Intra-arterial Mitomycin C infusion in a large cohort of advanced liver metastatic breast cancer patients: safety, efficacy and factors influencing survival

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Minimally invasive locoregional therapies have a growing role in the multidisciplinary treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Factors contributing to the expanding role of ablation for primary breast cancer include earlier diagnosis, when tumors are small, and increased longevity of patients whose condition precludes surgery. Cryoablation has emerged as the leading ablative modality for primary breast cancer owing to its wide availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the ability to monitor the ablation zone. Emerging evidence suggests that in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, use of locoregional therapies to eradicate all disease sites may confer a survival advantage. Evidence also suggests that transarterial therapies-including chemoembolization, chemoperfusion, and radioembolization-may be helpful to some patients with advanced liver metastases from breast cancer, such as those with hepatic oligoprogression or those who cannot tolerate systemic therapy. However, the optimal modalities for treatment of oligometastatic and advanced metastatic disease remain unknown. Finally, locoregional therapies may produce tumor antigens that in combination with immunotherapy drive anti-tumor immunity. Although key trials are ongoing, additional prospective studies are needed to establish the inclusion of interventional oncology in societal breast cancer guidelines to support further clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes.

Breast cancer liver metastases: systematic review and time to event meta-analysis with comparison between available treatments

INTRODUCTION

The current gold standard treatment for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is systemic chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. Nonetheless, greater consideration has been given to local therapeutic strategies in recent years. We sought to compare survival outcomes for available systemic and local treatments for BCLM, specifically surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS

A review of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. Data from included studies were extracted and subjected to time-to-event data synthesis, algorithmically reconstructing individual patient-level data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

FINDINGS

A total of 54 studies were included, comprising data for 5,430 patients (surgery, n=2,063; ablation, n=305; chemotherapy, n=3,062). Analysis of the reconstructed data demonstrated survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years of 90%, 65.9% and 53%, respectively, for the surgical group, 83%, 49% and 35% for the ablation group and 53%, 24% and 14% for the chemotherapy group (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Local therapeutic interventions such as liver resection and radiofrequency ablation are effective treatments for BCLM, particularly in patients with metastatic disease localised to the liver. Although the data from this review support surgical resection for BCLM, further prospective studies for managing oligometastatic breast cancer disease are required.

Transarterial Yttrium-90 Glass Microsphere Radioembolization of Chemotherapy-Refractory Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: Results of a Single Institution Retrospective Study

Purpose

Our purpose was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial hepatic radioembolization (TARE) treatment with yttrium-90 labeled glass microspheres in patients with chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective single-institution study evaluated 31 female patients (mean age of 59.6 ± 13.2 years) who were treated with TARE. All patients received and progressed on systemic chemotherapy before TARE. Twenty-one patients also had extrahepatic metastases, including 13 patients who had metastases in bones only besides the liver. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Imaging response to treatment was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) from the TARE was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 9.1-16.9 months). The survival probability at 1, 2, and 3 years was 60.1%, 36.7%, and 24.5%, respectively. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.9 months). There was no 30-day mortality and 3 patients (9.4%) had grade 3 toxicity. Estrogen receptor (ER) positive status predicted prolonged survival (14 months for ER+ vs 9 months for ER-; P = .028). Patients who had bone-only extrahepatic disease had higher OS than patients with extraosseous metastases (23 vs 8 months, P = .02). At the 3-month follow-up the radiographic objective response rate was 46.6% and disease control rate was 70%.

Conclusions

The treatment of patients with liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer metastases with TARE using yttrium-90 labeled glass microspheres is safe and led to promising hepatic disease control and OS especially in patients with ER+ tumors and in patients without extrahepatic extraosseous metastases.

Intra-Arterial Therapies for Liver Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Performing a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of intra-arterial therapies in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients.

METHODS

A systemic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS for studies regarding intra-arterial therapies in LMBC patients. Full text studies of LMBC patients (n ≥ 10) published between January 2010 and December 2020 were included when at least one outcome among response rate, adverse events or survival was available. Response rates were pooled using generalized linear mixed models. A weighted estimate of the population median overall survival (OS) was obtained under the assumption of exponentially distributed survival times.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies (1266 patients) were included. Eleven articles reported on transarterial radioembolization (TARE), ten on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and four on chemo-infusion. One retrospective study compared TARE and TACE. Pooled response rates were 49% for TARE (95%CI 32-67%), 34% for TACE (95%CI 22-50%) and 19% for chemo-infusion (95%CI 14-25%). Pooled median survival was 9.2 months (range 6.1-35.4 months) for TARE, 17.8 months (range 4.6-47.0) for TACE and 7.9 months (range 7.0-14.2) for chemo-infusion. No comparison for OS was possible due to missing survival rates at specific time points (1 and 2 year OS) and the large heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Although results have to be interpreted with caution due to the large heterogeneity, the superior response rate of TARE and TACE compared to chemo-infusion suggests first choice of TARE or TACE in chemorefractory LMBC patients. Chemo-infusion could be considered in LMBC patients not suitable for TARE or TACE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3a.

Sequential intra-arterial infusion of 90Y-resin microspheres and mitomycin C in chemo refractory liver metastatic breast cancer patients: a single centre pilot study

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial mitomycin C (MMC) infusion after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) resin microspheres in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients.

Patients and methods

The prospective pilot study included LMBC patients from 2012–2018. Patients first received infusion of ⁹⁰Y resin microspheres, after 6–8 weeks response to treatment was assessed by MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory tests. After exclusion of progressive disease, MMC infusion was administrated 8 weeks later in different dose cohorts; A: 6 mg in 1 cycle, B: 12 mg in 2 cycles, C: 24 mg in 2 cycles and D: maximum of 72 mg in 6 cycles. In cohort D the response was evaluated after every 2 cycles and continued after exclusion of progressive disease. Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE version 5.0.

Results

Sixteen patients received ⁹⁰Y treatment. Four patients were excluded for MMC infusion, because of extra hepatic disease progression (n = 3) and clinical and biochemical instability (n = 1). That resulted in the following number of patient per cohort; A: 2, B: 1, C: 3 and D: 6. In 4 of the 12 patients (all cohort D) the maximum dose of MMC was adjusted due biochemical toxicities (n = 2) and progressive disease (n = 2). One grade 3 AE occurred after ⁹⁰Y treatment consisting of a gastrointestinal ulcer whereby prolonged hospitalization was needed.

Conclusions

Sequential treatment of intra-arterial infusion of MMC after ⁹⁰Y SIRT was feasible in 75% of the patients when MMC was administrated in different escalating dose cohorts. However, caution is needed to prevent reflux after ⁹⁰Y SIRT in LMBC patients.