Predictive value of lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema undergoing complex decongestive therapy

Characterizing Normal Upper Extremity Lymphatic Flow with 99mTc In-House Dextran: A Retrospective Study

Lymphoscintigraphy evaluates the lymphatic system using radiocolloid compounds like 99mTc-sulfur colloid and 99mTc-nanocolloid, which vary in particle size and distribution timing. A local in-house Dextran kit (15-40 nm) was developed in 2005 and began clinical use in 2008 to localize sentinel lymph nodes; diagnose lymphedema; and detect lymphatic leakage. The normal drainage pattern remains unexplored. We retrospectively analyzed 84 upper extremity lymphoscintigraphies from 2008 to 2021. 99mTc in-house Dextran was intradermally injected into both hands, followed by whole-body imaging at specified intervals (≤15 min; 16-30 min; 31-45 min; 46-60 min), with some receiving delayed imaging. Visual and quantitative analyses recorded axillary and forearm lymph nodes and liver, kidney, and urinary bladder activity. Results showed 92% (77/84) upper extremity lymphatic tract visualization within 45 min. Axillary node detection rates increased from 46% (≤15 min) to 86% (46-60 min). Delayed imaging further revealed nodes. Epitrochlear or brachial node visualization was rare (4%, 3/84). Hepatic, renal, and urinary bladder activity was noted in 54%, 71%, and 93% at 1 h, respectively. The axillary node uptake ratio was minimal (<2.5% of injection site activity; median 0.33%). This study characterizes normal upper extremity lymphatic drainage using 99mTc in-house Dextran, offering insights into its clinical application.

Lymphoscintigraphy is frequently recommended but seldom used in a "real world setting"

OBJECTIVE

Lymphedema (LED) lacks a standard, simple, guiding noninvasive diagnostic test, unlike the two other circulatory disorders-arterial or venous disease. Lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) has been recommended by several guidelines as the diagnostic test of choice for LED. Several recent expert panels, however, have suggested from anecdotal experience that LSG was used infrequently, and that the diagnosis of LED is usually based on clinical examination.

METHODS

To determine the use of LSG in a large real-world LED population, the International Business Machines MarketScan Research Database was examined from April 2012 to March 2020 for patients with a new diagnosis of LED (the index date). Use of LSG (LSG+) was ascertained during the period beginning 12 months prior to the initial coding of a LED diagnosis and ending 12 months after the index date based on the corresponding Current Procedural Terminology code; LSG use for sentinel node mapping at the time of oncologic surgery was excluded. Demographic profiles, comorbidities, and causes of LED among patients with and without evidence of LSG were characterized.

RESULTS

We identified 57,674 patients, aged ≥18 years, who had a new diagnosis of LED and health care coverage for ≥12 months before and after this index date. Only a small number (1429; 2.5%) of these patients underwent LSG during the study period. The LSG + cohort was younger (53.7 vs 60.7 years), had a higher proportion of women (91.3% vs 73.4%), but a lower percentage of diabetes (12.8% vs 27.5%), heart failure (2.2% vs 8.7%), hypertension (32.4% vs 51.0%), and obesity (15.1% vs 22.2%) compared with the LED population who did not undergo LSG (all P < .001). Most importantly, the use of LSG for diagnosis varied with the etiology of LED (LSG was most frequently utilized among patients with melanoma-LED (9.5%) and patients with breast cancer-LED (6.7%), in contrast to patients with advanced venous disease-related LED (1.1%; P < .05 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite four guidelines recommending LSG, including the Guidelines of the American Venous Forum (Handbook of Venous and Lymphatic Disease-4th edition), which recommended LSG "for the initial evaluation of patients with LED" with a 1B recommendation, LSG plays a minor role in establishing the diagnosis of LED in the United States. This underlines the need for a better, simple diagnostic test for LED to complement clinical examination.

The breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach: Algorithm for conservative and multimodal surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Multiple surgical alternatives are available to treat breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) providing a variable spectrum of outcomes. This study aimed to present the breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach (B-LYMA) to systematically treat BCRL.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients presenting with BCRL between 2017 and 2021 were included. The average age and BMI were 49.4 ± 7.8 years and 28.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2 , respectively. Forty patients had lymphedema ISL stage II (51.3%) and 38 had stage III (48.7%). The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Treatment was selected according to the B-LYMA algorithm, which aims to combine physiologic and excisional procedures according to the preoperative evaluation of patients. All patients had pre- and postoperative complex decongestive therapy (CDT).

RESULTS

Stage II patients were treated with lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) (n = 18), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) (n = 12), and combined DIEP flap and VLNT (n = 10). Stage III patients underwent combined suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and LVA (n = 36) or combined SAL and VLNT (n = 2). Circumferential reduction rates (CRR) were comparable between patients treated with LVA (56.5 ± 8.4%), VLNT (54.4 ± 10.2%), and combined VLNT-DIEP flap (56.5 ± 3.9%) (p > .05). In comparison to LVA, VLNT, and combined VLNT-DIEP flap, combined SAL-LVA exhibited higher CRRs (85 ± 10.5%, p < .001). The CRR for combined SAL-VLNT was 75 ± 8.5%. One VLNT failed and minor complications occurred in the combined DIEP-VLNT group.

CONCLUSION

The B-LYMA protocol directs the treatment of BCRL according to the lymphatic system's condition. In advanced stages where a single physiologic procedure is not sufficient, additional excisional surgery is implemented. Preoperative and postoperative CDT is mandatory to improve the outcomes.

Imaging of the Lymphatic Vessels for Surgical Planning: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Secondary lymphedema is a common complication after surgical or radiotherapeutic cancer treatment. (Micro) surgical intervention such as lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer is a possible solution in patients who are refractory to conventional treatment. Adequate imaging is needed to identify functional lymphatic vessels and nearby veins for surgical planning.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Embase, MEDLINE ALL via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Trials databases was conducted in February 2022. Studies reporting on lymphatic vessel detection in healthy subjects or secondary lymphedema of the limbs or head and neck were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 lymphatic vessel imaging studies were included, and six imaging modalities were identified. The aim of the studies was diagnosis, severity staging, and/or surgical planning.

CONCLUSION

Due to its utility in surgical planning, near-infrared fluorescence lymphangiography (NIRF-L) has gained prominence in recent years relative to lymphoscintigraphy, the current gold standard for diagnosis and severity staging. Magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) gives three-dimensional detailed information on the location of both lymphatic vessels and veins and the extent of fat hypertrophy; however, MRL is less practical for routine presurgical implementation due to its limited availability and high cost. High frequency ultrasound imaging can provide high resolution imaging of lymphatic vessels but is highly operator-dependent and accurate identification of lymphatic vessels is difficult. Finally, photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a novel technique for visualization of functional lymphatic vessels and veins. More evidence is needed to evaluate the utility of PAI in surgical planning.

Imaging biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment response in patients with lymphedema

Lymphedema is defined as a dysfunction of the lymphatic system producing an accumulation of lymphatic fluid in the surrounding tissue, as well as edema and fibrosis. A total of 250 million people worldwide are affected by this condition. Greater than 99% of these cases are related to a secondary cause. As there is a lack of curative therapy, the goal involves early diagnosis, in order to prevent the progression of the disease. Additionally, early diagnosis can aid in decreasing the demand for more complex surgical procedures. Currently, there is an impressive breadth of diagnostic tests available for these patients. We aimed to review the available literature in relation to the utilization of imaging biomarkers for the early diagnosis and treatment response in lymphedema.

KSNM 60 in General Nuclear Medicine: the Old Dream Comes True

Since the establishment of the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM) in 1961 by Professor Munho Lee, the KSNM has been progressing in various medical fields. Many papers have been published in the Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine (KJNM), the official journal of KSNM, since 1967 and other domestic/international journals. Here, we tried to highlight the academic activities of KSNM members from the perspective of general nuclear medicine. After the introduction of the ⁹⁹Mo/^99mTc generator, general nuclear medicine has widened the field of clinical application with the advancement of imaging technology and emerging new radiopharmaceuticals; however, there have been many ups and downs. Treatment, as well as diagnosis, was a major concern in Korean nuclear medicine. With the recent advent of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, we hope that our old dream (diagnosis and treatment under the same principle of nuclear medicine) comes true.

Lymphoscintigraphic Findings as Indicators of Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Outcome in Patients With Extremity Lymphedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the surgical outcomes of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) in a patient with extremity lymphedema.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 133 patients with extremity lymphedema who underwent lymphoscintigraphy followed by LVA surgery from February 2018 to March 2020. Lymphoscintigraphic findings were evaluated on the following parameters: the extent of dermal backflow (small/large), lymphatic flow patterns (trunk flow pattern/proximal-restricted pattern/distal-restricted pattern), visualization of lymph nodes, and collateral lymphatic vessels. The mean circumferential difference change before and after surgery, circumferential reduction (CR) rate (%), was used as the clinical outcome variables.

RESULTS

A decrease in circumference was observed in 93 (69.9%) of 133 patients after LVA. The extent of dermal backflow and lymphatic flow patterns was significantly correlated with improved clinical outcomes after LVA. The large extent of the dermal backflow group showed a more significant CR rate than the small extent (19.27% vs 1.24%, P = 0.005). The TP group showed the most significantly decreased CR rate to 21.46%, and the proximal-restricted pattern and distal-restricted pattern groups were -2.49% and -5.33%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that dermal backflow and lymphatic flow patterns were independent predictors of therapeutic outcome (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that pretreatment lymphoscintigraphy may help predict the therapeutic effect of LVA in patients with extremity lymphedema. Furthermore, dermal backflow and lymphatic flow patterns are independent predictors of CR rate after LVA surgery for extremity lymphedema.

Longitudinal impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on arm lymphedema in patients with breast cancer: An analysis of serial changes in arm volume measured by infrared optoelectronic volumetry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate the longitudinal impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on persistent severe lymphedema (PSL) using arm volume measurements by an infrared optoelectronic volumetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the patients who underwent mastectomy between 2008 and 2016, we included 330 patients with secondary arm lymphedema. Percentage of excessive volume (PEV) of the arm were serially assessed using an optoelectronic volumetry 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months after the lymphedema diagnosis (T_{lymh_Dx}). We defined PSL as 2 or more episodes of PEV ≥ 20%. Risk factors for PSL were evaluated using stepwise regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients who received PMRT (n = 202, 61.2%) were more likely to have larger extent of axillary node dissection (AND), and frequent stage II/III lymphedema at T_{lymh_Dx} than those who did not receive PMRT (p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 72.5 months, PSL occurred in 71 (21.5%) patients. Patients with PSL were more frequently treated with AND of ≥ 20 nodes without reconstruction, had advanced lymphedema stage and higher PEV at T_{lymh_Dx}, and more frequent events of cellulitis compared to those without PSL. The risk of developing PSL was significantly associated with PMRT with regional node irradiation (RNI), AND of ≥20 nodes, lymphedema stage, and PEV at T_{lymh_Dx}, cellulitis, and compliance with physical therapy.

CONCLUSION

PMRT, especially RNI, was associated with a consistent increase in PEV in patients with arm lymphedema. Therefore, timely physical therapy is necessary for this patient population.

Prognostic Factors of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphic Findings in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the effects of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who underwent pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy and completed 2 weeks of CDT. A total of 18 patients with unilateral BCRL clinical stage II underwent 30-minute sessions of CDT five times per week for 2 weeks. The quantitative asymmetry index (QAI) of the upper extremity, axillary lymph node (LN) uptake, and axillary plus supraclavicular LN uptake from lymphoscintigraphy were calculated. The volume of lymphedema was calculated by percentage excess volume (PEV) at initial and posttreatment. The CDT response was assessed using percentage reduction in excess volume (PREV). Correlation analyses were conducted using Kendall tau rank correlation. There was positive correlation between upper extremity QAI at 2 hours and initial PEV. Negative correlations were found between axillary LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV, and between axillary plus supraclavicular LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV. The PREV showed a positive correlation with axillary LN QAI at 2 hours after injection (tau-b = 0.354, p = 0.041). Conclusion: Quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy have potential value for use in predicting the response to CDT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Using QAIs from lymphoscintigraphy, we could estimate the excess volume of lymphedema.

Lymphoscintigraphy for Evaluation of Lymphedema Treatment: A Systematic Review

Lymphoscintigraphy is a well-established radiologic examination to evaluate lymphatic function. We conducted a systematic review of the use of lymphoscintigraphy for evaluation of lymphedema treatment. We hypothesized that this radiologic examination could add relevant findings of treatment outcomes of lymphedema patients. We conducted a systematic review of articles in PubMed, without any time frame or language limitations, about the use of lymphoscintigraphy for the evaluation of lymphedema treatment. Articles were excluded if they investigated other uses of lymphoscintigraphy, such as diagnosis or prevention of lymphedema. Abstracts, presentations, reviews, and meta-analyses were also excluded. Of 101 potential articles found in the literature, 5 fulfilled our study eligibility criteria, and they were all case series. These articles included a total of 327 patients, most of whom had breast cancer-related lymphedema. Interventions included lymph node or vessel transfer (3 of 5 articles), complex decongestive therapy (1 of 5), and adipose-derived stem cell injection (1 of 5). The authors of these studies used lymphoscintigraphy to investigate the treatment functional outcomes, prognostic value, and complications. Lymphoscintigraphy detected lymphangiogenesis in transferred lymph nodes, and it was able to predict patient response to complex decongestive therapy. Studies that used lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate lymphedema treatment demonstrated its flexibility to provide various types of information. We hope this review will support future studies.