Extracellular matrix stiffness controls VEGF165 secretion and neuroblastoma angiogenesis via the YAP/RUNX2/SRSF1 axis

Biomechanical forces and force-triggered drug delivery in tumor neovascularization

Tumor angiogenesis is one of the typical hallmarks of tumor occurrence and development, and tumor neovascularization also exhibits distinct characteristics from normal blood vessels. As the number of cells and matrix inside the tumor increases, the biomechanical force is enhanced, specifically manifested as solid stress, fluid stress, stiffness, and topology. This mechanical microenvironment also provides shelter for tumors and intensifies angiogenesis, providing oxygen and nutritional support for tumor progression. During tumor development, the biomechanical microenvironment also emerges, which in turn feeds back to regulate the tumor progression, including tumor angiogenesis, and biochemical and biomechanical signals can regulate tumor angiogenesis. Blood vessels possess inherent sensitivity to mechanical stimuli, but compared to the extensive research on biochemical signal regulation, the study of the regulation of tumor neovascularization by biomechanical signals remains relatively scarce. Biomechanical forces can affect the phenotypic characteristics and mechanical signaling pathways of tumor blood vessels, directly regulating angiogenesis. Meanwhile, they can indirectly regulate tumor angiogenesis by causing an imbalance in angiogenesis signals and affecting stromal cell function. Understanding the regulatory mechanism of biomechanical forces in tumor angiogenesis is beneficial for better identifying and even taming the mechanical forces involved in angiogenesis, providing new therapeutic targets for tumor vascular normalization. Therefore, we summarized the composition of biomechanical forces and their direct or indirect regulation of tumor neovascularization. In addition, this review discussed the use of biomechanical forces in combination with anti-angiogenic therapies for the treatment of tumors, and biomechanical forces triggered delivery systems.

Zonally Stratified Decalcified Bone Scaffold with Different Stiffness Modified by Fibrinogen for Osteochondral Regeneration of Knee Joint Defect

Articular cartilage is generally known to be a complex tissue with multiple layers. Each layer has different composition, structure, and mechanical properties, making regeneration after knee joint defects a troubling clinical problem. A novel integrated stratified decalcified bone matrix (SDBM) scaffold with different stiffness to mimic the mechanical properties of articular cartilage is presented herein. This SDBM scaffold was modified using fibrinogen (Fg) (Fg + SDBM) to enhance its vascularization ability and improve its repair efficiency for osteochondral defects of knee joints. A Fg + SDBM scaffold with different elastic modulus in each layer (high-stiffness DBM (HDBM) layer, 174.208 ± 44.330 MPa (Fg + HDBM); medium-stiffness DBM (MDBM) layer, 21.214 ± 6.922 MPa (Fg + MDBM); and low-stiffness DBM (LDBM) layer, 0.678 ± 0.269 MPa (Fg + LDBM)) was constructed by controlling the stratified decalcification time with layered embedding paraffin (0, 3, and 5 days). The low- and medium-stiffness layers of the Fg + SDBM scaffold remarkably promoted the cartilage differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Subcutaneous transplantation and rabbit knee joint osteochondral defect repair experiments revealed that the low- and medium-stiffness layers of the Fg + SDBM scaffold exhibited wonderful cartilage capacity, whereas the high-stiffness layer of Fg + SDBM scaffold exhibited good osteogenesis ability. Furthermore, this scaffold could promote blood vessel formation in subchondral bone area. This study presents a feasible strategy for osteochondral regeneration of defective knee joints, which is of great clinical value for tissue repair.

Matrix stiffness in regulation of tumor angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is one of the most common malignant features of solid tumors such as liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and gastrointestinal tumors, which is the basis of tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. It is also an important target of anti-tumor therapy. Tumor angiogenesis is usually triggered by biochemical, hypoxic, and biomechanical factors in the microenvironment. The regulation of biochemical signals and hypoxic microenvironment in tumor angiogenesis have been widely documented, but the role of biomechanical signals in tumor angiogenesis has gradually begun to be uncovered in recent years. The vasculature system is naturally sensitive to mechanical stimuli. Recent studies have highlighted the important regulatory effects of biomechanical stimuli, such as matrix stiffness, fluid shear stress, and vascular lumen pressure, on the phenotype and functions of tumor blood vessels. In this paper, we summarize the new progress and internal mechanisms of matrix stiffness-mediated effects on tumor angiogenesis.

Sulphur dioxide and fluoride co-exposure induce incisor hypomineralization and amelogenin upregulation via YAP/RUNX2 signaling pathway

Sulphur dioxide (SO₂) and fluoride are among the most common environmental pollutants affecting human health, and both co-exist in areas predominantly consuming coal. It is vital to analyse the combined toxicity of SO₂ and fluoride, and their effects on health and the underlying mechanisms of their co-exposure have not yet been adequately assessed. In the present study, we used ICR mice and LS8 cells to investigate the toxicity of SO₂ and fluoride exposure to the enamel, alone or in combination. Factorial design analysis was used to reveal the combined toxicity in vitro and in vivo. Co-exposure to SO₂ and fluoride exacerbated enamel injury, resulting in more severe hypomineralization of incisor, and enamel structure disorders in mice, and could induce the accumulation of protein residue in the matrix of the enamel. Amelogenin expression was increased upon exposure to SO₂ and fluoride, but enamel matrix proteases were not affected. Consistent with our in vivo results, co-exposure of SO₂ and fluoride aggravated amelogenin expression in LS8 cells, and increased the YAP and RUNX2 levels. Co-exposure to SO₂ and fluoride resulted in greater toxicity than individual exposure, both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that residents of areas exposed to SO₂ and fluoride may have an increased risk of developing enamel damage.