Overexpression of Stat3 increases circulating cfDNA in breast cancer

An Investigation into Cell-Free DNA in Different Common Cancers

Diagnosis is the most important step in different diseases, especially in cancers and blood malignancies. There are different methods in order to better diagnose of cancer, but many of them are invasive and also, some of them are not useful for immediate diagnosis. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or liquid biopsy easily accessible in peripheral blood is one of the non-invasive prognostic biomarkers in various areas of cancer management. In fact, amounts of cfDNA in serum or plasma can be used for diagnosis. In this review, we have considered some cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, and hematologic malignancies to compare the various methods of cfDNA diagnosis.

Basic Science with Preclinical Models to Investigate and Develop Liquid Biopsy: What Are the Available Data and Is It a Fruitful Approach?

The molecular analysis of circulating analytes (circulating tumor-DNA (ctDNA), -cells (CTCs) and -RNA (ctRNA)/exosomes) deriving from solid tumors and detected in the bloodstream—referred as liquid biopsy—has emerged as one of the most promising concepts in cancer management. Compelling data have evidenced its pivotal contribution and unique polyvalence through multiple applications. These data essentially derived from translational research. Therewith, data on liquid biopsy in basic research with preclinical models are scarce, a concerning lack that has been widely acknowledged in the field. This report aimed to comprehensively review the available data on the topic, for each analyte. Only 17, 17 and 2 studies in basic research investigated ctDNA, CTCs and ctRNA/exosomes, respectively. Albeit rare, these studies displayed noteworthy relevance, demonstrating the capacity to investigate questions related to the biology underlying analytes release that could not be explored via translational research with human samples. Translational, clinical and technological sectors of liquid biopsy may benefit from basic research and should take note of some important findings generated by these studies. Overall, results underscored the need to intensify the efforts to conduct future studies on liquid biopsy in basic research with new preclinical models.