Breast cancer and its impact in male transsexuals

Transgender people's knowledge about the adverse effects of cross-hormonization: challenges for nursing

OBJECTIVES

to identify trans women's and men's knowledge about the adverse effects of cross-hormonization and understand the repercussions of hormonization practices on trans women's and men's health.

METHODS

exploratory, descriptive, qualitative research, developed with 41 participants, from July 2019 to February 2020, in a trans health outpatient clinic. Thematic-categorical content analysis was used.

RESULTS

from the analysis, the categories emerged: Knowledge about the adverse effects of cross-hormonization; and Cross-hormonization practices and their meaning.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

nursing practices, based on the identification of knowledge about adverse effects and the understanding of cross-hormonization practices in trans women's and men's health, can result in more inclusive care.

Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening in transgender and gender nonbinary individuals

Background

Current cancer screening guidelines for transgender individuals are guided primarily by expert opinion, and are extrapolated from guidelines for cisgender populations, despite the additional unique risks that transgender populations face in cancer risk and cancer care.

Aims

We examined adherence to current recommended screening guidelines as well as drivers of cancer screening in 192 transgender and gender-nonbinary (TGNB) individuals participating in Project AFFIRM, a multi-site longitudinal cohort study of TGNB individuals.

Methods

We used a chi-squared analysis to look for significant associations between predictors and adherence to breast, cervical, prostate and colon cancer screening. We analyzed predictors by 3 different categories: sex/gender identity, healthcare access, and socioeconomic status.

Results

Screening rates were low for breast, cervical, prostate and colon cancer in TGNB populations compared to national rates for cisgender populations. Among several significant predictors, gender-affirming surgery (hysterectomy) (p-value = <0.0001) and telling others they are transgender at a younger age (< 18) (p-value = 0.0344) were associated with increased screening adherence, while having HIV was associated with decreased screening adherence (p-value = 0.0045).

Discussion

Our results suggest that interacting with the healthcare system to obtain comprehensive cancer screening can be difficult to navigate among the other healthcare needs of TGNB individuals both on an individual and systems level. Future efforts to mitigate the barriers to screening adherence should be targeted at the healthcare system level.

Culturally safe, appropriate, and high-quality breast cancer screening for transgender people: A scoping review

Background

There is a recognized need for evidence to inform breast cancer screening guidelines and services for transgender people, who face barriers to accessing appropriate and inclusive health care.

Aims

This review summarized evidence for breast cancer risk and screening guidelines in transgender individuals, including the potential impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT); factors that may influence screening decision-making and behaviors; and considerations for providing culturally safe, high-quality screening services.

Methods

A protocol was developed based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Searches were performed in Medline, Emcare, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting information on the provision of culturally safe, high-quality breast cancer screening services for transgender people.

Results

We identified 57 sources for inclusion: 13 cross-sectional studies, 6 case reports, 2 case series, 28 review or opinion articles, 6 systematic reviews, 1 qualitative study, and 1 book chapter. Evidence on rates of breast cancer screening among transgender people and the association between GAHT and breast cancer risk was inconclusive. Factors negatively associated with cancer screening behaviors included socioeconomic barriers, stigma, and lack of health provider awareness of transgender health issues. Breast cancer screening recommendations varied and were generally based on expert opinion due to the lack of clear evidence. Considerations for providing culturally safe care to transgender people were identified and mapped to the areas of workplace policies and procedures, patient information, clinic environment, professional conduct, communication, and knowledge and competency.

Discussion

Screening recommendations for transgender individuals are complicated by the lack of robust epidemiological data and clear understanding of the role GAHT may play in breast cancer pathogenesis. Guidelines have been developed based on expert opinion and are subsequently not uniform or evidence based. Further work is required to clarify and consolidate recommendations.

Sexuality after breast cancer, how to provide a global and contemporary approach

Patients' sexuality is one of the major and most neglected impact of breast cancer (BC) and its treatment. Even though research is ongoing on the subject, sexuality issues are rarely taken into account and efficiently dealt with in clinical practice. The objective is to review the impact of BC and its treatment on modern women sexuality. In the literature, a heterogeneous level of advancement is notable in the different publishing countries depending on the cultural background; some countries simply do not publish on the matter, others mainly discuss the male partners and practicians experience, and lastly, the most progressive countries have moved up to studying niches of patients such as sexual and gender minorities. A multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management, appears most efficient. There is a need for greater inclusion of partners and for providing a specific training to first-line health care providers. This review provides a general contemporary worldwide overview of the state of the art in sexuality issues in BC patients and survivors.

Cancer screening in the transgender population: a review of current guidelines, best practices, and a proposed care model

Over the last 50 years cancer mortality has decreased, the biggest contributor to this decrease has been the widespread adoption of cancer screening protocols. These guidelines are based on large population studies, which often do not capture the non-gender conforming portion of the population. The aim of this review is to cover current guidelines and practice patterns of cancer screening in transgender patients, and, where evidence-based data is lacking, to draw from cis-gender screening guidelines to suggest best-practice screening approaches for transgender patients. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline, using all iterations of the follow search terms: transgender, gender non-conforming, gender non-binary, cancer screening, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, anal cancer, and all acceptable abbreviations. Given the limited amount of existing literature inclusion was broad. After eliminating duplicates and abstract, all queries yielded 85 unique publications. There are currently very few transgender specific cancer screening recommendations. All the guidelines discussed in this manuscript were designed for cis-gender patients and applied to the transgender community based on small case series. Currently, there is not sufficient to evidence to determine the long-term effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy on an individual’s cancer risk. Established guidelines for cisgender individuals and can reasonably followed for transgender patients based on what organs remain in situ. In the future comprehensive cancer screening and prevention initiatives centered on relevant anatomy and high-risk behaviors specific for transgender men and women are needed.