Comparisons of New HIV Rapid Test Kit Performance

Rapid tests should be used with caution for HIV-1 primary infection screening

Rapid tests allow outpatient, low cost, reliable, screening for chronic HIV infection. However, data regarding their sensitivity on primary infection remain scarce. The objective of this study was to assess sensitivity of nine HIV rapid tests for primary HIV-1 infection screening. Seventy-five serum samples from patients during HIV-1 primary infection were included. Primary infection was diagnosed by a positive 4th generation ELISA and HIV-1 RNA positivity confirmed by Western blot patterns associated with HIV-1 primary infection. Early seroconversion was defined as the absence of antibodies on HIV-1 Western blot associated with HIV-1 RNA and p24-antigen positivity. An identical sensitivity (95% CI) of 76.7% (65.2-84.2%) was observed for HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK® Assay (STAT-PAK), INSTI™ HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody Test (INSTI), SURE CHECK® HIV 1/2 (SURE CHECK) and MULTISURE HIV rapid test (MULTISURE) with visual reading. Sensitivity was 74.7% (63.8-83.1%) for MULTISURE (automatic reading), 77.0% (66.3-85.1%) for FIRST RESPONSE® Test VIH 1-2.O CARTE (FIRST RESPONSE), 83.8% (73.8-90.5%) for VIKIA HIV1/2® (VIKIA), 88.0% (78.7-93.6%) for Genie™ Fast HIV 1/2 (Genie Fast), 88.6% (79.0-94.1%) for Hexagon HIV (Hexagon), and 92.8% (83.6-96.3%) for Exacto® TEST HIV Pro (Exacto). However, rapid tests performed poorly for the early seroconversion subgroup (n = 14), with sensitivities ranging from 7% (1.3-31.5%) for STAT-PAK, INSTI, SURE CHECK, MULTISURE (automatic reading), to 29% (12-55%) for FIRST RESPONSE, 31% (13-58%) for VIKIA, 43% (21-67%) for Hexagon and 57.1% (32.6-78.6%) for Exacto and Genie Fast. Overall, despite significant discrepancies in sensitivity, HIV rapid tests should be used with caution in the context of a suspected primary infection.

Rectal douching in a community sample of men and women

Rectal douching (RD) may be a vector for sexually transmitted infection (STI) acquisition. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between RD, and the prevalence of various STIs and sexual behaviors in a sample of women and men in Long Beach, California. Five hundred and forty-seven men (mean age 42.8 years) and 530 women (mean age 37 years) recruited from a community-based setting between April 2010 and August 2014 completed the Risk Behavior Assessment and a questionnaire eliciting information on use of lubricants and enemas for vaginal intercourse (VI) and anal intercourse (AI). Participants were screened for high-risk behaviors for human immunodeficiency virus infection including injection drug use. Bivariate analyses were conducted separately for women and men. Based on the empirical results, separate logistic regression models for women and men were constructed. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model fit for reduced samples of only those men and women who reported AI. For men, RD was associated with a lower odds of being hepatitis C antibody positive, greater odds of being positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, syphilis, and using lubricants for receptive anal intercourse (RAI). RD in women was associated with higher odds of a positive test for syphilis, ever vaginally douching for VI, and using lubricants for RAI. Men and women who practice RD report positive syphilis test results and use of lubricants for RAI. RD should not be perceived as preventing STIs.