Association between FGFR1 copy numbers, MAP3K1 mutations, and survival in axillary node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, and HER2-negative early breast cancer in the PACS04 and METABRIC studies

Select gene mutations associated with survival outcomes in ER-positive ERBB2-negative early-stage invasive breast cancer: A single-institutional tissue bank study

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic capability of targeted sequencing of primary tumors in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative early-stage invasive breast cancer (EBC) in a real-world setting is uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to determine the correlation between a 22-gene mutational profile and long-term survival outcomes in patients with ER+/ERBB2- EBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 73 women diagnosed with ER+/ERBB2- EBC between January 10, 2004, and June 2, 2008, were followed up until December 31, 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were constructed to plot the relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test derived p-value was obtained. For external validation, we performed a survival analysis of 1163 comparable patients retrieved from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 16 (21.9%) patients had relapsed, while 21 (nearly 29%) harbored mutant genes. Thirty-three missense mutations were detected in 14 genes. The median ages were 51 and 46 years in patients with and without mutations, respectively. Patients with any mutation had a 1.85-fold higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-5.69) compared to those without any mutation. Patients who harbored any of the six genes (MAP2K4, FGFR3, APC, KIT, RB1, and PTEN) had a nearly 6-fold increase in the risk of relapse (HR: 5.82, 95% CI: 1.31-18.56; p = 0.0069). Multivariate Cox models revealed that the adjusted HR for RFS and OS were 6.67 (95% CI: 1.32-27.57) and 8.31 (p = 0.0443), respectively. METABRIC analysis also demonstrated a trend to significantly worse RFS (p = 0.0576) in the subcohort grouped by having a mutation in any of the six genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-institution tissue bank study of Taiwanese women with ER+/ERBB2- EBC suggests that a novel combination of six gene mutations might have prognostic capability for survival outcomes.

Unveiling breast cancer risk profiles: a survival clustering analysis empowered by an online web application

Aim: To develop a shiny app for doctors to investigate breast cancer treatments through a new approach by incorporating unsupervised clustering and survival information. Materials & methods: Analysis is based on the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) dataset, which contains 1726 subjects and 22 variables. Cox regression was used to identify survival risk factors for K-means clustering. Logrank tests and C-statistics were compared across different cluster numbers and Kaplan-Meier plots were presented. Results & conclusion: Our study fills an existing void by introducing a unique combination of unsupervised learning techniques and survival information on the clinician side, demonstrating the potential of survival clustering as a valuable tool in uncovering hidden structures based on distinct risk profiles.

Genetic and Immunohistochemical Profiling of Mammary Hidradenoma and Comparison to Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is exceedingly rare in the breast, with <45 cases reported in the literature. Although estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor 2 triple-negative, MEC is characterized as a special subtype of breast carcinoma with significantly better prognosis than conventional basal-type tumors. Cutaneous hidradenoma (HA) is considered a benign adnexal neoplasm showing histomorphologic overlap with MEC. Rare cases of HA have also been reported in the breast, but these are relatively uncharacterized. In this study, we examined the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), and genetic features of 8 breast HAs, in comparison to 3 mammary MECs. All cases were positive for MAML2 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eight cases demonstrated a CRTC1::MAML2 fusion, and one MEC harbored a CRTC3::MAML2 fusion; the latter is a novel finding in the breast. Mutational burden was very low, with only one HA exhibiting a MAP3K1 pathogenic alteration. By IHC, both MEC and HA demonstrated cell type-dependent expression of high- and low-molecular-weight keratins and p63, as well as negative to low-positive estrogen receptor and androgen receptor. Smooth muscle myosin and calponin highlighted an in situ component in the 3 cases of MEC; expression of these myoepithelial markers was negative in HAs. Additional distinguishing characteristics included the growth pattern and tumor architecture, the presence of glandular/luminal cells in HA, and overall higher IHC expression of SOX10, S100 protein, MUC4, and mammaglobin in MEC. Morphologic findings were also compared to a series of 27 cutaneous nonmammary HAs. Mucinous and glandular/luminal cells were identified in significantly more mammary HAs than nonmammary lesions. The findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of MAML2-rearranged neoplasms of the breast, underscore the overlapping genetic features of MEC and HA, and highlight similarities to their extramammary counterparts.

Genomics to select treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Cancer progression is driven in part by genomic alterations¹. The genomic characterization of cancers has shown interpatient heterogeneity regarding driver alterations², leading to the concept that generation of genomic profiling in patients with cancer could allow the selection of effective therapies^3,4. Although DNA sequencing has been implemented in practice, it remains unclear how to use its results. A total of 1,462 patients with HER2-non-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer were enroled to receive genomic profiling in the SAFIR02-BREAST trial. Two hundred and thirty-eight of these patients were randomized in two trials (nos. NCT02299999 and NCT03386162) comparing the efficacy of maintenance treatment⁵ with a targeted therapy matched to genomic alteration. Targeted therapies matched to genomics improves progression-free survival when genomic alterations are classified as level I/II according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT)⁶ (adjusted hazards ratio (HR): 0.41, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.61, P < 0.001), but not when alterations are unselected using ESCAT (adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.56-1.06, P = 0.109). No improvement in progression-free survival was observed in the targeted therapies arm (unadjusted HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.76-1.75) for patients presenting with ESCAT alteration beyond level I/II. Patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 49) derived high benefit from olaparib (gBRCA1: HR = 0.36, 90% CI: 0.14-0.89; gBRCA2: HR = 0.37, 90% CI: 0.17-0.78). This trial provides evidence that the treatment decision led by genomics should be driven by a framework of target actionability in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor signalling dysregulation and targeting in breast cancer

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) signalling plays a critical role in breast embryonal development, tissue homeostasis, tumorigenesis and metastasis. FGFR, its numerous FGF ligands and signalling partners are often dysregulated in breast cancer progression and are one of the causes of resistance to treatment in breast cancer. Furthermore, FGFR signalling on epithelial cells is affected by signals from the breast microenvironment, therefore increasing the possibility of breast developmental abnormalities or cancer progression. Increasing our understanding of the multi-layered roles of the complex family of FGFRs, their ligands FGFs and their regulatory partners may offer novel treatment strategies for breast cancer patients, as a single agent or rational co-target, which will be explored in depth in this review.

Spectrum of MAP3K1 mutations in breast cancer is luminal subtype-predominant and related to prognosis

MAP3K1 is a MAPK family serine-threonine kinase that is frequently mutated in human cancer. The association between mutations in the MAP3K1 gene and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with breast cancer remain unclear in the Chinese population. Thus, the aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the possible role and function of MAP3K1 in breast cancer. Data obtained from 412 consecutive patients with breast cancer were selected from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) for analysis in the present study. Mutations were assessed using next-generation sequencing. The association between MAP3K1 mutations and clinicopathological features were analyzed and further compared with the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) cohort and data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). In the GDPH cohort, a total of 45 mutations MAP3K1 were identified in 8.5% (n=35) of the 412 patients, compared with 9.7% (n=244) in METABRIC and 7.9% (n=88) in TCGA. The majority of the mutations identified in the in three cohorts were truncating mutations, followed by mis-sense mutations. Mutations in MAP3K1 were predominant in patients with the luminal A and B breast cancer subtypes in METABRIC datasets (P<0.001), although no significant differences were observed in the GDPH cohort (P=0.227). In the METABRIC cohort, patients with MAP3K1 mutations experienced a improved overall survival (OS) rate than patients without MAP3K1 mutations (P=0.006). In patient with hormone receptor (HR)⁺ breast cancer, a more significantly higher OS rate was observed in patients with MAP3K1 mutations (P<0.001). MAP3K1 expression was associated with OS in the HR⁺ subgroup. Moreover, the MAP3K1 methylation levels were reduced in primary breast cancer tissue, compared with normal tissue. Thus, the present findings identified MAP3K1 mutations in Chinese patients with breast cancer, and compared MAP3K1 mutations between the cohorts from Western and Eastern countries.

Prognostic and Predictive Value of CCND1/Cyclin D1 Amplification in Breast Cancer With a Focus on Postmenopausal Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Up to 80% of breast cancers (BCa) are estrogen receptor positive and current treatments target the estrogen receptor (endocrine therapies) and/or CDK4/6 (CDK4/6 inhibitors). CCND1 encodes the protein cyclin D1, responsible for regulation of G1 to S phase transition in the cell cycle. CCND1 amplification is common in BCa and contributes to increased cyclin D1 expression. As there are signalling interactions between cyclin D1 and the estrogen receptor, understanding the impact of CCND1 amplification on estrogen receptor positive patients' disease outcomes, is vital. This review aims to evaluate CCND1 amplification as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in BCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications were retrieved from the databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library. Exclusion criteria were duplication, publication type, non-English language, in vitro and animal studies, not BCa, male BCa, premenopausal BCa, cohort size <35, CCND1 amplification not reported. Publications with cohort duplication, and inadequate recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data, were also excluded. Included publications were assessed for Risk of Bias (RoB) using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Statistical analyses (Inverse Variance and Mantel-Haenszel) were performed in Review Manager. The PROSPERO registration number is [CRD42020208179].

RESULTS

CCND1 amplification was significantly associated with positive estrogen receptor status (OR:1.70, 95% CI:1.19-2.43, p = 0.004) and cyclin D1 overexpression (OR: 5.64, 95% CI: 2.32-13.74, p=0.0001). CCND1 amplification was significantly associated with shorter RFS (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.38, p = 0.009), and OS (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.92, p = 0.0008) after removal of studies with a high RoB. In endocrine therapy treated patients specifically, CCND1 amplification predicted shorter RFS (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.96-3.41, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.49, p = 0.05) also after removal of studies with a high RoB.

CONCLUSION

While a lack of standardised approach for the detection of CCND1 amplification is to be considered as a limitation, CCND1 amplification was found to be prognostic of shorter RFS and OS in BCa. CCND1 amplification is also predictive of reduced RFS and OS in endocrine therapy treated patients specifically. With standardised methods and cut offs for the detection of CCND1 amplification, CCND1 amplification would have potential as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020208179.

Targeted Inhibition of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1-GLI Through AZD4547 and GANT61 Modulates Breast Cancer Progression

The underlying mechanism of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) mediated carcinogenesis is still not fully understood. For instance, FGFR1 upregulation leads to endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer patients. The current study aimed to identify FGFR1-linked genes to devise improved therapeutic strategies. RNA-seq and microarray expression data of 1,425 breast cancer patients from two independent cohorts were downloaded for the analysis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify differentially expressed pathways associated with FGFR1 expression. Validation was done using 150 fresh tumor biopsy samples of breast cancer patients. The clinical relevance of mRNA and protein expression of FGFR1 and its associated genes were also evaluated in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231). Furthermore, MDA-MB-231 cell line was treated with AZD4547 and GANT61 to identify the probable role of FGFR1 and its associated genes on cells motility and invasion. According to GSEA results, SHH pathway genes were significantly upregulated in FGFR1 patients in both discovery cohorts of breast cancer. Statistical analyses using both discovery cohorts and 150 fresh biopsy samples revealed strong association of FGFR1 and GLI1, a member of SHH pathway. The increase in the expression of these molecules was associated with poor prognosis, lymph node involvement, late stage, and metastasis. Combined exposures to AZD4547 (FGFR1 inhibitor) and GANT61 (GLI1 inhibitor) significantly reduced cell proliferation, cell motility, and invasion, suggesting molecular crosstalk in breast cancer progression and metastasis. A strong positive feedback mechanism between FGFR1-GLI1 axis was observed, which significantly increased cell proliferation and metastasis. Targeting FGFR1-GLI1 simultaneously will significantly improve the prognosis of breast cancer in patients.

2b or Not 2b: How Opposing FGF Receptor Splice Variants Are Blocking Progress in Precision Oncology

More than ten thousand peer-reviewed studies have assessed the role of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) in cancer, but few patients have yet benefited from drugs targeting this molecular family. Strategizing how best to use FGFR-targeted drugs is complicated by multiple variables, including RNA splicing events that alter the affinity of ligands for FGFRs and hence change the outcomes of stromal-epithelial interactions. The effects of splicing are most relevant to FGFR2; expression of the FGFR2b splice isoform can restore apoptotic sensitivity to cancer cells, whereas switching to FGFR2c may drive tumor progression by triggering epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The differentiating and regulatory actions of wild-type FGFR2b contrast with the proliferative actions of FGFR1 and FGFR3, and may be converted to mitogenicity either by splice switching or by silencing of tumor suppressor genes such as CDH1 or PTEN. Exclusive use of small-molecule pan-FGFR inhibitors may thus cause nonselective blockade of FGFR2 isoforms with opposing actions, undermining the rationale of FGFR2 drug targeting. This splice-dependent ability of FGFR2 to switch between tumor-suppressing and -driving functions highlights an unmet oncologic need for isoform-specific drug targeting, e.g., by antibody inhibition of ligand-FGFR2c binding, as well as for more nuanced molecular pathology prediction of FGFR2 actions in different stromal-tumor contexts.

Shallow Whole-Genome Sequencing from Plasma Identifies FGFR1 Amplified Breast Cancers and Predicts Overall Survival

Background: Focal amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) defines a subgroup of breast cancers with poor prognosis and high risk of recurrence. We sought to demonstrate the potential of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis to evaluate FGFR1 copy numbers from a cohort of 100 metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples were screened for FGFR1 amplification by FISH, and positive cases were confirmed with a microarray platform (Oncoscan^TM). Subsequently, cfDNA was evaluated by two approaches, i.e., mFAST-SeqS and shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS), to estimate the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allele fraction (AF) and to evaluate the FGFR1 status. Results: Tissue-based analyses identified FGFR1 amplifications in 20/100 tumors. All cases with a ctDNA AF above 3% (n = 12) showed concordance for FGFR1 status between tissue and cfDNA. In one case, we were able to detect a high-level FGFR1 amplification, although the ctDNA AF was below 1%. Furthermore, high levels of ctDNA indicated an association with unfavorable prognosis based on overall survival. Conclusions: Screening for FGFR1 amplification in ctDNA might represent a viable strategy to identify patients eligible for treatment by FGFR inhibition, and mBC ctDNA levels might be used for the evaluation of prognosis in clinical drug trials.