Sustainability of Statewide Rapid HIV Testing in Labor and Delivery

Statewide Implementation of Universal Third-Trimester Repeat HIV Testing in Illinois

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to assess statewide uptake of HIV repeat testing in the first 2 years after the implementation of an amendment to the Illinois Perinatal HIV Prevention Act (IPHPA) mandating universal repeat HIV testing in the third trimester.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, population-based study of all birthing individuals in Illinois (2018-2019). Data were collected using the state-mandated closed system of perinatal HIV test reporting. We evaluated the incidence of mother-infant pairs with negative early tests and repeat third-trimester tests (RTTTs) performed in adherence with the law, as well as the timing of the performance of the RTTTs (outpatient vs. inpatient). Chi-square tests of trend by quarter were performed to ascertain sustainability.

RESULTS

Of 138,805 individuals delivered in 2018, 80.6% presented with early test and RTTTs. In 2018, outpatient RTTTs improved from 71.8% (quarter 1) to 85.1% (quarter 4; p < 0.001). In 2018, the proportion of mother-infant dyads who received testing that was adherent to the IPHPA Amendment was 92.1, 95.5, 96.7, and 96.4% in quarters 1 through 4, respectively (p < 0.001). In 2019, outpatient RTTTs performance remained high (87.4%) and stable (p = 0.06). In 2019, 99.9% of mother-infant dyads had testing adherent to the mandate in quarters 1 through 4 (p = 0.39). Of individuals who presented without RTTTs, 93.5% (2018) and 98.8% (2019) underwent inpatient testing before delivery.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of RTTTs in Illinois was rapid, successful, and sustained in its first 2 years. Public health methodologies from Illinois may benefit other states implementing RTTT programs.

KEY POINTS

· In 2018, Illinois enacted statewide RTTT for HIV among all parturients.. · In 2019, over 99% of mother-infant dyads had documentation of both early and repeat HIV testing before hospital discharge.. · Implementation of repeat third-trimester HIV testing in Illinois was rapid, successful, and sustained in its first 2 years.. · Public health methodologies from Illinois may benefit other states implementing similar programs..

Evaluation of State-Mandated Third Trimester Repeat HIV Testing in a Large Tertiary Care Center

OBJECTIVE

The Illinois Perinatal HIV Prevention Act was passed to ensure universal HIV testing once during pregnancy and was extended in 2018 to add third trimester repeat HIV screening. The objectives of this analysis were to describe uptake of, and patient factors associated with, third trimester repeat HIV testing at a high-volume birthing center.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of people who delivered at a single tertiary care hospital in Illinois during 2018. Women who delivered before 27 weeks, had an intrauterine fetal demise, a known diagnosis of HIV, or no HIV test during pregnancy were excluded. Repeat testing was defined as an HIV test at or after 27 weeks' gestation after an earlier negative HIV test during the same pregnancy. The primary outcome was the proportion of people who received repeat testing prior to delivery. Bivariable analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with documentation of repeat HIV testing.

RESULTS

Of 12,053 people eligible for inclusion, 3.4% (n = 414) presented without a documented third trimester repeat HIV test. The proportion of people with repeat testing improved from 80 to >99% in the first year. Patient factors were largely not associated with testing performance although multiparous people were more likely to have documented repeat testing.

CONCLUSION

Rapid implementation of third trimester repeat HIV testing was achieved without disparity. Patient factors were largely not associated with testing performance which reinforces the goal of a universal screen to test all people equitably and effectively without bias.

KEY POINTS

· Little is known about adherence to repeat third trimester HIV testing in pregnancy.. · Universal third trimester HIV screening was implemented with high uptake and without disparity.. · Protocolization of repeat HIV testing in pregnancy may reduce bias compared to risk based-screening..

HIV testing during pregnancy among women with a recent live birth-Seven US States, 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

Although the United States has made progress in reducing the transmission of HIV from mother-to-child, it has not yet met the goal of reducing such transmissions to 70%. Self-reported HIV testing varied by state of residence. Approximately, two in three women reported that their health care provider asked them about HIV testing during prenatal care, and 82.3% of those asked reported receipt of a test.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was (1) to examine the prevalence of receipt of an HIV test during pregnancy and (2) to examine differences in HIV testing during pregnancy by race/ethnicity, state of residence, and other sociodemographic characteristics.

DESIGN

Population-based surveillance of women with a recent live birth from seven US states. Individuals were sampled from birth certificate records 2-6 months postpartum and surveyed about their behaviors and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy.

METHODS

Data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a large, population-based survey, were used to estimate the prevalence of HIV testing during pregnancy during 2016-2019. Weighted prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated overall and by demographic and other selected characteristics.

RESULTS

Approximately two-thirds of women (66.1%) self-reported having a test for HIV during pregnancy. Prevalence varied by maternal characteristics and was highest among women who were non-Hispanic Black (80.7%) and among women who were aged ⩽ 24 years, had a high school education or less, were unmarried, or had Medicaid or no insurance for prenatal care (each > 70%). Self-reported HIV testing varied by state of residence. Approximately two in three women reported that their health care provider asked them about HIV testing during prenatal care, and 82.3% of those asked reported receipt of a test.

CONCLUSION

About one in three Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System respondents did not report an HIV test during pregnancy. Health care providers can help educate pregnant patients about the importance of HIV testing and ensure universal testing to help identify individuals needing treatment and reduce the rates of mother-to-child HIV transmission.

Pregnancy outcomes and pharmacokinetics in pregnant women living with HIV exposed to long‐acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine in clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on pregnant women living with HIV exposed to cabotegravir + rilpivirine (CAB + RPV). Outcomes in pregnant participants exposed to CAB + RPV, and pharmacokinetic washout data in those exposed to CAB + RPV long-acting (LA) with live births, are presented.

METHODS

Women exposed to one or more doses of CAB + RPV (oral/LA) from ViiV Healthcare-sponsored phase 2b/3/3b clinical trials and the compassionate use programme who became pregnant were included. Upon pregnancy in the trial programme, CAB + RPV was discontinued, an alternative antiretroviral regimen was initiated, and quarterly pharmacokinetic sampling for 52 weeks post-last injection was obtained. CAB + RPV continuation or alternative antiretroviral regimen initiation was decided by pregnant compassionate use programme participants and their treating physicians.

RESULTS

As of 31 March 2021, 25 pregnancies following CAB + RPV exposure at conception were reported (five oral, 20 LA), including four who conceived during pharmacokinetic washout following treatment discontinuation. There were eight elective abortions, six miscarriages (five in first trimester), one ectopic pregnancy, and 10 live births (one oral, nine LA), including one infant born with congenital ptosis. Among participants exposed to CAB + RPV LA at conception with live births, plasma CAB and RPV washout concentrations during pregnancy were within the range of those observed in non-pregnant women.

CONCLUSION

In this first analysis of pregnancy outcomes following CAB + RPV exposure at conception, 10 live births, including one with congenital anomaly, were reported. Plasma CAB and RPV washout concentrations during pregnancy were within the range of those in non-pregnant women. Pregnancy surveillance within ViiV Healthcare-sponsored clinical trials is ongoing, with dedicated pregnancy studies planned.

Identifying barriers and facilitators of the inclusion of pregnant individuals in hepatitis C treatment programs in the United States

BACKGROUND

The rising prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and the availability of direct acting antivirals for HCV treatment has prompted a public health goal of HCV eradication. Despite the availability of treatment for HCV, treatment programs have generally excluded pregnant individuals. Our objective was to query patients and clinicians to identify barriers to including pregnant individuals in HCV treatment programs.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This qualitative investigation included obstetricians and previously/currently pregnant individuals with HCV. Participants completed interviews regarding knowledge of and attitudes towards HCV treatment and perceived barriers to treatment during pregnancy. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Obstetricians (N = 18) and patients (N = 21) described concerns about equity, access, and cost. Both expressed uncertainty about safety and confirmed a need for clinician education. Obstetricians emphasized the lack of professional guidelines. Although some clinicians expressed concern about patient adherence and engagement, patients were largely desirous of treatment; both groups identified potential benefits of antenatal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both patients and obstetricians were generally receptive to HCV treatment in pregnancy and recognized pregnancy as an important window of opportunity for treatment. Our findings suggest the need for further research on maternal-fetal safety of HCV treatment as well as on interventions to ensure fair and appropriate access to HCV treatment for pregnant individuals.

Barriers and facilitators to HIV and syphilis rapid diagnostic testing in antenatal care settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Testing and treatment during pregnancy is a well-established and cost-effective prevention strategy, which relies largely on use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). Yet, in many low-income and-middle-income countries, the uptake of RDTs is suboptimal. A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted to identify the barriers and enablers to use of HIV and syphilis RDTs among pregnant women in low-income and middle-income countries.

METHODS

This review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed publications, which used qualitative methods to explore HIV and syphilis RDT in antenatal care clinics in low-income and middle-income countries. Studies focusing on perspectives of pregnant women, healthcare workers and/or stakeholders were included. We used an inductive approach informed by a modified socioecological model to synthesise the data.

RESULTS

62 manuscripts met the eligibility criteria. For pregnant women, initial acceptance of the RDT and continuation in antenatal care depends on the perception that engaging in testing will be a beneficial experience for their baby and themselves, often influenced by the provision of services that are gender-sensitive, confidential, respectful, flexible and considers their well-being into the future. Local sociocultural beliefs about pregnancy and diseases, awareness of diseases and gender roles in society also influenced RDT acceptability among pregnant women. For healthcare workers, the ability to provide high-quality RDT care required ongoing training, accurate and easy to use tests, support from supervisors and communities, sufficient resources and staffing to provide services, and reliable salary. At the stakeholder level, well-developed guidelines and health system infrastructures were imperative to the delivery of RDT in antenatal clinics.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight clear gaps to the provision of sustainable and culturally acceptable maternal HIV and/or syphilis screening using RDTs. In addition, greater attention needs to be paid to community stakeholders in promoting the uptake of RDT in antenatal clinics.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018112190.

Melhores práticas de gestão no cuidado ao HIV: scoping review

RESUMO Este estudo objetivou mapear e examinar as melhores práticas de gestão do HIV disponíveis nas publicações científicas da área da saúde. Realizou-se revisão sistemática da literatura por meio de scoping review, nas bases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cinahl, Lilacs e Catálogo de Teses e Dissertações da Capes, no período de 2009 a julho de 2020. Dos 427 estudos identificados, 19 foram incluídos, e apesar de não explicitar um conceito de melhor prática, apresentam práticas de gestão do HIV expressas como uma melhor prática por meio da avaliação de estratégias, ferramentas, serviços de saúde, programas de saúde, intervenções e ações que contribuíram para uma melhoria de uma determinada condição de saúde na prevenção e cuidado em HIV. As práticas identificadas nos estudos com uma ‘melhor prática’ justificam-se pela análise dos aspectos de avaliação, os quais expressaram modificações positivas, contribuindo para melhorias das práticas de gestão do HIV. Acredita-se que esses achados podem subsidiar a construção de políticas públicas em diferentes cenários e a instituição de práticas de saúde que visem à melhoria da qualidade das ações direcionadas à gestão do HIV.

Best management practices in HIV care: scoping review

ABSTRACT This study aimed to map and examine the best HIV management practices available in scientific publications in the health field. A systematic literature review was carried out through scoping review, on the basis of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, LILACS, and CAPES Thesis and Dissertations Catalog, from 2009 to July 2020. From the 427 identified studies, 19 were included, and although it does not explain a concept of best practice, they present HIV management practices expressed as a best practice through the evaluation of strategies, tools, health services, health programs, interventions, and actions that contributed to an improvement of a given health condition in HIV prevention and care. The practices identified in the studies with a ‘best practice’ are justified by the analysis of the evaluation aspects, which expressed positive changes, contributing to improvements in HIV management practices. It is believed that these findings can support the construction of public policies in different scenarios and the establishment of health practices that seek to improve the quality of actions aimed at managing HIV.

Third-trimester repeat HIV testing: it is time we make it universal

Since the 1990s, perinatal transmission of HIV has decreased substantially, largely as a result of improved detection secondary to routine HIV screening in pregnancy and the use of antiretroviral therapy. However, despite reductions in HIV transmission, elimination of perinatal transmission, defined as an incidence of perinatal HIV infection of <1 per 100,000 live births and a transmission rate of <1%, remains elusive. An estimated 80% of perinatal transmissions occur after 36 weeks' gestation, which highlights the importance of diagnosis and treatment of maternal HIV infection before the highest-risk period for perinatal transmission. With timely identification of seroconversion, intrapartum and neonatal interventions can lower the risk of perinatal transmission from 25% to 10%, substantially reducing perinatal transmission events. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that routine HIV testing be performed in all pregnancies, as early in the prenatal course as possible. Third-trimester repeat testing is only recommended for individuals known to be at high risk of acquiring HIV (ie, those who are incarcerated; who reside in jurisdictions with elevated HIV incidence; who are receiving care in facilities that have an HIV incidence in pregnant women > 1 per 1000 per year; or have signs or symptoms of acute HIV). However, among reproductive-age women, heterosexual intercourse is the most common mode of HIV transmission, and the risk of HIV seroconversion is greater during pregnancy than outside of pregnancy. Furthermore, state statutes for HIV testing in pregnancy are largely lacking. In this clinical opinion, we reviewed the evidence in support of universal third-trimester repeat HIV testing in pregnancy using a successful state-mandated testing program in Illinois. In addition, we provided clinical recommendations to further reduce missed perinatal transmission cases by implementing universal third-trimester repeat testing, obtaining hospital buy-in, monitoring testing adherence, bridging communications across multidisciplinary teams, and engaging clinicians in advocacy work.

Home Birth in the Era of COVID-19: Counseling and Preparation for Pregnant Persons Living with HIV

With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States, a majority of states have instituted "shelter-in-place" policies effectively quarantining individuals-including pregnant persons-in their homes. Given the concern for COVID-19 acquisition in health care settings, pregnant persons with high-risk pregnancies-such as persons living with HIV (PLHIV)-are increasingly investigating the option of a home birth. Although we strongly recommend hospital birth for PLHIV, we discuss our experience and recommendations for counseling and preparation of pregnant PLHIV who may be considering home birth or at risk for unintentional home birth due to the pandemic. We also discuss issues associated with implementing a risk mitigation strategy involving high-risk births occurring at home during a pandemic. KEY POINTS: · Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in home birth.. · Women living with HIV are pursuing home birth.. · Safe planning is paramount for women living with HIV desiring home birth, despite recommending against the practice..

A need for implementation science to optimise the use of evidence-based interventions in HIV care: A systematic literature review

To improve health outcomes in people living with HIV, adoption of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) using effective and transferable implementation strategies to optimise the delivery of healthcare is needed. ViiV Healthcare's Positive Pathways initiative was established to support the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals. A compendium of EBIs was developed to address gaps within the HIV care continuum, yet it was unknown whether efforts existed to adapt and implement these EBIs across diverse clinical contexts. Therefore, this review sought to report on the use of implementation science in adapting HIV continuum of care EBIs. A systematic literature review was undertaken to summarise the evaluation of implementation and effectiveness outcomes, and report on the use of implementation science in HIV care. Ten databases were reviewed to identify studies (time-period: 2013-2018; geographic scope: United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Canada, Australia and Europe; English only publications). Studies were included if they reported on people living with HIV or those at risk of acquiring HIV and used interventions consistent with the EBIs. A broad range of study designs and methods were searched, including hybrid designs. Overall, 118 publications covering 225 interventions consistent with the EBIs were identified. These interventions were evaluated on implementation (N = 183), effectiveness (N = 81), or both outcomes (N = 39). High variability in the methodological approaches was observed. Implementation outcomes were frequently evaluated but use of theoretical frameworks was limited (N = 13). Evaluations undertaken to assess effectiveness were inconsistent, resulting in a range of measures. This review revealed extensive reporting on implementation science as defined using evaluation outcomes. However, high variability was observed in how implementation outcomes and effectiveness were defined, quantified, and reported. A more specific and consistent approach to conducting and reporting on implementation science in HIV could facilitate achievement of UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets.