Dynamics of circulating tumor DNA during postoperative radiotherapy in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective observational study

Implication of Pre- and Post-radiotherapy ctDNA Dynamics in Patients with Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Findings from a Prospective Observational Study

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine the association between pre- and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and oncological outcomes in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2019 and July 2020, 11 nonmetastatic patients with residual disease who underwent surgery after NAC were prospectively enrolled. In each patient, tumor specimens obtained during surgery and blood samples collected at three time points during PORT (T0: pre-PORT, T1: 3 weeks after PORT, T2: 1 month after PORT) were sequenced, targeting 38 cancer-related genes. Disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated and the association between DFS and ctDNA dynamics was analyzed.

RESULTS

At T0, ctDNA was detected in three (27.2%) patients. The ctDNA dynamics were as follows: two showed a decreasing ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) and reached zero VAF at T2, while one patient exhibited an increasing VAF during PORT and maintained an elevated VAF at T2. After a median follow-up of 48 months, two patients experienced distant metastasis without any locoregional failures. All failures occurred in patients with ctDNA positivity at T0 and a decreased VAF after PORT. The 4-year DFS rates according to the T0 ctDNA status were 67% (positive ctDNA) and 100% (negative ctDNA) (p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

More than a quarter of the patients with residual disease after post-NAC surgery exhibited pre-PORT ctDNA positivity, and ctDNA positivity was associated with poor DFS. For patients with pre-PORT ctDNA positivity, the administration of a more effective systemic treatment should be considered.

Dynamic analysis of circulating tumor DNA to predict the prognosis and monitor the treatment response of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective study

Background

Limited data are available on applying circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients. Here, we investigated the value of ctDNA for predicting the prognosis and monitoring the treatment response in mTNBC patients.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 70 Chinese patients with mTNBC who had progressed after ≤2 lines of chemotherapy and collected blood samples to extract ctDNA for 457-gene targeted panel sequencing.

Results

Patients with ctDNA+, defined by 12 prognosis-relevant mutated genes, had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than ctDNA- patients (5.16 months vs. 9.05 months, p=0.001), and ctDNA +was independently associated with a shorter PFS (HR, 95% CI: 2.67, 1.2-5.96; p=0.016) by multivariable analyses. Patients with a higher mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) score (≥6.316) or a higher ctDNA fraction (ctDNA%≥0.05) had a significantly shorter PFS than patients with a lower MATH score (5.67 months vs.11.27 months, p=0.007) and patients with a lower ctDNA% (5.45 months vs. 12.17 months, p<0.001), respectively. Positive correlations with treatment response were observed for MATH score (R=0.24, p=0.014) and ctDNA% (R=0.3, p=0.002), but not the CEA, CA125, or CA153. Moreover, patients who remained ctDNA +during dynamic monitoring tended to have a shorter PFS than those who did not (3.90 months vs. 6.10 months, p=0.135).

Conclusions

ctDNA profiling provides insight into the mutational landscape of mTNBC and may reliably predict the prognosis and treatment response of mTNBC patients.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81902713), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2019LZL018), Breast Disease Research Fund of Shandong Provincial Medical Association (Grant No. YXH2020ZX066), the Start-up Fund of Shandong Cancer Hospital (Grant No. 2020-PYB10), Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Fund (Grant No. KC2021-ZZ-0010-1).

Association of ctDNA detection and recurrence assessment in patients with neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The utilization of neoadjuvant therapy is progressively expanding in various clinical settings. However, the absence of a clinically validated biomarker to evaluate the treatment response remains a significant challenge in the field. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection, a novel and emerging monitoring approach in the field of oncology, holds promise as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with cancer. This meta-analysis investigated the clinical significance of ctDNA detection as a predictive tool for cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted using public databases to identify relevant studies that investigated the association between ctDNA detection and cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to assess the relationship between cancer recurrence and relevant factors. Cancer recurrence was considered the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies encompassing 1590 patients across eight different cancer types were included in the final analysis. Positive ctDNA detection was significantly associated with higher cancer recurrence, especially at post-neoadjuvant treatment and post-surgery time points. The risk values for the different cancer categories and geographic areas also differed significantly.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive meta-analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between ctDNA detection and a higher risk of cancer recurrence in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. In addition, the risk of recurrence was influenced by variations in cancer type, timing of detection, and geographic region. These findings highlight the promising clinical applicability of ctDNA as a prognostic marker and monitoring approach for patients with cancer. However, the precise mechanism is unknown and more evidence is needed for further research.

ctDNA and residual cancer burden are prognostic in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual disease

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) are at high risk for recurrence. Biomarkers to risk-stratify patients with RD could help individualize adjuvant therapy and inform future adjuvant therapy trials. We aim to investigate the impact of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status and residual cancer burden (RCB) class on outcomes in TNBC patients with RD. We analyze end-of-treatment ctDNA status in 80 TNBC patients with residual disease who are enrolled in a prospective multisite registry. Among 80 patients, 33% are ctDNA positive (ctDNA+) and RCB class distribution is RCB-I = 26%, RCB-II = 49%, RCB-III = 18% and 7% unknown. ctDNA status is associated with RCB status, with 14%, 31%, and 57% of patients within RCB-I, -II, and -III classes demonstrating ctDNA+ status (P = 0.028). ctDNA+ status is associated with inferior 3-year EFS (48% vs. 82%, P < 0.001) and OS (50% vs. 86%, P = 0.002). ctDNA+ status predicts inferior 3-year EFS among RCB-II patients (65% vs. 87%, P = 0.044) and shows a trend for inferior EFS among RCB-III patients (13% vs. 40%, P = 0.081). On multivariate analysis accounting for T stage and nodal status, RCB class and ctDNA status independently predict EFS (HR = 5.16, P = 0.016 for RCB class; HR = 3.71, P = 0.020 for ctDNA status). End-of-treatment ctDNA is detectable in one-third of TNBC patients with residual disease after NAST. ctDNA status and RCB are independently prognostic in this setting.

Real world practice of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a national survey of radiation oncologists in China

BACKGROUND

Results from Lung ART and PORT-C trials suggest that postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) cannot routinely be recommended as standard treatment in completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients, but their effects on the real-world practice of PORT in China remain unclear.

METHODS

A national cross-section survey was conducted by using an online survey service. Participants were voluntarily recruited using a river sampling strategy. A link to the survey was posted on websites of radiation oncologist associations and tweets from public WeChat accounts. The survey collected the real names of participants to ensure that they were board-certified radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

A total of 484 radiation oncologists were included with a median age of 40 years (IQR, 35-47). A total of 377 (77.9%) participants were male, and 282 (58.1%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience practicing thoracic radiotherapy. Before Lung ART and PORT-C trials were published, 313 (64.7%) respondents recommended PORT, 11 (2.3%) did not recommend it, and 160 (33.1%) reported that they made decisions based on risk factors. After the presentation of two trials, only 42 (8.7%) did not recommend PORT, while 108 (22.3%) recommended it, and 334 (69.0%) made decisions based on risk factors. The five most commonly considered risk factors among these 334 respondents were as follows: nodal extracapsular extension, the highest lymph node (LN) station involved, the number of dissected mediastinal LN stations, the number of positive mediastinal LN stations, and surgical approaches. In addition, the majority of all 484 respondents recommended a total dose of 50 Gy, lung stump + ipsilateral hilus + regions containing positive LNs as the targeted region, lung V20 < 25%, and heart V30 < 40% as dose constraints for PORT.

CONCLUSION

Most Chinese radiation oncologists recommended PORT for completely resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients based on risk factors, especially status of LN station.

Postneoadjuvant treatment for triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been conventionally associated with poor prognosis, as a result of limited therapeutic options. In the early setting, prognosis is informed by clinical-pathological factors; for patients receiving neoadjuvant treatments, pathological complete response (pCR) is the strongest factor. In this review, we mapped the landscape of clinical trials in the postneoadjuvant space, and identified three patterns of clinical trial design.

RECENT FINDINGS

For patients at higher risk, effective postneoadjuvant treatments are of paramount importance to address a high clinical need. Postneoadjuvant risk-adapted treatments have demonstrated to improve survival in patients at high of recurrence.

SUMMARY

Patients at high risk have indication for adjuvant treatment intensification, informed by baseline clinical, pathological or molecular factors (type 1 approach), on the presence, extent and molecular characteristics of the residual disease at the time of surgery (type 2) or on risk factors assessed in the postsurgical setting (type 3), for example, circulating tumour DNA. Most of the past trials were based on type 2 approaches, for example, with capecitabine and Olaparib. Few trials were based on a type 1 approach, notably pembrolizumab for early TNBC. The clinical validity of type 3 approaches is under investigation in several ongoing trials.

Circulating tumour DNA dynamics for assessment of molecular residual disease and for intercepting resistance in breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising tool for monitoring tumour evolution. In patients with breast cancer, ctDNA dynamics for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) and resistances may, respectively, help clinicians in treatment modulation of adjuvant treatments, and in anticipating resistance to ongoing treatments and switch treatments before clinical progression, to improve disease control. Anyway, the introduction of this dynamic biomarker into clinical practice requires the demonstration of analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

In early breast cancer setting, several observational studies demonstrated the clinical validity of MRD monitoring through ctDNA in identifying patients at a higher risk of relapse, but many clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility are still ongoing, and few data resulted in inconclusive results.Instead, ctDNA dynamics for intercepting resistance have not been fully evaluated in terms of clinical validity, because monitoring schedules of most observational studies are not intensive. The only trial assessing their clinical utility (PADA-1) demonstrated a benefit in terms of progression-free survival, portraying a new landscape for clinical trials in this space.

SUMMARY

Rigorous clinical trials with adequate assays and patient-relevant endpoints are paramount to demonstrate the clinical utility of ctDNA dynamics and eventually increase clinical outcomes.