1
|
Yu Y, Cao F, Wan G. Valid Analysis of Brain-Specific Progression-Free Survival. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:1135. [PMID: 38869908 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuandong Yu
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Fengjun Cao
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Guoxing Wan
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang L, Zhang W, Chen L. Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2024; 16:379-392. [PMID: 39071808 PMCID: PMC11278000 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s460856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Background Research on the sequencing of brain radiotherapy and targeted chemotherapy after brain metastasis (BM) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients is limited and inconclusive. This study investigated the efficacy of sequential delivery of radiotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with BM. Methods Fifty-seven patients were categorized into two groups: the targeted-radiotherapy group (receiving 2-8 cycles of anti-HER2-targeted therapy followed by radiotherapy after BM) and the radiotherapy-targeted group (undergoing radiotherapy first, followed by regular anti-HER2-targeted therapy). The study endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival. Factors associated with intracranial progression and mortality were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results Patients in the radiotherapy-targeted group had better iPFS (P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.145). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that different sequential treatment groups were independent prognostic factors for iPFS. In patients with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0, the median survival time was 26 months in the radiotherapy-targeted group and 22 months in the targeted-radiotherapy group (P = 0.019). Conclusion Overall, radiotherapy followed by targeted therapy may improve survival in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with BM, particularly in those with a modified breast graded prognostic assessment score of 3.5-4.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifeng Tang
- Department of Oncology, Liuzhou People’s Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Liuzhou People’s Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, People’s Republic of China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borm KJ, Behzadi ST, Hörner-Rieber J, Krug D, Baumann R, Corradini S, Duma MN, Dunst J, Fastner G, Feyer P, Fietkau R, Haase W, Harms W, Hehr T, Matuschek C, Piroth MD, Schmeel LC, Souchon R, Strnad V, Budach W, Combs SE. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:259-275. [PMID: 38488902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02202-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Borm
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie T Behzadi
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Rene Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helios Clinics of Schwerin-University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany
- Department for Human Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Petra Feyer
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wulf Haase
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, St.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Harms
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hehr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christiane Matuschek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Marc D Piroth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HELIOS University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Rainer Souchon
- Formerly Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Partner Site Munich, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim JS, Kim K, Jung W, Shin KH, Im SA, Kim HJ, Kim YB, Chang JS, Kim JH, Choi DH, Park YH, Kim DY, Kim TH, Choi BO, Lee SW, Kim S, Kwon J, Kang KM, Chung WK, Kim KS, Yoon WS, Kim JH, Cha J, Oh YK, Kim IA. Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200:37-45. [PMID: 37138198 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06936-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients. METHODS Between 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months. RESULTS Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months. CONCLUSION The initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonguen Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee-Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Ock Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sea-Won Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suzy Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ki Mun Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - Woong-Ki Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Ansan-Si, Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jihye Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju-Si, Korea
| | - Yoon Kyeong Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chosun University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gumi-Ro 173, 82 Beon-Gil, Bundang Gu, Seongnam, 13620, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim JS, Kim K, Jung W, Shin KH, Im SA, Kim HJ, Kim YB, Chang JS, Kim JH, Choi DH, Park YH, Kim DY, Kim TH, Choi BO, Lee SW, Kim S, Kwon J, Kang KM, Chung WK, Kim KS, Nam JH, Yoon WS, Kim JH, Cha J, Oh YK, Kim IA. The Pattern of Care for Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer over the Past 10 Years in Korea: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 16-12). Cancer Res Treat 2022; 54:1121-1129. [PMID: 34990524 PMCID: PMC9582469 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.1083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to investigate manifestations and patterns of care for patients with brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer (BC) and compared their overall survival (OS) from 2005 through 2014 in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 600 BC patients with BM diagnosed between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. We categorized the patients into three groups according to the year when BM was initially diagnosed (group I [2005-2008], 98 patients; group II [2009-2011], 200 patients; and group III [2012-2014], 302 patients). RESULTS Over time, the median age at BM diagnosis increased by 2.2 years (group I, 49.0 years; group II, 48.3 years; and group III, 51.2 years; p=0.008). The percentage of patients with extracranial metastasis was 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.011). The time interval between BC and BM was prolonged in patients with stage III primary BC (median, 2.4 to 3 years; p=0.029). As an initial brain-directed treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy alone decreased from 80.0% in 2005 to 41.1% in 2014. Meanwhile, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone increased from 13.3% to 34.7% during the same period (p=0.005). The median OS for group I, II, and III was 15.6, 17.9, and 15.0 months, respectively, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSION The manifestations of BM from BC and the pattern of care have changed from 2005 to 2014 in Korea. However, the OS has remained relatively unchanged over the 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Wonguen Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hee-Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jee Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang,
Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang,
Korea
| | - Byung Ock Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sea-Won Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Suzy Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon,
Korea
| | - Ki Mun Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon,
Korea
| | - Woong-Ki Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun,
Korea
| | - Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Busan,
Korea
| | - Ji Ho Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan,
Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Asan,
Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu,
Korea
| | - Jihye Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju,
Korea
| | - Yoon Kyeong Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chosun University Medical School, Gwangju,
Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim JS, Kim K, Jung W, Shin KH, Im SA, Kim YB, Chang JS, Choi DH, Kim H, Park YH, Kim DY, Kim TH, Kwon J, Kang KM, Chung WK, Kim KS, Kim IA. Novel prognostic classification predicts overall survival of patients receiving salvage whole-brain radiotherapy for recurrent brain metastasis from breast cancer: A recursive partitioning analysis (KROG 16-12). Breast 2021; 60:272-278. [PMID: 34814043 PMCID: PMC8609050 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate outcomes of salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for recurrent brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC), to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS), and to propose a novel prognostic classification for OS in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 54 patients who had received salvage WBRT as the second brain-focused treatment for recurrent BM from BC (2000-2014). The median follow-up duration was 4.9 months. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to develop a model to predict OS at the time of salvage WBRT. RESULTS The median OS was 6.8 months. OS according to BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), modified breast-GPA, and updated breast-GPA did not represent our cohort. In the multivariate analysis, a long time before salvage WBRT (≥16 months), control of primary BC or extracranial metastases, systemic treatment after salvage WBRT, and administration of a biologically effective dose for an α/β of 10 Gy (BED10) of salvage WBRT >37.5 Gy showed superior OS. We proposed three RPA classes based on the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and BED10 of salvage WBRT: class I, class II, and class III. In this model, patients with class I experienced the best OS (34.6 months; class II, 5.0 months; class III, 2.4 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In our RPA classification according to the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and the dose of salvage WBRT, significant differences in OS were observed. The subsequent use of a systemic treatment showed better OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Wonguen Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Dae Yong Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, South Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, South Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Ki Mun Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, South Korea
| | - Woong-Ki Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, South Korea
| | - Kyung Su Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - In Ah Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
He DJ, Yu DQ, Wang QM, Yu ZY, Qi YH, Shao QJ, Chang H. Breast Cancer Subtypes and Mortality of Breast Cancer Patients With Brain Metastasis at Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 2021; 58:469580211055636. [PMID: 34789038 PMCID: PMC8619743 DOI: 10.1177/00469580211055636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Brain metastasis is an important cause of breast cancer-related death. Aim We evaluated the relationships between breast cancer subtype and prognosis
among patients with brain metastasis at the initial diagnosis. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was searched to
identify patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer between 2010 and
2015. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify
factors that were associated with survival among patients with initial brain
metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to compare survival outcomes
according to breast cancer subtype. Results Among 752 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis at diagnosis, 140
patients (18.6%) underwent primary surgery and 612 patients (81.4%) did not
undergo surgery, while 460 patients (61.2%) received chemotherapy and 292
patients (38.8%) did not receive chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis
revealed that, relative to HR+/HER2– breast cancer, HR–/HER2– breast cancer
was associated with significantly poorer overall survival (hazard ratio:
2.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.99–3.21), independent of age, sex, race,
marital status, insurance status, grade, liver involvement, lung
involvement, primary surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The median
overall survival intervals were 12 months for HR+/HER2−, 19 months for
HR+/HER2+, 11 months for HR−/HER2+, and 6 months for HR–/HER2–
(P < .0001). Relative to HR+/HER2– breast cancer,
HR–/HER2– breast cancer was associated with a significantly higher risk of
mortality among patients, and the association was stronger among patients
who received chemotherapy (p for interaction = .005). Conclusions Breast cancer subtype significantly predicted overall survival among patients
with brain metastasis at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Jie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Quan Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi-Ming Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Zong-Yan Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Hong Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiu-Ju Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tangdu Hospital, 56697The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|