1
|
Niell BL, Jochelson MS, Amir T, Brown A, Adamson M, Baron P, Bennett DL, Chetlen A, Dayaratna S, Freer PE, Ivansco LK, Klein KA, Malak SF, Mehta TS, Moy L, Neal CH, Newell MS, Richman IB, Schonberg M, Small W, Ulaner GA, Slanetz PJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S126-S143. [PMID: 38823941 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany L Niell
- Panel Chair, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| | | | - Tali Amir
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ann Brown
- Panel Vice Chair, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Megan Adamson
- Clinica Family Health, Lafayette, Colorado; American Academy of Family Physicians
| | - Paul Baron
- Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Alison Chetlen
- Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Sandra Dayaratna
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | | | | | | | - Tejas S Mehta
- UMass Memorial Medical Center/UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Linda Moy
- NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; RADS Committee
| | - Ilana B Richman
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Society of General Internal Medicine
| | - Mara Schonberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; American Geriatrics Society
| | - William Small
- Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, Illinois; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Priscilla J Slanetz
- Specialty Chair, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Speiser D, Bick U. Primary Prevention and Early Detection of Hereditary Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:448-454. [PMID: 38125920 PMCID: PMC10730103 DOI: 10.1159/000533391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary prevention and early detection of hereditary breast cancer has been one of the main topics of breast cancer research in recent decades. The knowledge of risk factors for breast cancer has been increasing continuously just like the recommendations for risk management. Pathogenic germline variants (mutations, class 4/5) of risk genes are significant susceptibility factors in healthy individuals. At the same time, germline mutations serve as biomarkers for targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, management of healthy mutation carriers to enable primary prevention is in the focus as much as the consideration of pathogenic germline variants for therapeutic decisions. Since 1996, the German Consortium has provided quality-assured care for counselees and patients with familial burden of breast and ovarian cancer. Summary Currently, there are 23 university centers with over 100 cooperating DKG-certified breast and gynecological cancer centers. These centers provide standardized, evidence-based, and knowledge-generating care, which includes aspects of primary as well as secondary and tertiary prevention. An important aspect of quality assurance and development was the inclusion of the HBOC centers in the certification system of the German Cancer Society (GCS). Since 2020, the centers have been regularly audited and their quality standards continuously reviewed according to quality indicators adapted to the current state of research. The standard of care at GC-HBOC' centers involves the evaluation as well as evolution of various aspects of care like inclusion criteria, identification of new risk genes, management of variants of unknown significance (class 3), evaluation of risk-reducing options, intensified surveillance, and communication of risks. Among these, the possibility of intensified surveillance in the GC-HBOC for early detection of breast cancer is an important component of individual risk management for many counselees. As has been shown in recent years, in carriers of pathogenic variants in high-risk genes, this approach enables the detection of breast cancer at very early, more favorable stages although no reduction of mortality has been demonstrated yet. The key component of the intensified surveillance is annual contrast-enhanced breast MRI, supplemented by up to biannual breast ultrasound and mammography usually starting at age 40. Key Messages Apart from early detection, the central goal of care is the prevention of cancer. By utilizing individualized risk calculation, the optimal timeframe for risk-reducing surgery can be estimated, and counselees can be supported in reaching preference-sensitive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Speiser
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Menko FH, Monkhorst K, Hogervorst FB, Rosenberg EH, Adank M, Ruijs MW, Bleiker EM, Sonke GS, Russell NS, Oldenburg HS, van der Kolk LE. Challenges in breast cancer genetic testing. A call for novel forms of multidisciplinary care and long-term evaluation. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 176:103642. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
4
|
Kanana N, Ben David MA, Nissan N, Yagil Y, Shalmon A, Halshtok O, Gotlieb M, Faermann R, Klang E, Samoocha D, Yassin M, Davidson T, Zippel D, Madorsky Feldman D, Friedman E, Kaidar-Person O, Sklair Levy M. Post-mastectomy surveillance of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Outcomes from a specialized clinic for high-risk breast cancer patients. Breast J 2021; 27:441-447. [PMID: 33576117 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers may elect bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. There is a paucity of data on yield of imaging surveillance after risk-reducing mastectomy. This retrospective study focused on female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent bilateral mastectomy either as primary preventative, or as secondary preventative, after breast cancer diagnosis. All participants underwent breast imaging at 6- to 12-month intervals after mastectomy. Data on subsequent breast cancer diagnosis and timing were collected and compared between the groups. Overall, 184 female mutation carriers (134 BRCA1, 45 BRCA2, 5 both BRCA genes) underwent bilateral mastectomy after initial breast cancer diagnosis, between April 1, 2009 and August 31, 2018. During a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 4.2 years, 13 (7.06%) were diagnosed with breast cancer; 12 ipsilateral (range: 0.4-28.8 years) and 1 contralateral breast cancer, 15.9 years after surgery. On the contrary, among asymptomatic BRCA1 (n = 40) and BRCA2 (n = 13) mutation carriers who underwent primary risk-reducing mastectomy (mean age at surgery 39.5 ± 8.4 years); none has developed breast cancer after a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 3.4 years. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers with prior disease who underwent risk-reducing mastectomy after breast cancer diagnosis are still prone for developing ipsi or contralateral breast cancer, and therefore may benefit from continues clinical and imaging surveillance, unlike BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers who undergo primary preventative bilateral mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayroz Kanana
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Meirav A Ben David
- The Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Noam Nissan
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Yael Yagil
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Anat Shalmon
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Osnat Halshtok
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Michael Gotlieb
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Renata Faermann
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Eyal Klang
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - David Samoocha
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Mohammad Yassin
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Dov Zippel
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Dana Madorsky Feldman
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Miri Sklair Levy
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specialized breast cancer early detection programs with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high-risk patients are by now well established in several countries. In Germany, such a program has been running as part of routine care since 2005. OBJECTIVES This review article will summarize current developments in high-risk screening with MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Experiences with the high-risk screening program in Germany over now more than 10 years as well as a review of the current literature will form the basis for this article. RESULTS The MRI of the breast is by far the most sensitive imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer and represents the back bone of high-risk screening. More than 90% of cancers detected at high-risk screening are visible on the MRI and more than 30% of cancers are detected primarily by MRI alone. However, a prerequisite for effective screening with MRI is a sufficiently high breast cancer incidence in the screened population. This is demonstrated by the fact that the positive predictive value of screening with MRI in women without a BRCA1/2 mutation in the age group between 30 and 39 years is unacceptably low with 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS In high-risk screening, MRI is the primary imaging tool with mammography and/or ultrasound added as adjunct if necessary. In women with a strong family history of breast cancer but no proven pathogenic mutation in one of the known risk genes in the index patient in the family, the high-risk screening should not routinely start at age 30, but should be postponed until the 10-year breast cancer risk passes a threshold of 5%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Bick
- Klinik für Radiologie, CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|