1
|
Xie F, Shen J, Liu T, Zhou M, Johnston LJ, Zhao J, Zhang H, Ma X. Sensation of dietary nutrients by gut taste receptors and its mechanisms. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2022; 63:5594-5607. [PMID: 34978220 DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.2021388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Nutrients sensing is crucial for fundamental metabolism and physiological functions, and it is also an essential component for maintaining body homeostasis. Traditionally, basic taste receptors exist in oral cavity to sense sour, sweet, bitter, umami, salty and et al. Recent studies indicate that gut can sense the composition of nutrients by activating relevant taste receptors, thereby exerting specific direct or indirect effects. Gut taste receptors, also named as intestinal nutrition receptors, including at least bitter, sweet and umami receptors, have been considered to be activated by certain nutrients and participate in important intestinal physiological activities such as eating behavior, intestinal motility, nutrient absorption and metabolism. Additionally, gut taste receptors can regulate appetite and body weight, as well as maintain homeostasis via targeting hormone secretion or regulating the gut microbiota. On the other hand, malfunction of gut taste receptors may lead to digestive disorders, and then result in obesity, type 2 diabetes and gastrointestinal diseases. At present, researchers have confirmed that the brain-gut axis may play indispensable roles in these diseases via the secretion of brain-gut peptides, but the mechanism is still not clear. In this review, we summarize the current observation of knowledge in gut taste systems in order to shed light on revealing their important nutritional functions and promoting clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiakun Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianyi Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Min Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Lee J Johnston
- West Central Research & Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jingwen Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongfu Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sudakov S, Bogdanova N. Involvement of Peripheral Opioid Receptors in the Realization of Food Motivation Into Eating Behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 14:600920. [PMID: 33510624 PMCID: PMC7835398 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.600920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The involvement of peripheral opioid receptors in the mechanisms of eating behavior is still unclear. The aim of this work was to study the role of peripheral, predominantly gastric mu and delta opioid receptors in the realization of food motivation in conditions of different energy costs for eating behavior. Experiments were performed under a between-sessions progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in food-deprived rats. The level of food motivation was calculated using a self-developed method. Food intake, motor activity, and metabolic rate were recorded in fed and hungry animals. Results showed that intragastric administration of the mu opioid receptor agonist DAMGO led to an increase in the level of food motivation in the light variant of operant feeding behaviors. Food consumption did not change. At high costs for feeding behavior, the administration of DAMGO did not alter food motivation; however, food consumption and motor activity were reduced. Intragastric administration of the delta opioid receptor agonist DADLE did not lead to changes in the level of food motivation and physical activity, but inhibition of feeding behavior was observed in all reinforcement schedules. Three regulatory pathways of eating behavior in difficult food conditions by peripheral, predominantly gastric opioid receptors are hypothesized: environmental-inhibitory afferentations and suppression of the realization of food motivation into behavior; homeostatic-inhibitory action on food motivation; and rewarding-suppression of the anticipatory reinforcement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Sudakov
- Laboratory of Physiology of Reinforcement, P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia Bogdanova
- Laboratory of Physiology of Reinforcement, P.K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simon MJ, Zafra MA, Puerto A. Differential rewarding effects of electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and parabrachial complex: Functional characterization and the relevance of opioid systems and dopamine. J Psychopharmacol 2019; 33:1475-1490. [PMID: 31282233 DOI: 10.1177/0269881119855982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the discovery of rewarding intracranial self-stimulation by Olds and Milner, extensive data have been published on the biological basis of reward. Although participation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system is well documented, its precise role has not been fully elucidated, and some authors have proposed the involvement of other neural systems in processing specific aspects of reinforced behaviour. AIMS AND METHODS We reviewed published data, including our own findings, on the rewarding effects induced by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and of the external lateral parabrachial area (LPBe) - a brainstem region involved in processing the rewarding properties of natural and artificial substances - and compared its functional characteristics as observed in operant and non-operant behavioural procedures. RESULTS Brain circuits involved in the induction of preferences for stimuli associated with electrical stimulation of the LBPe appear to functionally and neurochemically differ from those activated by electrical stimulation of the LH. INTERPRETATION We discuss the possible involvement of the LPBe in processing emotional-affective aspects of the brain reward system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J Simon
- Department of Psychobiology, Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Maria A Zafra
- Department of Psychobiology, Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Amadeo Puerto
- Department of Psychobiology, Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bodnar RJ. Endogenous opioid modulation of food intake and body weight: Implications for opioid influences upon motivation and addiction. Peptides 2019; 116:42-62. [PMID: 31047940 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This review is part of a special issue dedicated to Opioid addiction, and examines the influential role of opioid peptides, opioid receptors and opiate drugs in mediating food intake and body weight control in rodents. This review postulates that opioid mediation of food intake was an example of "positive addictive" properties that provide motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior and that are not subject to the "negative addictive" properties associated with tolerance, dependence and withdrawal. Data demonstrate that opiate and opioid peptide agonists stimulate food intake through homeostatic activation of sensory, metabolic and energy-related In contrast, general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists typically block these homeostatically-driven ingestive behaviors. Intake of palatable and hedonic food stimuli is inhibited by general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists. The selectivity of specific opioid agonists to elicit food intake was confirmed through the use of opioid receptor antagonists and molecular knockdown (antisense) techniques incapacitating specific exons of opioid receptor genes. Further extensive evidence demonstrated that homeostatic and hedonic ingestive situations correspondingly altered the levels and expression of opioid peptides and opioid receptors. Opioid mediation of food intake was controlled by a distributed brain network intimately related to both the appetitive-consummatory sites implicated in food intake as well as sites intimately involved in reward and reinforcement. This emergent system appears to sustain the "positive addictive" properties providing motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, United States; Psychology Doctoral Program and CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sudakov SK. Physiology and Pharmacology of Positive Reinforcement. Bull Exp Biol Med 2019; 166:709-713. [PMID: 31020579 DOI: 10.1007/s10517-019-04423-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
An original concept of a two-stage mechanism of positive reinforcement is proposed. The first stage, "virtual" reinforcement, is formed in parallel with the action result acceptor when the result is still not achieved. At this stage, the importance of the planned result and the probability of its achievement are assessed. The greater are these indices, the stronger is "virtual" reinforcement. Hypothetically, the "virtual" reinforcement is mediated by dopamine release from nerve terminals in the mesencephalon. The "real" reinforcement (the second stage) occurs after achievement of the result. Probably, an important role in the mechanisms of the "real" reinforcement is given to endogenous opioids, cannabinoids, and GABA. Based on the advanced hypothesis on interaction between the central and peripheral subdivisions of the corresponding neurochemical systems, the review focuses on possibility of pharmacological intervention into the mechanisms of positive reinforcement by modifying activity of the peripheral opioid and dopamine receptors with the ligands that cannot cross blood-brain barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Sudakov
- P. K. Anokhin Research Institute of Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
This paper is the thirty-eighth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2015 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia, stress and social status, tolerance and dependence, learning and memory, eating and drinking, drug abuse and alcohol, sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology, mental illness and mood, seizures and neurologic disorders, electrical-related activity and neurophysiology, general activity and locomotion, gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions, cardiovascular responses, respiration and thermoregulation, and immunological responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, United States.
| |
Collapse
|