Whole Body PMHS Response in Injurious Experimental Accelerative Loading Events

Comparison of Adult Female and Male PMHS Pelvis and Lumbar Response to Underbody Blast

The goal of this study was to gather and compare kinematic response and injury data on both female and male whole-body Post-mortem Human Surrogates (PMHS) responses to Underbody Blast (UBB) loading. Midsized males (50th percentile, MM) have historically been most used in biomechanical testing and were the focus of the Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin (WIAMan) program, thus this population subgroup was selected to be the baseline for female comparison. Both small female (5th percentile, SF) and large female (75th percentile, LF) PMHS were included in the test series to attempt to discern whether differences between male and female responses were predominantly driven by sex or size. Eleven tests, using 20 whole-body PMHS, were conducted by the research team. Preparation of the rig and execution of the tests took place at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds (APG) in Aberdeen, MD. Two PMHS were used in each test. The Accelerative Loading Fixture (ALF) version 2, located at APG's Bear Point range was used for all male and female whole-body tests in this series. The ALF was an outdoor test rig that was driven by a buried explosive charge, to accelerate a platform holding two symmetrically mounted seats. The platform was designed as a large, rigid frame with a deformable center section that could be tuned to simulate the floor deformation of a vehicle during a UBB event. PMHS were restrained with a 5-point harness, common in military vehicle seats. Six-degree-of-freedom motion blocks were fixed to L3, the sacrum, and the left and right iliac wings. A three-degree-of freedom block was fixed to T12. Strain gages were placed on L4 and multiple locations on the pelvis. Accelerometers on the floor and seat of the ALF provided input data for each PMHS' feet and pelvis. Time histories and mean peak responses in z-axis acceleration were similar among the three PMHS groups in this body region. Injury outcomes were different and seemed to be influenced by both sex and size contributions. Small females incurred pelvis injuries in absence of lumbar injures. Midsized males had lumbar vertebral body fractures without pelvis injuries. And large females with injuries had both pelvis and lumbar VB fractures. This study provides evidence supporting the need for female biomechanical testing to generate female response and injury thresholds. Without the inclusion of female PMHS, the differences in the injury patterns between the small female and midsized male groups would not have been recognized. Standard scaling methods assume equivalent injury patterns between the experimental and scaled data. In this study, small female damage occurred in a different anatomical structure than for the midsized males. This is an important discovery for the development of anthropomorphic test devices, injury criteria, and injury mitigating technologies. The clear separation of small female damage results, in combination with seat speeds, suggest that the small female pelvis injury threshold in UBB events lies between 4 - 5 m/s seat speed. No inference can be made about the small female lumbar threshold, other than it is likely at higher speeds and/or over longer duration. Male lumbar spine damage occurred in both the higher- and lower lower-rate tests, indicating the injury threshold would be below the seat pulses tested in these experiments. Large females exhibited injury patterns that reflected both the small female and midsized male groups - with damaged PMHS having fractures in both pelvis and lumbar, and in both higher- and lower- rate tests. The difference in damage patterns between the sex and size groups should be considered in the development of injury mitigation strategies to protect across the full population.

Pelvis-Sacrum-Lumbar Spine Injury Characteristics From Underbody Blast Loading

INTRODUCTION

Combat-related injuries from improvised explosive devices occur commonly to the lower extremity and spine. As the underbody blast impact loading traverses from the seat to pelvis to spine, energy transfer occurs through deformations of the combined pelvis-sacrum-lumbar spine complex, and the time factor plays a role in injury to any of these components. Previous studies have largely ignored the role of the time variable in injuries, injury mechanisms, and warfighter tolerance. The objective of this study is to relate the time or temporal factor using a multi-component, pelvis-sacrum-lumbar spinal column complex model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intact pelvis-sacrum-spine specimens from pre-screened unembalmed human cadavers were prepared by fixing at the superior end of the lumbar spine, pelvis and abdominal contents were simulated, and a weight was added to the cranial end of the fixation to account for torso effective mass. Prepared specimens were placed on the platform of a custom vertical accelerator device and aligned in a seated soldier posture. An accelerometer was attached to the seat platen of the device to record the time duration to peak velocity. Radiographs and computed tomography images were used to document and associate injuries with time duration.

RESULTS

The mean age, stature, weight, body mass index, and bone density of 12 male specimens were as follows: 65 ± 11 years, 1.8 ± 0.01 m, 83 ± 13 kg, 27 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and 114 ± 21 mg/cc. They were equally divided into short, medium, and long time durations: 4.8 ± 0.5, 16.3 ± 7.3, and 34.5 ± 7.5 ms. Most severe injuries associated with the short time duration were to pelvis, although they were to spine for the long time duration.

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate time for the underbody blast loading to traverse the pelvis-sacrum-spine complex, distal structures are spared while proximal/spine structures sustain severe/unstable injuries. The time factor may have implications in seat and/or seat structure design in future military vehicles to advance warfighter safety.

Temporal corridors of forces and moments, and injuries to pelvis-lumbar spine in vertical impact simulating underbody blast

Pelvis and lumbar spine fractures occur in falls, motor vehicle crashes, and military combat events. They are attributed to vertical impact from the pelvis to the spine. Although whole-body cadavers were exposed to this vector and injuries were reported, spinal loads were not determined. While previous studies determined injury metrics such as peak forces using isolated pelvis or spine models, they were not conducted using the combined pelvis-spine columns, thereby not accounting for the interaction between the two body regions. Earlier studies did not develop response corridors. The study objectives were to develop temporal corridors of loads at the pelvis and spine and assess clinical fracture patterns using a human cadaver model. Vertical impact loads were delivered at the pelvic end to twelve unembalmed intact pelvis-spine complexes, and pelvis forces and spinal loads (axial, shear and resultant and bending moments) were obtained. Injuries were classified using clinical assessments from post-test computed tomography scans. Spinal injuries were stable in eight and unstable in four specimens. Pelvis injuries included ring fractures in six and unilateral pelvis in three, sacrum fractures in ten, and two specimens did not sustain any injuries to the pelvis or sacrum complex. Data were grouped based on time to peak velocity, and ± one standard deviation corridors about the mean of the biomechanical metrics were developed. Time-history corridors of loads at the pelvis and spine, hitherto not reported in any study, are valuable to assess the biofidelity of anthropomorphic test devices and assist validating finite element models.

Lower Extremity Validation of a Human Body Model for High Rate Axial Loading in the Underbody Blast Environment

While the use of Human Body Models (HBMs) in the underbody blast (UBB) environment has increased and shown positive results, the potential of these models has not been fully explored. Obtaining accurate kinematic and kinetic response are necessary to better understand the injury mechanisms for military safety applications. The objective of this study was to validate the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) M50 lower extremity using a combined objective rating scheme in vertical and horizontal high-rate axial loading. The model's lower extremity biomechanical response was compared to Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) subjects for vertically and horizontally-applied high rate axial loading. Two distinct experimental setups were used for model validation, comprising a total of 33 distinct end points for validation. A combined Correlation and Analysis (CORA) score that incorporates CORA, time-to-peak (TTP) and peak magnitude of the experimental signals and ISO TS 18571 was used to evaluate the model response. For the horizontal impacts, the combined CORA scores were 0.80, 0.84, and 0.81 for compression, force, and strain respectively. For the vertical impacts combined CORA scores for the knee Z force, compression and heel Z displacement ranged from 0.70-0.81, 0.87-0.91, and 0.82-0.99 respectively. The GHBMC lower extremity model showed good agreement with PMHS experimental data in the horizontal and vertical loading environment in 33 unique tests. The accuracy is demonstrated by using the ISO TS 18571 standard and a combined CORA score that takes into consideration the peak and time to peak of the signal. The results of this study show that GHBMC v 6.0 HBM lower extremity can be used for kinetic and kinematic predictions in the UBB environment.

Loading rate effect on tradeoff of fractures from pelvis to lumbar spine under axial impact loading

Objectives: The transmission of impact loading from the seat-to-pelvis-to-lumbar spine in a seated occupant in automotive and military events is a mechanism for fractures to these body regions. While postmortem human subject (PMHS) studies have replicated fractures to the pelvis or lumbar spine using isolated/component models, the role of the time factor that manifests as a loading rate issue on injuries has not been fully investigated in literature. The objective of this study was to explore the hypothesis that short duration pulses fracture the pelvis while longer pulses fracture the spine, and intermediate pulses involve both components.Methods: Unembalmed PMHS thoracolumbar spine-pelvis specimens were fixed at the superior end, and a six-axis load cell was attached. The specimens were mounted on a vertical accelerator, and noninjury and injury tests were conducted by applying short, medium, or long pulses with 5, 15, or 35 ms durations, respectively. Peak axial, shear and resultant forces were obtained. Injuries were documented using posttest x-ray and computed tomography images and scaled using the AIS (2015).Results: The mean age, stature, weight, body mass index, and BMD of twelve specimens were 64.8 ± 11.4 years, 1.8 ± 0.01 m, 83 ± 13 kg, 26.7 ± 5.0 kg/m², and 114.5 ± 21.3 mg/cc, respectively. For the short, long, and medium duration pulses, the mean resultant forces were 5.6 ± 0.9 kN, 5.9 ± 0.94 kN, and 5.4 ± 1.8 kN, and time durations were 4.8 ± 0.5 ms, 16.3 ± 7.3 ms, and 34.5 ± 7.5 ms, respectively. For the short pulse, pelvis injuries were more severe in 3 out 4 specimens, for the medium pulse, they were distributed between the pelvis and spine, and for the long pulse, spine injuries were more severe in 3 out of 4 specimens.Conclusions: While acknowledging the limitations of the sample size, the results of this study support the hypothesis of the time variable in the tradeoff between pelvis and spine injuries with pulse duration. The tradeoff pattern is attributed to mass recruitment: short pulse biases injuries to pelvis while limiting spinal injuries, and the opposite is true for the longer pulse, thus supporting the hypothesis. It is important to account for the time variable in injury analysis.

Verification of High-Rate Vertical Loading Laboratory Skeletal Fractures by Comparison with Theater Injury Patterns

For the current study, an existing theater injury data set was compared to component and whole body experiments meant to replicate the theater high rate vertical loading environment. The theater injury data set was derived from real world events that were within the design range of the Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the whole body fracture patterns was developed to determine whether the laboratory loading was correctly representing the resulting injuries seen in theater Underbody Blast (UBB) events. Results indicated that most of the experimental test fracture patterns were similar to the theater injuries for Abbreviated Injury Scale body regions of interest (lower extremities, pelvis, and spine); however, some of the body regions had higher similarity scores compared to others. Whole body fracture distribution was less similar than the component tests because of differences in injury distributions. The lower extremity whole body similarity was lower than spine and pelvis similarity. This analysis was able to identify some experimental tests that might not represent theater loading. In conclusion, this analysis confirmed that some laboratory testing produced skeletal injury patterns that are seen in comparable theater UBB events.