Physiology and Pharmacology of Positive Reinforcement

Animals in Animal-Assisted Services: Are They Volunteers or Professionals?

With the increasingly common practice of Animal-Assisted Services (AAS), whether in therapy, coaching, education, or volunteering programs, the concern over animal welfare has also risen. However, no standards have yet been established for good practices to ensure the animal’s mental health. This is largely due to the wide variety of roles played by animals in interventions and the lack of ‘job descriptions’ for the animal in diverse settings. Some professionals call their animal a ‘volunteer’, others mention that some directive guidance is given to the therapy animal, and some assistance animals are highly trained. Misunderstandings could be avoided if the integrated animal were to receive a justifiable label: volunteer or professional. Choosing either one comes with obligations for the owner, handler, or therapist. In this paper, we compare the roles of human volunteers and professionals to the roles of animals involved in therapy. We also demonstrate the obligations that come along with the decision to label animals as such either volunteers or professionals. Furthermore, we make a plea for animal-friendly interventions, whether in a volunteer position or as a professional, in order to stimulate the animal’s cooperation and motivation. Studying dopamine and translating the findings into context-ethograms can provide a way to judge behavior more objectively.

Involvement of Peripheral Opioid Receptors in the Realization of Food Motivation Into Eating Behavior

The involvement of peripheral opioid receptors in the mechanisms of eating behavior is still unclear. The aim of this work was to study the role of peripheral, predominantly gastric mu and delta opioid receptors in the realization of food motivation in conditions of different energy costs for eating behavior. Experiments were performed under a between-sessions progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in food-deprived rats. The level of food motivation was calculated using a self-developed method. Food intake, motor activity, and metabolic rate were recorded in fed and hungry animals. Results showed that intragastric administration of the mu opioid receptor agonist DAMGO led to an increase in the level of food motivation in the light variant of operant feeding behaviors. Food consumption did not change. At high costs for feeding behavior, the administration of DAMGO did not alter food motivation; however, food consumption and motor activity were reduced. Intragastric administration of the delta opioid receptor agonist DADLE did not lead to changes in the level of food motivation and physical activity, but inhibition of feeding behavior was observed in all reinforcement schedules. Three regulatory pathways of eating behavior in difficult food conditions by peripheral, predominantly gastric opioid receptors are hypothesized: environmental-inhibitory afferentations and suppression of the realization of food motivation into behavior; homeostatic-inhibitory action on food motivation; and rewarding-suppression of the anticipatory reinforcement.