1
|
Kakyo TA, Xiao LD, Chamberlain D. Exploring the dark side of informal mentoring: Experiences of nurses and midwives working in hospital settings in Uganda. Nurs Inq 2024:e12641. [PMID: 38606562 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Mentoring literature explores the dark side of mentoring as factors such as gender and race and how they affect the overall mentoring experience. The sociocultural context of the nursing and midwifery professions presents unique characteristics warranting a qualitative exploration of negative mentoring experiences. We aimed to characterise the dark side of mentoring based on informal mentoring relationships occurring among nurses and midwives working in hospitals. Utilising semistructured interviews in a qualitative descriptive design and reflexive thematic analysis, we examined the perceptions of 35 nurses and midwives from three public hospitals located in the Western, Northern and North-western regions of Uganda. Findings emerged in four overarching themes mentoring process deficits, mentoring relational problems, organisational challenges in mentoring and implications of negative mentoring experiences. Our study findings underscore that, while mentoring is frequently beneficial, it can also be interspersed with negative experiences arising from relational dynamics, particular mentoring processes and the overarching hospital environment. Notably, nurses and midwives actively transformed these challenges into opportunities for growth and self-improvement, while introspectively examining their roles in contributing to these negative experiences. Such a proactive approach highlights their resilience and steadfast commitment to professional development, even in the face of adversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Alexis Kakyo
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Muni University, Arua, Uganda
| | - Lily Dongxia Xiao
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Diane Chamberlain
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phua GLG, Owyong JLJ, Leong ITY, Goh S, Somasundaram N, Poon EYL, Chowdhury AR, Ong SYK, Lim C, Murugam V, Ong EK, Mason S, Hill R, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:398. [PMID: 38600515 PMCID: PMC11007913 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05203-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reviewing experiences and recognizing the impact of personal and professional views and emotions upon conduct shapes a physician's professional and personal development, molding their professional identity formation (PIF). Poor appreciation on the role of reflection, shortages in trained tutors and inadequate 'protected time' for reflections in packed medical curricula has hindered its integration into medical education. Group reflection could be a viable alternative to individual reflections; however, this nascent practice requires further study. METHODS A Systematic Evidence Based Approach guided Systematic Scoping Review (SSR in SEBA) was adopted to guide and structure a review of group reflections in medical education. Independent searches of articles published between 1st January 2000 and 30th June 2022 in bibliographic and grey literature databases were carried out. Included articles were analysed separately using thematic and content analysis, and combined into categories and themes. The themes/categories created were compared with the tabulated summaries of included articles to create domains that framed the synthesis of the discussion. RESULTS 1141 abstracts were reviewed, 193 full-text articles were appraised and 66 articles were included and the domains identified were theories; indications; types; structure; and benefits and challenges of group reflections. CONCLUSIONS Scaffolded by current approaches to individual reflections and theories and inculcated with nuanced adaptations from other medical practices, this SSR in SEBA suggests that structured group reflections may fill current gaps in training. However, design and assessment of the evidence-based structuring of group reflections proposed here must be the focus of future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences, Singapore University of Social Sciences, 463 Clementi Road, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Tze Yong Leong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Suzanne Goh
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- KK Women's and Children Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Rd, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Nagavalli Somasundaram
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eileen Yi Ling Poon
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Crystal Lim
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Medical Social Services, Singapore General Hospital, 16 College Road, Block 3 Level 1, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Vengadasalam Murugam
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, 832 Thomson Rd, Singapore, Singapore
- Office of Medical Humanities, SingHealth Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, 31 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168753, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Ruaridh Hill
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, The Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, Singapore, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krishna LKR, Pisupati A, Ong YT, Teo KJH, Teo MYK, Venktaramana V, Quek CWN, Chua KZY, Raveendran V, Singh H, Wong SLCH, Ng VWW, Loh EKY, Yeoh TT, Owyong JLJ, Chiam M, Ong EK, Phua GLG, Hill R, Mason S, Ong SYK. Assessing the effects of a mentoring program on professional identity formation. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:799. [PMID: 37880728 PMCID: PMC10601320 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04748-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical education has enjoyed mixed fortunes nurturing professional identity formation (PIF), or how medical students think, feel and act as physicians. New data suggests that structured mentoring programs like the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI) may offer a means of developing PIF in a consistent manner. To better understand how a well-established structured research mentoring program shapes PIF, a study of the experiences of PMI mentees is proposed. METHODOLOGY Acknowledging PIF as a sociocultural construct, a Constructivist approach and Relativist lens were adopted for this study. In the absence of an effective tool, the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) and Krishna-Pisupati Model (KPM) model were used to direct this dual Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (Dual-SEBA) study in designing, employing and analysing semi-structured interviews with PMI mentees and mentoring diaries. These served to capture changes in PIF over the course of the PMI's mentoring stages. Transcripts of the interviews and mentoring diaries were concurrently analysed using content and thematic analysis. Complementary themes and categories identified from the Split Approach were combined using the Jigsaw Approach and subsequently compared with mentoring diaries in the Funnelling Process. The domains created framed the discussion. RESULTS A total of 12 mentee interviews and 17 mentoring diaries were analysed, revealing two domains-PMI as a Community of Practice (CoP) and Identity Formation. The domains confirmed the centrality of a structured CoP capable of facilitating longitudinal mentoring support and supporting the Socialisation Process along the mentoring trajectory whilst cultivating personalised and enduring mentoring relationships. CONCLUSION The provision of a consistent mentoring approach and personalised, longitudinal mentoring support guided along the mentoring trajectory by structured mentoring assessments lay the foundations for more effective mentoring programs. The onus must now be on developing assessment tools, such as a KPM-based tool, to guide support and oversight of mentoring relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, UK.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, L3 9TA, Liverpool, UK.
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC C/O Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kelly Jia Hui Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mac Yu Kai Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vaishnavi Venktaramana
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vijayprasanth Raveendran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Harpreet Singh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sabine Lauren Chyi Hui Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Victoria Wen Wei Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eleanor Kei Ying Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Dr, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ting Ting Yeoh
- Division of Oncology Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng Koon Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Assisi Hospice, Singapore, Singapore
- Office of Medical Humanities, SingHealth Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gillian Li Gek Phua
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, L3 9TA, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Yew Kuang Ong
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mancuso-Marcello M, Salloum NL, Copley PC, Emelifeonwu JA, Kaliaperumal C. Promoting padawans: a survey examining the state of mentorship in neurosurgical training in the United Kingdom. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37:158-162. [PMID: 34605722 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1982864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentorship has long since been acknowledged as an integral part of Neurosurgical training. The authors sought to evaluate the state of mentorship in Neurosurgical training in the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS A 28-point questionnaire was sent to all neurosurgical trainees in the UK and Ireland via the British Neurosurgical Trainee's Association (BNTA), comprising 180 trainees. RESULTS There were 75 responses (180 trainees on the mailing list, 42% response rate). Despite all respondents reporting it to be at least somewhat important to have a mentor, 16% felt they had no mentors. The mean number of mentors was 2.91 with 72% of respondents having more than 1 mentor. In terms of the content of mentorship relationships, 63% were comfortable discussing career related topics with their mentor to a high or very high degree but only 29% felt comfortable discussing their general wellbeing. With regards to allocated educational supervisors, 43% thought this person to be a 'low' or 'very low' source of mentorship. The three most important traits of the ideal mentor as reported by respondents were: someone chosen by them (48%), working in the same hospital (44%) and having received formal mentorship training (36%). CONCLUSIONS The current perception of mentorship in Neurosurgery from the surveyed trainees is mixed. A healthy majority of trainees benefit from mentorship of some kind, whilst a significant minority feel underserved. The surveyed trainees feel mentorship is slanted more towards clinical and professional aspects of development than it is towards personal ones. Suggestions for future insight would be an evaluation of senior registrar and consultant sentiments towards mentorship, whilst exploration into more flexible models for establishing mentoring relationships may help to address the heavy importance of trainee choice which is voiced by this survey's results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadia Liber Salloum
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mentoring future mentors in undergraduate medical education. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273358. [PMID: 36108091 PMCID: PMC9477267 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Efforts to support flagging mentoring programs facing shortages of experienced clinical mentors have had an unexpected and welcome effect. Supplementing traditional mentoring programs with peer-mentoring have not only addressed gaps in practice, structure, support and mentee oversight but have offered mentees charged with peer-mentoring duties the opportunity to take on mentoring roles under senior supervision. This study evaluates the experiences of peer-mentors within a local research mentoring program to better understand and advance this endeavor. Methods Semi-structured interviews and post-interview surveys based on recent reviews on mentoring were employed. Adapting the Systematic Evidence Based Approach, data was analysed using thematic and content analysis. Results were combined using the Jigsaw Perspective to ensure that key elements of the different mentoring stages were identified. Results The interviews and surveys revealed the following domains: Motivation, Initiation, Practicing, and Mentoring Environment. Conclusion These findings provide novel insight into a structured framework that may help guide the experiences, training, assessment, and oversight of peer-mentors beyond the auspices of our local program. These general observations will equip host organizations with the direction they need to take in designing and executing peer-mentoring training and assessment programs of their own. Whilst the stages of peer-mentoring need further evaluation and an effective means of assessment and support pivotal, we believe our findings suggest that peer-mentoring may not only help to address the shortfall in mentors but is an invaluable learning experience that prepares and instils key values, beliefs and principles in young would-be mentors.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ong RSR, Wong RSM, Chee RCH, Quek CWN, Burla N, Loh CYL, Wong YA, Chok AKL, Teo AYT, Panda A, Chan SWK, Shen GS, Teoh N, Chin AMC, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:466. [PMID: 35710490 PMCID: PMC9203147 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03515-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characterised by feelings of helplessness in the face of clinical, organization and societal demands, medical students are especially prone to moral distress (MD). Despite risks of disillusionment and burnout, efforts to support them have been limited by a dearth of data and understanding of MD in medical students. Yet, new data on how healthcare professionals confront difficult care situations suggest that MD could be better understood through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP). A systematic scoping review (SSR) guided by the RToP is proposed to evaluate the present understanding of MD amongst medical students. METHODS The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA) is adopted to map prevailing accounts of MD in medical students. To enhance the transparency and reproducibility, the SEBA methodology employs a structured search approach, concurrent and independent thematic analysis and directed content analysis (Split Approach), the Jigsaw Perspective that combines complementary themes and categories, and the Funnelling Process that compares the results of the Jigsaw Perspective with tabulated summaries to ensure the accountability of these findings. The domains created guide the discussion. RESULTS Two thousand six hundred seventy-one abstracts were identified from eight databases, 316 articles were reviewed, and 20 articles were included. The four domains identified include definitions, sources, recognition and, interventions for MD. CONCLUSIONS MD in medical students may be explained as conflicts between the values, duties, and principles contained within the different aspects of their identity. These conflicts which are characterised as disharmony (within) and dyssynchrony (between) the rings of RToP underline the need for personalised and longitudinal evaluations and support of medical students throughout their training. This longitudinal oversight and support should be supported by the host organization that must also ensure access to trained faculty, a nurturing and safe environment for medical students to facilitate speak-up culture, anonymous reporting, feedback opportunities and supplementing positive role modelling and mentoring within the training program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Song Ryan Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ruth Si Man Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Choon Hoe Chee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chrystie Wan Ning Quek
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Neha Burla
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu An Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrea York Tiang Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aiswarya Panda
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sarah Wye Kit Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Shen Shen
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ning Teoh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore libraries, Singapore Blk MD6, Centre, 14 Medical Dr, #05-01 for Translational Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, 169610, Singapore, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore 8 College Rd,, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goh S, Wong RSM, Quah ELY, Chua KZY, Lim WQ, Ng ADR, Tan XH, Kow CS, Teo YH, Lim EG, Pisupati A, Chong EJX, Kamal NHA, Tan LHE, Tay KT, Ong YT, Chiam M, Lee ASI, Chin AMC, Mason S, Krishna LKR. Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review : Mentoring programs during COVID-19. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:359. [PMID: 35545787 PMCID: PMC9094135 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03409-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The redeployment of mentors and restrictions on in-person face-to-face mentoring meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic has compromised mentoring efforts in Palliative Medicine (PM). Seeking to address these gaps, we evaluate the notion of a combined novice, peer-, near-peer and e-mentoring (CNEP) and interprofessional team-based mentoring (IPT) program. METHODS A Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SEBA) guided systematic scoping review was carried out to study accounts of CNEP and IPT from articles published between 1st January 2000 and 28th February 2021. To enhance trustworthiness, concurrent thematic and content analysis of articles identified from structured database search using terms relating to interprofessional, virtual and peer or near-peer mentoring in medical education were employed to bring together the key elements within included articles. RESULTS Fifteen thousand one hundred twenty one abstracts were reviewed, 557 full text articles were evaluated, and 92 articles were included. Four themes and categories were identified and combined using the SEBA's Jigsaw and Funnelling Process to reveal 4 domains - characteristics, mentoring stages, assessment methods, and host organizations. These domains suggest that CNEP's structured virtual and near-peer mentoring process complement IPT's accessible and non-hierarchical approach under the oversight of the host organizations to create a robust mentoring program. CONCLUSION This systematic scoping review forwards an evidence-based framework to guide a CNEP-IPT program. At the same time, more research into the training and assessment methods of mentors, near peers and mentees, the dynamics of mentoring interactions and the longitudinal support of the mentoring relationships and programs should be carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherill Goh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Ruth Si Man Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Wei Qiang Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Aubrey Ding Rui Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Xiu Hui Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Cheryl Shumin Kow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yao Hao Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Elijah Gin Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Anushka Pisupati
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Eleanor Jia Xin Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lorraine Hui En Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Alexia Sze Inn Lee
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of Singapore Libraries, Block MD6, Centre for Translational Medicine, 14 Medical Drive, #05-01, Singapore, 117599, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Cr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, 119077, Singapore
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional identity formation (PIF) in medical students is a multifactorial phenomenon, shaped by ways that clinical and non-clinical experiences, expectations and environmental factors merge with individual values, beliefs and obligations. The relationship between students' evolving professional identity and self-identity or personhood remains ill-defined, making it challenging for medical schools to support PIF systematically and strategically. Primarily, to capture prevailing literature on PIF in medical school education, and secondarily, to ascertain how PIF influences on medical students may be viewed through the lens of the ring theory of personhood (RToP) and to identify ways that medical schools support PIF. METHODS A systematic scoping review was conducted using the systematic evidence-based approach. Articles published between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2020 related to PIF in medical students were searched using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and Scopus. Articles of all study designs (quantitative and qualitative), published or translated into English, were included. Concurrent thematic and directed content analyses were used to evaluate the data. RESULTS A total of 10443 abstracts were identified, 272 full-text articles evaluated, and 76 articles included. Thematic and directed content analyses revealed similar themes and categories as follows: characteristics of PIF in relation to professionalism, role of socialization in PIF, PIF enablers and barriers, and medical school approaches to supporting PIF. DISCUSSION PIF involves iterative construction, deconstruction and inculcation of professional beliefs, values and behaviours into a pre-existent identity. Through the lens of RToP, factors were elucidated that promote or hinder students' identity development on individual, relational or societal levels. If inadequately or inappropriately supported, enabling factors become barriers to PIF. Medical schools employ an all-encompassing approach to support PIF, illuminating the need for distinct and deliberate longitudinal monitoring and mentoring to foster students' balanced integration of personal and professional identities over time.
Collapse
|
9
|
Maggio LA, Larsen K, Thomas A, Costello JA, Artino AR. Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 55:689-700. [PMID: 33300124 PMCID: PMC8247025 DOI: 10.1111/medu.14431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Over the last two decades, the number of scoping reviews in core medical education journals has increased by 4200%. Despite this growth, research on scoping reviews provides limited information about their nature, including how they are conducted or why medical educators undertake this knowledge synthesis type. This gap makes it difficult to know where the field stands and may hamper attempts to improve the conduct, reporting and utility of scoping reviews. Thus, this review characterises the nature of medical education scoping reviews to identify areas for improvement and highlight future research opportunities. METHOD The authors searched PubMed for scoping reviews published between 1/1999 and 4/2020 in 14 medical education journals. The authors extracted and summarised key bibliometric data, the rationales given for conducting a scoping review, the research questions and key reporting elements as described in the PRISMA-ScR. Rationales and research questions were mapped to Arksey and O'Malley's reasons for conducting a scoping review. RESULTS One hundred and one scoping reviews were included. On average, 10.1 scoping reviews (SD = 13.1, median = 4) were published annually with the most reviews published in 2019 (n = 42). Authors described multiple reasons for undertaking scoping reviews; the most prevalent being to summarise and disseminate research findings (n = 77). In 11 reviews, the rationales for the scoping review and the research questions aligned. No review addressed all elements of the PRISMA-ScR, with few authors publishing a protocol (n = 2) or including stakeholders (n = 20). Authors identified shortcomings of scoping reviews, including lack of critical appraisal. CONCLUSIONS Scoping reviews are increasingly conducted in medical education and published by most core journals. Scoping reviews aim to map the depth and breadth of emerging topics; as such, they have the potential to play a critical role in the practice, policy and research of medical education. However, these results suggest improvements are needed for this role to be fully realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A. Maggio
- Department of MedicineUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Kelsey Larsen
- Department of Politics, Security, and International AffairsUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoFLUSA
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational TherapyInstitute of Health Sciences EducationFaculty of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealQCCanada
| | | | - Anthony R. Artino
- Department of Health, Human Function, and Rehabilitation SciencesThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health SciencesWashingtonDCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kow CS, Teo YH, Teo YN, Chua KZY, Quah ELY, Kamal NHBA, Tan LHE, Cheong CWS, Ong YT, Tay KT, Chiam M, Mason S, Krishna LKR. A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 20:246. [PMID: 32736552 PMCID: PMC7395401 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02169-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring provides mentees and mentors with holistic support and research opportunities. Yet, the quality of this support has been called into question amidst suggestions that mentoring is prone to bullying and professional lapses. These concerns jeopardise mentoring's role in medical schools and demand closer scrutiny. METHODS To better understand prevailing concerns, a novel approach to systematic scoping reviews (SSR) s is proposed to map prevailing ethical issues in mentoring in an accountable and reproducible manner. Ten members of the research team carried out systematic and independent searches of PubMed, Embase, ERIC, ScienceDirect, Scopus, OpenGrey and Mednar databases. The individual researchers employed 'negotiated consensual validation' to determine the final list of articles to be analysed. The reviewers worked in three independent teams. One team summarised the included articles. The other teams employed independent thematic and content analysis respectively. The findings of the three approaches were compared. The themes from non-evidence based and grey literature were also compared with themes from research driven data. RESULTS Four thousand six titles were reviewed and 51 full text articles were included. Findings from thematic and content analyses were similar and reflected the tabulated summaries. The themes/categories identified were ethical concerns, predisposing factors and possible solutions at the mentor and mentee, mentoring relationship and/or host organisation level. Ethical concerns were found to stem from issues such as power differentials and lack of motivation whilst predisposing factors comprised of the mentor's lack of experience and personality conflicts. Possible solutions include better program oversight and the fostering of an effective mentoring environment. CONCLUSIONS This structured SSR found that ethical issues in mentoring occur as a result of inconducive mentoring environments. As such, further studies and systematic reviews of mentoring structures, cultures and remediation must follow so as to guide host organisations in their endeavour to improve mentoring in medical schools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Shumin Kow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yao Hao Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yao Neng Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Keith Zi Yuan Chua
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Elaine Li Ying Quah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad Kamal
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Lorraine Hui En Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Level 11, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Dr, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Rd, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Blk MD 11, 10 Medical Drive, #02-03, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, PalC c/o Dover Park Hospice, 10 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308436, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krishna L, Tay KT, Yap HW, Koh ZYK, Ng YX, Ong YT, Shivananda S, Compton S, Mason S, Kanesvaran R, Toh YP. Combined novice, near-peer, e-mentoring palliative medicine program: A mixed method study in Singapore. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234322. [PMID: 32502180 PMCID: PMC7274408 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An acute shortage of senior mentors saw the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI) combine its novice mentoring program with electronic and peer mentoring to overcome insufficient mentoring support of medical students and junior doctors by senior clinicians. A three-phased evaluation was carried out to evaluate mentees' experiences within the new CNEP mentoring program. METHODS Phase 1 saw use of a Delphi process to create a content-valid questionnaire from data drawn from 9 systematic reviews of key aspects of novice mentoring. In Phase 2 Cognitive Interviews were used to evaluate the tool. The tool was then piloted amongst mentees in the CNEP program. Phase 3 compared mentee's experiences in the CNEP program with those from the PMI's novice mentoring program. RESULTS Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed three themes-the CNEP mentoring process, its benefits and challenges that expound on the descriptive statistical analysis of specific close-ended and Likert scale responses of the survey. The results show mentee experiences in the PMI's novice mentoring program and the CNEP program to be similar and that the addition of near peer and e-mentoring processes enhance communications and support of mentees. CONCLUSION CNEP mentoring is an evolved form of novice mentoring built on a consistent mentoring approach supported by an effective host organization. The host organization marshals assessment, support and oversight of the program and allows flexibility within the approach to meet the particular needs of mentees, mentors and senior mentors. Whilst near-peer mentors and e-mentoring can make up for the lack of senior mentor availability, their effectiveness hinges upon a common mentoring approach. To better support the CNEP program deeper understanding of the mentoring dynamics, policing and mentor and mentee training processes are required. The CNEP mentoring tool too needs to be validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Krishna
- Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hong Wei Yap
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zachary Yong Keat Koh
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yong Xiang Ng
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sushma Shivananda
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Stephen Mason
- Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ying Pin Toh
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232511. [PMID: 32384090 PMCID: PMC7209188 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring's success in enhancing a mentee's professional and personal development, and a host organisations' reputation has been called into question, amidst a lack of effective tools to evaluate mentoring relationships and guide oversight of mentoring programs. A scoping review is proposed to map available literature on mentoring assessment tools in Internal Medicine to guide design of new tools. OBJECTIVE The review aims to explore how novice mentoring is assessed in Internal Medicine, including the domains assessed, and the strengths and limitations of the assessment methods. METHODS Guided by Levac et al.'s framework for scoping reviews, 12 reviewers conducted independent literature reviews of assessment tools in novice mentoring in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, Cochrane, GreyLit, Web of Science, Open Dissertations and British Education Index databases. A 'split approach' saw research members adopting either Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis or directed content analysis to independently evaluate the data and improve validity and objectivity of the findings. RESULTS 9662 abstracts were identified, 187 full-text articles reviewed, and 54 full-text articles included. There was consensus on the themes and categories identified through the use of the split approach, which were the domains assessed and methods of assessment. CONCLUSION Most tools fail to contend with mentoring's evolving nature and provide mere snap shots of the mentoring process largely from the mentee's perspective. The lack of holistic, longitudinal and validated assessments propagate fears that ethical issues in mentoring are poorly recognized and addressed. To this end, we forward a framework for the design of 'fit for purpose' multi-dimensional tools. PRACTICE POINTS Most tools focus on the mentee's perspective, do not consider mentoring's evolving nature and fail to consider mentoring holistically nor longitudinallyA new tool capable of addressing these gaps must also consider inputs from all stakeholders and take a longitudinal perspective of mentoring.
Collapse
|
13
|
Krishna LKR, Tan LHE, Ong YT, Tay KT, Hee JM, Chiam M, Chia EWY, Sheri K, Tan XH, Teo YH, Kow CS, Mason S, Toh YP. Enhancing Mentoring in Palliative Care: An Evidence Based Mentoring Framework. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT 2020; 7:2382120520957649. [PMID: 33015366 PMCID: PMC7517982 DOI: 10.1177/2382120520957649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growing concerns over ethical issues in mentoring in medicine and surgery have hindered efforts to reinitiate mentoring for Palliative Care (PC) physicians following the easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Ranging from the misappropriation of mentee's work to bullying, ethical issues in mentoring are attributed to poor understanding and structuring of mentoring programs, underlining the need for a consistent approach to mentoring practices. METHODS Given diverse practices across different settings and the employ of various methodologies, a novel approach to narrative reviews (NR)s is proposed to summarize, interpret, and critique prevailing data on novice mentoring. To overcome prevailing concerns surrounding the reproducibility and transparency of narrative reviews, the Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) adopts a structured approach to searching and summarizing the included articles and employed concurrent content and thematic analysis that was overseen by a team of experts. RESULTS A total of 18 915 abstracts were reviewed, 62 full text articles evaluated and 41 articles included. Ten themes/categories were ascertained identified including Nature; Stakeholders; Relationship; Approach; Environment; Benefits; Barriers; Assessments; Theories and Definitions. CONCLUSION By compiling and scrutinizing prevailing practice it is possible to appreciate the notion of the mentoring ecosystem which sees each mentee, mentor, and host organization brings with them their own microenvironment that contains their respective goals, abilities, and contextual considerations. Built around competency based mentoring stages, it is possible to advance a flexible yet consistent novice mentoring framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- The Palliative Care Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, UK and Cancer Research Centre, 200 London Rd, Liverpool L3 9TA, UK.
| | - Lorraine Hui En Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Min Hee
- National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elisha Wan Ying Chia
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Krish Sheri
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiu Hui Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yao Hao Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheryl Shumin Kow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ying Pin Toh
- National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chua WJ, Cheong CWS, Lee FQH, Koh EYH, Toh YP, Mason S, Krishna LKR. Structuring Mentoring in Medicine and Surgery. A Systematic Scoping Review of Mentoring Programs Between 2000 and 2019. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2020; 40:158-168. [PMID: 32898120 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence of novice mentoring's successes in having senior clinicians support junior doctors and/or medical students in their clinical, academic, and research goals has spurred efforts to include mentoring in the core medical curriculum. However, lack of effective structuring threatens the viability of mentoring programs, precipitating ethical concerns about mentoring. This review aims to answer the question "what is known about mentoring structures in novice mentoring among medical students and junior doctors in medicine and surgery postings?," which will guide the design of a consistent structure to novice mentoring. METHODS Levac (2010)'s framework was used to guide this systematic scoping review of mentoring programs in medicine and surgery published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2019 in PubMed, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Embase, Scopus, Mednar, and OpenGrey. A "split approach" involving concurrent independent use of a directed content analysis and thematic approach was used to analyze included articles. RESULTS Three thousand three hundred ninety-five abstracts were identified. There was concordance between the 3 themes and categories identified in analyzing the 71 included articles. These were the host organization, mentoring stages, and evaluations. CONCLUSION The data reveal the need for balance between ensuring consistency and flexibility to meet the individual needs of stakeholders throughout the stages of the mentoring process. The Generic Mentoring Framework provides a structured approach to "balancing" flexibility and consistency in mentoring processes. The Generic Mentoring Framework is reliant upon appropriate, holistic, and longitudinal assessments of the mentoring process to guide adaptations to mentoring processes and ensure effective support and oversight of the program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Jie Chua
- Mr. Chua: Fourth year medical student, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Ms. Cheong: Fourth year medical student, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, and Division of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. Ms. Lee: Fourth year medical student, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Dr. Koh: Medical officer, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. Dr Toh is an Adjunct Lecturer at the Division of Family Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Dr. Toh: National University Hospital Singapore, Family Medicine Residency, Singapore. Dr. Mason: Research and Development Lead, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. Dr. Krishna: Senior Consultant, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Division of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Family Medicine Residency, Singapore, Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, and Centre of Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chia EWY, Tay KT, Xiao S, Teo YH, Ong YT, Chiam M, Toh YP, Mason S, Chin AMC, Krishna LKR. The Pivotal Role of Host Organizations in Enhancing Mentoring in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT 2020; 7:2382120520956647. [PMID: 33062895 PMCID: PMC7536487 DOI: 10.1177/2382120520956647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
In undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, mentoring offers personalized training and plays a key role in continuing medical education and the professional development of healthcare professionals. However, poor structuring of the mentoring process has been attributed to failings of the host organization and, as such, we have conducted a scoping review on the role of the host organization in mentoring programs. Guided by Levac et al's methodological framework and a combination of thematic and content analysis, this scoping review identifies their "defining" and secondary roles. Whilst the "defining" role of the host is to set standards, nurture, and oversee the mentoring processes and relationships, the secondary roles comprise of supporting patient care and specific responsibilities toward the mentee, mentor, program, and organization itself. Critically, striking a balance between structure and flexibility within the program is important to ensure consistency in the mentoring approach whilst accounting for the changing needs and goals of the mentees and mentors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisha Wan Ying Chia
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kuang Teck Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shiwei Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yao Hao Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Ting Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Min Chiam
- Division of Cancer Education, National
Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ying Pin Toh
- Department of Family Medicine, Yong Loo
Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Star PALS, HCA Hospice Care,
Singapore
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool,
Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool, UK
| | - Annelissa Mien Chew Chin
- Medical Library, National University of
Singapore Libraries, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Supportive and Palliative
Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Cancer Education, National
Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Palliative Care Institute Liverpool,
Academic Palliative & End of Life Care Centre, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool, UK
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National
University of Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School,
Singapore
- PalC, The Palliative Care Centre for
Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|