1
|
Camus L, Gautier M, Boitard S. Predicting species invasiveness with genomic data: Is genomic offset related to establishment probability? Evol Appl 2024; 17:e13709. [PMID: 38884022 PMCID: PMC11178484 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Predicting the risk of establishment and spread of populations outside their native range represents a major challenge in evolutionary biology. Various methods have recently been developed to estimate population (mal)adaptation to a new environment with genomic data via so-called Genomic Offset (GO) statistics. These approaches are particularly promising for studying invasive species but have still rarely been used in this context. Here, we evaluated the relationship between GO and the establishment probability of a population in a new environment using both in silico and empirical data. First, we designed invasion simulations to evaluate the ability to predict establishment probability of two GO computation methods (Geometric GO and Gradient Forest) under several conditions. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the interpretability of absolute Geometric GO values, which theoretically represent the adaptive genetic distance between populations from distinct environments. Second, utilizing public empirical data from the crop pest species Bactrocera tryoni, a fruit fly native from Northern Australia, we computed GO between "source" populations and a diverse range of locations within invaded areas. This practical application of GO within the context of a biological invasion underscores its potential in providing insights and guiding recommendations for future invasion risk assessment. Overall, our results suggest that GO statistics represent good predictors of the establishment probability and may thus inform invasion risk, although the influence of several factors on prediction performance (e.g., propagule pressure or admixture) will need further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Camus
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, L'institut Agro, Université de Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Mathieu Gautier
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, L'institut Agro, Université de Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Simon Boitard
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, L'institut Agro, Université de Montpellier Montpellier France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kean JM, Manoukis NC, Dominiak BC. Review of surveillance systems for tephritid fruit fly threats in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 2024; 117:8-23. [PMID: 38141199 PMCID: PMC10860160 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toad228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Many countries conduct fruit fly surveillance but, while there are guidelines, practices vary widely. This review of some countries in the Pacific region demonstrates the diversity of fruit fly surveillance practices. All utilize 3 parapheromones-trimedlure, cuelure, and methyl eugenol-to trap adult male fruit flies. Some target species are not attracted to these compounds so other attractants such as food-based lures are used in certain areas or circumstances. Lure loading and replacement cycles depend on the target species and the local climate. Malathion and dichlorvos (DDVP) are commonly used toxicants, but not in all countries, and other toxicants are being developed to replace these older-generation pesticides. Jackson and Lynfield are commonly used trap designs but newer designs such as cone and Biotrap are being adopted. Local factors such as chemical registrations and climate affect the choice of trap, lure, dispenser, toxicant, and bait concentration. These choices affect the efficacy of traps, in turn influencing optimal trap deployment in space and time. Most states now follow similar practices around trap inspection, servicing, and data handling, but these processes will be disrupted by emerging automated trap technologies. Ultimately, different practices can be attributed to the unique fruit fly risk profiles faced by each state, particularly the suite of fruit flies already present and those that threaten from nearby. Despite the diversity of approaches, international trade in fruit continues with the assurance that fruit fly surveillance practices evolve and improve according to each country's risk profile and incursion experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Kean
- Ruakura Science Centre, AgResearch, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand
| | - Nicholas C Manoukis
- Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 64 Nowelo St, Hilo 96720, HI, USA
| | - Bernie C Dominiak
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, The Ian Armstrong Building, 105 Prince St, Orange 2800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Liu S, De Meyer M, Liao Z, Zhao Y, Virgilio M, Feng S, Qin Y, Singh S, Wee SL, Jiang F, Guo S, Li H, Deschepper P, Vanbergen S, Delatte H, van Sauers-Muller A, Syamsudin TS, Kawi AP, Kasina M, Badji K, Said F, Liu L, Zhao Z, Li Z. Genomes of the cosmopolitan fruit pest Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) reveal its global invasion history and thermal adaptation. J Adv Res 2023; 53:61-74. [PMID: 36574947 PMCID: PMC10658297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis is one of the most destructive agricultural pests worldwide, with highly debated species delimitation, origin, and global spread routes. OBJECTIVES Our study intended to (i) resolve the taxonomic uncertainties between B. dorsalis and B. carambolae, (ii) reveal the population structure and global invasion routes of B. dorsalis across Asia, Africa, and Oceania, and (iii) identify genomic regions that are responsible for the thermal adaptation of B. dorsalis. METHODS Based on a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome assembly, we explored the population relationship using a genome-scale single nucleotide polymorphism dataset generated from the resequencing data of 487 B. dorsalis genomes and 25 B. carambolae genomes. Genome-wide association studies and silencing using RNA interference were used to identify and verify the candidate genes associated with extreme thermal stress. RESULTS We showed that B. dorsalis originates from the Southern India region with three independent invasion and spread routes worldwide: (i) from Northern India to Northern Southeast Asia, then to Southern Southeast Asia; (ii) from Northern India to Northern Southeast Asian, then to China and Hawaii; and (iii) from Southern India toward the African mainland, then to Madagascar, which is mainly facilitated by human activities including trade and immigration. Twenty-seven genes were identified by a genome-wide association study to be associated with 11 temperature bioclimatic variables. The Cyp6a9 gene may enhance the thermal adaptation of B. dorsalis and thus boost its invasion, which tended to be upregulated at a hardening temperature of 38 °C. Functional verification using RNA interference silencing against Cyp6a9, led to the specific decrease in Cyp6a9 expression, reducing the survival rate of dsRNA-feeding larvae exposed to extreme thermal stress of 45 °C after heat hardening treatments in B. dorsalis. CONCLUSION This study provides insights into the evolutionary history and genetic basis of temperature adaptation in B. dorsalis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhang
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Shanlin Liu
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Marc De Meyer
- Royal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium
| | - Zuxing Liao
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yan Zhao
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Massimiliano Virgilio
- Royal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium
| | - Shiqian Feng
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yujia Qin
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Sandeep Singh
- Department of Fruit Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Suk Ling Wee
- Centre for Insect Systematics, Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Fan Jiang
- Institute of Plant Quarantine, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing 100176, China
| | - Shaokun Guo
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Hu Li
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Pablo Deschepper
- Royal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium
| | - Sam Vanbergen
- Royal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren B3080, Belgium
| | | | | | - Tati Suryati Syamsudin
- School of Life Science and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
| | | | - Muo Kasina
- Apiculture Research Institute, P.O. Box 32-40302, Marigat, Kenya
| | - Kemo Badji
- Crop Protection Directorate, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Fazal Said
- Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Lijun Liu
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zihua Zhao
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zhihong Li
- College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Management for Plant Quarantine Pests, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoskins JL, Rempoulakis P, Stevens MM, Dominiak BC. Biosecurity and Management Strategies for Economically Important Exotic Tephritid Fruit Fly Species in Australia. INSECTS 2023; 14:801. [PMID: 37887813 PMCID: PMC10607784 DOI: 10.3390/insects14100801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Exotic tephritid incursions are of high concern to Australia's biosecurity and its horticultural industries. It is vital that Australia remains ready to respond to incursions as they arise, as an incursion of tephritid fruit fly species will result in significant economic losses. In this review, we compared Australian incursion management strategies for fruit flies with global management strategies and identified possible areas where improvements could be made in an Australian context. Overall, Australia has a good understanding of the main tephritid threats, of which Bactrocera species from across the Torres Strait (northern Australia) are of most concern. Effective tools for tephritid detection and early warning surveillance at points of entry are in place at ports and in horticultural areas Australia-wide and provide the basis for initiating biosecurity responses in the event of an incursion. Area-wide control measures used in successful eradication attempts globally are available for use in Australia. However, a specific tephritid emergency response plan identifying suitable response measures and control options for species of concern is not yet available. We have identified that Australia has the policies and management tools available to respond to an exotic tephritid incursion, but the speed at which this could be accomplished would be greatly improved by the development of species-specific emergency response plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L. Hoskins
- Yanco Agricultural Institute, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Private Mail Bag, Yanco, NSW 2703, Australia;
| | - Polychronis Rempoulakis
- Central Coast Primary Industries Centre, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Locked Bag 26, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia;
| | - Mark M. Stevens
- Yanco Agricultural Institute, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Private Mail Bag, Yanco, NSW 2703, Australia;
| | - Bernard C. Dominiak
- The Ian Armstrong Building, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 105 Prince Street, Orange, NSW 2280, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hopper KR. Reduced-representation libraries in insect genetics. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2023; 59:101084. [PMID: 37442341 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2023.101084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Genotyping-by-sequencing of reduced-representation libraries has ushered in an era where genome-wide data can be gotten for any species. Here, I review research on this topic during the last two years, report meta-analysis of the results, and discuss analysis methods and issues. Scanning the literature from 2021 to 2022 identified 21 papers, the majority of which were on population differences, including local adaptation and migration, but several papers were on genetic maps and their use in assembly scaffolding or analysis of quantitative trait loci, on the origin of incursions of pest insects, or on infection rates of a pathogen in a disease vector. The research reviewed includes 33 species from 25 families and 11 orders. Meta-analysis showed that less than 16%, and most often, less than 1% of the genome was implicated in local adaptation and that the number of adaptive loci correlated with genetic divergence among populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith R Hopper
- Beneficial Insect Introductions Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Newark, DE, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sinclair BJ, Sørensen JG, Terblanche JS. Harnessing thermal plasticity to enhance the performance of mass-reared insects: opportunities and challenges. BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2022; 112:441-450. [PMID: 35346401 DOI: 10.1017/s0007485321000791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Insects are mass-reared for release for biocontrol including the sterile insect technique. Insects are usually reared at temperatures that maximize the number of animals produced, are chilled for handling and transport, and released into the field, where temperatures may be considerably different to those experienced previously. Insect thermal biology is phenotypically plastic (i.e. flexible), which means that there may exist opportunities to increase the performance of these programmes by modifying the temperature regimes during rearing, handling, and release. Here we synthesize the literature on thermal plasticity in relation to the opportunities to reduce temperature-related damage and increase the performance of released insects. We summarize how and why temperature affects insect biology, and the types of plasticity shown by insects. We specifically identify aspects of the production chain that might lead to mismatches between the thermal acclimation of the insect and the temperatures it is exposed to, and identify ways to harness physiological plasticity to reduce that potential mismatch. We address some of the practical (especially engineering) challenges to implementing some of the best-supported thermal regimes to maximize performance (e.g. fluctuating thermal regimes), and acknowledge that a focus only on thermal performance may lead to unwanted trade-offs with other traits that contribute to the success of the programme. Together, it appears that thermal physiological plasticity is well-enough understood to allow its implementation in release programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent J Sinclair
- Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada N6G 1L3
| | | | - John S Terblanche
- Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|