Unenhanced magnetic resonance screening using fused diffusion-weighted imaging and maximum-intensity projection in patients with a personal history of breast cancer: role of fused DWI for postoperative screening

Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging

Considering the high cost of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and various contraindications and health concerns related to administration of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents, there is emerging interest in non-contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) is a fast, unenhanced technique that has wide clinical applications in breast cancer detection, characterization, prognosis, and predicting treatment response. It also has the potential to serve as a non-contrast MR imaging screening method. Standardized protocols and interpretation strategies can help to enhance the clinical utility of breast DWI. A variety of other promising non-contrast MR imaging techniques are in development, but currently, DWI is closest to clinical integration, while others are still mostly used in the research setting.

Image quality of DWI at breast MRI depends on the amount of fibroglandular tissue: implications for unenhanced screening

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast-enhanced breast MRI (DCE-T1) stratified by the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) as a measure of breast density.

METHODS

Retrospective, multi-reader, bicentric visual grading analysis study on breast density (A-D) and overall image and fat suppression quality of DWI and DCE-T1, scored on a standard 5-point Likert scale. Cross tabulations and visual grading characteristic (VGC) curves were calculated for fatty breasts (A/B) versus dense breasts (C/D).

RESULTS

Image quality of DWI was higher in the case of increased breast density, with good scores (score 3-5) in 85.9% (D) and 88.4% (C), compared to 61.6% (B) and 53.5% (A). Overall image quality of DWI was in favor of dense breasts (C/D), with an area under the VGC curve of 0.659 (p < 0.001). Quality of DWI and DCE-T1 fat suppression increased with higher breast density, with good scores (score 3-5) for 86.9% and 45.7% of density D, and 90.2% and 42.9% of density C cases, compared to 76.0% and 33.6% for density B and 54.7% and 29.6% for density A (DWI and DCE-T1 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Dense breasts show excellent fat suppression and substantially higher image quality in DWI images compared with non-dense breasts. These results support the setup of studies exploring DWI-based MR imaging without IV contrast for additional screening of women with dense breasts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our findings demonstrate that image quality of DWI is robust in women with an increased amount of fibroglandular tissue, technically supporting the feasibility of exploring applications such as screening of women with mammographically dense breasts.

KEY POINTS

• Image and fat suppression quality of diffusion-weighted imaging are dependent on the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) which is closely connected to breast density. • Fat suppression quality in diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast is best in women with a high amount of fibroglandular tissue. • High image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging in women with a high amount of FGT in MRI supports that the technical feasibility of DWI can be explored in the additional screening of women with mammographically dense breasts.

Performance of Diffusion-weighted Imaging-based Noncontrast MRI Protocols for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly recognized as a powerful diagnostic tool and tested alternative to contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses the diagnostic performance of DWI-based noncontrast MRI protocols (ncDWI) for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search in PubMed for articles published from January 1985 to September 2023 was performed. Studies were excluded if they investigated malignant lesions or selected patients and/or lesions only, used DWI as an adjunct technique to CE MRI, or were technical studies. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic accuracy and investigating between-study heterogeneity. Additional subgroup comparisons of ncDWI to CE MRI and standard mammography were performed. Results A total of 28 studies were included, with 4406 lesions (1676 malignant, 2730 benign) in 3787 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ncDWI were 86.5% (95% CI: 81.4, 90.4) and 83.5% (95% CI: 76.9, 88.6), and both measures presented with high between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 81.6% and 91.6%, respectively; P < .001). CE MRI (18 studies) had higher sensitivity than ncDWI (95.1% [95% CI: 92.9, 96.7] vs 88.9% [95% CI: 82.4, 93.1], P = .004) at similar specificity (82.2% [95% CI: 75.0, 87.7] vs 82.0% [95% CI: 74.8, 87.5], P = .97). Compared with ncDWI, mammography (five studies) showed no evidence of a statistical difference for sensitivity (80.3% [95% CI: 56.3, 93.3] vs 56.7%; [95% CI: 41.9, 70.4], respectively; P = .09) or specificity (89.9% [95% CI: 85.5, 93.1] vs 90% [95% CI: 61.3, 98.1], respectively; P = .62), but ncDWI had a higher area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (0.93 [95% CI: 0.91, 0.95] vs 0.78 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.81], P < .001). Conclusion A direct comparison with CE MRI showed a modestly lower sensitivity at similar specificity for ncDWI, and higher diagnostic performance indexes for ncDWI than standard mammography. Heterogeneity was high, thus these results must be interpreted with caution. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kataoka and Iima in this issue.

Update on DWI for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring

DWI is a noncontrast MRI technique that measures the diffusion of water molecules within biologic tissue. DWI is increasingly incorporated into routine breast MRI examinations. Currently, the main applications of DWI are breast cancer detection and characterization, prognostication, and prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, DWI is promising as a noncontrast MRI alternative for breast cancer screening. Problems with suboptimal resolution and image quality have restricted the mainstream use of DWI for breast imaging, but these shortcomings are being addressed through several technologic advancements. In this review, we present an up-to-date assessment of the use of DWI for breast cancer imaging, including a summary of the clinical literature and recommendations for future use.

Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether reader training improves the performance and agreement of radiologists in interpreting unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A study of 96 breasts (35 cancers, 24 benign, and 37 negative) in 48 asymptomatic women was performed between June 2019 and October 2020. High-resolution DWI with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 sec/mm² was performed using a 3.0-T system. Sixteen breast radiologists independently reviewed the DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted MRI scans and recorded the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for each breast. After a 2-h training session and a 5-month washout period, they re-evaluated the BI-RADS categories. A BI-RADS category of 4 (lesions with at least two suspicious criteria) or 5 (more than two suspicious criteria) was considered positive. The per-breast diagnostic performance of each reader was compared between the first and second reviews. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using a multi-rater κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Before training, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 16 readers were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.4-79.9), 90.8% (95% CI: 85.6-94.2), and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.6-87.4), respectively. After training, significant improvements in specificity (95.2%; 95% CI: 90.8-97.5; P = 0.001) and accuracy (85.9%; 95% CI: 80.9-89.8; P = 0.01) were observed, but no difference in sensitivity (69.8%; 95% CI: 58.1-79.4; P = 0.58) was observed. Regarding inter-reader agreement, the κ values were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) before training and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74) after training, with a difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02-0.18; P = 0.01). The ICC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.74) before training and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) after training (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Brief reader training improved the performance and agreement of interpretations by breast radiologists using unenhanced MRI with DWI.

Accelerating acquisition of readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) with a simultaneous multislice (SMS) technique for diffusion-weighted (DW) breast MRI: Evaluation of image quality factors

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values, and scan time between readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) rs-EPI sequences.

METHODS

A total of 80 consecutive women who underwent breast diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were included, and two rs-EPI DWI sequences with and without SMS were acquired and compared. Qualitative analysis involved three radiologists independently scoring image quality and radiologist preference. For quantitative comparison, the radiologists independently measured the ADC values in patients, while SNR, CNR, and ADC values were measured on a phantom.

RESULTS

The acquisition time was 5:47 min for rs-EPI and 3:20 min for SMS rs-EPI. In terms of image quality, scores were similar between rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences in the pooled data set, with the exception of skin-line distinction (p = 0.001) and background noise (p < 0.001). All radiologists considered SMS rs-EPI as equal or superior to rs-EPI in more than 70 % of cases. SMS rs-EPI demonstrated significantly higher ADC values than rs-EPI by all radiologists (p ≤ 0.002). For the phantom measurement, ADC (SMS: 1.26 ± 0.68 and RS: 1.26 ± 0.68, p = 0.198), SNR (SMS: 540.6 ± 342.1 and RS: 558.8 ± 523.2, p = 0.927), and CNR (SMS: 235.5 ± 38.9 and RS: 252.8 ± 108.0, p = 0.784) values did not significantly differ between the two sequences.

CONCLUSION

SMS rs-EPI exhibited comparable image quality and similar ADC, SNR, and CNR values to rs-EPI while reducing the scan time by 42%.

Computed diffusion-weighted imaging with a low-apparent diffusion coefficient-pixel cut-off technique for breast cancer detection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with low-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-pixel cut-off technique (cDWI cut-off) and actual measured DWI (mDWI).

METHODS

Eighty-seven consecutive patients with malignant breast lesions and 72 with negative breast lesions who underwent breast MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Computed DWI with high b-values of 800, 1200, and 1500 s/mm2 and ADC cut-off thresholds of none, 0, 0.3, and 0.6 (×10-3 mm2/s) were generated from DWI with two b-values (0 and 800 s/mm2). To identify the optimal conditions, two radiologists evaluated the fat suppression and lesion reduction failure using a cut-off technique. The contrast between breast cancer and glandular tissue was evaluated using region of interest analysis. Three other board-certified radiologists independently assessed the optimised cDWI cut-off and mDWI data sets. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

When an ADC cut-off threshold of 0.3 or 0.6 (× 10-3 mm2/s) was applied, fat suppression improved significantly (p < .05). The contrast of the cDWI cut-off with a b-value of 1200 or 1500 s/mm2 was better than the mDWI (p < .01). The ROC area under the curve for breast cancer detection was 0.837 for the mDWI and 0.909 for the cDWI cut-off (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

The cDWI cut-off provided better diagnostic performance than mDWI for breast cancer detection.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Using the low-ADC-pixel cut-off technique, computed DWI can improve diagnostic performance by increasing contrast and eliminating un-suppressed fat signals.

New Approaches and Recommendations for Risk-Adapted Breast Cancer Screening

Population-based breast cancer screening using mammography as the gold standard imaging modality has been in clinical practice for over 40 years. However, the limitations of mammography in terms of sensitivity and high false-positive rates, particularly in high-risk women, challenge the indiscriminate nature of population-based screening. Additionally, in light of expanding research on new breast cancer risk factors, there is a growing consensus that breast cancer screening should move toward a risk-adapted approach. Recent advancements in breast imaging technology, including contrast material-enhanced mammography (CEM), ultrasound (US) (automated-breast US, Doppler, elastography US), and especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (abbreviated, ultrafast, and contrast-agent free), may provide new opportunities for risk-adapted personalized screening strategies. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and radiomics techniques has the potential to enhance the performance of risk-adapted screening. This review article summarizes the current evidence and challenges in breast cancer screening and highlights potential future perspectives for various imaging techniques in a risk-adapted breast cancer screening approach. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Comparison of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Unenhanced MRI and Abbreviated Post-Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background and Objectives: To determine the percentage of breast cancers detectable by fused diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and abbreviated post-contrast-enhanced MRI. Materials and Methods: Between October 2016 and October 2017, 194 consecutive women (mean age, 54.2 years; age range, 28-82 years) with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer, who underwent preoperative 3.0 T breast MRI with DWI, were evaluated. Both fused DWI and abbreviated MRI were independently reviewed by two radiologists for the detection of index cancer (which showed the most suspicious findings in both breasts), location, lesion conspicuity, lesion type, and lesion size. Moreover, the relationship between cancer detection and histopathological results of surgical specimens was evaluated. Results: Index cancer detection rates were comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI (radiologist 1: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 184/194 [94.8%], respectively, p = 0.057; radiologist 2: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 183/194 [94.3%], respectively, p = 0.092). In both radiologists, abbreviated MRI showed a significantly higher lesion conspicuity than fused DWI (radiologist 1: 9.37 ± 2.24 vs. 8.78 ± 3.03, respectively, p < 0.001; radiologist 2: 9.16 ± 2.32 vs. 8.39 ± 2.93, respectively, p < 0.001). The κ value for the interobserver agreement of index cancer detection was 0.67 on fused DWI and 0.85 on abbreviated MRI. For lesion conspicuity, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.72 on fused DWI and 0.82 on abbreviated MRI. Among the histopathological factors, tumor invasiveness was associated with cancer detection on both fused DWI (p = 0.011) and abbreviated MRI (p = 0.004, radiologist 1), lymphovascular invasion on abbreviated MRI (p = 0.032, radiologist 1), and necrosis on fused DWI (p = 0.031, radiologist 2). Conclusions: Index cancer detection was comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI, although abbreviated MRI showed a significantly better lesion conspicuity.

The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Based on Maximum-Intensity Projection in Young Patients with Marked Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) utilizing maximum-intensity projection (MIP) was suggested as a cost-effective alternative tool without the risk of gadolinium-based contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DWI MIPs played a supportive role in young (≤60) patients with marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). The research included 1303 patients with varying degrees of BPE, and correlations between BPE on CE-MRI, the background diffusion signal (BDS) on DWI, and clinical parameters were analyzed. Lesion detection scores were compared between CE-MRI and DWI, with DWI showing higher scores. Among the 186 lesions in 181 patients with marked BPE on CE-MRI, the main lesion on MIPs of CE-MRI was partially or completely seen in 88.7% of cases, while it was not seen in 11.3% of cases. On the other hand, the main lesion on MIPs of DWI was seen in 91.4% of cases, with only 8.6% of cases showing no visibility. DWI achieved higher scores for lesion detection compared to CE-MRI. The presence of a marked BDS was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of a higher DWI score (p < 0.001), and non-mass lesions were associated with a decreased likelihood of a higher DWI score compared with mass lesions (p = 0.196). In conclusion, the inclusion of MIPs of DWI in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer patients, particularly young women with marked BPE, proved highly beneficial in improving the overall diagnostic process.

Image quality assessment using deep learning in high b-value diffusion-weighted breast MRI

The objective of this IRB approved retrospective study was to apply deep learning to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts on maximum intensity projections (MIP) of the breast, which were derived from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocols. The dataset consisted of 1309 clinically indicated breast MRI examinations of 1158 individuals (median age [IQR]: 50 years [16.75 years]) acquired between March 2017 and June 2020, in which a DWI sequence with a high b-value equal to 1500 s/mm2 was acquired. From these, 2D MIP images were computed and the left and right breast were cropped out as regions of interest (ROI). The presence of MRI image artifacts on the ROIs was rated by three independent observers. Artifact prevalence in the dataset was 37% (961 out of 2618 images). A DenseNet was trained with a fivefold cross-validation to identify artifacts on these images. In an independent holdout test dataset (n = 350 images) artifacts were detected by the neural network with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.921 and a positive predictive value of 0.981. Our results show that a deep learning algorithm is capable to identify MRI artifacts in breast DWI-derived MIPs, which could help to improve quality assurance approaches for DWI sequences of breast examinations in the future.

Deep Learning to Simulate Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI of Invasive Breast Cancer

Background There is increasing interest in noncontrast breast MRI alternatives for tumor visualization to increase the accessibility of breast MRI. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of generating simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from precontrast MRI sequences in biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer with use of deep learning. Materials and Methods Women with invasive breast cancer and a contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination that was performed for initial evaluation of the extent of disease between January 2015 and December 2019 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. A three-dimensional, fully convolutional deep neural network simulated contrast-enhanced T1-weighted breast MRI scans from five precontrast sequences (T1-weighted non-fat-suppressed [FS], T1-weighted FS, T2-weighted FS, apparent diffusion coefficient, and diffusion-weighted imaging). For qualitative assessment, four breast radiologists (with 3-15 years of experience) blinded to whether the method of contrast was real or simulated assessed image quality (excellent, acceptable, good, poor, or unacceptable), presence of tumor enhancement, and maximum index mass size by using 22 pairs of real and simulated contrast-enhanced MRI scans. Quantitative comparison was performed using whole-breast similarity and error metrics and Dice coefficient analysis of enhancing tumor overlap. Results Ninety-six MRI examinations in 96 women (mean age, 52 years ± 12 [SD]) were evaluated. The readers assessed all simulated MRI scans as having the appearance of a real MRI scan with tumor enhancement. Index mass sizes on real and simulated MRI scans demonstrated good to excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73-0.86; P < .001) without significant differences (mean differences, -0.8 to 0.8 mm; P = .36-.80). Almost all simulated MRI scans (84 of 88 [95%]) were considered of diagnostic quality (ratings of excellent, acceptable, or good). Quantitative analysis demonstrated strong similarity (structural similarity index, 0.88 ± 0.05), low voxel-wise error (symmetric mean absolute percent error, 3.26%), and Dice coefficient of enhancing tumor overlap of 0.75 ± 0.25. Conclusion It is feasible to generate simulated contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans with use of deep learning. Simulated and real contrast-enhanced MRI scans demonstrated comparable tumor sizes, areas of tumor enhancement, and image quality without significant qualitative or quantitative differences. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Slanetz in this issue. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on January 17, 2023.

The road to breast cancer screening with diffusion MRI

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women with a huge medical, social and economic impact. Mammography (MMG) has been the gold standard method until now because it is relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, MMG suffers from certain limitations, such as exposure to X-rays and difficulty of interpretation in dense breasts. Among other imaging methods, MRI has clearly the highest sensitivity and specificity, and breast MRI is the gold standard for the investigation and management of suspicious lesions revealed by MMG. Despite this performance, MRI, which does not rely on X-rays, is not used for screening except for a well-defined category of women at risk, because of its high cost and limited availability. In addition, the standard approach to breast MRI relies on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI with the injection of Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA), which have their own contraindications and can lead to deposit of gadolinium in tissues, including the brain, when examinations are repeated. On the other hand, diffusion MRI of breast, which provides information on tissue microstructure and tumor perfusion without the use of contrast agents, has been shown to offer higher specificity than DCE MRI with similar sensitivity, superior to MMG. Diffusion MRI thus appears to be a promising alternative approach to breast cancer screening, with the primary goal of eliminating with a very high probability the existence of a life-threatening lesion. To achieve this goal, it is first necessary to standardize the protocols for acquisition and analysis of diffusion MRI data, which have been found to vary largely in the literature. Second, the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of MRI examinations must be significantly improved, which may become possible with the development of dedicated low-field MRI units for breast cancer screening. In this article, we will first review the principles and current status of diffusion MRI, comparing its clinical performance with MMG and DCE MRI. We will then look at how breast diffusion MRI could be implemented and standardized to optimize accuracy of results. Finally, we will discuss how a dedicated, low-cost prototype of breast MRI system could be implemented and introduced to the healthcare market.

Performance of abbreviated protocols versus unenhanced MRI in detecting occult breast lesions of mammography in patients with dense breasts

To assess the diagnostic ability of abbreviated protocols of MRI (AP-MRI) compared with unenhanced MRI (UE-MRI) in mammographically occult cancers in patients with dense breast tissue. The retrospective analysis consisted of 102 patients without positive findings on mammography who received preoperative MRI full diagnostic protocols (FDP) between January 2015 and December 2018. Two breast radiologists read the UE, AP, and FDP. The interpretation times were recorded. The comparisons of the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of each MRI protocol, and the sensitivity of these protocols in each subgroup of different size tumors used the Chi-square test. The paired sample t-test was used for evaluating the difference of reading time of the three protocols. Among 102 women, there were 68 cancers and two benign lesions in 64 patients and 38 patients had benign or negative findings. Both readers found the sensitivity and specificity of AP and UE-MRI were similar (p > 0.05), whereas compared with FDP, UE had lower sensitivity (Reader 1/Reader 2: p = 0.023, 0.004). For different lesion size groups, one of the readers found that AP and FDP had higher sensitivities than UE-MRI for detecting the lesions ≤ 10 mm in diameter (p = 0.041, p = 0.023). Compared with FDP, the average reading time of UE-MRI and AP was remarkably reduced (p < 0.001). AP-MRI had more advantages than UE-MRI to detect mammographically occult cancers, especially for breast tumors ≤ 10 mm in diameter.

Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques

The role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as a biomarker has been the subject of active investigation in the field of breast radiology. By quantifying the random motion of water within a voxel of tissue, DWI provides indirect metrics that reveal cellularity and architectural features. Studies show that data obtained from DWI may provide information related to the characterization, prognosis, and treatment response of breast cancer. The incorporation of DWI in breast imaging demonstrates its potential to serve as a non-invasive tool to help guide diagnosis and treatment. In this review, current technical literature of diffusion-weighted breast imaging will be discussed, in addition to clinical applications, advanced techniques, and emerging use in the field of radiomics.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast invasive lobular carcinoma: comparison with invasive carcinoma of no special type using a histogram analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the imaging findings and visibility of breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics of ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) using a histogram analysis.

METHODS

We performed an observational retrospective study of 629 consecutive women with pathologically proven ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma of NST, who underwent 3-T MRI including DWI, between January 2017 and August 2020.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 71 women were allocated to each group. On DWI, 9 (12.7%) lesions of ILC and 4 (5.6%) invasive carcinomas of the NST were not visualized. For the tumor visibility on DWI, tumor size, tumor ADC value, and background diffusion grade were significantly associated with the visibility score in both groups (all P<0.05), whereas the mean background ADC value was not significant (P>0.05). The mean ADC (1.226×10^-3 vs. 1.052×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001), median ADC (1.222×10^-3 vs. 1.051×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.002), maximum ADC (1.758×10^-3 vs. 1.504×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001), minimum ADC (0.717×10^-3 vs. 0.649×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.003), 90th percentile ADC (1.506×10^-3 vs. 1.292×10^-3 mm²/s, P<0.001) and 10th percentile ADC (0.956×10^-3 vs. 0.818×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.008) were higher in ILC than in invasive carcinoma of NST. Additionally, the ADC difference value of the ILC was higher than that of invasive carcinoma of NST (1.04×10^-3 vs. 0.855×10^-3 mm²/s, P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

On DWI, the visibility of ILC was lower compared to invasive carcinoma of NST. ILC showed higher quantitative ADC values and higher ADC difference values.

Screening Breast MRI Primer: Indications, Current Protocols, and Emerging Techniques

Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Screening MRI is currently performed predominantly in patients at high risk for breast cancer, but it could be of benefit in patients at intermediate risk for breast cancer and patients with dense breasts. Decreasing scan time and image interpretation time could increase cost-effectiveness, making screening MRI accessible to a larger group of patients. Abbreviated breast MRI (Ab-MRI) reduces scan time by decreasing the number of sequences obtained, but as multiple delayed contrast enhanced sequences are not obtained, no kinetic information is available. Ultrafast techniques rapidly acquire multiple sequences during the first minute of gadolinium contrast injection and provide information about both lesion morphology and vascular kinetics. Diffusion-weighted imaging is a noncontrast MRI technique with the potential to detect mammographically occult cancers. This review article aims to discuss the current indications of breast MRI as a screening tool, examine the standard breast DCE-MRI technique, and explore alternate screening MRI protocols, including Ab-MRI, ultrafast MRI, and noncontrast diffusion-weighted MRI, which can decrease scan time and interpretation time.

Noncontrast-Enhanced MR-Based Conductivity Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection and Lesion Differentiation

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in noncontrast-enhanced MRI due to safety concerns for gadolinium contrast agents.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical feasibility of MR-based conductivity imaging for breast cancer detection and lesion differentiation.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and ten women, with 112 known cancers and 17 benign lesions (biopsy-proven), scheduled for preoperative MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Non-fat-suppressed T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence (T2WI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3T.

ASSESSMENT

Cancer detectability on each imaging modality was qualitatively evaluated on a per-breast basis: the conductivity maps derived from T2WI were independently reviewed by three radiologists (R1-R3). T2WI, DWI, and pre-operative digital mammography were independently reviewed by three other radiologists (R4-R6). Conductivity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements (mean, minimum, and maximum) were performed for 112 cancers and 17 benign lesions independently by two radiologists (R1 and R2). Tumor size was measured from surgical specimens.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Cancer detection rates were compared using generalized estimating equations. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with cancer detectability. Discriminating ability of conductivity and ADC was evaluated by using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Conductivity imaging showed lower cancer detection rates (20%-32%) compared to T2WI (62%-71%), DWI (85%-90%), and mammography (79%-88%) (all P < 0.05). Fatty breast on MRI (odds ratio = 11.8, P < 0.05) and invasive tumor size (odds ratio = 1.7, P < 0.05) were associated with cancer detectability of conductivity imaging. The maximum conductivity showed comparable ability to the mean ADC in discriminating between cancers and benign lesions (AUC = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.75] vs. 0.84 [0.76, 0.90], P = 0.06 (R1); 0.65 [0.56, 0.73] vs. 0.82 [0.74, 0.88], P = 0.07 (R2)).

DATA CONCLUSION

Although conductivity imaging showed suboptimal performance in breast cancer detection, the quantitative measurement of conductivity showed the potential for lesion differentiation.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Detection of Contralateral Breast Cancer Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison with Combined Mammography and Whole-Breast Ultrasound

Objective

To compare the screening performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and combined mammography and ultrasound (US) in detecting clinically occult contralateral breast cancer in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2017 and July 2018, 1148 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 53.2 ± 10.8 years) with unilateral breast cancer and no clinical abnormalities in the contralateral breast underwent 3T MRI, digital mammography, and radiologist-performed whole-breast US. In this retrospective study, three radiologists independently and blindly reviewed all DW MR images (b = 1000 s/mm² and apparent diffusion coefficient map) of the contralateral breast and assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category. For combined mammography and US evaluation, prospectively assessed results were used. Using histopathology or 1-year follow-up as the reference standard, cancer detection rate and the patient percentage with cancers detected among all women recommended for tissue diagnosis (positive predictive value; PPV₂) were compared.

Results

Of the 30 cases of clinically occult contralateral cancers (13 invasive and 17 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]), DW MRI detected 23 (76.7%) cases (11 invasive and 12 DCIS), whereas combined mammography and US detected 12 (40.0%, five invasive and seven DCIS) cases. All cancers detected by combined mammography and US, except two DCIS cases, were detected by DW MRI. The cancer detection rate of DW MRI (2.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%, 3.0%) was higher than that of combined mammography and US (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.5%, 1.8%; p = 0.009). DW MRI showed higher PPV₂ (42.1%; 95% CI: 26.3%, 59.2%) than combined mammography and US (18.5%; 95% CI: 9.9%, 30.0%; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, DW MRI detected significantly more contralateral breast cancers with fewer biopsy recommendations than combined mammography and US.

Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. A total of 29 women (mean age, 43.5 years) underwent DWI between August 2018 and April 2019 for 32 breast cancers and 16 benign breast lesions. Three radiologists independently reviewed the acquired DWI with b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 (A-b1000 and A-b2000) and the computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 (C-b2000). Image quality was scored and compared between the three DWI datasets. Lesion detectability was recorded, and the lesion's likelihood for malignancy was scored using a five-point scale.

RESULTS

The A-b1000 images were superior to the A-b2000 and C-b2000 images in chest distinction, fat suppression, and overall image quality. The A-b2000 and C-b2000 images showed comparable scores for all image quality parameters. C-b2000 showed the highest values for lesion detection among all readers, although there was no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy between the DWI datasets. The malignancy scores of the DWI images were not significantly different among the three readers.

CONCLUSIONS

A-b1000 DWI is suitable for breast lesion evaluations, considering its better image quality and comparable diagnostic values compared to that of A-b2000 and C-b2000 images. The additional use of computed high b-value DWI may have the potential to increase the detectability of breast masses.

Fusion of high b-value diffusion-weighted and unenhanced T1-weighted images to diagnose invasive breast cancer: factors associated with false-negative results

OBJECTIVES

We sought factors associated with false-negative results in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer via non-contrast breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using fused high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and unenhanced T1-weighted images (T1WI).

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2019, 316 consecutive women (mean age, 54.6 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative breast MRI, including fused high b-value DWI and unenhanced T1WI, were retrospectively evaluated. Malignancy confidence ratings of the most suspicious breast lesions evident on fused DWI were derived by two radiologists using a 6-point Likert-type scale. Both clinicopathological and imaging features were analyzed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with false-negative DWI results in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 316 breast cancers, fused DWI yielded 289 (91.5%) true-positive and 27 (8.5%) false-negative results. Multivariate analysis showed that small tumor size (≤ 1 cm) (odds ratio [OR], 5.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11, 16.81; p = 0.001), presence of calcifications in the tumor (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.27, 9.15; p = 0.015), and a moderate/marked background diffusion signal (ORs, 4.23 and 19.18; 95% CI, 1.31, 13.67 and 6.51, 56.46; p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively) were significantly associated with false-negative results. In subgroup analysis of 141 screening-detected cancers, a marked background diffusion signal (OR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.30, 27.35; p = 0.001) remained significantly associated with false-negative results in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to histopathological features, a higher background diffusion signal was associated with false-negative results in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer via non-contrast MRI using fused high b-value DWI and unenhanced T1WI.

KEY POINTS

• Subcentimeter tumors and presence of calcifications in the tumor are associated with false-negative diffusion-weighted imaging results in the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. • A higher degree of background diffusion signal may lead to false-negative interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Design and Imaging Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Study in Korea

Purpose

Interest in unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for breast cancer is growing due to concerns about gadolinium deposition in the brain and the high cost of contrast-enhanced MRI. The purpose of this report is to describe the protocol of the Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Trial (DWIST), which is a prospective, multicenter, intraindividual comparative cohort study designed to compare the performance of mammography, ultrasonography, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI screening in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 890 women with BRCA mutation or family history of breast cancer and lifetime risk ≥ 20% are enrolled. The participants undergo 2 annual breast screenings with digital mammography, ultrasonography, DCE MRI, and DW MRI at 3.0 T. Images are independently interpreted by trained radiologists. The reference standard is a combination of pathology and 12-month follow-up. Each image modality and their combination will be compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, rate of invasive cancer detection, abnormal interpretation rate, and characteristics of detected cancers. The first participant was enrolled in April 2019. At the time of manuscript submission, 5 academic medical centers in South Korea are actively enrolling eligible women and a total of 235 women have undergone the first round of screening. Completion of enrollment is expected in 2022 and the results of the study are expected to be published in 2026.

Discussion

DWIST is the first prospective multicenter study to compare the performance of DW MRI and conventional imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in high-risk women. DWIST is currently in the patient enrollment phase.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03835897

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as a Stand-Alone Breast Imaging Modality

확산강조영상은 유방암의 진단과 스크리닝에 있어 독립적 검사 방법으로서의 기대되는 결과를 보여주는 빠른 비조영증강 검사 방법이다. 현재까지의 연구 결과 유방암 진단에 있어 독립적 검사 방법으로서 확산강조영상의 민감도는 역동적 조영증강 검사보다는 낮으나 유방촬영술보다는 높으며, 이로써 유방암 스크리닝에 대한 유용한 대안이 될 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 확산강조영상의 표준화된 영상 획득과 판독을 통해 영상 화질이 개선될 수 있고, 판독 결과의 다양성도 감소할 것으로 기대된다. 또한, 최신 기법과 후처리 기법을 사용한 고해상도 확산강조영상을 시행함으로써 1 cm 미만의 작은 암의 발견율을 증가시킬 수 있고, 가음성 및 가양성 결과를 감소시킬 것으로 보인다. 현재 한국에서 진행 중인 고위험군 여성에서의 확산강조영상 스크리닝에 대한 다기관 연구 결과가 나온다면 독립적 검사로서의 확산강조영상의 사용을 촉진시킬 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been increasingly used to study breast cancer for screening high-risk cases, pre-operative staging, and problem-solving because of its high sensitivity. However, its cost-effectiveness is still debated. Thus, the concept of abbreviated MRI (ABB-MRI) protocols was proposed as a possible solution for reducing MRI costs.

PURPOSE

: to investigate the role of the abbreviated MRI protocols in detecting and staging breast cancer.

METHODS

: a systematic search of the literature was carried out in the bibliographic databases: Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Science Direct.

RESULTS

: forty-one articles were included, which described results of the assessment of fifty-three abbreviated protocols for screening, staging, recurrence assessing, and problem-solving or clarification.

CONCLUSIONS

: the use of ABB-MRI protocols allows reducing the acquisition and reading times, maintaining a high concordance with the final interpretation, in comparison to a complete protocol. However, larger prospective and multicentre trials are necessary to validate the performance in specific clinical environments.

Simultaneous Multislice Readout-Segmented Echo Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancers

BACKGROUND

In diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of breast MRI, simultaneous multislice acceleration techniques can be used for readout-segmented echo planar imaging (rs-EPI) to shorten the scan time.

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, and scan time of rs-EPI and simultaneous multislice rs-EPI (SMS rs-EPI) sequences.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

In all, 134 consecutive women (mean age: 55.3 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI.

FIELD STRENGTH/ SEQUENCES

3.0T; rs-EPI sequence, prototypic SMS rs-EPI sequence and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) sequence ASSESSMENT: For quantitative comparison, two radiologists independently measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion contrast, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). For qualitative comparison, image quality, lesion conspicuity, and reader preference were assessed with a reference of DCE-MRI.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used.

RESULTS

For SNR and CNR, there were no differences between the sequences (P = 0.342 and 0.665 for reader 1; P = 0.606 and P = 0.116 for reader 2). Lesion contrast of SMS rs-EPI was higher than that of rs-EPI (P < 0.05 for both reader 1 and reader 2). Mean tumor ADC was similar in rs-EPI and SMS rs-EPI sequences (0.98 ± 0.22 vs. 1.00 ± 0.22; P = 0.291 for reader 1, 0.98 ± 0.21 vs. 1.00 ± 0.22; P = 0.418 for reader 2). Regarding qualitative comparison, image quality and lesion conspicuity were higher in SMS rs-EPI than in rs-EPI (both P < 0.05 for both readers). The two readers regarded SMS rs-EPI as superior or equal to rs-EPI in over 90% of cases. The acquisition time was 4:30 minutes for rs-EPI and 2:31 minutes for SMS rs-EPI.

DATA CONCLUSION

The SMS rs-EPI sequence resulted in a similar ADC value and better image quality than the rs-EPI sequence in a 44.1% reduced scan time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 3.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Standardization of Image Acquisition and Interpretation

Diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapid, unenhanced imaging technique that measures the motion of water molecules within tissues and provides information regarding the cell density and tissue microstructure. DW MRI has demonstrated the potential to improve the specificity of breast MRI, facilitate the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and can be employed in unenhanced MRI screening. However, standardization of the acquisition and interpretation of DW MRI is challenging. Recently, the European Society of Breast Radiology issued a consensus statement, which described the acquisition parameters and interpretation of DW MRI. The current article describes the basic principles, standardized acquisition protocols and interpretation guidelines, and the clinical applications of DW MRI in breast imaging.

Clinical Feasibility of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Technique in Breast Cancer Patients

Background: We evaluated the feasibility of the reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with computed DWI technique by comparison and analysis of the inter-method agreement among acquired rFOV DWI (rFOVA), rFOV DWI with computed DWI technique (rFOVS), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A total of 130 patients with biopsy-proven breast cancers who underwent breast MRI from April 2017 to December 2017 were included in this study. The rFOVS were reformatted by calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient curve obtained from rFOVA b = 0 s/mm² and b = 500 s/mm². Visual assessment of the image quality of rFOVA b = 1000 s/mm², rFOVS, and DCE MRI was performed using a four-point grading system. Morphologic analyses of the index cancer was performed on rFOVA, rFOVS, and DCE MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast of tumor-to-parenchyma (TPC) were calculated. Results: Image quality scores with rFOVA, rFOVS, and DCE MRI were not significantly different (p = 0.357). Lesion analysis of shape, margin, and size of the index cancer also did not show significant differences among the three sequences (p = 0.858, p = 0.242, and p = 0.858, respectively). SNR, CNR, and TPC of DCE MRI were significantly higher than those of rFOVA and rFOVS (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.016, respectively). Significant differences were not found between the SNR, CNR, and TPC of rFOVA and those of rFOVS (p > 0.999, p > 0.999, and p > 0.999, respectively). Conclusion: The rFOVA and rFOVS showed nearly equivalent levels of image quality required for morphological analysis of the tumors and for lesion conspicuity compared with DCE MRI.

Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T for detection of occult disease in the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer

PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) offers unenhanced method to detect breast cancer without cost and safety concerns associated with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of DW-MRI at 3.0T in detection of clinically and mammographically occult contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2018, 1130 patients (mean age 53.3 years; range 26-84 years) with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast MRI and had no abnormalities on clinical and mammographic examinations of contralateral breast were included. Three experienced radiologists independently reviewed DW-MRI (b = 0 and 1000 s/mm²) and DCE-MRI and assigned a BI-RADS category. Using histopathology or 1-year clinical follow-up, performance measures of DW-MRI were compared with DCE-MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 21 (1.9%, 21/1130) cancers were identified (12 ductal carcinoma in situ and 9 invasive ductal carcinoma; mean invasive tumor size, 8.0 mm) in the contralateral breast. Cancer detection rate of DW-MRI was 13-15 with mean of 14 per 1000 examinations (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-23 per 1000 examinations), which was lower than that of DCE-MRI (18-19 with mean of 18 per 1000 examinations, P = 0.01). A lower abnormal interpretation rate (14.0% versus 17.0%, respectively, P < 0.001) with higher specificity (87.3% versus 84.6%, respectively, P < 0.001) but lower sensitivity (77.8% versus 96.8%, respectively, P < 0.001) was noted for DW-MRI compared to DCE-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

DW-MRI at 3.0T has the potential as a cost-effective tool for evaluation of contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Correlations of female hormone levels with background parenchymal enhancement and apparent diffusion coefficient values in premenopausal breast cancer patients: Effects on cancer visibility

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationships between female hormone levels and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of breast parenchyma, as well as the effects of BPE and ADC values on cancer visibility.

METHODS

This prospective study was performed in 164 consecutive premenopausal patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from November 2016 to December 2018. Two radiologists analyzed the qualitative, quantitative BPE and ADC values of normal contralateral breast parenchyma. We also analyzed the cancer visibility using a three-point scale (0: no visibility, 1: slight visibility, 2: excellent visibility).

RESULTS

The progesterone level was significantly correlated with qualitative BPE grade and quantitative values of the BPE, as well as with the mean ADC. On contrast enhanced image (CEI), the visibility score was significantly associated with tumor size, qualitative and quantitative BPE. On diffusion weighted image (DWI), tumor size was significantly associated with the visibility score, whereas the ADC value was not. Of four lesions with a score of 0 on CEI, three had a score of 2 and one a score of 1 on DWI. Regarding the visibility score on DWI, tumor size and histologic type were significantly different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative or quantitative BPE of breast parenchyma was positively correlated with the progesterone level and the mean ADC was negatively correlated. The cancer visibility was affected by BPE on CEI, but not by ADC on DWI. Small-sized cancer and invasive lobular cancer could be the causes of false-negative diagnoses on DWI.

Diffusion-weighted MRI for Unenhanced Breast Cancer Screening

Diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is a rapid technique that measures the mobility of water molecules within tissue, reflecting the cellular microenvironment. At DW MRI, breast cancers typically exhibit reduced diffusivity and appear hyperintense to surrounding tissues. On the basis of this characteristic, DW MRI may offer an unenhanced method to detect breast cancer without the costs and safety concerns associated with dynamic contrast material-enhanced MRI, the current reference standard in the setting of high-risk screening. This application of DW MRI has not been widely explored but is particularly timely given the growing health concerns related to the long-term use of gadolinium-based contrast material. Moreover, increasing breast density notification legislation across the United States is raising awareness of the limitations of mammography in women with dense breasts, emphasizing the need for additional cost-effective supplemental screening examinations. Preliminary studies suggest unenhanced MRI with DW MRI may provide higher sensitivity than screening mammography for the detection of breast malignancies. Larger prospective multicenter trials are needed to validate single-center findings and assess the performance of DW MRI for generalized breast cancer screening. Standardization of DW MRI acquisition and interpretation is essential to ensure reliable sensitivity and specificity, and an optimal approach for screening using readily available techniques is proposed here.

Diffusion MRI of the breast: Current status and future directions

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is increasingly being incorporated into routine breast MRI protocols in many institutions worldwide, and there are abundant breast DWI indications ranging from lesion detection and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors to assessing prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer and predicting treatment response. DWI has the potential to serve as a noncontrast MR screening method. Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, which is a commonly used quantitative DWI measure, advanced DWI models such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), non-Gaussian diffusion MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are extensively exploited in this field, allowing the characterization of tissue perfusion and architecture and improving diagnostic accuracy without the use of contrast agents. This review will give a summary of the clinical literature along with future directions. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:70-90.

Abbreviated MRI Protocols in Breast Cancer Diagnostics

Oncologic imaging focused on the detection of breast cancer is of increasing importance, with over 1.7 million new cases detected each year worldwide. MRI of the breast has been described to be one of the most sensitive imaging modalities in breast cancer detection; however, clinical use is limited due to high costs. In the past, the objective and clinical routine of oncologic imaging was to provide one extended imaging protocol covering all potential needs and clinical implications regardless of the specific clinical indication or question. Future protocols might be more focused according to a "keep it short and simple" approach, with a reduction of patient magnet time and a limited number of images to review. Rather than replacing conventional full-diagnostic breast MRI protocols, these approaches aim at introducing a new thinking in oncologic imaging using a diversification of available imaging approaches targeted to the dedicated clinical needs of the individual patient. Here we review current approaches on using abbreviated protocols that aim to increase the clinical availability and use of breast MRI for improved early detection of breast cancer. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:647-658.

Diffusion-weighted breast imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast represents one of the most sensitive imaging modalities in breast cancer detection. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a sequence variation introduced as a complementary MRI technique that relies on mapping the diffusion process of water molecules thereby providing additional information about the underlying tissue. Since water diffusion is more restricted in most malignant tumors than in benign ones owing to the higher cellularity of the rapidly proliferating neoplasia, DWI has the potential to contribute to the identification and characterization of suspicious breast lesions. Thus, DWI might increase the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI and its clinical value. Future applications including optimized DWI sequences, technical developments in MR devices, and the application of radiomics/artificial intelligence algorithms may expand the potential of DWI in breast imaging beyond its current supplementary role.

Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a noncontrast-enhanced MRI technique. There are new promising studies on the use of DWI as a part of the enhanced or unenhanced abbreviated breast MRI protocols.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of breast DWI in the assessment of mass morphology and determine the contribution of this morphologic evaluation in their characterization.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 213 consecutive women were breast MR imaged and had a later confirmed diagnosis.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) and DWI at 1.5T.

ASSESSMENT

After Institutional Review Board approval, two radiologists first independently, and later in consensus, evaluated the visibility and morphology of the 143 malignant, 70 benign masses on DWI and DCE-MRI in separate sessions, blindly. Shape, margin, and internal pattern of the masses were evaluated according to BI-RADS lexicon. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor size were measured by one radiologist.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Consistency between imaging methods and readers was evaluated with Cohen's kappa statistics. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the best predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS

Tumor visibility on DWI was high to moderate in at least 88% of cases. Consistency between DWI and DCE-MRI was substantial (kappa ≥0.757) for shape and margin and moderate (kappa = 0.505) for internal pattern. Interobserver agreement was substantial to moderate for all morphologic parameters (kappa ≥0.596). Morphology evaluated on DWI provided 83-84% accuracy in discriminating malignant from benign masses. ADC alone provided 90-91% accuracy. Both morphologic parameters and ADC were significantly associated with malignancy on multivariate analysis and provided 91-93% accuracy.

DATA CONCLUSION

DWI might be used not only for ADC evaluation but also for the morphological evaluation of breast masses to characterize them.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1668-1677.