Screening-relevant age threshold of 70 years and older is a stronger determinant for the choice of adjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients than tumor biology

Geriatric Breast Cancer: Staging, Molecular Surrogates, and Treatment. A Review & Meta-analysis

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most frequent cancers in females across the globe. Treatment recommendations for BC patients are primarily driven by patient age, staging and tumor molecular subtype. Thus, we updated the general overview of BC staging, molecular surrogates, and treatment choices for women >70 years based on a systematic study encompassing the years 2013-2023. A PRISMA guidelines and PICO framework were followed, and relevant research articles were searched using different data bases (Web of Sciences, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for studies quality assessment. The research articles that made it into the systematic review were compiled using qualitative criteria. In the meanwhile, heterogeneity was determined using meta-analysis with RevMan 5.4. We applied a random effects model with a 0.05 significance level. Overall, there were 4151 research articles, after screening only 17 articles with 39,906 patients were included. Conclusion: Elderly patients with breast cancer should be treated differently in an adapted way. The treatment should not be the same worldwide due to different health systems. Molecular surrogates are different in geriatric patients. Surgery is the best option for treatment in this subset of patients. We need to have therapeutic decision appointments for elderly patients with breast cancer. The guidelines and medical authority should be used in the best decision.

Current clinical practice and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: analysis of individual data from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is frequently used in patients with early breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar survival after NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, certain subtypes may benefit more when NACT contains regimes leading to high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. In this study we analyzed data using the OncoBox research from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers to describe the current clinical practice of and outcomes after NACT under routine conditions. These data were compared to patients treated with ACT. 40% of all patients received chemotherapy. The use of NACT increased over time from 5% in 2007 up to 17.3% in 2016. The proportion of patients receiving NACT varied by subtype. It was low in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (5.8%). However, 31.8% of patients with triple-negative, 31.9% with HR-negative/HER2-positive, and 26.5% with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer received NACT. The rates of pCR were higher in patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive, HR-negative/HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (36, 53 and 38%) compared to HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors (12%). PCR was achieved more often in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors over time.This is the largest study on use and effects of NACT in German breast cancer centers. It demonstrates the increased use of NACT based on recommendations in current clinical guidelines. An improvement of pCR was shown in particular in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, which is consistent with data from randomized controlled trails.

COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Patients Operated on for Breast Cancer. Comparison with the General Population

BACKGROUND

Breast Cancer (BC) remains the most diagnosed malignancy and the most common cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Covid-19 mortality in BC patients has been linked to comorbid conditions rather than to cancer treatment itself, although this was not confirmed by a meta-analysis. Also, during Covid-19 outbreaks, a great deal of health care resources is reassigned to critical Covid-19 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 5 consecutive trimesters (from 1/12/2020 to 31/3/2021) 2511 BC patients older than 20 years from our institution were surveyed. 1043 of them had received a Covid test and these made our study group, which was conveniently compared with the Covid-19 tested background feminine Catalan population.

RESULTS

13.1% of our patients presented with a positive Covid-19 test, whereas confirmed COVID-19 infection amounted to 7.1% of the feminine Catalan tested population. The COVID-19-specific mortality rate was 11.7% (16/137) in the study group, which compares with a 4.7% rate for the overall population. Most deaths occurred in patients over 70.

CONCLUSION

Three clinical factors were significantly associated with Covid-19 mortality in BC, namely lack of hormone therapy, distant metastases, and BC dwelling in nursing homes. BC patients are at a higher risk of Covid-19 infection and mortality in comparison with the reference group without BC.

Prognostic role of radiotherapy in low-risk elderly breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggested that radiotherapy (RT) had a small absolute benefit in patients with low-risk breast cancer over the age of 65. To reduce the patient's treatment burden and cost, as well as the damage to normal tissue, this study sought to explore the prognostic role of RT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly patients.

METHODS

Patients who were aged ≥65 years, stage T1N0M0, and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive (ER+/PR+) were included in this study. Age, marital status, histology, race, grade, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), subtype, treatment method, and survival were also collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. We compared overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in the patients who underwent BCS with or without RT. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used in our study.

RESULTS

The data of 3,623 patients were analyzed in this study. Among them, 2,851 (78.69%) patients had received RT. The multivariate analyses before PSM showed that RT resulted in better OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.62, P<0.001], and BCSS (HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27-0.58, P<0.001). The multivariate analyses after PSM (n=1,538) confirmed that patients who received RT (n=769) had a longer survival time than those who did not (n=769) (OS: HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, P=0.018; and BCSS: HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.93, P=0.025). The survival analysis showed that patients receiving RT had a better OS (P=0.028) and BCSS (P=0.016) than those who did not receive RT. However, there were no significant differences in patients' OS and BCSS with or without RT across the different age subgroups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, patients who received RT had a longer survival time. However, the age subgroup analysis showed that RT did not have any survival benefit in elderly patients with T1N0M0 and ER+/PR+ breast cancer. Furthermore, at the age of 65-69 years, the P value for OS approached 0.05, which suggests that the decision to administer RT in this patient group should be made based on each patient's condition.

Chemotherapy Decision-Making and Survival Outcomes in Older Women With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evidence From Real-World Practice

Data regarding chemotherapy options and benefits in older women with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are limited. Our study aimed to assess the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival (RFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) rates in elderly TNBC patients. Patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC (except T1aN0) between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively included. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to minimize bias. A total of 177 patients were included with a median age of 69 years (range, 65-86), almost all had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0-2, and 127 (71.8%) received chemotherapy. Patients who received chemotherapy were younger, had more advanced-stage disease and had better ECOG performance status (P<0.05). Among the 127 patients who were administered chemotherapy, 45 (35%) received taxane plus carboplatin, 36 (28%) received anthracycline-and-taxane-based regimens, and 23 (18%) received taxane-based regimens. The regimen options differed based on patient age and tumour stage (P<0.05). Nearly 80% of the patients completed ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy, and half had their dosage decreased. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients who received ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy were found to have improved RFS rates (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.87; P=0.027), and receipt of chemotherapy (≥1 cycle) was associated with better BCSS (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.97; P=0.046) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.87; P=0.029) rates. These results support the considering the risk for recurrence and performing individualized assessments when determining the appropriate chemotherapy approach for older women with early TNBC.

Evaluation of the Dynamics of Breast Cancer Incidence in Kyrgyzstan: Component Analysis

BACKGROUND: In 2020, 19.2 million cases of all types of cancer were registered worldwide, of which 11.7%, that is, 2.3 million, related to breast cancer (BC). The global burden of cancer is increasing worldwide, with the majority of new cancer cases and related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: The study is to conduct a component analysis of the dynamics of the incidence of BC in Kyrgyzstan. METHODS: Primary data were for registered patients with BC (International Classification of Diseases – C50) in the whole country during the period of 2003–2017. Evaluation of changes in BC incidence in the population of Kyrgyzstan was performed using component analysis according to the methodological recommendations. RESULTS: The study period, 7850 new cases of BC were recorded. The incidence rate increased from 17.70°/0000 (2003) to 19.03°/0000 in 2017 and the overall growth was 1.34°/0000, including due to the age structure – ΣΔA=2.08°/0000, due to the risk of acquiring illness – ΣΔR=−0.55°/0000 and their combined effect – ΣΔRA=−0.19°/0000. The component analysis revealed that the increase in the number of patients with BC was mainly due to the growth of the population (ΔP=+71.8%), changes in its age structure (ΔA=+35.5%), and changes associated with the risk of acquiring illness (ΔR=+8.4%). The increase and, in some cases, the decrease in the number of patients in the regions of the republic is due to the influence of demographic factors and risk factors for getting sick. CONCLUSION: The component analysis assessed the role of the influence of demographic factors and the risk of acquiring the disease on the formation of the number of patients and the incidence of BC, while geographical variability was established. The implementation of the results of this study is recommended in the management of anticancer measures for BC.

Suboptimal therapy following breast conserving surgery in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To assess potential disparities in guideline-concordant care delivery among women with early-stage triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy.

METHODS

Women ≥ 40 years old diagnosed with pT2N0M0 triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with primary surgery and axillary staging between 2012 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiation concordant with current guidelines. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to assess the prevalence of optimal therapy use across patient and cancer characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess 5-year overall survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the impact of optimal therapy on 5-year mortality.

RESULTS

11,785 women were included with 7,843 receiving optimal therapy. Receipt of optimal therapy decreased with age even after adjusting for comorbidities and cancer characteristics; other sociodemographic factors were not associated with differences in receipt of optimal therapy. Among patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, most were not offered the treatment (49%) or refused (40%). Overall 5-year survival was higher among women who received optimal therapy (89% [95% CI 88.0-89.3] vs. 66% [95% CI 62.9-68.5]). Patients who received suboptimal therapy were over twice as likely to die within 5 years of their diagnosis (adjusted HR 2.44, 95% CI 2.12-2.82).

CONCLUSION

Age is the primary determinant of the likelihood of a woman to receive optimal adjuvant therapies in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. Patients who did not receive optimal therapy had significantly diminished survival.

Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery

BACKGROUND/AIM

In 2016, in the United States, more than 50% of breast cancer (BC) cases were diagnosed in patients older than 60 years of age. Our study aimed to estimate the risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) in patients who underwent breast-conservative treatment (BCT), according to age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study analyzed 613 cases of patients who underwent BCT between 2003 and 2014. Patients were divided into groups according to age: Under70 (under 70 years old) and Over70 (above 70 years old). Margins width, histology results, prognostic and predictive factors were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who experienced LR.

RESULTS

LR Incidence among Under70 and Over70 was 5.4% and 1.7%, respectively (p<0.01). Group Over70 is characterized by larger tumors and a lower Ki67 index (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Operation time reduction, better aesthetic results and reduced LR risk support BCT. The Over70 group exhibited better outcomes in terms of LR despite larger tumor dimensions.

Association of Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation With Survival in Women Aged 70 Years or Older With Breast Cancer

Background

Survival in elderly patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has not been specifically analyzed. This study aimed to explore the association between different types of axillary lymph node (ALN) evaluations and survival of elderly breast cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of invasive ductal breast cancer patients 70 years and older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016). Analyses were performed to compare the characteristics and survival outcomes of patients who received surgical lymph node dissection and those who did not. Breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival were compared by using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) methods to account for selection bias from covariate imbalance.

Results

Of the 75,950 patients analyzed, patients without ALN evaluation had a significantly worse prognosis, while there was no significant difference for BCSS between using a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after adjustment for known covariates [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.991, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.925–1.062, p = 0.800]. In the stratification analyses after PSM, the ALND did not show a significant BCSS advantage compared with SLNB in any subgroups except for the pN1 stage or above. Furthermore, after PSM of the pN1 stage patients, SLNB was associated with a significantly worse BCSS in hormone receptor negative (HR−) patients (HR = 1.536, 95%CI = 1.213–1.946, p < 0.001), but not in the hormone receptor positive (HR+) group (HR = 1.150, 95%CI = 0.986–1.340, p = 0.075).

Conclusion

In our study, ALND does not yield superior survival compared with SLNB for elderly patients with pN1 stage HR+ breast cancer. Although our findings are limited by the bias associated with retrospective study design, we believe that in the absence of results from randomized clinical trials, our findings should be considered when recommending the omission of ALND for elderly breast cancer patients.

Defining Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Older Adults With Cancer: A Scoping Literature Review

PURPOSE

The terms undertreatment and overtreatment are often used to describe inappropriate management of older adults with cancer. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the literature to clarify the meanings behind the use of the terms.

METHODS

We searched PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) for titles and abstracts that included the terms undertreatment or overtreatment with regard to older adults with cancer. We included all types of articles, cancer types, and treatments. Definitions of undertreatment and overtreatment were extracted, and categories underlying these definitions were derived through qualitative analysis. Within a random subset of articles, C.D. and K.P.L. independently performed this analysis to determine final categories and then independently assigned these categories to assess inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Articles using the terms undertreatment (n = 236), overtreatment (n = 71), or both (n = 51) met criteria for inclusion in our review (n = 256). Only 14 articles (5.5%) explicitly provided formal definitions; for the remaining, we inferred the implicit definitions from the terms' surrounding context. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.81) between C.D. and K.P.L. in independently assigning categories of definitions within a random subset of 50 articles. Undertreatment most commonly implied less than recommended therapy (148; 62.7%) or less than recommended therapy associated with worse outcomes (88; 37.3%). Overtreatment most commonly implied intensive treatment of an older adult in whom the harms of treatment outweigh the benefits (38; 53.5%) or intensive treatment of a cancer not expected to affect an older adult in his/her remaining lifetime (33; 46.5%).

CONCLUSION

Undertreatment and overtreatment of older adults with cancer are imprecisely defined concepts. We propose new, more rigorous definitions that account for both oncologic factors and geriatric domains.

Symptom Experience, Management, and Outcomes According to Race and Social Determinants Including Genomics, Epigenomics, and Metabolomics (SEMOARS + GEM): an Explanatory Model for Breast Cancer Treatment Disparity

Even after controlling for stage, comorbidity, age, and insurance status, black women with breast cancer (BC) in the USA have the lowest 5-year survival as compared with all other races for stage-matched disease. One potential cause of this survival difference is the disparity in cancer treatment, evident in many population clinical trials. Specifically, during BC chemotherapy, black women receive less relative dose intensity with more dose reductions and early chemotherapy cessation compared with white women. Symptom incidence, cancer-related distress, and ineffective communication, including the disparity in patient-centeredness of care surrounding patient symptom reporting and clinician assessment, are important factors contributing to racial disparity in dose reduction and early therapy termination. We present an evidence-based overview and an explanatory model for racial disparity in the symptom experience during BC chemotherapy that may lead to a reduction in dose intensity and a subsequent disparity in outcomes. This explanatory model, the Symptom Experience, Management, Outcomes and Adherence according to Race and Social determinants + Genomics Epigenomics and Metabolomics (SEMOARS + GEM), considers essential factors such as social determinants of health, clinician communication, symptoms and symptom management, genomics, epigenomics, and pharmacologic metabolism as contributory factors.

Aberrant methylation of WD-repeat protein 41 contributes to tumour progression in triple-negative breast cancer

WD-repeat proteins are implicated in a variety of biological functions, most recently in oncogenesis. However, the underlying function of WD-repeat protein 41 (WDR41) in tumorigenesis remains elusive. The present study was aimed to explore the role of WDR41 in breast cancer. Combined with Western blotting and immunohistochemistry, the results showed that WDR41 was expressed at low levels in breast cancer, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), we observed that WDR41 presented hypermethylation in MDA-MB-231 cells. Methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) management increased the expression of WDR41 in MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in MCF-10A (normal mammary epithelial cells) or oestrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells. WDR41-down-regulation promoted, while WDR41-up-regulation inhibited the tumour characteristics of TNBC cells including cell viability, cell cycle and migration. Further, WDR41-up-regulation dramatically suppressed tumour growth in vivo. Mechanistically, WDR41 protein ablation activated, while WDR41-up-regulation repressed the AKT/GSK-3β pathway and the subsequent nuclear activation of β-catenin in MDA-MB-231 cells, and 5-aza-dC treatment enhanced this effect. After treatment with the AKT inhibitor MK-2206, WDR41-down-regulation-mediated activation of the GSK-3β/β-catenin signalling was robustly abolished. Collectively, methylated WDR41 in MDA-MB-231 cells promotes tumorigenesis through positively regulating the AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway, thus providing an important foundation for treating TNBC.

Breast Cancer and COVID-19: The Effect of Fear on Patients' Decision-making Process

BACKGROUND/AIM

Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak is currently having a huge impact on medical resource allocation. Breast Cancer (BC) patients are concerned both with BC treatment and COVID-19. This study aimed to estimate the impact of anxiety among patients, caused by the spreading of COVID-19.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between the 16th of January and the 20th of March 2020, we retrospectively enrolled 160 patients. Eighty-two patients with a suspected breast lesion (SBL) were divided into two groups: PRE-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-SBL. Seventy-eight BC patients were divided into PRE-COVID-19-BC and POST-COVID-19-BC. Patient characteristics including age, marital status, SBL/BC diameter, personal and family history of BC, clinical stage and molecular subtype were recorded. Procedure Refusal (PR) and Surgical Refusal (SR) were also recorded with their reason.

RESULTS

BC and SBL analysis showed no difference in pre-treatment characteristics (p>0.05). Both POST-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-BC groups showed higher rates of PR and SR (p=0.0208, p=0.0065 respectively). Infection risk represented primary reason for refusal among POST-COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19-related anxiety could affect patients' decision-making process.

Outcomes of exclusive radiation therapy for older women with breast cancer according to age and comorbidity status: An observational retrospective study

The management of older patients with breast cancer, a public health issue, remains a highly topical subject. Among this heterogeneous population, only few studies have focused on outcomes of older women treated with exclusive radiation therapy for localized BC. This retrospective study provides data concerning the efficacy and safety of exclusive RT, as well as the impact of comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index on survival in this subset of women not suitable for surgery or who have refused it. This analysis demonstrates that this treatment is well-tolerated; however, the prognosis is strongly impacted by age and comorbidities.

Guideline-concordant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive and node-positive, early breast cancer leads to better overall and metastases-free survival with limited benefit in elderly patients

Purpose

The German guideline for breast cancer recommends using chemotherapy (CHT) in patients with hormone receptor-positive and node-positive, invasive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of CHT in this patient group on overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), especially considering the 70-year threshold.

Methods

1772 patients from the clinical cancer registry Regensburg (Germany) with hormone receptor-positive and node-positive, invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2013 were analysed in a retrospective cohort study. OS and DMFS were evaluated by means of Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox-regression method. Results were further examined according to age at diagnosis.

Results

The comparison of 1544 patients with CHT to 228 patients without CHT showed a significant benefit for CHT regarding 5-year OS (91.3% vs. 76.8%) and 5-year DMFS (86.7% vs. 74.4%, both p < 0.001). Likewise, better OS and DMFS were seen in patients aged < 70 years using CHT compared to patients without CHT of the same age. Patients aged ≥ 70 years with CHT had a minimal benefit regarding 5-year OS compared to patients without CHT, but no advantage considering DMFS. All results were confirmed in multivariable analyses except for patients being ≥ 70 years of age.

Conclusion

Patients with hormone receptor-positive and node-positive, invasive breast cancer benefit from chemotherapy with regard to a significantly better overall and distant metastases-free survival, although chemotherapy use in patients aged ≥ 70 years results in a smaller benefit considering OS and no benefit considering DMFS.

Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Among Older Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background: This study examined receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) according to evidence-based treatment guidelines and quality measures and specific types of treatment among older women with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 142,433 patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified in the SEER-Medicare linked database. Algorithms considering cancer characteristics and the appropriate course of care as per guidelines versus actual care received determined receipt of GCC. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the likelihood of GCC and specific types of treatment for women aged ≥75 versus 66 to 74 years. Results: Overall, 39.7% of patients received GCC. Patients diagnosed at stage II or III, with certain preexisting conditions, and of nonwhite race were less likely to receive GCC. Patients with hormone-negative tumors, higher grade tumors, and greater access to oncology care resources were more likely to receive GCC. Patients aged ≥75 years were approximately 40% less likely to receive GCC or adjuvant endocrine therapy, 78% less likely to have any surgery, 61% less likely to have chemotherapy, and about half as likely to have radiation therapy than those aged 66 to 74 years. Conclusions: Fewer than half of older women with breast cancer received GCC, with the lowest rates observed among the oldest age groups, racial/ethnic minorities, and women with later-stage cancers. However, patients with more aggressive tumor characteristics and greater access to oncology resources were more likely to receive GCC. Considering that older women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and that many are diagnosed at stages requiring more aggressive treatment, efforts to increase rates of earlier stage diagnosis and the development of less toxic treatments could help improve GCC and survival while preserving quality of life.

Adjuvant treatment and survival in older women with triple negative breast cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis

Patients with triple negative breast cancer were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Competing risks analysis was used to assess the cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Multivariable Fine-Gray regression was used to identify predictors of BCSM. Women age 70+ (n = 4221) were less likely to receive chemotherapy and radiation treatment (P < 0.0001) and had higher BCSM compared to younger women (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in BCSM in patients who received adjuvant treatment (P = 0.10). Stage II patients derived the greatest relative and absolute benefit from adjuvant treatment. Age was not a significant predictor of BCSM.

Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1006 used as a potential novel biomarker of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidences have shown that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), longer than 200 nucleotides in length, play a crucial role in cancer occurrence and development. However, the relationships between most lncRNAs and gastric carcinogenesis remain poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the diagnostic value of one typical lncRNA, long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1006 (LINC01006), in gastric cancer.

METHODS

First, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the expression levels of LINC01006 in various gastric tissues from gastric cancer patients, healthy controls, and gastric dysplasia. Next, the correlation between LINC01006 expression levels and clinicopathological features of patients with gastric cancer was assessed. Finally, the relative levels of LINC01006 in gastric cancer cell lines comparing to normal gastric epithelial cell line were analyzed.

RESULTS

LINC01006 levels in cancer tissues were significantly lower than those in adjacent normal tissues (P< 0.001) and healthy control tissues (P< 0.001). Its expression was associated with age (P= 0.013), tumor location (P= 0.022), tumor size (P= 0.030), and venous invasion (P= 0.018). Moreover, expression of LINC01006 was downregulated in two gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803 (P< 0.05) and AGS (P< 0.001) compared to normal gastric epithelial cell line GES-1.

CONCLUSIONS

All the data implied that LINC01006 may be a novel biomarker for gastric cancer.

Patient Reported Outcomes After Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases as a Function of Age: A Secondary Analysis of the NCIC CTG SC-Twenty-Three Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To explore the age difference in response and patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer having bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life (QOL) Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22), EORTC QOL Core-15-Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL), and Dexamethasone Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) before a single 8-Gy radiation treatment, on days 10 and 42 after treatment. Patient demographics, performance status, analgesic consumption, BM22, C15, and DSQ were compared with multivariant analysis between patients under 75 years and 75 years and older. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the differences between age-groups, adjusting for baseline demographics and primary disease sites.

RESULTS

There were 298 patients (170 male) with 209 (70%) less than 75 years of age. Most common primary cancer sites include lung, prostate, and breast. At baseline, younger patients had better performance status, consumed more analgesic, and reported worse scores in nausea, insomnia, and functional interference, while older patients more commonly had prostate cancer. There were no significant differences in the incidence of radiation-induced pain flare; response to radiation; changes from baseline for BM22, C15-PAL; and DSQ, nor overall survival at day 42 between the 2 groups. Responders to radiation in the elderly group reported better improvement in physical and emotional domains when compared with nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cancer having bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy, there was no significant difference in general with age in response to radiation and patient-reported outcomes. Palliative radiotherapy should be offered to elderly patients when needed.