Octopus anastomosis: selection of anastomotic configuration in lymphaticovenular anastomosis according to vessels' conditions

Three-dimensional non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography severity stage for upper extremity lymphedema

PURPOSES

Non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NMRL) has recently shown the capability of evaluating anatomical fluid distribution in upper extremity lymphedema (UEL). However, there is still a lack of knowledge about the correlation between the characteristic three-dimensional (3D) NMRL findings and the indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L) findings. Our goal was to clarify the relationship between the 3D NMRL findings and the ICG-L findings.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients with secondary UEL who underwent NMRL and ICG-L between January 2018 to October 2021 were reviewed. The upper extremities were divided into 6 regions; the hand, elbow, and the radial and ulnar aspects of the forearm and the upper arm. We investigated the prevalence of characteristic 3D NMRL patterns (Mist/Spray/Inky) in each region based on the ICG-L stage. We also examined the association between the 3D NMRL stage which we proposed and the ICG-L stage, and other clinical factors.

RESULTS

A total of 150 regions of 25 patients with upper extremities lymphedema were enrolled in the study. All of the characteristic patterns increased significantly as the ICG-L stage advanced (p < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The predominant NMRL patterns changed significantly from the Early pattern (Mist pattern) to the Advanced pattern (Inky/Spray pattern) as the ICG-L stage progressed (p < 0.001). The higher Stage of 3D NMRL was significantly associated with the progression of the ICG-L stage (rs = 0.80, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristic 3D NMRL patterns and the 3D NMRL Stage had a significant relationship with the ICG-L stage and other clinical parameters. This information may be an efficient tool for a more precise and objective evaluation of various treatments for UEL patients.

"Double Barrel" Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis: A Useful Addition to a Supermicrosurgeon's Repertoire

Microsurgical amelioration of lymphedema has gained much traction in recent years and is now an established modality of treatment for this condition. Despite the development of many newer techniques, lymphaticovenous anastomosis still remains the most frequently carried out microsurgical procedure for lymphedema. One of the most common hurdles faced by lymphatic surgeons while carrying out a lymphaticovenous anastomosis is a mismatch in sizes of the vein and the lymphatic vessels.

METHOD

This article describes a novel but simple "double barrel" technique, developed by the authors for carrying out lymphaticovenous anastomosis in cases of such lymphaticovenous mismatch. Seventeen double barrel anastomoses were carried out in 12 lymphedema patients, over a 4-year period from 2017 to 2021.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 100%, as measured by clinical observation (venous washout, lymphatic backflow), the Acland vessel strip test, and by means of intraoperative ICG lymphography. Mild leakage was observed in four cases after release of the venous clamp and was corrected by application of additional sutures.

CONCLUSIONS

The double barrel technique is a safe and effective tool that can be employed to deal with the bane of size mismatch, a persistent problem faced by lymphedema surgeons universally. Although we do not advocate it as a total replacement for other techniques, it can be a worthy addition to the present set of available options. In specific scenarios of mismatch with additional challenges, the double barrel technique has the potential to be considered as primus inter pares.