XRCC3 5′-UTR and IVS5-14 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

AR expression-independent XRCC3 mediates DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation against prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) resistance is closely associated with altered AR status. Aberrant AR expression is critical for the induction of ADT resistance, necessitating the identification of an anti-PCa target independent of AR expression.

METHODS

Transcriptomic data and clinical information of PRAD were obtained from TCGA database. Genes with PCa-related and AR expression-independent were screened by bioinformatics, and characterized by PPI and GO functional enrichment analyses. Candidate genes were locked by co-expression correlation and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses. A prognostic gene set was established using LASSO Cox regression algorithm. Cox proportional risk regression was performed to identify a key prognostic gene. Expression of the target protein in PCa tissues was verified by The Human Protein Atlas database. In vitro validation of cellular function and molecular mechanism by knockdown and overexpression of the target gene.

RESULTS

Two AR expression-independent genes (SLC43A1 and XRCC3) were available for the optimal prognostic model. This gene set effectively predicted PRAD patients' DFS at 1-, 3- and 5-year, where XRCC3 and tumor (T) stage were independent risk factors. XRCC3 was higher expressed in PRAD patients with T3-T4 stages and accompanied by poorer DFS. IHC staining also validated its higher expression in high-risk PCa tissues. In vitro experiments demonstrated that silencing XRCC3 significantly inhibited 22Rv1 and DU145 cell proliferation, migration and invasion, while promoted apoptosis. Further, silencing XRCC3 promoted DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation, which was absent with overexpression.

CONCLUSION

Silencing XRCC3 exerts anti-PCa effects by promoting DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation in an AR expression-independent manner.

The association between XRCC3 rs1799794 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 34 case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Studies on the XRCC3 rs1799794 polymorphism show that this polymorphism is involved in a variety of cancers, but its specific relationships or effects are not consistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between rs1799794 polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies through June 11, 2019. All analyses were performed with Stata 14.0. Subgroup analyses were performed by cancer type, ethnicity, source of control, and detection method. A total of 37 studies with 23,537 cases and 30,649 controls were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

XRCC3 rs1799794 increased cancer risk in the dominant model and heterozygous model (GG + AG vs. AA: odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.08, P = 0.051; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01, P = 0.015). The existence of rs1799794 increased the risk of breast cancer and thyroid cancer, but reduced the risk of ovarian cancer. In addition, rs1799794 increased the risk of cancer in the Caucasian population.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms that XRCC3 rs1799794 is related to cancer risk, especially increased risk for breast cancer and thyroid cancer and reduced risk for ovarian cancer. However, well-designed large-scale studies are required to further evaluate the results.

X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 and 3 polymorphisms and susceptibility of breast cancer in a Jordanian population

Objectives:

To elucidate the contribution of x-ray repair cross-complementing (XRCC) protein 1 399Gln, XRCC3 241M, and XRCC3-5’-UTR polymorphisms to the susceptibility of breast cancer (BC) in a Jordanian population.

Methods:

Forty-six formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples from BC diagnosed female patients, and 31 samples from the control group were subjected to DNA sequencing. Samples were collected between September 2013 and December 2014.

Results:

The XRCC1 Arg399Gln genotype did not exhibit any significant correlation with the susceptibility of BC (odds ratio [OR]=1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-3.51) (p=0.47). Likewise, XRCC3 M241T genotype did not show significant correlation with BC (OR=2.02, 95% CI: 0.50-8.21) (p=0.40). However, distribution of XRCC3-5’UTR (rs1799794 A/G) genotype showed a significant difference between the patient and control group (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.06-8.46) (p=0.02).

Conclusion:

The XRCC3-5’UTR (rs1799794) G allele frequency was higher in cancer patients while XRCC1 (rs25487) and XRCC3 (rs861539) did not show any significant correlation with susceptibility of BC in the selected Jordanian population. Contribution of other environmental factors should be studied in future works, as well as the response of cancer therapy.

NBN and XRCC3 genetic variants in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Nibrin and DNA repair protein XRCC3 are involved in DNA double-strand break repair. We genotyped seven tagging SNPs in these genes (rs1805794, rs709816; rs1063054; rs7141928, rs1799794, rs861530, rs861539) with the aim to analyse their association with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), a disease, that is characterised by elevated genetic instability. Study consisted of 460 paediatric ALL cases and 552 healthy controls. For selection of DNA sequence variants we employed SNP-tagging approach, incorporating the HAPMAP CEU reference panel data. We did not find association of analysed and tagged SNPs and derived haplotypes with the ALL risk thus did not confirm the hypothesis that analysed DNA recombination repair variants account for increased susceptibility to ALL.

XRCC3 and RAD51 expression are associated with clinical factors in breast cancer

AIMS

XRCC3 and RAD51 are two important members in homologous recombination repair pathway. This study was performed to detect the expressions of these two molecules in breast cancer and explore their correlations with clinicopathological factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry was used to detect protein expressions of XRCC3 and RAD51 in 248 cases of breast cancer tissue and 78 cases of adjacent non-cancerous tissue. Data showed that expressions for both XRCC3 and RAD51 were significantly increased in breast cancer. High XRCC3 expression was associated with large tumor size and positive PR and HER2 status, while high RAD51 expression was associated with axillary lymph node metastasis and positive PR and HER2 status. The result of multivariate analysis demonstrated that HER2, PR and RAD51 were significantly association with XRCC3. And besides XRCC3, axillary lymph node metastasis and PR were significantly correlated with RAD51.

CONCLUSIONS

XRCC3 and RAD51 were significantly associated with clinicopathological factors and they might play important roles in the development and progress of breast cancer.

Significant association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Many studies were published to examine the association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk, but their results were inconsistent. To assess the association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk more precisely, a meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, Embase and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant case-control studies. Data were extracted, and the pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Finally, seven studies comprising 2,288 cases with hepatocellular carcinoma and 3,249 controls were included into the meta-analysis. Overall, there was an obvious association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (TT versus CC: OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.52-7.19, P = 0.003; TT versus

CC/CT

OR = 3.31, 95% CI 1.81-6.06, P < 0.001). After adjusting for heterogeneity, there was still an obvious association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (TT versus CC: OR = 1.92, 95 % CI 1.13-3.26, P = 0.016; TT versus

CC/CT

OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.25-3.55, P = 0.005). Overall, there is a significant association between XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Further studies are needed to further assess the association in Caucasians.

Association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and lung cancer risk in the Asian population

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) plays a vital role in maintaining the stability of genome by homologous recombination repair for DNA double-strand breaks. The genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 C241T has been implicated in lung cancer risk, but the findings across published studies in Asians are inconsistent and inconclusive. To estimate the precise association of XRCC3 C241T polymorphism with lung cancer risk, a meta-analysis of all currently available studies in Asians was performed. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for eligible studies based on the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association. Besides, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed for further estimation. Seven available studies with a total of 7,398 subjects were finally included into this meta-analysis. The overall ORs indicated that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism was not associated with a lung cancer risk among Asians in all genetic contrast modes (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.95-1.24, P OR = 0.252; ORTT vs. CC = 1.30, 95 % CI 0.69-2.45, P OR = 0.426; ORCT vs. CC = 1.07, 95 % CI 0.93-1.24, P OR = 0.363; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.94-1.24, P OR = 0.300; ORTT vs. CC + CT = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.68-2.43, P OR = 0.439). We failed to identify significant association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and risk of lung cancer in Chinese and population-based studies. Interestingly, the pooled ORs in hospital-based studies indicated that the XRCC3 C241T variant carriers were more susceptible to lung cancer (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.04-1.56, P OR = 0.019; ORCT vs. CC = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.01-1.57, P OR = 0.045; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.28, 95 % CI 1.03-1.59, P OR = 0.027). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability and liability of all results. This meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism may not exert a risk effect on the lung cancer risk in Asians, although a statistically significant association was observed among the hospital-based studies. Thus, the precise relationship between the XRCC3 C241T variant and lung cancer risk needs further confirmation in future studies with large available data.

Comparative study and meta-analysis of meta-analysis studies for the correlation of genomic markers with early cancer detection

A large number of common disorders, including cancer, have complex genetic traits, with multiple genetic and environmental components contributing to susceptibility. A literature search revealed that even among several meta-analyses, there were ambiguous results and conclusions. In the current study, we conducted a thorough meta-analysis gathering the published meta-analysis studies previously reported to correlate any random effect or predictive value of genome variations in certain genes for various types of cancer. The overall analysis was initially aimed to result in associations (1) among genes which when mutated lead to different types of cancer (e.g. common metabolic pathways) and (2) between groups of genes and types of cancer. We have meta-analysed 150 meta-analysis articles which included 4,474 studies, 2,452,510 cases and 3,091,626 controls (5,544,136 individuals in total) including various racial groups and other population groups (native Americans, Latinos, Aborigines, etc.). Our results were not only consistent with previously published literature but also depicted novel correlations of genes with new cancer types. Our analysis revealed a total of 17 gene-disease pairs that are affected and generated gene/disease clusters, many of which proved to be independent of the criteria used, which suggests that these clusters are biologically meaningful.

Is there evidence of involvement of DNA repair polymorphisms in human cancer?

DNA suffers from a wide range of damage, both from extracellular agents and via endogenous mechanisms. Damage of DNA can lead to cancer and other diseases. Therefore, it is plausible that sequence variants in DNA repair genes are involved in cancer development. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis, based on the "Venice criteria", showed that out of 241 associations investigated, only three resulted to have a strong grade of cumulative evidence. These associations were: two SNPs rs1799793 and rs13181 in the ERCC2 gene and lung cancer (recessive model) and rs1805794 in the NBN gene and bladder cancer (dominant model). An update of this meta-analysis has been performed in the present paper, and we found partially inconsistent results. Inconsistencies in the literature are thus far not easy to explain. In addition, none of the cancer genome-wide association studies (GWAs) published so far showed highly statistically significant associations for any of the common DNA repair gene variants, in such a way as to place DNA repair genes among the top 10-20 hits identified in GWAs. Though this suggests that it is unlikely that DNA repair gene polymorphisms per se play a major role, a clarification of the discrepancies in the literature is needed. Also, gene/environment and gene/lifestyle interactions for the carcinogenic mechanisms involving DNA repair should be investigated more systematically and with less classification error. Finally, the combined effect of multiple SNPs in several genes in one or more relevant DNA repair pathways could have a greater impact on pathological phenotypes than SNPs in single genes, but this has been investigated only occasionally.

Polymorphism of THBS1 rs1478604 A>G in 5-untranslated region is associated with lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer in a Southeast Chinese population

Thrombospondin-1 plays an important role in cancer development and progression. This study investigated if a correlation exists between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Thrombospondin-1 gene (THBS1) and gastric cancer. We conducted a case-control study on a randomly recruited population of 283 patients and 283 healthy individuals from the city of Fuzhou in Southeast China. Individuals were genotyped for four SNPs (rs1478604 A>G, rs2228261 C>T, rs2292305 T>C, and rs3743125 C>T) in THBS1 using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. THBS1 genotypic distributions between the case and control groups were tested for correlations with cancer development. Comparisons between the case and control groups showed no significant differences in the genotypic distributions of rs1478604 A>G, rs2228261 C>T, and rs3743125 C>T. However, we found a statistically significant association between homozygous CC of THBS1 rs2292305 T>C and development of highly differentiated carcinoma (HDC). The rs1478604 A>G variant was found to be associated with invasion and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. After logistic regression and stratification analysis, rs1478604 A>G was more strongly associated with lymph node metastasis in HDC gastric cancer. The power to detect an effect for rs1478604 A>G in HDC was 90%. These findings indicate that the THBS1 rs1478604 A>G variant is linked with differential risks for gastric cancer nodal metastasis. These results support further investigation of THBS1 as a potential therapeutic target in gastric cancer.