Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy jenson-shannon divergence and its application in multi-attribute decision making

A multiattribute group decision-making method based on a new aggregation operator and the means and variances of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values

The development of information measures associated with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values (IVIFVs) has been an important research area over the past few decades. In the literature, the existing decision -making method using IVIFVs has some drawbacks, and the identification degree and information utilization suffer from a gap in the evaluation of alternatives. Therefore, the need for a reliable, useful, and comprehensive decision method is obvious. To obtain more accurate and reliable evaluation results, multiattribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, where the same attribute weights given by different decision-makers are different, are studied in this paper. First, the novel operational laws of IVIFVs and a new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted arithmetic aggregation operator are defined to overcome the drawbacks of the IIFWA aggregation operator and avoid losing or distorting the original decision information in the process of aggregation. Second, the mean and variance of the possibility degrees of IVIFVs are defined based on the concept of a definite integral. Third, a novel MAGDM method based on the new aggregation operator and the mean and variance of the possibility degrees of IVIFVs is proposed to improve the identification of the evaluation results and ensure the effectiveness of the ranking order. Finally, the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method are verified by an air combat training accuracy assessment example. This example can be used to assist decision-makers in evaluating air combat training hits in a timely and efficient manner, providing an objective, scientific basis for the realization and application of air combat training hit assessment and a new method and idea for MAGDM problems in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment.

An Innovative Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach under Picture Fuzzy Information

These days, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches play a vital role in making decisions considering multiple criteria. Among these approaches, the picture fuzzy soft set model is emerging as a powerful mathematical tool for handling various kinds of uncertainties in complex real-life MCDM situations because it is a combination of two efficient mathematical tools, namely, picture fuzzy sets and soft sets. However, the picture fuzzy soft set model is deficient; that is, it fails to tackle information symmetrically in a bipolar soft environment. To overcome this difficulty, in this paper, a model named picture fuzzy bipolar soft sets (PRFBSSs, for short) is proposed, which is a natural hybridization of two models, namely, picture fuzzy sets and bipolar soft sets. An example discussing the selection of students for a scholarship is added to illustrate the initiated model. Some novel properties of PRFBSSs such as sub-set, super-set, equality, complement, relative null and absolute PRFBSSs, extended intersection and union, and restricted intersection and union are investigated. Moreover, two fundamental operations of PRFBSSs, namely, the AND and OR operations, are studied. Thereafter, some new results (De Morgan’s law, commutativity, associativity, and distributivity) related to these proposed notions are investigated and explained through corresponding numerical examples. An algorithm is developed to deal with uncertain information in the PRFBSS environment. To show the efficacy and applicability of the initiated technique, a descriptive numerical example regarding the selection of the best graphic designer is explored under PRFBSSs. In the end, concerning both qualitative and quantitative perspectives, a detailed comparative analysis of the initiated model with certain existing models is provided.

An Evidential Software Risk Evaluation Model

Software risk management is an important factor in ensuring software quality. Therefore, software risk assessment has become a significant and challenging research area. The aim of this study is to establish a data-driven software risk assessment model named DDERM. In the proposed model, experts’ risk assessments of probability and severity can be transformed into basic probability assignments (BPAs). Deng entropy was used to measure the uncertainty of the evaluation and to calculate the criteria weights given by experts. In addition, the adjusted BPAs were fused using the rules of Dempster–Shafer evidence theory (DST). Finally, a risk matrix was used to get the risk priority. A case application demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method. The proposed risk modeling framework is a novel approach that provides a rational assessment structure for imprecision in software risk and is applicable to solving similar risk management problems in other domains.