Axillary recurrence after sentinel node biopsy

Could axillary lymph node dissection be omitted in the mastectomy patient with tumor positive sentinel node?

Background

Recent data from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial suggest that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may not be necessary for patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with irradiation. However, consensus statements and guidelines have recommended that patients undergoing mastectomy with tumor-positive sentinel node undergo completion ALND. In this study, we compared the locoregional recurrence rate of patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes among three groups: mastectomy with SLNB, mastectomy with ALND and BCS with SLNB.

Method

We identified 6,163 women with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgical resection at our institution between January 2000 and December 2011. Clinicopathologic data obtained from the prospectively collected medical database were analyzed retrospectively. Among the patients with sentinel node positive, mastectomy with SLNB was performed in 39 cases, mastectomy with ALND in 181 cases, and BCS with SLNB in 165 cases. The primary end point was the loco-regional recurrence rate.

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics were similar among the groups. There were no cases of loco-regional recurrence in the sentinel groups. At a median follow-up of 61.0 months (last follow-up May 2013), the loco-regional recurrence rate of each group was 0% for BCS with SLNB and mastectomy with SLNB only, and 1.7% for mastectomy with ALND (p=0.182).

Conclusion

In our study, there was no significant difference in loco-regional recurrence rates between groups. This result lends weight to the argument that SLNB without ALND may be a reasonable management for selected patients with appropriate surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy.

Omitting SLNB in Breast Cancer: Is a Nomogram the Answer?

BACKGROUNDS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard care as a staging procedure in patients with invasive breast cancer. The axillary recurrence rate, even after positive SLNB, is low. This raises serious doubts regarding the clinical value of SLNB in early breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to select patients with low suspected axillary burden in whom SLNB might be omitted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2015 primary breast cancer patients between 2007 and 2015, with 982 patients allocated to the training and 961 to the validation cohort. Variables associated with nodal disease were analyzed and used to build a nomogram for predicting nodal disease.

RESULTS

A total of 32.8% of patients had macrometastatic disease. A predictive model was constructed based on age, cN0, morphology, grade, multifocality, and tumor size with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83. Considering a false-negative rate of 5%, 32.8% of patients could be spared axillary surgery. In a subanalysis of patients with relatively favorable characteristics, 26.8% had less than 5% chance of macrometastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a model with excellent predictive value that can select one-third of patients in whom SLNB is deemed not necessary because of less than 5% chance of nodal involvement. Whether missing 1 in 20 patients with macrometastatic disease is worthwhile balanced against preventing side-effects of the SLN procedure remains to be established. A number of ongoing large prospective trials evaluating the outcome of omitting SLNB are awaited. Meanwhile, this nomogram may be used for individual decision-making.

Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary for positive preoperative aspiration cytology lymph node results?

INTRODUCTION

Based on international guidelines, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended in cases of breast cancer if preoperative examinations confirm axillary metastasis. We examined which set of preoperative parameters might render ALND unnecessary.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative examinations (axillary ultrasound and aspiration cytology) confirmed axillary metastasis in 190 cases out of 2671 patients with breast cancer; primary ALN dissection was performed on these patients with or without prior neoadjuvant therapy. The clinicopathological results were analysed to determine which parameter might predict the presence of no more than 2 or 3 metastatic ALNs.

RESULTS

The final histological examination confirmed 1-3 metastatic lymph nodes in ALND samples in 116 cases and over 3 metastatic lymph nodes in 74 cases. For patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (59 out of the 190 cases), if the size of the primary tumour was 2 cm or smaller and/or the metastatic ALN was 15 mm or smaller, then the patient was likely to have no more than 3 positive ALNs (stage N0-1 disease) (p < 0.001). If the patient did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, stage N2 or N3 disease was very likely. No correlation was found between other clinicopathological characteristics of the tumour and involvement of the ALNs.

CONCLUSION

Axillary lymph node dissection is not necessary for selected breast cancer patients with axillary metastasis receiving neoadjuvant therapy. In these cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without radiation therapy and close follow-up may serve as adequate therapy.

Ultrasound Imaging for Detecting Metastasis to Level II and III Axillary Lymph Nodes after Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Invasive Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic value of axillary ultrasound (US) for level II and III axillary lymph node metastasis after axillary lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer is currently not clear. The objectives of this study were to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic value of axillar US for level II and III axillary lymph node metastasis and compare it with palpation and to analyze the US features of level II and III axillary lymph nodes that are predictive of metastatic recurrence during follow-up.

METHODS

Cases with level II or III axillary lymph nodes detected by US between January 2005 and December 2017 at a cancer center were divided into 2 groups according to a retrospective analysis of US findings: potential malignancy group and follow-up group. Biopsy was performed in all patients in the potential malignancy group. In the follow-up group, the patients were followed for at least 2 years, and biopsy was performed if suspicious US features were detected.

RESULTS

The 401 enrolled cases were followed by axillary US and physical examination (PE) for comparison. Finally, 55 axillary metastases were pathologically confirmed (14%). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for axillary US were 92.7%, 93.9%, and 0.933, respectively, and the corresponding values for PE were 49.1%, 91.3%, and 0.702 (P < .001). An increase in the major or minor axis diameter of the lymph nodes of greater than 2 mm, a Solbiati index value of less than 1.5, and the presence of new suspicious lesions in other regions were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis based on the US findings (P = .013, .006, .015, and .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary is helpful in the follow-up of level II and III axillary lymph nodes after axillary lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer and can detect cancer recurrence earlier than PE.

Comparative Study between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Patients with One or Two Lymph Node Metastases

Purpose

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard axillary surgery in early breast cancer. If the SLNB result is positive, subsequent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a routine procedure. In 2011, the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial revealed that ALND may not be necessary in early breast cancer with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among Korean patients with one or two positive axillary lymph nodes in the final pathology who did and did not undergo ALND.

Methods

A total of 131,717 patients from the Korea Breast Cancer Society registry database received breast cancer surgery from January 1995 to December 2014. Inclusion criteria were T stage 1 or 2, one or two positive lymph nodes, and having received breast-conserving surgery (BCS), whole breast radiation therapy, and no neoadjuvant therapy. We analyzed the differences in disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received SLNB only and those who underwent SLNB+ALND.

Results

A total 4,442 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,268 (28.6%) in the SLNB group and 3,174 (71.4%) in the SLNB+ALND group. There were no differences in DSS and OS between the two groups (p=0.378 and p=0.925, respectively). The number of patients who underwent SLNB alone for one or two positive lymph nodes increased continuously from 2004 to 2014.

Conclusion

Korean patients with early breast cancer and 1 or 2 positive axillary lymph nodes who received BCS plus SLNB showed no significant difference in DSS and OS regardless of whether they received ALND. The findings of this retrospective study demonstrate that omitting ALND can be considered when treating selected patients with early breast cancer who have one or two positive lymph nodes.

Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram

BACKGROUND

We have developed a new nomogram to predict the probability of a patient with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to present further axillary disease.

METHODS

Data were collected from 480 patients who were diagnosed with 1-2 positive lymph nodes and thus underwent axillary lymph node dissection between March 2005 and June 2011. Clinical and pathological features of the patients were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. The Shanghai Cancer Center Non-SLN nomogram (SCC-NSLN) was created from the logistic regression model. This new model was subsequently applied to 481 patients from July 2011 to December 2013. The predictive accuracy of the SCC-NSLN nomogram was measured by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Based on the results of the univariate analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with the incidence of non-SLN metastasis in an SLN-positive patient included lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion, the number of positive SLNs, the number of negative SLNs, and the size of SLN metastasis were identified as independent predictors of non-SLN metastasis. The SCC-NSLN nomogram was then developed using these four variables. The new model was accurate and discriminating on both the modeling and validation groups (AUC: 0.7788 vs 0.7953). The false-negative rates of the SCC-NSLN nomogram were 3.54 and 9.29 % for the predicted probability cut-off points of 10 and 15 % when applied to patients who have 1-2 positive SLNs.

CONCLUSION

The SCC-NSLN nomogram could serve as an acceptable clinical tool in clinical discussions with patients. The omission of ALND might be possible if the probability of non-SLN involvement is <10 and <15 % in accordance with the acceptable risk determined by medical staff and patients.

New trends in breast cancer surgery: a therapeutic approach increasingly efficacy and respectful of the patient

The surgical management of breast cancer has undergone continuous and profound changes over the last 40 years. The evolution from aggressive and mutilating treatment to conservative approach has been long, but constant, despite the controversies that appeared every time a new procedure came to light. Today, the aesthetic satisfaction of breast cancer patients coupled with the oncological safety is the goal of the modern breast surgeon. Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy is considered the gold standard approach for patients with early stage breast cancer and the recent introduction of "oncoplastic techniques" has furtherly increased the use of breast-conserving procedures. Mastectomy remains a valid surgical alternative in selected cases and is usually associated with immediate reconstructive procedures. New surgical procedures called "conservative mastectomies" are emerging as techniques that combine oncological safety and cosmesis by entirely removing the breast parenchyma sparing the breast skin and nipple-areola complex. Staging of the axilla has also gradually evolved toward less aggressive approaches with the adoption of sentinel node biopsy and new therapeutic strategies are emerging in patients with a pathological positivity in sentinel lymph node biopsy. The present work will highlight the new surgical treatment options increasingly efficacy and respectful of breast cancer patients.

Management of Early Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Australia: A Multicentre Study

To examine practice patterns for breast cancer patients with limited sentinel node (SN) disease in light of the ACOSOG Z0011 results. Retrospective analysis of patients with T1-2 breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) admitted between January 2009 and December 2012. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments were recorded. Eight hundred positive SLNBs were identified. A total of 452 (56.5%) proceeded to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). cALND rate decreased from 65.1% to 49.7% from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012. cALND was performed for micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells in 39.3% in 2009-2010 and 22.2% in 2011-2012, whereas for macrometastases the rates were 83.1% and 68.6%, respectively. cALND rates diminished for both Z0011-eligible and -ineligible patients. The ACOSOG Z0011 trial presentation and publication coincided with a reduction in cALND for breast cancer with limited nodal disease. There appears equipoise regarding management of macrometastatic SN disease.

The feasibility of the ACOSOG Z0011 Criteria to Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of the Z0011 criteria to Chinese breast cancer patients. An survey about the Z0011 trial was distributed and we collected 658 consecutive patients with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy from five centers’ databases and grouped them as eligible or ineligible for omitting ALND according to the Z0011 criteria. The eligible group was compared with the cohort included in the Z0011 trial and with the ineligible group. Of the 427 respondants, 106 (24.8%) and 130 (30.4%)would not routinely perform ALND in patients meeting Z0011 criteria before and after learning of the trial results, respectively. Among the 658 patients, 151 (22.9%) were eligible and 507 were ineligible for omitting ALND. The clinicopathologic factors were not statistically different between the eligible group and the Z0011 cohort. Compared with the eligible Group, the ineligible group had significantly more T2 and T3 stage tumors, positive lymph nodes(LNs) and positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) (P < 0.01). The findings suggest good exportability of the Z0011 criteria to Chinese patients omitting ALND, but application of Z0011 as national treatment guideline still needs additional time and effort.

The impact of preoperative axillary ultrasonography in T1 breast tumours

OBJECTIVES

To (a) determine the diagnostic validity of axillary ultrasound (AUS) in pT1 tumours and whether fine-needle aspiration (FNA) improves its diagnostic performance, and (b) determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of AUS in a simulation environment (cutoff: two lymph nodes with macrometastases) in patients fulfilling American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicentre cross-sectional study analysed diagnostic accuracy in 355 pT1 breast cancers. All patients underwent AUS; visible nodes underwent FNA regardless of their AUS appearance. Sentinel node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were gold standards. Data were analysed considering micrometastases 'positive' and considering micrometastases 'N negative'. The simulation environment included all patients fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria.

RESULTS

Axillary involvement: 22.8 %; AUS sensitivity: 46.9 % (Nmic positive)/66.7 % (Nmic negative); AUS+FNA sensitivity: 52.6 % (pNmic positive)/72.0 % (pNmic negative). In the simulation environment, AUS had 75.0 % sensitivity, 88.9 % specificity and 99.2 % NPV.

CONCLUSION

AUS has moderate sensitivity in T1 tumours. As ALND is unnecessary in micrometastases, considering micrometastases 'N negative' increases the practical impact of AUS. In patients fulfilling ACOSOG Z0011 criteria, AUS alone can predict cases unlikely to benefit from ALND.

KEY POINTS

• AUS+FNA can predict axillary involvement, thus avoiding SNB. • Not all patients with axillary involvement need ALND. • Axillary tumour load determines axillary management. • AUS could classify patients according to axillary load.

Clinicopathologic features predicting involvement of non- sentinel axillary lymph nodes in Iranian women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Almost half of the breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes have no additional disease in the remaining axillary lymph nodes. This group of patients do not benefit from complete axillary lymph node dissection. This study was designed to assess the clinicopathologic factors that predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Iranian breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, between 2003 and 2012, were reviewed. Patients with at least one positive sentinel lymph node who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection were enrolled in the present study. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics including age, primary tumor size, histological and nuclear grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, extracapsular invasion, and number of harvested lymph nodes, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The data of 167 patients were analyzed. A total of 92 (55.1%) had non-sentinel lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis of data revealed that age, primary tumor size, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, extracapsular invasion, and the number of positive sentinel lymph nodes to the total number of harvested sentinel lymph nodes ratio, were associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis. After logistic regression analysis, age (OR=0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.8), primary tumor size (OR=7.7; 95% CI, 1.4-42.2), lymphovascular invasion (OR=19.4; 95% CI, 1.4- 268.6), extracapsular invasion (OR=13.3; 95% CI, 2.3-76), and the number of positive sentinel lymph nodes to the total number of harvested sentinel lymph nodes ratio (OR=20.2; 95% CI, 3.4-121.9), were significantly associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this study, age, primary tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular invasion, and the ratio of positive sentinel lymph nodes to the total number of harvested sentinel lymph nodes, were found to be independent predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis.

Relevance of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial to breast cancer in the Australian setting

BACKGROUND

Conventional wisdom suggests that a patient with a positive sentinel node requires a completion axillary clearance to obtain full staging and durable regional control. However, this dictum has been challenged by the recent American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial demonstrating that women with node-positive breast cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy only, and were treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation, had equivalent locoregional recurrence and survival rates to those who had a completion axillary clearance. The aim of our study was to determine what the clinical impact of the Z0011 findings might be if patients were managed according to the Z0011 criteria in an Australian teaching hospital setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review, using prospectively collected data, of all female patients with breast cancer assessed at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute in 2010 and identified the subgroup who would potentially have fulfilled all Z0011 criteria. The characteristics and management of this group were compared with node-positive and to mastectomy patient subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients with invasive breast cancer were identified. Twenty-six patients satisfied all Z0011 criteria, representing 9.3% of all patients and 21.5% of node-positive patients. Twenty-two (84.6%) patients had a subsequent axillary clearance, with six (27.3%) having additional positive nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Z0011 study is relevant to 9.3% of all breast cancer patients and 21.5% of node-positive breast cancer patients treated in a major Australian teaching hospital.

Axillary ultrasonography in breast cancer patients helps in identifying patients preoperatively with limited disease of the axilla

BACKGROUND

The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure is the method of choice for the identification and monitoring of regional lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. In the case of a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), additional lymph node dissection is still warranted for regional control, although 40-65 % have no additional axillary disease. Recent studies show that after breast-conserving surgery, SLNB, and adjuvant systemic therapy, there is no significant difference between recurrence-free period and overall survival if there are ≤2 positive axillary nodes. The purpose of this study was preoperative identification of patients with limited axillary disease (≤2 macrometastases) by using ultrasonography.

METHODS

Data from 1,103 consecutive primary breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 50 mm, no palpable adenopathy, and a maximum of 2 SLNs with macrometastases were collected. The variable of interest was US of the axilla.

RESULTS

Of the 1,103 patients included, 1,060 remained after exclusion criteria. Of these, 102 (9.6 %) had more than 2 positive axillary nodes on ALND. Selected by unsuspected US, the chance of having >2 positive lymph nodes (LNs) is substantially lower (4.2 %). This is significant on univariate and multivariate analysis. After excluding the patients with extracapsular extension of the SLN, the chance of having >2 positive LNs is only 2.6 %. For pT1-2, this is 2.2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of more than 2 positive axillary nodes is relatively small in patients with cT1-2 breast cancer. US of the axilla helps in further identifying patients with a minimal risk of additional axillary disease, putting ALND up for discussion.

Questioning the role of axillary node dissection in sentinel node positive early stage breast cancer in the South Eastern Cancer Centre

INTRODUCTION

Axillary node status is a predictor of breast cancer survival. Axillary node dissection (ALND) following positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is challenged by the American College of Surgeons Z0011 trial, where clinically/radiologically node-negative, SLNB positive early stage patients failed to derive therapeutic benefit from ALND at 6 years.

AIMS

To quantify the rates of non-sentinel lymph node positivity after ALND in all breast cancer stages. To assess Z0011 trial result application to an Irish patient population.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast conserving surgery and ALND for a positive SLNB from January 2011 to January 2012.

RESULTS

Of 174 new breast cancers diagnosed, 144 underwent surgery of which 127 patients were clinically/radiologically node-negative; 46 patients were SLNB positive; 34 (73.9 %) proceeded to ALND. Of 9 T1 tumours, 3 (33.3 %) had further positive nodes on ALND. Of 24 T2 tumours, 11 (45.8 %) had further positive nodes on ALND. All 3 (100 %) T3/T4 tumours had further positive nodes on ALND. Mean numbers of sentinel and axillary nodes harvested were 2.3 and 15.2, respectively. In the SLNB positive, ALND negative group, 12 of 18 (66.7 %) patients were <60 years versus 14 of 17 (82.4 %) in the SLNB positive, ALND positive group. This may be indicative that younger women have a trend toward node positivity following ALND for a positive SLNB.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that a significant proportion (41.9 %) of T1/T2 tumours undergoing ALND following positive SLNB have further positive nodes. It may be premature to exclude ALND in patients with T1/T2 tumours following a positive SLNB.

An independent assessment of the 7 nomograms for predicting the probability of additional axillary nodal metastases after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a cohort of British patients with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is currently the recommended procedure in patients with tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A significant proportion of patients with positive SLNs will not have any additional metastases in nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs). Predictive nomograms could identify a subgroup of patients with low or high risk of further disease in whom completion ALND can be avoided or recommended. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the currently available 7 nomograms in a cohort of British patients with breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 138 patients with positive SLNs who underwent completion ALND were identified. Data were then used to calculate the probability of further metastases in NSLNs predicted by the 7 nomograms that are currently in use: the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Cambridge, Turkish, Stanford, MDACC (University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Tenon, and MOU (Masarykuv onkologický ústav, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute) models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated for each nomogram.

RESULTS

Of the 138 patients, 54 (41%) had additional metastases in NSLNs. AUC values for the MSKCC, Cambridge, Turkish, Stanford, MDACC, Tenon, and MOU models are 0.68, 0.68, 0.70, 0.69, 0.56, 0.63, and 0.74, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MOU nomogram was more predictive than the other nomograms, with a better AUC value and false-negative rate. None of the models were able to achieve AUC value ≥ 0.80 in a cohort of British patients with breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

ABSTRACT: 

Patient selection and timing of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in the context of primary chemotherapy continues to evolve; there is some evidence that primary chemotherapy may modify lymphatic drainage patterns and cause differential downstaging between SLNs and non-SLNs. SLN biopsy undertaken prior to chemotherapy will minimize the risk of a false-negative result, may allow more accurate initial staging and provides important information on prognostication which can guide decisions about adjuvant radiotherapy. However, quantification of regional metastatic load is incomplete and some advocate SLN biopsy after primary chemotherapy to take advantage of nodal downstaging and avoidance of axillary dissection in up to 40% of patients. Initial reports on false-negative rates for SLN biopsy after primary chemotherapy in patients who had proven axillary node metastases at presentation based on needle core biopsy were relatively high and a cause for clinical concern. However, more recent data suggest that SLN biopsy is as accurate when performed post- as pre-neochemotherapy and current practice incorporates both approaches.

Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: past, present, and future

Sentinel node biopsy has replaced axillary lymph node dissection as the standard of care in early breast cancers. Sentinel node biopsy represents a highly accurate and less-morbid axillary staging, which allows most patients to avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection and its morbidity. This review provides information including several issues which are still under debate, such as clinical significance of micrometastases, avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection for patients with positive sentinel nodes, accuracy and timing of sentinel node biopsy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and how many sentinel nodes are sufficient for removal. Finally, a new topic is introduced: superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography (CT)-lymphography (CT-LG) in patients with breast cancer. SPIO-enhanced MR imaging is a useful method of detecting metastases in sentinel nodes localized by CT-LG in patients with breast cancer. Patients with clinically negative nodes may be spared even sentinel node biopsy when the sentinel node is diagnosed as disease free using SPIO-enhanced MR imaging.

Impact of the american college of surgeons oncology group Z0011 criteria applied to a contemporary patient population

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial concluded that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may not be necessary for all patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The aim of this study was to assess applicability of Z0011 results to our patient population and determine what percentage may be affected by these results.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with clinical T1-2, N0 breast cancer, treated with surgery first between 1994 and 2009, who had 1 to 2 positive SLNs, were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and log-rank used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for ALND vs SLN dissection (SLND) alone in 2 patient populations: patients undergoing BCT or total mastectomy (TM) and patients undergoing BCT only.

RESULTS

Of 861 patients, 188 (21.8%) underwent SLND alone. Of 488 (56.7%) patients who underwent BCT, 125 (25.6%) had SLND alone. Of 412 patients undergoing TM, 67 (16.3%) had SLND alone. Patients undergoing ALND were significantly younger, had larger tumors, macrometastasis, and extranodal extension in both populations. Compared with the Z0011 cohort, our BCT patients had more T1 tumors (76.0% vs 69.3%, p = 0.01) and more grade II to III tumors (87.3% vs 76.2%, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for T-stage, there were no significant differences in DFS and OS between patients undergoing SLND alone or ALND in both populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of our breast cancer patients with Z0011 trial criteria suggests that almost 75% of SLN-positive patients would be candidates to avoid ALND if they undergo BCT.

Changing behavior in clinical practice in response to the ACOSOG Z0011 trial: a survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated no difference in overall survival or local-regional recurrence rates between patients planned for breast conservation therapy including whole breast irradiation (WBI) with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) randomly selected to undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus no further surgery. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of Z0011 on surgical practice nationally.

METHODS

A survey was sent by e-mail to 2,759 members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS). Questions assessed the respondents' practice, familiarity with Z0011, and preferences for treating patients with one or two positive SLNs.

RESULTS

Of those surveyed, 849 (30.8 %) responded. The majority (97 %) indicated familiarity with the data. Of those respondents, 468 (56.9 %) would not routinely perform ALND in patients planned to receive WBI, while 279 (36.0 %) would consider omission of completion ALND in patients planned to receive accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), and 218 (26.6 %) would consider omission of ALND in patients not planned to receive radiation. Academic and private practice surgeons were equally likely to incorporate Z0011 into practice.

CONCLUSIONS

ACOSOG Z0011 has changed surgical practice. ASBrS respondents have embraced Z0011 and have changed their practice, omitting ALND in patients with one or two positive SLNs who will undergo WBI. However, many also omit ALND in patients undergoing surgery without radiation or with APBI. As these clinical scenarios were not studied in Z0011, further evaluation is required prior to changing clinical practice.

Axillary recurrence after a tumor-positive sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary treatment: a review of the literature

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become standard of care as a staging procedure in patients with invasive breast cancer. A positive SLNB allows completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) to be performed. The axillary recurrence rate (ARR) after cALND in patients with positive SLNB is low. Recently, several studies have reported a similar low ARR when cALND is not performed. This review aims to determine the ARR when cALND is omitted in SLNB-positive patients.

Methods

A literature search was performed in the PubMed database with the search terms “breast cancer,” “sentinel lymph node biopsy,” “axillary” and “recurrence.” Articles with data regarding follow-up of patients with SLNB-positive breast cancer were identified. To be eligible, patients should not have received cALND and ARR should be reported.

Results

Thirty articles were analyzed. This resulted in 7,151 patients with SLNB-positive breast cancer in whom a cALND was omitted (median follow-up of 45 months, range 1–142 months). Overall, 41 patients developed an axillary recurrence. 27 studies described 3,468 patients with micrometastases in the SLNB, of whom 10 (0.3 %) developed an axillary recurrence. ARR varied between 0 and 3.7 %. Sixteen studies described 3,268 patients with macrometastases, 24 (0.7 %) axillary recurrences were seen. ARR varied between 0 and 7.1 %. Details regarding type of surgery and adjuvant treatment were lacking in the majority of studies.

Conclusions

ARR appears to be low in SLNB-positive patients even when a cALND is not performed. Withholding cALND may be safe in breast cancer selected patients such as those with isolated tumor cells or micrometastatic disease.

Disease recurrence in sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients forgoing axillary lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

Clinically node-negative breast cancer patients usually undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. When metastasis is identified, completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) is recommended. Newer data suggest that CALND may be omitted in some women as it does not improve local control or survival.

METHODS

Women with a positive SLN diagnosed between 1999 and 2010 were included in this review and were stratified according to whether they did or did not undergo CALND. Primary endpoints included recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality. Differences between the groups and in time to recurrence were compared and summarized.

RESULTS

Overall, 276 women were included: 206 (79 %) women who underwent CALND (group 1) and 70 (21 %) women in whom CALND was omitted (group 2). Group 1 patients were younger, had more SLN disease, and received more chemotherapy (P < 0.05 for each). The groups did not vary by tumor characteristics (P > 0.05 for each). Median follow-up was 69 (range 6-147) and 73 (range 15-134) months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Five (2 %) women in group 1 and three (4 %) women in group 2 died of breast cancer (P = 0.39). Local-regional or distant recurrence occurred in 20 (10 %) group 1 patients and in 10 (14 %) group 2 patients (P = 0.39). On multivariate analysis, only estrogen receptor negativity and lymphovascular invasion predicted for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Omission of CALND in women with SLN disease does not significantly impact in-breast, nodal, or distant recurrence or mortality. Longer-term follow-up is needed to verify that this remains true with time.

Who should have or not have an axillary node dissection with breast cancer?

There have been dramatic changes in the approach to the axilla in women with breast cancer over the last 100 years, reflecting the evolution in our understanding of the underlying tumor biology, reduced disease burden because of early detection, and advances in all breast cancer treatment modalities. The approach to the axilla needs to be individualized, much like the extent of surgery for the primary tumor. Axillary dissection remains an important intervention for patients with more locally advanced disease. However, in patients with early-stage breast cancer, in whom regional recurrence is extremely low, the added benefit of an ALND has yet to be confirmed.

Lymph node metastasis in patients with frozen section analyses that are negative for tumors

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess the necessity of delayed complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) for patients whose sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were negative for tumors on intraoperative frozen section analysis, but later proven positive on hematoxylin and eosin staining or immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

We identified 341 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with cALND at the Samsung Medical Center between 1998 and 2008, and reviewed the clinicopathological records of women diagnosed with invasive carcinoma of the breast.

RESULTS

Of the 341 patients, 59 underwent delayed cALND due to negative results on frozen section. Only 1 patient had a non-SLNs metastasis in the group of delayed cALND. Delayed cALND was associated with higher rates of breast-conserving surgery, smaller primary tumor and metastasis size in SLNs, fewer metastatic lymph nodes and SLNs and a lower TNM stage. The detection of metastases of SLNs on frozen section and the number of metastatic SLNs were related to the detection of additional metastases of nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) in cALND.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the lack of detection of metastases on frozen sections may be a predictive factor for nonmetastasis in NSLNs. cALND could therefore be omitted in such cases.

Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. To do or not to do?

AIM

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of axillary ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the preoperative diagnosis of axillary metastases.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2009, 1132 female patients were evaluated and treated in our clinic for histologically proven breast carcinoma. Preoperative axillary ultrasound with subsequent FNAC in case of suspicious lymph nodes was performed in 1150 axillae (18 bilateral breast carcinomas). We analyzed the results of axillary ultrasound and FNAC retrospectively. Pathological node status was used as the reference standard (based on axillary dissection or sentinel node biopsy).

RESULTS

Axillary ultrasound showed suspicious lymph nodes in 327 axillae (28.4%). FNAC showed axillary metastases in 107 of these 327 axillae. Final histological analysis confirmed 106 metastases (one false positive). Histological analysis showed metastatic disease in 429 of 1150 axillae (37.3%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of axillary ultrasound alone were 43.8% (188/429), 80.7% (582/721), 57.5% (188/327) and 70.7% (582/823), respectively. When combining axillary ultrasound with FNAC of suspicious lymph nodes, sensitivity was 24.7% (106/429), specificity was 99.9% (720/721), PPV was 99.1% (106/107) and NPV was 69.0% (720/1043).

CONCLUSIONS

106/429 (24.7%) Node-positive axillae were identified by ultrasound-guided FNAC and spared unnecessary sentinel node biopsy. Unfortunately, the percentage of false negative results of ultrasound-guided FNAC (28.1%, 323/1150) was very high.

The role of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center status: observed variation in surgical care depends on the level of evidence

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate differences in guideline concordance between National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated and other centers and determine whether the level of available evidence influences the degree of variation in concordance.

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Institute recognizes centers of excellence in the advancement of cancer care. These NCI-designated cancer centers have been shown to have better outcomes for cancer surgery; however, little work has compared surgical process measures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare claims data. Fee-for-service Medicare patients with a definitive surgical resection for breast, colon, gastric, rectal, or thyroid cancers diagnosed between 2000 and 2005 were identified. Claims data from 1999 to 2006 were used. Our main outcome measure was guideline concordance at NCI-designated centers compared to other institutions, stratified by level of evidence as graded by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline panels.

RESULTS

All centers achieved at least 90%, and often 95%, concordance with guidelines based on level 1 evidence. Concordance rates for guidelines with lower-level evidence ranged from 30% to 97% and were higher at NCI-designated centers. The adjusted concordance ratios for category 1 guidelines were between 1.02 and 1.08, whereas concordance ratios for guidelines with lower-level evidence ranged from 0.97 to 2.19, primarily favoring NCI-designated centers.

CONCLUSIONS

When strong evidence supports a guideline, there is little variation in practice between NCI-designated centers and other hospitals, suggesting that all are providing appropriate care. Variation in care may exist, however, for guidelines that are based on expert consensus rather than strong evidence. This suggests that future efforts to generate needed evidence on the optimal approach to care may also reduce institutional variation.

Regional recurrence in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells

OBJECTIVE

The impact of axillary treatment in daily practice on 5-year regional recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with isolated tumor cells or micrometastases in the sentinel node (SLN).

BACKGROUND

Axillary dissection is recommended in patients with tumor-positive SLNs. But, in recent studies, regional recurrence rates seemed low if dissection was omitted.

METHODS

We identified all patients in The Netherlands with invasive breast cancer who had an SLN biopsy before 2006, favorable primary tumor characteristics, and node-negative disease, isolated tumor cells or micrometastases as final nodal status. The primary endpoint was regional recurrence rate. To investigate differences in recurrence rates between patients with and without axillary treatment, a proportional hazard regression was carried out correcting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 857 patients with node-negative disease, 795 patients with isolated tumor cells, and 1028 patients with micrometastases in the SLN were included. Without axillary treatment, the 5-year regional recurrence rates were 2.3%, 2.0%, and 5.6%, respectively. Compared with patients who underwent axillary treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for regional recurrence in patients who underwent an SLN procedure only was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.23-4.98) for node-negative disease, 2.39 (95% CI, 0.67-8.48) for isolated tumor cells, and 4.39 (95% CI, 1.46-13.24) for micrometastases. Doubling of tumor size, grade 3 and negative hormone receptor status were also significantly associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Not performing axillary treatment in patients with SLN micrometastases is associated with an increased 5-year regional recurrence rate. Axillary treatment is recommended in patients with SLN micrometastases and unfavorable tumor characteristics.

Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node (Pilot study)

BACKGROUND

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) procedure was found to be an accurate method of staging the axilla in patients with early stage breast cancer. The standard of care for breast cancer patients with positive SLN metastasis includes complete Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND). However, in 40-70% of patients, the SLN is the only involved axillary node. Factors predicting non SLN metastasis should be identified in order to define subgroups of patients with positive SLN in whom the axilla may be staged by SLNB alone.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors predicting metastatic involvement of the non-SLNs in breast cancer patients having SLN metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected and analyzed from 80 patients with early stage invasive breast cancer (T1, T2, N0, M0) who underwent SLNB at the Surgical Oncology Department, Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC) between November 2004 and February 2009. SLNB was performed using a combined technique (radioactive colloid, and blue dye) in the majority of cases. In some cases, only one technique was used. Complete ALND was performed in the case of failure of SLN identification and in patients with positive SLN. Multiple variables (patient, tumor, and SLN characteristics) were tested as possible predictors of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 46.6years. The median tumor size was 2cm. The SLN identification rate was 96.2% (77 out of 80 patients). The SLN was positive in 24 patients (31%), and half of these showed evidence of capsular invasion. The median number of SLNs removed was two. The median number of positive SLNs was one. The incidence of non-SLN metastasis associated with positive SLN was 50% (12 out of 24 patients). Lymphovascular invasion was found to be the only factor associated with non-SLN metastases. In addition, two trends were observed, though they did not reach the statistical significance: the first is that the majority of patients having capsular invasion of the SLN (8 out of 12 patients, 67%) had positive non-SLN metastasis, and the second is that the patients having more than one SLN metastasis were more likely to have non-SLN metastasis (4 out of 5, 80%).

CONCLUSION

In the current pilot study, only the lymphovascular invasion in the area of the primary tumor was found to be significantly related to the nonsentinel lymph node metastasis. There was a tendency toward higher incidence of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis associated with the number of positive SLN and capsular invasion of SLN, though this did not reach the statistical significance. This could be attributed to the small number of patients recruited. Further evaluation of the predictors of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis on a larger number of patients is required. The validation of these predictors in prospective studies may enable approximately half of early stage breast cancer patients with positive SLN to be staged with SLNB alone while avoiding the morbidity of unnecessary ALND.

Tumor characteristics influencing non-sentinel lymph node involvement in clinically node negative patients with breast cancer

Purpose

The negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy avoids conventional axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer with clinically negative axilla. Despite negative SLN, there is a risk of leaving involved non-SLN behind in the axilla. We investigated the predictive power of tumor characteristics for non-SLN metastasis.

Methods

Lymphatic mapping with blue dye method for SLN biopsy and level 1-2 axillary dissections were performed to establish axillary status in 59 patients with T1 and T2 breast cancer and clinically negative axilla. Tumor's characteristics were histopathologically established to assess their association with non-SLN metastasis.

Results

The axilla was malignant in 23 (39%) patients. The SLN alone was metastatic in 10, both SLN and non-SLN in 9, and non-SLN alone in 4 (7%) patients. The false negative rate for SLN biopsy was 10% in our series. The rate of positive non-SLN was found as 0% in T1a-b, 19% in T1c, and 40% in T2 tumors (p=0.035). Lymphovascular invasion was positive in 14 (61%) patients with axillary metastasis (p<0.001), and in 10 (77%) patients with non-SLN involvement (p<0.001).

Conclusion

We concluded that there was a small risk of involved non-SLN despite negative SLN. Tumor size (near or greater than 2 cm) was significantly associated with non-SLN metastasis. Peritumoral lymphovascular invasion was a positive predictor of the metastatic involvement in non-SLNs.

Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery is widely used for nodal staging in early-stage breast cancer. This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of SLN surgery for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus patients undergoing surgery first.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Controversy exists regarding the timing of SLN surgery in patients planned for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Proponents of SLN surgery after chemotherapy prefer a single surgical procedure with potential for fewer axillary dissections. Opponents cite early studies with low identification rates and high false-negative rates after chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 3746 patients with clinically node negative T1-T3 breast cancer underwent SLN surgery from 1994 to 2007. Clinicopathologic data were reviewed and comparisons made between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those undergoing surgery first.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 575 (15.3%) underwent SLN surgery after chemotherapy and 3171 (84.7%) underwent surgery first. Neoadjuvant patients were younger (51 vs. 57 years, P < 0.0001) and had more clinical T2-T3 tumors (87.3% vs. 18.8%, P < 0.0001) at diagnosis. SLN identification rates were 97.4% in the neoadjuvant group and 98.7% in the surgery first group (P = 0.017). False-negative rates were similar between groups (5/84 [5.9%] in neoadjuvant vs. 22/542 [4.1%] in the surgery first group, P = 0.39). Analyzed by presenting T stage, there were fewer positive SLNs in the neoadjuvant group (T1: 12.7% vs. 19.0%, P = 0.2; T2: 20.5% vs. 36.5%, P < 0.0001; T3: 30.4% vs. 51.4%, P = 0.04). Adjusting for clinical stage revealed no differences in local-regional recurrences, disease-free or overall survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN surgery after chemotherapy is as accurate for axillary staging as SLN surgery prior to chemotherapy. SLN surgery after chemotherapy results in fewer positive SLNs and decreases unnecessary axillary dissections.

Sentinel node biopsy alone for node-positive breast cancer: 12-year experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Complete node dissection for a tumor-positive sentinel node (SN) is becoming more controversial. We report our institution's 12-year experience with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) alone for a tumor-positive SN.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review from 1998 to 2009. Of 3,806 patients who underwent SNB, 2,139 underwent SNB alone, of which 1,997 were tumor-negative and 123 were tumor-positive. SNs were staged node-positive (N1mic or N1) according to American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-three node-positive patients underwent SNB alone with no completion axillary dissection for invasive breast cancer. Mean age was 57 years (range 32 to 92 years) and stage distribution was as follows: stage IIA: 76 (62%) patients; stage IIB: 40 (33%) patients; and stage III: 4 patients (3%). Mean size of the tumors was 1.9 cm (range 0.1 to 9 cm). Eighty-nine (72%) underwent lumpectomy and 34 (28%) underwent mastectomy. Ninety-three percent of patients underwent some form of adjuvant therapy. Forty-two patients (34%) did not undergo radiation and there were no axillary recurrences in this group. At median follow-up of 95 months, there has been 1 axillary recurrence (0.8%) and 13 deaths, 4 of which were attributed to metastatic breast cancer and the rest to non-breast-related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary recurrence is rare after SN biopsy alone. This might be related to favorable tumor and patient characteristics and frequent use of adjuvant therapy.

Primary tumor and patient characteristics in breast cancer as predictors of adjuvant therapy regimen: a regression model

PURPOSE

Adjuvant therapy reduces the risk of recurrence of breast cancer. This study was undertaken to determine characteristics guiding choice of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of characteristics of patients with breast cancer (stages I-III) at a regional center from 2004 to 2007. Univariate analysis was used to select factors (P < 0.1) for entry into multivariate stepwise logistic regressions. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A P value of <0.05 was significant, and comparisons were two-tailed.

RESULTS

Model 1 (n = 744) assessed the prescription of any adjuvant regimen (hormonal or chemotherapy). Indicators of choice of any regimen were positive lymph nodes [OR 16.5, CI (6.2, 44.0)], grade [4.0, (2.5, 6.0)], size [3.2, (2.1, 4.6)], PR [0.3, (0.1, 0.6)], and multicentricity [0.2 (0.04, 0.66)]. Model 2 (n = 663) assessed chemotherapy in ER+ patients. Indicators of addition of chemotherapy were stage [8.9 (4.3, 18.6), grade [5.5 (3.1, 9.6)], positive nodes [2.7 (1.1, 6.4)], physician experience [1.1 (1.0, 1.2)], age [0.8 (0.79, 0.86)], and year of treatment [0.8, (0.4, 0.9)]. Model 3 (n = 867) assessed prescription of a more aggressive chemotherapy regimen and indicators were treatment by a breast specialist oncologist [8.6 (1.7, 43.1)], stage [3.6 (2.4, 5.4)], positive nodes [2.6 (1.7, 4.1)], year of treatment [1.5 (1.3, 1.8)], size [1.2 (1.1, 1.4)], age [0.91 (0.89, 0.93)], and PR [0.4 (0.3, 0.6)].

CONCLUSIONS

This study verifies known factors for choice of adjuvant therapy, excludes others thought to be important, and quantifies effects at our center. Further studies are required to compare these models where risk stratification is different.

Systematic review of the effect of external beam radiation therapy to the breast on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy

BACKGROUND

Axillary recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with invasive breast carcinoma remains a concern. Previous investigations to identify prognostic factors for axillary recurrence identified that a disproportionate number of patients with an axillary recurrence after negative SLNB were not treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the breast as part of initial treatment. This finding prompted a systematic review to test the hypothesis that EBRT to the breast reduces the risk of axillary recurrence after negative SLNB.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and the Spanish-language database LILACS to identify articles publishing data regarding follow-up of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients. Reports and articles lacking information on the initial treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

Forty-five articles were accepted for review. A total of 23,357 SLN-negative patients were identified with median follow-up ranging from 15 to 102 months. Some 18,878 patients were treated with EBRT to the breast as part of their initial treatment. One hundred and twenty-seven patients with an axillary recurrence were identified, of whom 73 had EBRT as part of their initial treatment. Meta-analysis showed that EBRT was associated with a lower rate of axillary recurrence (P < 0·001), but this finding was subject to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

This review and meta-analysis showed that EBRT is associated with a significantly lower axillary recurrence rate after negative SLNB.

Micrometastatic disease and isolated tumor cells as a predictor for additional breast cancer axillary metastatic burden

BACKGROUND

Our study aims were to investigate breast cancer patients with micrometastases or isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to determine the rate of non-SLN metastasis and axillary recurrences, and to compare actual non-SLN metastasis rates with those predicted by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram.

METHODS

We identified 116 stage I to III breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy and had micrometastases or ITCs (<2-mm deposits). Patients underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (group 1) or had no further axillary surgery (group 2). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients with micrometastases or ITCs in SLNs, 55 (47%) underwent completion ALND (group 1), and 61 (53%) had no further axillary surgery (group 2). The rate of non-SLN metastases in group 1 patients was 9 (16%) of 55, which was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram (median 30%, P < 0.001). Patient age, race, tumor histology, tumor grade, estrogen receptor/Her-2neu status, and lymphovascular invasion did not differ significantly between group 1 patients with positive non-SLNs and those with negative non-SLNs (P > 0.05 for each), but patients with positive non-SLNs had larger tumors (P < 0.001). No patient in group 1 experienced an axillary recurrence, while only one patient (1.6%) in group 2 experienced axillary recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual rate of positive non-SLNs for breast cancer patients with SLN micrometastases or ITCs who underwent completion ALND was significantly less than that predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. The rate of axillary recurrence is negligible, regardless of the extent of axillary staging.

Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains the standard practice. As nodal surgery has long been considered a staging procedure without a clear survival benefit, the need for ALND in all patients is debatable. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in survival for patients undergoing SLNB alone versus SLNB with complete ALND.

METHODS

Patients with breast cancer who underwent SLNB and were found to have nodal metastases were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1998-2004). Clinicopathologic and outcomes data were examined for patients who underwent SLNB alone versus SLNB with ALND.

RESULTS

We identified 26,986 patients with disease-positive lymph nodes; 4,425 (16.4%) underwent SLNB alone, and 22,561 (83.6%) underwent SLNB with ALND. Patients were significantly more likely to undergo SLNB alone if they were older (median 59 years old) or if the tumor was low grade and estrogen receptor positive. From 1998 to 2004, the proportion of patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes who underwent SLNB alone increased from 21.0 to 37.8% (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 50 months, there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between patients who underwent SLNB alone versus complete ALND.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increasing trend toward omitting ALND in patients with micrometastatic nodal disease identified by SLNB. Compared with SLNB alone, completion ALND does not seem to be associated with improved survival for breast cancer patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes.

Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has eliminated the need for axillary dissection (ALND) in patients whose sentinel node (SN) is tumor-free. However, completion ALND for patients with tumor-involved SNs remains the standard to achieve locoregional control. Few studies have examined the outcome of patients who do not undergo ALND for positive SNs. We now report local and regional recurrence information from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 was a prospective trial examining survival of patients with SN metastases detected by standard H and E, who were randomized to undergo ALND after SLND versus SLND alone without specific axillary treatment. Locoregional recurrence was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 446 patients randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND + ALND. Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, estrogen receptor status, use of adjuvant systemic therapy, tumor type, T stage, and tumor size. Patients randomized to SLND + ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared with a median of only 2 SN removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.11) or regional recurrence (P = 0.45) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND can offer excellent regional control and may be reasonable management for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.