. SLN biopsy was performed by using each institution's established protocols. Patients were followed up for recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

In this study population, the median age was 59 years, and 62% were male. The median tumor thickness was 2.6 mm, 77% of tumors had invasion to Clark level IV/V, and 33% of lesions were ulcerated. The primary melanoma was located on the extremities, trunk, and head/neck in 45%, 43%, and 12%, respectively. The median follow-up was 20 months. The median time to recurrence was 11 months. Nodal recurrence was a component of the first site of recurrence in 20 patients (15%). Nodal recurrence-free survival was statistically insignificantly worse than that seen in a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent CLND. Disease-specific survival for positive-SLN patients who did not undergo CLND was 80% at 36 months, which was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent CLND.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of ongoing prospective randomized trials in determining the therapeutic value of CLND after positive SLN biopsy in melanoma patients.

Surgical Management of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Excision Margins and the Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Examination

Surgical strategies for managing patients who have primary cutaneous melanoma have changed dramatically over the past 30 years. More conservative excision margins have been shown to be adequate, and routine complete lymph node dissection (CLND)has been abandoned since the sentinel node (SN) biopsy technique was introduced. Knowledge of a patient's SN status not only provides a reliable guide to prognosis, but also allows CLND to be avoided in 80% to 85% of patients. Recent clinical trial results suggest that SN biopsy, with immediate CLND if an SN is positive,confers a survival advantage in those who have metastatic disease in regional nodes. Minimally invasive and noninvasive methods of SN assessment, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, are being evaluated.

Sentinel lymph node status in melanoma: a valuable prognostic factor?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is advocated as the standard of care for patients with primary melanoma. It is a procedure with few side-effects and provides valuable staging information about the regional lymphatics.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic value of SLN biopsy and to compare it with that of other known risk factors in primary melanoma.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-nine patients with primary melanomas (tumour thickness >1.0 mm) underwent SLN biopsy between May 1998 and April 2004 at our department. This report summarizes the follow-up data of this cohort until October 2004.

RESULTS

SLN biopsies of 49 of 149 patients (33%) revealed micrometastatic disease. Of all clinical and histological criteria, only the clinical type of primary melanoma (11 of 19 patients with acrolentiginous melanomas) and the Clark level were predictive for SLN positivity. Progression was observed in 22 patients (15%). It was significantly associated with ulceration of the primary tumour, tumour thickness, clinical type and localization of the primary tumour, female sex and older age. In contrast, SLN positivity was not significantly associated with a higher risk of progression (eight of 49 SLN-positive vs. 14 of 100 SLN-negative patients; P = 0.807). Twelve of 149 patients (8%) died because of melanoma in the follow-up period. Significant criteria for death were ulceration of the tumour, clinical type and localization of the primary tumour, but not SLN positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of positive SLNs was observed in the patients with melanoma in our study (33%). The fractions of patients both with progressive disease and with tumour-related death were not significantly higher in patients with positive SLN than in those with negative SLN. We therefore conclude that the SLN status is not a reliable prognostic factor for progression of melanoma.

Clinical significance of occult metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes and other high-risk factors based on long-term follow-up

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) following preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is the most significant recent advance in the management of patients with primary melanoma. This study evaluates the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and other risk factors in predicting survival and recurrence in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. From October 1993 to July 1998 a series of 412 patients with primary invasive melanoma underwent SSL at the UCSF/ Mt. Zion Melanoma Center. The outcome of 363 evaluable patients is summarized in this study. The factors related to survival and disease recurrence were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression models. The overall incidence of patients with positive SLNs was 18%. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the overall mortality rate in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma was 18.7%, and 74 recurrences occurred (20.4%). Mortality was significantly related to SLN status [HR = 2.06; 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.18, 3.58], angiolymphatic invasion (HR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.08, 4.55), ulceration (HR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.02, 3.15), mitotic index (HR =1.38; 95% CI 1.01, 1.90), and tumor thickness (HR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.21, 3.99). Factors significantly related to disease-free survival included SLN status (HR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.31, 3.34), tumor thickness (HR = 1.89; 95%. CI 1.20,2.98), and age (HR= 1.26 95% CI 1.08, 1.47). SLN status was the most significant factor for melanoma recurrence and death. Other important predictors include tumor thickness, ulceration, lymphatic invasion, and mitotic index.

Survival analysis following sentinel lymph node biopsy: a validation trial demonstrating its accuracy in staging early breast cancer

Few long-term follow-up studies prove sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) effectively stages breast cancer without the further evaluation of a completion axillary dissection. Our prospective study addressed this issue, enrolling 345 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB from October 1997 through December 2000. The median age of the patients in the study was 56.7 years. Average primary tumor size was 1.42 cm. Ninety-three patients had a positive sentinel lymph node (27%); 70 (75.3%) of these patients underwent completion axillary dissection, while 23 patients (24.7%) declined further surgery. Most (91.3%) of the patients who declined further surgery had evidence of micrometastatic disease only. The median follow-up period for all patients was 60 months. No tumor recurrences in the axilla were reported in either sentinel node-negative or -positive patients. The local and systemic recurrence rates were 3.1% and 4% in node-negative patients and 2.2% and 4.3% in node-positive patients. Two patients (0.9%) in the node-negative group and 6 (6.5%) in the node-positive group died of their disease. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival rates were 96% for node-negative patients and 87% for node-positive patients (P = 0.02). The clinical false-negative rate of the SLNB in this study was 0%. This long-term validation trial proves the accuracy of the SLNB and its extremely low false-negative rate. The findings indicate that patients with a positive SLNB have significantly different survival rates than patients with a negative SLNB.

CD44v3 levels in primary cutaneous melanoma are predictive of prognosis: Assessment by the use of tissue microarray

Despite the use of sentinel node biopsy techniques, the search continues for other strategies to improve the accuracy of estimating prognosis in melanoma patients. Various biomarkers have previously been studied for use in this role, but none has yet achieved acceptance in routine practice. We have applied the novel technology of tissue microarray for the high throughput screening of a cohort of 120 primary cutaneous melanoma specimens for expression of the transmembrane glycoprotein CD44, splice variant 3 (v3), which has previously been implicated in tumor progression. A highly significant correlation between CD44v3 expression and Breslow thickness, Clark's level and patient age was demonstrated (Spearman correlation p < 0.001). Regarding clinical outcome, CD44v3 expression was shown to be significantly associated with better outcome (chi(2) = 7.2219, p = 0.0072). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed a sequentially improved survival probability associated with the intensity of CD44v3 staining (chi(2) = 12.5162, p = 0.0058). Analysis in a Cox multivariate model, however, did not show CD44v3 to be independently predictive of prognosis. The implications of these findings are considered, and the use of CD44v3 as a potential prognostic marker or a target for therapeutic manipulation are discussed.

A Sentinel Node Biopsy Does Not Increase the Incidence of In-Transit Metastasis in Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that performing a sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with cutaneous melanoma increases the incidence of in-transit metastasis (ITM).

METHODS

ITM rates for 2018 patients with primary melanomas > or =1.0 mm thick treated at a single institution between 1991 and 2000 according to 3 protocols were compared: wide local excision (WLE) only (n = 1035), WLE plus SNB (n = 754), and WLE plus elective lymph node dissection (n = 229).

RESULTS

The incidence of ITM for the three protocols was 4.9%, 3.6%, and 5.7%, respectively (not significant), and as a first site of recurrent disease the incidence was 2.5%, 2.4%, and 4.4%, respectively (not significant). The subset of patients who were node positive after SNB and after elective lymph node dissection also had similar ITM rates (10.8% and 7.1%, respectively; P = .11). On multivariate analysis, primary tumor thickness and patient age predicted ITM as a first recurrence, but type of treatment did not. Patients who underwent WLE only and who had a subsequent therapeutic lymph node dissection (n = 149) had an ITM rate of 24.2%, compared with 10.8% in patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node treated with immediate dissection (n = 102; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing an SNB in patients with melanoma treated by WLE does not increase the incidence of ITM.

Outcome in 846 Cutaneous Melanoma Patients From a Single Center After a Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy

BACKGROUND

A negative sentinel node biopsy (SNB) implies a good prognosis for melanoma patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome for melanoma patients with a negative SNB.

METHODS

Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed for 836 SNB-negative patients. All patients with a node field recurrence were reviewed, and sentinel node (SN) tissue was reexamined.

RESULTS

The median tumor thickness was 1.7 mm, and 23.8% were ulcerated. The median follow-up was 42.1 months. Melanoma specific survival at 5 years was 90%, compared with 56% for SN-positive patients (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only thickness and ulceration retained significance for disease-free and disease-specific survival. Five-year survival for patients with nonulcerated lesions was 94% vs. 78% with ulceration. Eighty-three patients (9.9%) had a recurrence. Twenty-seven patients developed recurrence in the regional node field, and in 22 of these, it was the first recurrence site. Six developed local recurrence, 17 an in-transit metastasis, and 58 distant disease. The false-negative rate was 13.2%. SN slides and tissue blocks were further examined in 18 patients with recurrence in the node field, and metastatic disease was found in 3 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, single-center study confirms that patients with a negative SNB have a significantly better prognosis than those with positive SNs. In those with a negative SNB, primary tumor thickness and ulceration are independent predictors of survival. Incorrect pathologic diagnosis contributed to only a minority of the false-negative results in this study.

Heterogeneous Patterns of Lymphatic Drainage to Sentinel Lymph Nodes by Primary Melanoma From Different Anatomic Sites

We want to define the patterns of lymphatic drainage for primary melanoma to sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) based on a large lymphoscintigraphic database. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was used to identify and classify SLN drainage basins and patterns of drainage.

METHODS

Lymphoscintigraphy using intradermally administered technetium-99m labeled sulfur colloid was performed on 400 consecutive patients with malignant melanoma to define lymphatic drainage channels and draining SLN basins before surgery. Primary tumor sites consisted of head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity. Different types of drainage patterns were classified and correlated with different anatomic sites.

RESULTS

SLN(s) were identified in over 98% of the patients, whereas lymphatic drainage channels were successfully identified in 90% of the patients. Drainage from the primary site to a single SLN through a single lymphatic channel (type IA) was seen in 186 of 400 patients (47%) as the most common type. In patients with a single SLN within a single basin (type I-V), the percentage of patients with primary lesions in the head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity regions were 61%, 79%, 55%, and 78%, respectively. In cases of multiple lymphatic channels (type VI-VII), the percentages of patients with primary lesions in the head and neck, upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity regions were 24%, 8%, 36%, and 19%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Various drainage patterns were noted from primary melanomas in different anatomic sites. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is important in establishing the SLN basins for harvesting the SLN(s).

Sentinel lymphonodectomy does not increase the risk of loco-regional cutaneous metastases of malignant melanomas

With regard to malignant melanoma, the impact of lymph node surgery on the development of loco-regional cutaneous metastases (LCM) has not yet been adequately addressed. However, this aspect is of interest, since sentinel lymphonodectomy (SLNE) has been suspected of causing LCM by inducing entrapment of melanoma cells. We analysed 244 patients with SLNE and compared the data with 199 patients treated with delayed lymph node dissection (DLND) for clinically palpable metastases. Analysis of both groups commenced at the time of excision of the primary tumour, using the Kaplan-Meier method. LCM that appeared as a first recurrence, as well as the overall probability of developing LCM, were recorded. For sentinel-negative patients with a primary melanoma >1mm thick, the 5-year probability of developing LCM as a first recurrence was 6.9 +/- 0.02% (+/-standard error of the mean (SEM)). The probability was 17.6 +/- 0.03% in the DLND group. Comparing the two node-positive subgroups, the probability of developing LCM as a first recurrence was significantly higher in patients with positive SLNE (27.3 +/- 0.05%, P = 0.03). However, the 5-year overall probability of developing LCM did not differ significantly in the node-positive groups (33.3% in the DLND group vs. 33.7% in patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs)). Since early excision of lymphatic metastases by SLNE avoids nodal recurrences, thereby prolonging the recurrence-free interval, the chance of LCM to manifest as a first recurrence should inevitably increase. However, the overall in-transit probability is not increased after SLNE.

Cutaneous melanoma

Episodic exposure of fair-skinned individuals to intense sunlight is thought to be responsible for the steadily increasing melanoma incidence worldwide over recent decades. Rarely, melanoma susceptibility is increased more than tenfold by heritable mutations in the cell cycle regulatory genes CDKN2A and CDK4. Effective treatment requires early diagnosis followed by surgical excision with adequately wide margins. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides accurate staging, but no published results are yet available from clinical trials designed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of early complete regional node dissection in those with metastatic disease in a sentinel node. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is one technique under investigation for non-invasive, in-situ assessment of sentinel nodes. Localised metastatic disease is best treated surgically. No postoperative adjuvant therapy is of proven value for improving overall survival, although numerous clinical trials of vaccines and cytokines are in progress. Medical therapies have contributed little to the control of established metastatic disease, but molecular pathways recently identified as being central to melanoma growth and apoptosis are under intense investigation for their potential as therapeutic targets.

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy for malignant melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma

To date, selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) should be considered a standard approach for staging patients with primary invasive melanoma greater than or equal to 1 mm. It is imperative that the multidisciplinary team master the techniques of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and postoperative pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). An SLN is defined as a blue, "hot" and any subsequent lymph node greater than 10% of the ex vivo count of the hottest lymph node. Any enlarged or indurated lymph node in the nodal basin should be excised. Frozen sections are not recommended. For extremity melanoma, delayed SSL may be performed. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for extremity melanoma may be done the night before so that the surgery can be scheduled as the first case of the following day. Every surgeon who uses blue dye should be aware of the potential adverse reaction to isosulfan blue and treatment for such a potential fatal reaction. A complete lymph node dissection is done if the SLN is found to be positive. Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) should not be done if an SSL can be performed as a staging procedure. SSL has further been applied to stage the nodal basin for Merkel cell carcinoma and high-risk squamous cell carcinoma. It is important for investigators involved with the SSL to follow the clinical outcome of these patients, so that the role of SSL can be further defined.

Antimony concentrations in nodal tissue can confirm sentinel node identity

The sentinel node biopsy procedure is a highly accurate method of staging patients with cutaneous melanoma and the tumor-harboring status of sentinel nodes is the most important prognostic factor. For the procedure to provide accurate prognostic information, however, it is essential that 'true' sentinel nodes are removed and examined thoroughly. A technique to confirm sentinel node identity may reduce the false-negative rate of the procedure. We have found that antimony (originating from the antimony sulfide colloid used for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in our institution) can be measured in tissue sections of sentinel nodes using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The aims of this study were to determine whether antimony concentrations can be used to confirm that removed sentinel nodes are 'true' sentinel nodes and to differentiate sentinel nodes from nonsentinel nodes. In all, 24 patients who had both a tumor-positive sentinel node and a tumor-negative nonsentinel node removed from one regional node field during the same operation, were identified. Tissue sections (50 microm) thick were cut from archival paraffin blocks of each of the sentinel nodes and nonsentinel nodes. Antimony concentrations in the tissue sections were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The median and mean concentrations of antimony in parts per billion were 0.526 and 1.198, respectively (range 0.020-7.596) in the sentinel nodes, and 0.043 and 0.123 (range 0-0.800) in the nonsentinel nodes (P = 0.004). In four of the 24 pairs, both the presumed sentinel nodes and the nonsentinel nodes had very low antimony levels (less than 0.18 parts per billion), suggesting that nodes designated as sentinel nodes may not have been 'true' sentinel nodes. It is concluded that determination of antimony concentrations within sentinel nodes using the highly sensitive method of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry can confirm the identity of sentinel nodes and validate the sentinel node technique.

Sentinel lymph node mapping and selective lymphadenectomy: the standard of care for melanoma

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) should be considered a standard of care approach for staging patients with primary invasive melanoma 1 mm or greater. It is essential that multidisciplinary teams should master the techniques of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). An SLN may be blue, hot, or any lymph node (LN) greater than 10% of the in-vivo count of the hottest LN. An enlarged or indurated LN should be removed because it may contain metastatic cancer cells that block blue dye or radiotracer entry. Frozen sections are not recommended. Surgeons who use isosulfan blue dye should be cognizant of treatment for a potentially fatal reaction. Prophylactic LN dissection should not be performed if a SSL can be performed as a staging procedure. A complete LN dissection is performed if the SLN is positive. It is important to follow the clinical outcome of patients undergoing SSL, thus its role can be further defined.

Paradigm of metastasis for melanoma and breast cancer based on the sentinel lymph node experience

Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for patients with melanoma and breast cancer. Because it is the first node draining the primary cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is most likely to harbor metastatic cancer cells. The Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma and the size of primary breast cancer are highly correlated with SLN metastasis. If the SLN is negative, its negative predictive value for the remaining nodal basin exceeds 95%; thus, survival rates for melanoma and breast cancer increase when the SLN is negative. The rate of SLN identification is more than 95%, and the false-negative rate is about 5%. SLN data from melanoma and breast cancer are so convincing that they have been incorporated into the new American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of these cancers. The therapeutic value of additional lymph node dissection after a positive SLN for melanoma or breast cancer is still controversial. In melanoma, a 3-year follow-up may confirm better survival when the SLN is negative. However, about 25% of histologically negative SLNs may be upstaged by molecular techniques, and patients whose SLNs are positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay may develop recurrence. In most cases, melanoma and breast cancer follow an orderly progression of metastasis to the SLN; however, a small subgroup may develop systemic dissemination without SLN involvement. Current SLN experience has confirmed that the earlier the cancer, the less its potential for metastasis. Since treatments for metastatic cancer are still limited, early detection and resection are imperative. Better understanding of the molecular and genetic mechanisms of metastasis will be critical to select high-risk patients for adjuvant therapy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer

BACKGROUND

Forty-three years after the first description of the sentinel lymph node technique in malignant tumours of the parotid by Gould, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a precious tool in the treatment of solid tumours.

METHODS

In the following review we give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the sentinel lymph node concept and then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SNLB in gastrointestinal cancers.

RESULTS

In some tumour entities, SNLB has been shown to reflect reliably the lymph node status of the tumour-draining lymph node basin. In melanoma and breast cancer, it became a widely accepted element of the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merckel cell carcinoma of the skin, were published more recently.

CONCLUSION

SNLB has become an important component of diagnosis and treatment of solid tumours. A growing number of publications on SNLB in gastrointestinal cancer documents the interest of many investigators in the application of this technique in this tumour entity. As long as imaging techniques like 18FDG PET or other molecular imaging techniques are limited by their spatial resolution, SNLB remains the technique of choice for lympho-nodal staging.

Failure to remove true sentinel nodes can cause failure of the sentinel node biopsy technique: evidence from antimony concentrations in false-negative sentinel nodes from melanoma patients

We have recently found that antimony (originating from the technetium 99m antimony trisulfide colloid, used for preoperative lymphoscintigraphy) can be measured in tissue sections from archival paraffin blocks of sentinel nodes (SNs) by means of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to confirm that removed nodes are true SNs. We performed a retrospective analysis of antimony concentrations in all our false-negative (FN) SNs to determine whether errors in lymphadenectomy (i.e., failure to remove true SNs) may be a cause of FN SN biopsies (SNBs). Among 27 patients with an FN SNB, metastases were found on histopathologic review of the original slides or additional sections in 7 of 23 patients for which they were available; however, antimony concentrations were low in 5 of 20 presumptive SNs. Our results suggest that an FN SNB can occur because of failure to remove the true SN as well as histopathologic misdiagnosis.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Has No Benefit for Patients with Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Metastatic to a Lymph Node: An Assertion Based on Comprehensive, Critical Analysis

The thesis is set forth in this treatise that there is no place in the routine practice of medicine for the procedure for melanoma known conventionally and universally as sentinel node biopsy. Our assertion is based on assessment of the extensive body of literature devoted to the subject of treatment of melanoma before any metastasis has manifested itself clinically and of that dedicated to therapy for overt metastatic melanoma by a variety of modalities, chief among those addressed here being elective lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy. In this era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, elective lymph node dissection has been modified to include only patients with metastasis of melanoma to lymph nodes, a procedure now termed "selective complete lymph node dissection." Among adjuvant medical therapies, the most popular today is interferon alpha-2B. Critical, incisive scrutiny of the literature leads to the conclusion, incontrovertibly, that elective lymph node dissection has no benefit for a patient and that all modifications of it also are devoid of value. The reason, logically, for the lack of utility of elective lymph node dissection becomes apparent by virtue of the route taken by cells of melanoma as they metastasize; those cells proceed in the same fashion as does lymph, bacteria, foreign material (including vital dyes and radioactive tracers), and other kinds of cells, to wit, by passing rapidly through nodes, including the sentinel one, and even bypassing entirely the nodes. In reality, cells of metastatic melanoma are not held up in nodes for any significant period of time, contrary to what is asserted repeatedly, but without any basis in fact, by many students of the subject. Moreover, not a single adjuvant medical therapy available currently is effective against metastatic melanoma and, therefore, none of them should be invoked to justify performance of sentinel node biopsy. Even if the sentinel node is found to house cells of melanoma, which, as a rule, conveys a grim message regarding the future, the finding in an individual patient is meaningless; a particular patient may live in harmony with metastases of melanoma for more than 30 years and even die of an unrelated malady. In short, no surgeon, pathologist, or oncologist is a seer, diviner, or prophet when it comes to predicting accurately the outcome for a patient with metastasis of melanoma; the end could come in weeks, months, or decades. If, however, a sentinel node is found to contain nary a cell of metastatic melanoma, it, too, means nothing for an individual patient because the existence of metastases widely is not excluded by that finding. In short, sentinel node biopsy cannot be considered the standard of care in the daily practice of medicine; it is woefully substandard because it is without benefit. There is no justification, whatsoever, for the procedure, scientifically or practically, and for that reason it should be abandoned, without delay, now.

Groin surgery and the sentinel lymph node

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease. Squamous-cell carcinomas account for 90% of vulvar cancers. The main mode of spread is lymphogenic to the inguinofemoral lymph nodes. Therefore, elective uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy is part of the standard treatment in combination with radical (wide) local excision of the vulvar tumour. Lymph drainage studies in relation to the biological behaviour of vulvar cancer are presented, as well as the anatomy and surgery of the groin. The sentinel lymph node procedure is a relatively new method of staging in vulvar cancer which may lead to the omission of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in those patients identified as not having inguinofemoral lymph node metastases. The accuracy of this technique appears to be high, but its safety still has to be proven. Moreover, the role of additional histopathological techniques for the examination of the sentinel lymph nodes needs to be established.

Review and evaluation of sentinel node procedures in 250 melanoma patients with a median follow-up of 6 years

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of sentinel node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma at our institute.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with cutaneous melanoma were studied prospectively. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed after injection of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid intradermally around the primary tumor or biopsy site (.32 mL, 65.5 MBq [1.8 mCi]). The sentinel node was surgically identified with the aid of patent blue dye and a gamma ray detection probe. The median follow-up was 72 months.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphic visualization was 100%, and surgical identification was 99.6%. In 60 patients (24%), 1 or more sentinel nodes were tumor positive at initial pathology evaluation. Late complications after sentinel node biopsy of the remaining 190 patients were seen in 35 patients (18%). The false-negative rate was 9%. In-transit metastases were seen in 7% of sentinel node-negative and 23% of sentinel node-positive patients. The estimated 5-year overall survival rates were 89% and 64%, respectively (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that the status of the sentinel node is a strong independent prognostic factor. The false-negative rate and the incidence of in-transit metastases in sentinel node-positive patients are high and have to be weighed against the possible survival benefit of early removal of nodal metastases.

Primary cutaneous melanoma: surgical management and other treatment options

The incidence of primary cutaneous melanoma continues to increase and is a growing public health problem. By virtue of its metastatic potential, melanoma accounts for most of the deaths from cutaneous malignancies. Management of cutaneous melanoma has undergone a paradigm shift in recent years. Clinical studies have furthered our understanding of the biology of this disease and have changed the standards of care. Specifically, sentinel node biopsy and interferon as the first effective postsurgical therapy have had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with melanoma. Surgery remains the primary treatment modality for cutaneous melanoma. An adequate excision of the primary lesion accomplishes durable local control and is curative for patients without micrometastatic disease. Although the extent of surgical resection has decreased in recent years, the standard treatment for primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide surgical excision with histologically negative margins. The extent of excision is based on the theory that the incidence and radial extent of local recurrences can be predicted by specific primary tumor histopathologic characteristics. Tumor thickness and ulceration are the most important histologic features associated with prognosis and are the basis for the current recommendations for surgical treatment of the primary tumor. The extent of surgical therapy for primary melanoma is an area of ongoing debate. No clinical trial has shown a survival disadvantage for narrow versus wide excision regimens for melanoma of any thickness. Ongoing clinical trials will determine the relationship between the extent of surgical therapy for the primary tumor and the outcomes of recurrence and survival in patients with melanoma.

Prognostic significance of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-negative sentinel nodes in malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular biology technique that can detect a single metastatic cell in 10(6) to 10(7) normal cells. Its use has been proposed as an additional new method for the detection of malignant melanoma nodal metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) to improve the detection rate guaranteed so far by standard histology (hematoxylin and eosin; H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

METHODS

Since October 1995, 137 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (Breslow thickness,.75-4 mm) have undergone surgery for selective lymphadenectomy. To identify the SLNs, every patient had preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and a vital dye perilesional injection, followed by a gamma probe-guided operation.

RESULTS

In 134 patients at least one SLN was detected, with a detection rate of 98%. Every SLN was examined by H&E and IHC (S-100 antigen and HMB-45 protein). The messenger RNA codifying for tyrosinase and MART-1 (melanoma antigen recognized by T cells) was used as the target sequence for the reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. The results showed 11% positive SLNs with IHC and H&E examination and 63% with RT-PCR. No recurrence was noted at follow-up in the group with RT-PCR-negative nodes (absence of false-negative cases).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, RT-PCR SLN negativity is achieving a very favorable prognostic significance. However, RT-PCR positivity is still to be evaluated. Furthermore, results obtained with this method have been shown so far to be independent of Breslow's tumor thickness.

[Marking the route of lymphatic spread of melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy]

<zakljucak> Biopsija limfnih zlezda strazara je postupak koji, uz relativno nizak morbiditet, daje precizne podatke o stanju regionalnog limfonodalnog basena bolesnika sa melanomom koze. Stanje regionalnih limfnih zlezda je kljucni prognosticki parametar, veoma bitan za planiranje daljeg lecenja. Za uspesnu identifikaciju i histopatolosku obradu SLN neophodna je saradnja hirurga, nuklearnog radiologa i histopatologa. Dijagnostikovanjem okultnih metastaza u regionalnim limfnim zlezdama identifikuju se bolesnici kojima treba uciniti kompletnu limfonododisekciju, kao i oni koji mogu imati koristi od primene adjuvantne antitumorske terapije. Uvodjenjem ovog postupka dilema izvodjenja ili ne ELND vise ne postoji. Tehnicki i kadrovski zahtevi medjutim, jos uvek je ne svrstavaju u rutinske standardne postupke u lecenju melanoma. Pronalazenje mikrometastaza u regionalnim limfnim zlezdama menja stadijum bolesti u kome je bolesnik do tada bio (migracija stadijuma, Will Rogers fenomen). Novim klasifikacionim sistemom definise se klinicki i patoloski stadijum bolesti (14, 114). Ukoliko su regionalni limfonodusi ispitivani klinickim i/ili radioloskim postupcima, moze se govoriti o klinickom stadijumu bolesti. Za odredjivanje patoloskog stadijuma neophodna je histoloska evaluacija limfnih zlezda dobijenih bilo selektivnom bilo elektivnom limfadenektomijom. SLNB se smatra jednim od najvecih napredaka u terapiji melanoma u zadnjoj deceniji XX veka (4, 111). Ocekuje se da ce postati standard u lecenju bolesnika sa klinicki negativnim limfnim zlezdama (99, 111, 112), posebno sa usvajanjem novog sistema za odredjivanje stadijuma koze (14, 114, 115).

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy for malignant melanoma

To date, selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) should be considered a standard approach for staging patients with primary invasive melanoma greater than or equal to 1 mm. It is imperative that the multidisciplinary team master the techniques of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and postoperative pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). A SLN is defined as a blue, "hot", or any subsequent lymph node greater than 10% of the in vivo count of the hottest lymph node and as an enlarged or indurated lymph node. Frozen sections are not recommended. For extremity melanoma, delayed SSL may be performed. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for extremity melanoma may be done the night before so that surgery can be scheduled as the first case of the following day. Every surgeon who uses blue dye should be cognizant of the potential adverse reaction to isosulfan blue and treatment for such a potential fatal reaction. A complete lymph node dissection is done if the SLN is found to be positive. Elective lymph node dissection should not be done if SSL can be done as a staging procedure. It is important for investigators involved with SSL to follow the clinical outcome of their patients so that the role of SSL can be further defined.

Accurate molecular detection of melanoma nodal metastases: an assessment of multimarker assay specificity, sensitivity, and detection rate

BACKGROUND

The application of lymphoscintigraphy followed by sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy to patients with primary melanoma has revolutionised the ability to identify accurately, yet conservatively, those patients who harbour occult nodal metastases. The molecular detection of SN micrometastases facilitates the cost effective analysis of the entire SN using multiple markers. Currently, a lack of marker specificity is the main barrier preventing the molecular evaluation of SN tissue from becoming clinically applicable.

AIMS

To develop a reproducible multimarker reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, with the emphasis on achieving high specificity for the accurate detection of melanoma metastases in nodal tissue.

METHODS

Three pigment cell specific (PCS) markers-tyrosinase, Pmel-17, and MART-1-and one cancer testis antigen (CTA)-MAGE-3-were selected for use in a multimarker RT-PCR assay. The conditions for this assay were optimised.

RESULTS

High specificity was achievable for each marker by optimising the PCR cycle number such that unwanted transcripts (that is, illegitimate transcripts and/or specific transcripts from other low abundance nodal cell types) remained undetectable in appropriate controls (normal visceral nodes). Tyrosinase was 100% specific at 40 PCR cycles, MAGE-3 and MART-1 at 35 PCR cycles, and Pmel-17 at 30 PCR cycles. Tyrosinase proved to be the most sensitive marker, detecting 10 melanoma cells in 0.1 g of nodal tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent reproducibility of the entire nodal processing and RT-PCR protocol for the detection of very low numbers of melanoma cells in nodal tissue was shown, although there is a risk of false positives using the PCS markers alone, because of an approximate 4-8.5% incidence rate of nodal nevi in melanoma draining SNs (these nevi being absent in all other normal nodes). MAGE-3 was shown to be the only marker that is not expressed by melanocytes. However, because not all melanomas express MAGE-3, it is recommended that more emphasis should be placed on the development of a panel of CTA markers to ensure a zero false positive rate and to provide optimum detection.

Patterns of early recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma

BACKGROUND

Patterns of early recurrence after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma was determined from the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, which includes patients with Breslow thickness > or =1.0 mm and nonpalpable regional lymph nodes.

METHODS

SLN were evaluated by routine histology and S-100 protein stain. Overall, there were 1,183 patients with a median follow-up of 16 months.

RESULTS

SLN were positive in 233 of 1,183 patients (20%). The recurrence rate was greater among patients with histologically positive SLN than those with negative SLN (15.5% versus 6.0%, respectively, P <0.05). Patients with positive SLN were more likely to have distant metastases (as opposed to locoregional recurrence) than those with negative SLN (67% versus 46%, respectively, P <0.05). By multivariate analysis, SLN status, Breslow thickness, Clark level, and ulceration were significant independent factors associated with early recurrence. Of patients with negative SLN, 14 of 950 (1.5%) experienced metastatic disease in lymph node basins which were staged as negative for tumor by SLN biopsy initially.

CONCLUSIONS

Early regional lymph node recurrence was very uncommon after positive SLN biopsy and completion lymphadenectomy. Patients with positive SLN are more likely than those with negative SLN to develop both local/in-transit recurrence and distant metastases within a short follow-up period.

Clinical axillary recurrence in breast cancer patients after a negative sentinel node biopsy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with a negative sentinel lymph node who did not have an axillary node dissection.

METHODS

Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients, without axillary node dissection if the node was negative, was introduced in 1998 at our institution. This study includes those women with a negative sentinel lymph node. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered based on primary tumor characteristics. If breast radiotherapy was used, no attempt was made to include the axilla.

RESULTS

From January 1998 to December 2001, 206 patients (208 breast cancers) had a negative sentinel lymph node. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years and median tumor size was 1.2 cm. With a median follow-up of 26 months, there have been 3 axillary recurrences with a clinical sentinel lymph node false negative rate of 1.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the clinical false negative rate of a sentinel lymph node biopsy is 1.4%. Our study provides further evidence supporting the use of sentinel lymphadenectomy in women with breast cancer.

Use of technetium-99m tin colloid for sentinel lymph node identification in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To test the reliability of sentinel lymph node identification in non-small cell lung cancer, sentinel nodes were localized with a radioactive colloid in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing curative resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection were examined. The day before surgery, technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) tin colloid was injected into the peritumoral region. At operation, the radioactivity of the lymph nodes was counted with a handheld gamma counter before (in vivo) and after (ex vivo) dissection. Lymph nodes with an ex vivo radioactive count more than 10 times the background value were identified as sentinel nodes. The correlation between the in vivo and ex vivo results was examined.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy revealed that it took longer than 6 hours for sufficient (99m)Tc tin colloid to reach the sentinel nodes. Sentinel nodes could be identified in 40 patients (87%). Patients whose sentinel nodes could not be identified had a significantly lower ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity than did those with identifiable sentinel nodes (P =.03). No false-negative sentinel nodes were detected in 14 patients with N1 or N2 disease (0%). In the hilar lymph node stations, the lobar lymph nodes were most frequently identified as sentinel nodes (as often as 85% of the time). Fourteen patients (35%) had sentinel nodes in the mediastinum, the distribution of which depended on the lobe. In vivo and ex vivo counting showed 88% concurrence for the identification of sentinel nodes in mediastinal lymph node stations.

CONCLUSION

The identification of sentinel nodes with (99m)Tc tin colloid is a reliable method of establishing the first site of nodal metastasis in non- small cell lung cancer. Sentinel nodes could be hardly identified in patients with a low ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity because of such conditions as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In vivo identification of sentinel nodes in the mediastinum could be useful approach to guide mediastinal lymph node sampling or dissection.

Vulvar melanoma: is there a role for sentinel lymph node biopsy?

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the author's recent, preliminary experience with the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with vulvar melanoma and to compare this experience with treatment and follow-up of patients with vulvar melanomas who were treated previously at their institution.

METHODS

From 1997, sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique (99mTechnetium-labeled nanocolloid and Patente Blue-V) was performed as a standard staging procedure for patients with vulvar melanoma with a thickness > 1 mm and no clinically suspicious inguinofemoral lymph nodes. For the current study, clinicopathologic data from all 33 patients with vulvar melanoma who were treated between 1978 and 2000 at the University Hospital Groningen were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

From January 1997 until December 2000, identification of sentinel lymph nodes was successful in all nine patients who were referred for treatment of vulvar melanoma. Three patients underwent subsequent complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy because of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. In follow-up, groin recurrences (in-transit metastases) occurred in two of nine patients, both 12 months after primary treatment. Both patients had melanomas with a thickness > 4 mm and previously had negative sentinel lymph nodes. There was a trend toward more frequent groin recurrences in patients after undergoing the sentinel lymph node procedure (2 of 9 patients) compared with 24 historic control patients (0 of 24 patients; P = 0.06). Five of 33 patients developed local recurrences: Two patients had groin recurrences, and 11 patients developed distant metastases. Twelve patients died of vulvar melanoma. Seventeen patients with a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 9-123 months) are currently alive (overall survival rate, 52%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the numbers were small, this study showed that the sentinel lymph node procedure is capable of identifying patients who have occult lymph node metastases and who may benefit from lymphadenectomy for locoregional control and prevention of distant metastases. However, the data also suggest that the sentinel lymph node procedure may increase the risk of locoregional recurrences (in-transit metastases), especially in patients with thick melanomas. The potential role of the sentinel lymph node procedure as an alternative method of lymph node staging in patients with vulvar melanoma needs further investigation only within the protection of clinical trials and probably should be restricted to patients with melanomas with intermediate thickness (1-4 mm).