1
|
Paz A, Lavikainen J, Turunen MJ, García JJ, Korhonen RK, Mononen ME. Knee-Loading Predictions with Neural Networks Improve Finite Element Modeling Classifications of Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Biomed Eng 2024:10.1007/s10439-024-03549-2. [PMID: 38842728 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03549-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Physics-based modeling methods have the potential to investigate the mechanical factors associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and predict the future radiographic condition of the joint. However, it remains unclear what level of detail is optimal in these methods to achieve accurate prediction results in cohort studies. In this work, we extended a template-based finite element (FE) method to include the lateral and medial compartments of the tibiofemoral joint and simulated the mechanical responses of 97 knees under three conditions of gait loading. Furthermore, the effects of variations in cartilage thickness and failure equation on predicted cartilage degeneration were investigated. Our results showed that using neural network-based estimations of peak knee loading provided classification performances of 0.70 (AUC, p < 0.05) in distinguishing between knees that developed severe OA or mild OA and knees that did not develop OA eight years after a healthy radiographic baseline. However, FE models incorporating subject-specific femoral and tibial cartilage thickness did not improve this classification performance, suggesting there exists an optimal point between personalized loading and geometry for discrimination purposes. In summary, we proposed a modeling framework that streamlines the rapid generation of individualized knee models achieving promising classification performance while avoiding motion capture and cartilage image segmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Paz
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
- Escuela de Ingeniería Civil y Geomática, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
| | - Jere Lavikainen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211, Kuopio, Finland
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael J Turunen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211, Kuopio, Finland
- Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland
| | - José J García
- Escuela de Ingeniería Civil y Geomática, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | - Rami K Korhonen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mika E Mononen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1, 70211, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kakavand R, Palizi M, Tahghighi P, Ahmadi R, Gianchandani N, Adeeb S, Souza R, Edwards WB, Komeili A. Integration of Swin UNETR and statistical shape modeling for a semi-automated segmentation of the knee and biomechanical modeling of articular cartilage. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2748. [PMID: 38302524 PMCID: PMC10834430 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52548-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Simulation studies, such as finite element (FE) modeling, provide insight into knee joint mechanics without patient involvement. Generic FE models mimic the biomechanical behavior of the tissue, but overlook variations in geometry, loading, and material properties of a population. Conversely, subject-specific models include these factors, resulting in enhanced predictive precision, but are laborious and time intensive. The present study aimed to enhance subject-specific knee joint FE modeling by incorporating a semi-automated segmentation algorithm using a 3D Swin UNETR for an initial segmentation of the femur and tibia, followed by a statistical shape model (SSM) adjustment to improve surface roughness and continuity. For comparison, a manual FE model was developed through manual segmentation (i.e., the de-facto standard approach). Both FE models were subjected to gait loading and the predicted mechanical response was compared. The semi-automated segmentation achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of over 98% for both the femur and tibia. Hausdorff distance (mm) between the semi-automated and manual segmentation was 1.4 mm. The mechanical results (max principal stress and strain, fluid pressure, fibril strain, and contact area) showed no significant differences between the manual and semi-automated FE models, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed semi-automated segmentation in creating accurate knee joint FE models. We have made our semi-automated models publicly accessible to support and facilitate biomechanical modeling and medical image segmentation efforts ( https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/k5hdc9cz7w/1 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Kakavand
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Mehrdad Palizi
- Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Peyman Tahghighi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Reza Ahmadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Neha Gianchandani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Samer Adeeb
- Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Roberto Souza
- Department of Electrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - W Brent Edwards
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Amin Komeili
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, CCIT 216, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
- Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|