Oncological and cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing "moving window" operation

Breast Modular Resection (BMR) in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) With Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI) Monitoring Improved Surgical Training Outcome Among Fellows

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) are challenging for surgical training among fellow trainees. We developed a surgical training course with novel concept of breast modular resection (BMR) for NSM/SSM procedure, and performed this study to investigate whether BMR could improve surgical outcomes compared to classical procedure resection (CPR).

METHODS

The records of 105 breast cancer patients undergoing NSM/SSM with immediate reconstruction performed by fellow trainees were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was performed to intraoperatively evaluate the blood supply of the NAC, and the absolute perfusion unit (PU) values and relative perfusion unit (rPU) values were further compared.

RESULTS

Surgical training outcomes of BMR group (N = 52) were insignificantly improved compared to CPR group (N = 53). The rates of NAC necrosis, flap necrosis and implant removal all reduced respectively. Among the 60 NSM patients, the blood loss (P = .011) and surgery time (P < .001) was significantly reduced in BMR group (N = 30) and all the other outcomes were insignificantly improved. Both the absolute PU values and rPU values were significantly higher among patients without NAC necrosis (P < .001). The absolute PU values were significantly higher in BMR group (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Compared to CPR, the BMR-based surgical training course for NSM demonstrated the reduction in complications and operating time, offering a potential streamlined, efficient, and safe method for NSM procedure. LSCI was effective for intraoperative visualized evaluation of NAC blood supply and could provide effective real-time feedback for fellow trainees.

Single-incision for breast-conserving surgery through round block technique

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using the single-incision round block technique in breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node (SLN) retrieval for breast cancer without compromising oncological safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational case-control study was conducted from January 2017 to October 2021. The study population consisted of two groups. In both groups, breast-conserving surgery was carried out through the round-block technique. In group A, SLN retrieval was performed using the round-block incision (study group), while in group B, SLN retrieval was conducted through a second skin incision in the axilla (control group). The study was approved by the local ethics committee Zurich (BASEC-Nr. 2020-02857), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

RESULTS

Overall, 134 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 86 women underwent breast-conserving surgery and SLN retrieval using the single-incision approach (group A), and 48 women underwent conventional surgery, using two independent incisions for tumour resection and SLN retrieval (group B). The overall success rate in group A regarding SLN retrieval was 97.7%, whereas most tumours were located in the upper outer (47.7%) and upper inner quadrant (27.9%). Although the technique was equally successful in the other quadrants, the share of tumours in the lower outer, and the lower inner quadrant, and the retroareolar region was smaller, representing 17.4%, 3.5% and 3.5%, respectively. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was two, with a positivity rate of 24.4%. The occurrence of axillary neuralgia and axillary skin retraction was significantly higher in group B along with tendentially more axillary seroma formation. There were no significant differences regarding reintervention rates, in terms of complications, resection margins, locoregional recurrences, or deaths with a mean follow-up of 11 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-incision method through the round block technique is as safe and effective as the standard two-incision approach regarding nodal staging and resection margins, and seems to be applicable for tumours in all breast quadrants.

Single-Incision Approach for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Effectiveness, Complications and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the success of tumor resection and its postoperative complications, satisfaction, and quality of life using a single-incision approach for breast-conserving surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational, prospective study conducted between 2015 and 2018. The study group consisted of patients in whom tumor extirpation and lymph node (LN) staging was performed using a single incision, while the control group consisted of patients who underwent a breast-conserving procedure with independent incisions. All patients were given the preoperative and postoperative module of the Breast-Q™ questionnaire.

RESULTS

Overall, 226 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, 152 of whom successfully underwent breast and LN removal using a single-incision approach (98.7% overall success). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, although there was a greater tendency towards breast seroma in the study group and axillary neuralgia in the control group. Both groups presented a similar rate of breast and axillary salvage surgery. The postoperative Breast-Q™ questionnaire showed that the study group had greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided by the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

The single-incision approach is as effective as standard surgery, with custom incisions in terms of breast resection, LN staging, and complications. There was greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided.

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: Volume replacement vs. volume displacement

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (BCS) has emerged as a third option between conventional BCS and mastectomy. Oncoplastic BCS includes two fundamentally different approaches: volume replacement and volume displacement. The former involves partial mastectomy and immediate reconstruction of the breast with the transposition of autologous tissue from elsewhere, while the latter involves partial mastectomy and using the remaining breast tissue to fill the defect resulting from extirpation of the tumor. There are several benefits associated with oncoplastic BCS. First, it allows partial mastectomy without cosmetic penalties, and can achieve better cosmetic outcomes than total mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Second, it avoids the need for total mastectomy in an increasing number of patients without compromising local control. Third, partial breast reconstruction is less extensive and has fewer complications than conventional procedures. Partial mastectomy and partial breast reconstruction can be carried out either simultaneously as a one-stage procedure, or using a two-stage approach. Although patients prefer a one-stage procedure, it requires intraoperative confirmation of complete tumor excision using frozen-section analysis. Moreover, oncoplastic BCS requires combined skills, knowledge, and understanding of both oncological and plastic surgeries, which may be optimally achieved by an oncoplastic surgeon.

Present status of endoscopic mastectomy for breast cancer

Endoscopy is now being used for breast cancer surgery. Though it is used for mastectomy, lymph node dissection, and breast reconstruction, its prime use is for mastectomy. Because an incision can be placed inconspicuously in the axillary site, a relatively large incision can be created. A retractor with an endoscope, CO₂, and an abrasion device with the endoscope are used for operation space security. It is extremely rare that an endoscope is used for lymph node dissection. For breast reconstruction, it may be used for latissimus muscle flap making, but an endoscope is rarely used for other reconstructions. Endoscopic mastectomy is limited to certain institutions and practiced hands, and it has not been significantly developed in breast cancer surgery. On the other hand, endoscopic surgery may be used widely in breast reconstruction. With respect to the spread of robotic surgery, many factors remain uncertain.

Technical feasibility and cosmetic advantage of hybrid endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We developed a new procedure called hybrid endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery (EBCS), which consists of a combination of plastic surgery and endoscopic surgery techniques. The purpose of this study was retrospectively to analyze the clinical outcome of hybrid EBCS and compare the cosmetic outcomes between hybrid EBCS and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients who had undergone hybrid EBCS (n=73) or CBCS (n=90) between May 2005 and April 2011 and had been followed up in our department until March 2012. The clinical outcomes and cosmetic outcomes of these two groups were compared. The safety of hybrid EBCS was also analyzed by confirming its complications and pathological surgical margin.

RESULTS

In the hybrid EBCS group, operation time was longer by 30-50 minutes. Blood loss was not significantly different between the two groups. The surgical margin of hybrid EBCS was as follows: 1 patient (1.4%) had a positive margin, 4 patients (5.5%) had a margin of <2 mm, in 9 patients (12.3%) the margin was ≥2 mm and <5 mm, and in 59 patients (80.8%) it was ≥5 mm. Seven cases (9.6%) of postoperative complications occurred in 6 hybrid EBCS patients. To date, no local recurrence has been observed in hybrid EBCS patients (postoperative observation period, 18.1±5.6 months). Compared with the CBCS group, the hybrid EBCS group had better cosmetic results, especially with a less noticeable operative scar (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid EBCS can provide sufficient free margin, and its surgical curability is acceptable. Additionally, this method is superior to CBCS in terms of cosmetic outcome.

Long-term outcome of breast cancer patients treated with radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered to be the most promising non-surgical ablation technique for the treatment of small breast cancer. However, few data are available regarding long-term follow-up of patients treated with this modality.

METHODS

Since 2005, we have performed RFA and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in 19 cases. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in patients with positive SLNs. From 24 to 202 days after RFA, the ablated tumour tissue was excised by mammotome biopsy and examined histologically or immunohistochemically with H&E staining, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-diaphorase staining, and single-stranded (ss) DNA staining. All cases were followed-up after breast radiation and systemic therapies.

RESULTS

Although complete response was histologically confirmed in only 8 cases, NADH-diaphorase and ssDNA staining did not demonstrate any viable tumour cells in the ablated lesions. At a mean follow-up of 60 months (follow-up range, 37-82 months), there were no cases of in-breast recurrence, although one patient died due to hepatic metastases. Cosmesis of the conserved breast was excellent or good in all of the cases, but a hard lump was persistent after RFA in half of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of patients treated with RFA is encouraging with regard to cosmesis and local control. Because a persisted lump may cause patient discomfort, anxiety and fear, however, further studies are needed to establish the optimal technique. Moreover, a prospective study will be required to determine the equivalency in local recurrence rates between the RFA therapy and conventional breast-conserving treatment.