Substantial evidence for the clinical significance of missense variant BRCA1 c.5309G>T p.(Gly1770Val)

Increased prevalence of the founder BRCA1 c.5309G>T and recurrent BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA mutations in breast cancer families from Northerstern region of Morocco: evidence of geographical specificity and high relevance for genetic counseling

BACKGROUND

Inherited mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) confer high risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Because the contribution of BRCA1/2 germline mutations to BC in the Northeastern population of Morocco remains largely unknown, we conducted this first study to evaluate the prevalence and the phenotypic spectrum of two BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations (the founder BRCA1 c.5309G>T and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA). This choice was also argued by the presence of an apparent specific geographical connection of these mutations and the Northeastern region of Morocco.

METHODS

Screening for the germline mutations c.5309G>T and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA was performed by sequencing on a total of 184 breast cancer (BC) patients originated from the Northeastern region of Morocco. The likelihood of identifying a BRCA mutation is calculated using the Eisinger scoring model. The clinical and pathologic features were compared between the BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative groups of patients. Difference in survival outcomes was compared between mutation carriers and non-carriers.

RESULTS

BRCA1 c.5309G>T and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA are responsible for a significant proportion of all BC cases (12.5%) and at least 20% of familial BC. The screening of BRCA1/2 genes by NGS sequencing confirmed that there are no additional mutations detected among positive patients. The clinicopathological features in positive patients were in accordance with typical characteristics of BRCA pathogenic mutations. The mean features in the carriers were the early onset of the disease, familial history, triple negative status (for BRCA1 c.5309G>T) and worse prognosis in terms of overall surviving. Our study indicates that the Eisinger scoring model could be recommended to identify patients for referral to BRCA1/2 oncogenetic counseling.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that BRCA1 c.5309G>T and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA mutations may have a strong founder and/or recurrent effect on breast cancer among the Northeastern Moroccan population. There contribution to breast cancer incidence is certainly substantial in this subgroup. Therefore, we believe that BRCA1 c.5309G>T and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA mutations have to be included in the array of tests aimed at revealing cancer syndrome carriers among subjects of Moroccan origin.

In Silico and Structure-Based Assessment of Similar Variants Discovered in Tandem Repeats of BRCT Domains of BRCA1 and BARD1 To Characterize the Folding Pattern

BRCA1 and BARD1 are important proteins in the homologous DNA damage repair pathways. Different genetic variants identified in these proteins have been clinically correlated with the occurrence of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) reported in the BRCT domains of BRCA1 and BARD1 substantiate the importance of BRCT domain-containing proteins for genomic integrity. To classify the pathogenicity of variants, in silico, structural and molecular dynamics (MD)-based approaches were explored. Different variants reported in the BRCT region were retrieved from cBioPortal, LOVD3, BRCA Exchange, and COSMIC databases to evaluate the pathogenicity. Multiple sequence alignment and superimposition of the structures of BRCA1 BRCT and BARD1 BRCT domains were performed to compare alterations in folding patterns. From 11 in silico predictions servers, variants reported to be pathogenic by 70% of the servers were considered for structural analysis. To our observations, four residue pairs of both the proteins were reported, harboring 11 variants, H1686Y, W1718L, P1749L, P1749S, and W1837L variants for BRCA1 BRCT and H606D, H606N, W635L, P657L, P657S, and W762F for BARD1 BRCT. MD simulations of the BRCT repeat regions of these variants and wild-type proteins were performed to evaluate the differences of folding patterns. Root mean square deviation (RMSD), R _g, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), and root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of variants showed slight differences in the folding patterns from the wild-type proteins. Furthermore, principal components analysis of H1686Y, P1749S, and W1718L variants of BRCA1 showed less flexibility than the wild type, whereas that of H606D, W635L, and W762F of BARD1 showed more flexibility than the wild type. Normal mode analysis of the energy minima from the simulation trajectories revealed that most of the variants do not show much differences in the flexibility compared to the wild-type proteins, except for the discrete regions in the BRCT repeats, most prominently in the 1798-1801 amino acid region of BRCA1 and at the residue 744 in BARD1.

Functional RECAP (REpair CAPacity) assay identifies homologous recombination deficiency undetected by DNA-based BRCAness tests

Germline BRCA1/2 mutation status is predictive for response to Poly-[ADP-Ribose]-Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in breast cancer (BC) patients. However, non-germline BRCA1/2 mutated and homologous recombination repair deficient (HRD) tumors are likely also PARP-inhibitor sensitive. Clinical validity and utility of various HRD biomarkers are under investigation. The REpair CAPacity (RECAP) test is a functional method to select HRD tumors based on their inability to form RAD51 foci. We investigated whether this functional test defines a similar group of HRD tumors as DNA-based tests. An HRD enriched cohort (n = 71; 52 primary and 19 metastatic BCs) selected based on the RECAP test (26 RECAP-HRD; 37%), was subjected to DNA-based HRD tests (i.e., Classifier of HOmologous Recombination Deficiency (CHORD) and BRCA1/2-like classifier). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was carried out for 38 primary and 19 metastatic BCs. The RECAP test identified all bi-allelic BRCA deficient samples (n = 15) in this cohort. RECAP status partially correlated with DNA-based HRD test outcomes (70% concordance for both RECAP-CHORD and RECAP-BRCA1/2-like classifier). RECAP selected additional samples unable to form RAD51 foci, suggesting that this functional assay identified deficiencies in other DNA repair genes, which could also result in PARP-inhibitor sensitivity. Direct comparison of these HRD tests in clinical trials will be required to evaluate the optimal predictive test for clinical decision making.

BRCA1 and Breast Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) is a tumor suppressor gene, which is mainly involved in the repair of DNA damage, cell cycle regulation, maintenance of genome stability, and other important physiological processes. Mutations or defects in the BRCA1 gene significantly increase the risk of breast, ovarian, prostate, and other cancers in carriers. In this review, we summarized the molecular functions and regulation of BRCA1 and discussed recent insights into the detection and treatment of BRCA1 mutated breast cancer.

Prevalence of specific and recurrent/founder pathogenic variants in BRCA genes in breast and ovarian cancer in North Africa

Background

Elucidation of specific and recurrent/founder pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA (BRCA1 and BRCA2) genes can make the genetic testing, for breast cancer (BC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC), affordable for developing nations.

Methods

To establish the knowledge about BRCA PVs and to determine the prevalence of the specific and recurrent/founder variants in BRCA genes in BC and/or OC women in North Africa, a systematic review was conducted in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia.

Results

Search of the databases yielded 25 relevant references, including eleven studies in Morocco, five in Algeria, and nine in Tunisia. Overall, 15 studies investigated both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, four studies examined the entire coding region of the BRCA1 gene, and six studies in which the analysis was limited to a few BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 exons. Overall, 76 PVs (44 in BRCA1 and32 in BRCA2) were identified in 196 BC and/or OC patients (129 BRCA1 and 67 BRCA2 carriers). Eighteen of the 76 (23.7%) PVs [10/44 (22.7%) in BRCA1 and 8/32 (25%) in BRCA2] were reported for the first time and considered to be novel PVs. Among those identified as unlikely to be of North African origin, the BRCA1 c.68_69del and BRCA1 c.5266dupC Jewish founder alleles and PVs that have been reported as recurrent/founder variants in European populations (ex: BRCA1 c.181T>G, BRCA1 c1016dupA). The most well characterized PVs are four in BRCA1 gene [c.211dupA (14.7%), c.798_799detTT (14%), c.5266dup (8.5%), c.5309G>T (7.8%), c.3279delC (4.7%)] and one in BRCA2 [c.1310_1313detAAGA (38.9%)]. The c.211dupA and c.5309G>T PVs were identified as specific founder variants in Tunisia and Morocco, accounting for 35.2% (19/54) and 20.4% (10/49) of total established BRCA1 PVs, respectively. c.798_799delTT variant was identified in 14% (18/129) of all BRCA1 North African carriers, suggesting a founder allele. A broad spectrum of recurrent variants including BRCA1 3279delC, BRCA1 c.5266dup and BRCA2 c.1310_1313detAAGA was detected in 42 patients. BRCA1 founder variants explain around 36.4% (47/129) of BC and outnumber BRCA2 founder variants by a ratio of ≈3:1.

Conclusions

Testing BC and/or OC patients for the panel of specific and recurrent/founder PVs might be the most cost-effective molecular diagnosis strategy.

Functional pre-therapeutic evaluation by genome editing of variants of uncertain significance of essential tumor suppressor genes

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies in oncology are promising but variants of uncertain significance (VUS) limit their use for clinical management and necessitate functional testing in vitro. Using BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, which have consequences on PARP inhibitor sensitivity, and POLE variants, potential biomarkers of immunotherapy response, we developed a rapid functional assay based on CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to determine the functional consequences of these variants having potentially direct implications on patients' access to targeted therapies.

METHODS

We first evaluated the functional impact of 26 BRCA1 and 7 BRCA2 variants by editing and comparing NGS results between the variant of interest and a silent control variant. Ten of these variants had already been classified as benign or pathogenic and were used as controls. Finally, we extended this method to the characterization of POLE VUS.

RESULTS

For the 23 variants that were unclassified or for which conflicting interpretations had been reported, 15 were classified as functionally normal and 6 as functionally abnormal. Another two variants were found to have intermediate consequences, both with potential impacts on splicing. We then compared these scores to the patients' responses to PARP inhibitors when possible. Finally, to prove the application of our method to the classification of variants from other tumor suppressor genes, we exemplified with three POLE VUS. Among them, two were classified with an intermediate functional impact and one was functionally abnormal. Eventually, four POLE variants previously classified in databases were also evaluated. However, we found evidence of a discordance with the classification, variant p.Leu424Val being found here functionally normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our new rapid functional assay can be used to characterize the functional implication of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, giving patients whose variants were evaluated as functionally abnormal access to PARP inhibitor treatment. Retrospective analysis of patients' responses to PARP inhibitors, where accessible, was consistent with our functional score evaluation and confirmed the accuracy of our protocol. This method could potentially be extended to the classification of VUS from all essential tumor suppressor genes and can be performed within a timeframe compatible with clinical applications, thereby having a direct theranostic impact.

Prevalence and founder effect of the BRCA1 p.(Val1833Met) variant in the Greek population, with further evidence for pathogenicity and risk modification

PURPOSE

Multiple lines of evidence have suggested a likely causative role in breast/ovarian cancer (BrCa/OvCa) predisposition for the BRCA1 p.(Val1833Met) variant, predominantly found among Greek patients. Our aim was to study the variant's prevalence and founder effect on the Greek population, while providing additional data for its pathogenicity.

METHODS

We genotyped 3531 BrCa/OvCa patients using Sanger and next generation sequencing, as well as 1558 healthy, age-matched females with real-time PCR. Carriers underwent haplotype analysis to determine a founder effect. A co-segregation analysis was applied to estimate the likelihood ratio for pathogenicity.

RESULTS

In total, 27 BrCa/OvCa patients (0.77%; 27/3531) were found to carry the p.(Val1833Met) variant. No carriers were identified in the control group diagnosis. A common shared haplotype, spanning 2.76 Mb on chromosome 17 was demonstrated among carriers, establishing the founder effect. BRCA1, p.(Val1833Met) is possibly a disease-associated variant, supported by a likelihood ratio of 1.88, while a correlation to ovarian cancer is suspected.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, BRCA1, p.(Val1833Met) variant is a Greek founder and is very likely to predispose for BrCa/OvCa. Therefore, such carriers should be counselled accordingly, with clinical recommendations supporting surveillance and risk-reduction strategies, while providing the option for targeted therapeutic interventions.