Using clinical experience in discussion within problem-based learning groups

The consequences of authentic early experience for medical students: creation of mētis

CONTEXT

Authentic early experience (AEE) describes experiences provided to new medical students to undertake 'human contact' to enhance learning. Although the concept of AEE is not new, and was commonplace prior to the Flexner Report of 1910, little is known about how or why meaning and knowledge are constructed through early student placements in medical, social and voluntary workplaces. Variance among settings means AEE is a collection of non-uniform, complex educational interventions which require students to make repeated transitions between different workplaces and their university institution. The purpose of this paper is to develop theory in this context.

METHODS

We report on a study undertaken in a UK medical school using interviews and discussion groups to generate data from students, workplace supervisors and school faculty staff. We used narrative analysis to access knowledge and meaning construction, in combination with analytic tools drawn from thematic and interpretative approaches to phenomena. We sought to refine theoretical understanding through the application of mētis, a socio-cultural theory novel to the field of medical education.

RESULTS

Scott's concept of mētis provides a useful theoretical framework for understanding how AEE works for students in terms of their creation of meaning and how they choose to use it in relation to formally recognised knowledge. Knowledge and meaning, generated as a consequence of AEE, contained dichotomies and paradoxes. Students improvised, in the face of unpredictability and uncertainty, to create a form of mētis that allowed them to handle the perceived competing demands of AEE settings and the medical school.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrate how meaning making can be conceived of as student mētis arising from social processes in students' learning interactions. We suggest that the development of collaborative working with students could potentiate positive forms of student mētis, thereby maximising desirable educational consequences. Further work is required to establish effective ways to do this.

Integrating problem-based learning into clinical clerkship: a pilot study

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching segment, named "problem-based clinical teaching," for the clinical clerkship in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

METHODS

Students were given a problem weekly on a case that they had seen during their rotation. The problem was provided by the instructor from a case that had already been diagnosed but came up with an additional problem that called for further investigation by the attending physician. The task for the students was to conduct the investigation and discuss the problem with the attending physician. A survey was conducted of a class of 3rd year medical students (n=43) who completed clerkships in internal medicine to measure the level of student engagement in the problem-based clinical teaching segment and the students' overall perceptions of this new teaching method.

RESULTS

Students generally agreed with the statements that they were actively engaged in the learning during the problem-based clinical teaching session. The students also perceived that this teaching session helped them acquire a deeper understanding of the knowledge and that it enhanced their problem solving skills and motivation.

CONCLUSION

Problem-based clinical teaching is a useful educational method to apply problem-based learning in clinical clerkship settings.

A model of clinical problem-based learning for clinical attachments in medicine

CONTEXT

Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical curricula for early-years training, but its use during clinical attachments has not been extensively explored. Objectives This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new model, 'clinical problem-based learning' (CPBL), to promote learning skills, attitudes and knowledge during clinical attachments.

METHODS

The CPBL model takes the principles of PBL and applies them to learning during clinical attachments. Real patient encounters are guided by a list of broadly defined case types to ensure curriculum coverage. By discussing history taking and examination in the context of differential diagnosis and problem listing, students generate learning objectives relating to clinical skills, disease mechanisms and clinical management. These are explored through self-directed learning before the second tutorial, in which the tutor takes the role of 'expert', demonstrating how learned material translates into clinical practice. We evaluated which components contributed most to the success of the model using semi-structured questionnaires, focus groups and a consensus (Delphi process) method.

RESULTS

Students found CPBL a positive learning experience. Identification of suitable cases for discussion was readily achieved, although follow-up was sometimes difficult. The tutor's level of expertise and a non-threatening learning environment, conducive to student questioning, were highly rated contributors to successful CPBL. Comments reinforced the view that CPBL is a parallel teaching approach that helps structure the teaching week, but does not replace traditional bedside teaching.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical problem-based learning was well received in clinical placements. Key elements were the learning interval, the involvement of expert tutors and a non-threatening learning environment.

Problem-based learning: where are we now?

The definition of problem-based learning (PBL) as an educational concept is as elusive in 2008 as it has been since the concept was first expressed over forty years ago. A definitive guide to the practice of PBL is equally elusive. Like all worthwhile educational ideas, PBL has proved attractive to those teachers who seek improvements for their courses. Its appeal has transcended the traditional boundaries in formal education so that there are examples of PBL from primary to tertiary education, and across many disciplines within these. Dissemination, however, has wrought confusion in understanding and practice, and consequent difficulties for researchers in evaluating its efficacy, and lack of clear advice for those who would like to adopt PBL. Rather than attempting to be definitive, this Guide explores the various interpretations and practices that claim the label PBL, and critiques these against the original concept and practice. The primary aim is to provide insight into the causes of the confusion about PBL in 2008. The second aim is to point a feasible way forward so that, where appropriate, the potential of PBL as a whole-of-curriculum concept may be realised; and, where it is not possible to implement the whole concept, worthwhile educational principles that have been associated more or less with PBL may be recognised as such and given value in their own right.

Innovations in problem-based learning: what can we learn from recent studies?

This article aims at discussing the six papers included in this special issue on innovations in Problem-based learning (PBL). The papers address different aspects related to the implementation and the development of PBL. This discussion article highlights the relevance of the theme explored by each of the papers, the contributions emerging from the study to what is already known about that topic, and its limitations, particularly those that suggest directions for future research. Emphasis is given to new insights brought by the papers for better understanding tutorial group processes and self-study phase in PBL. The contributions provided by the papers are discussed in the light of pertinent literature and also in relation to their companion articles in this issue when indicated.