Are all aromatase inhibitors alike?

Interaction Between MUC1 and STAT1 Drives IFITM1 Overexpression in Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells and Mediates Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis

The human oncoprotein, mucin 1 (MUC1), drives tumorigenesis in breast carcinomas by promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), epigenetic reprogramming, and evasion of immune response. MUC1 interacts with STAT1, through JAK/STAT signaling, and stimulates transcription of IFN-stimulated genes, specifically IFN-induced transmembrane protein 1 (IFITM1). Our laboratory has previously shown that IFITM1 overexpression in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant breast cancer cells promotes aggressiveness. Here, we demonstrate that differential regulation of MUC1 in AI-sensitive (MCF-7 and T-47D) compared with AI-resistant (MCF-7:5C) cells is critical in mediating IFITM1 expression. A tumor microarray of 94 estrogen receptor-positive human breast tumors correlated coexpression of MUC1 and IFITM1 with poor recurrence-free survival, poor overall survival, and AI-resistance. In this study, we investigated the effects of MUC1/IFITM1 on cell survival and proliferation. We knocked down MUC1 levels with siRNA and pharmacologic inhibitors, which abrogated IFITM1 mRNA and protein expression and induced cell death in AI-resistant cells. In vivo, estrogen and ruxolitinib significantly reduced tumor size and decreased expression of MUC1, P-STAT1, and IFITM1. IMPLICATIONS: MUC1 and IFITM1 overexpression drives AI resistance and can be targeted with currently available therapies.Visual Overview: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/17/5/1180/F1.large.jpg.

Anastrozole and RU486: Effects on estrogen receptor α and Mucin 1 expression and correlation in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line

Anastrozole and RU486 are shown to reduce hormone-responsive breast cancer progression when used as adjuvant treatments to surgical intervention, however, a high incidence of cancer recurrence remains. Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and Mucin 1 (MUC1), a glycoprotein, are both implicated in breast cancer progression. We assessed whether Anastrozole and RU486 treatment affects the expression of, and relationship between, ERα and MUC1 in the ERα(+) MUC1(+) MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. MCF-7 cells, treated with physiological concentrations of either Anastrozole or RU486 for 18 h or 72 h, were subjected to immunolocalization of both markers. CellProfiler software was used to quantify intensity for statistical analyses. ERα expression increased at both time periods following treatment. MUC1 expression increased with RU486-treatment at both times, whereas Anastrozole induced increased MUC1 expression at 72 h only. The biomarkers demonstrated increased point association at 72 h within treatment groups despite MUC1 diverging from correlation with ERα. We propose that tumor progression is independent of MUC1 and ERα correlation. These preliminary results indicate that withdrawal of adjuvant treatment may result in residual cell populations expressing increased ERα and MUC1. This phenotype may allow enhanced estrogenic and metastatic capacity influencing cancer recurrence, a hypothesis we are investigating further.

Exemestane for breast cancer prevention: a critical shift?

The Mammary Prevention 3 (MAP.3) placebo-controlled randomized trial in 4,560 high-risk postmenopausal women showed a 65% reduction in invasive breast cancer with the use of exemestane at 35 months median follow-up. Few differences in adverse events were observed between the arms, suggesting a promising risk:benefit balance with exemestane for use in chemoprevention. Yet, the MAP.3 design and implementation raise concerns regarding limited data maturity and not prospectively including key bone-related and other toxicities as study end points. Exemestane for prevention is juxtaposed against selective estrogen receptor modulators and the other aromatase inhibitors. Additional issues for prevention, including the influence of obesity, alternative dosing, and biomarker use in phase III trials, are addressed.

SIGNIFICANCE

The recently completed MAP.3 trial of exemestane for breast cancer prevention offers a potential new standard for pharmaceutical risk reduction in high-risk postmenopausal women. In addition to describing key findings from the publication of MAP.3 and related trials, our review undertakes a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of MAP.3 as well as the implications for future prevention research.

[Hormone therapy and breast cancer]

The nuclear estrogen receptors (ER) are the major targets for endocrine treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancers. Hormone therapy blocked endogenous estrogen activation of ER, either by competitive inhibition of endogenous estrogens (selective estrogen receptor modulators - SERM or selective estrogen receptor down regulators - SERD) or by inhibition of estrogen synthesis (aromatase inhibitors) from adrenal androgens in post-menopausal women. The efficacy of these treatments has been shown on large series of breast cancer patients. However de novo or acquired resistance to treatment occurs. The better knowledge of the mechanism of action of such treatment may help to better understand them, and also for the determinism of adverse side effects of the different class of molecules.

Letrozole: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer

Letrozole (Femara) is a third-generation, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Adjuvant therapy with letrozole is more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer, and extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole after the completion of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is more effective than placebo in this patient population; letrozole is generally well tolerated. Ongoing trials will help answer outstanding questions regarding the optimal duration of letrozole therapy in early breast cancer and its efficacy compared with other third-generation aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole. In the meantime, letrozole should be considered a valuable option in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer, both as adjuvant and extended adjuvant therapy.