1
|
Chen YA, Lai HW, Su HC, Loh EW, Huang TW, Tam KW. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in older patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data. Breast Cancer 2024:10.1007/s12282-024-01622-1. [PMID: 39085679 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01622-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insufficient data available for older patients with breast cancer complicates decision-making regarding optimal treatment. A systematic review that uses real-world data is required for assessing the effectiveness and potential adverse effects of various therapies for this age group of patients. METHODS Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. We included clinical studies that evaluated various treatments for geriatric breast cancer, including adjuvant radiation therapy, hypofractionated radiation therapy (hypo-RT) and accelerated and partial breast irradiation (APBI), endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. RESULTS A total of 71 studies were retrieved. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with no radiation [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.67]. The pooled estimates of OS for hypo-RT and APBI demonstrated no inferiority compared with conventional radiation. Both endocrine treatment (HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92) and chemotherapy (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88) significantly increased OS compared with no treatment. Trastuzumab monotherapy significantly enhanced OS compared with no trastuzumab use (HR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.73). CONCLUSION Despite concerns about potential complications during treatment in older patients, proactive therapies significantly increase their survival rates. For patients who are frailer, hypo-RT and APBI offer survival rates comparable to traditional modalities. Additionally, targeted therapy as a monotherapy holds promise as a viable option for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who cannot undergo chemotherapy. Therefore, by conducting thorough general assessments and clinical evaluations, the side effects of postoperative treatments can be effectively managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-An Chen
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsuan-Wen Lai
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Chen Su
- Department of Pharmacy, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - El-Wui Loh
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Tsai-Wei Huang
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 291, Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Li WX, Wu JH, Chen GH, Yang CM, Lu H, Wang X, Wang SS, Huang H, Cai L, Zhao L, Peng RJ, Lin Y, Tang J, Zeng J, Zhang LH, Ke YL, Wang XM, Liu XM, Zhang AQ, Xu F, Bi XW, Huang JJ, Li JB, Pang DM, Xue C, Shi YX, He ZY, Lin HX, An X, Xia W, Cao Y, Guo Y, Hong RX, Jiang KK, Zhong YY, Zhang G, Tienchaiananda P, Oikawa M, Yuan ZY, Chen QJ. Does the Dose of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Triple-negative Breast Cancer Benefit from Extended Capecitabine Metronomic Therapy? An Exploratory Analysis of the SYSUCC-001 Trial. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2024; 16:223-231. [PMID: 38628818 PMCID: PMC11020346 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s447290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Results from studies of extended capecitabine after the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were inconsistent, and only low-dose capecitabine from the SYSUCC-001 trial improved disease-free survival (DFS). Adjustment of the conventional adjuvant chemotherapy doses affect the prognosis and may affect the efficacy of subsequent treatments. This study investigated whether the survival benefit of the SYSUCC-001 trial was affected by dose adjustment of the standard adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Patients and Methods We reviewed the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens before the extended capecitabine in the SYSUCC-001 trial. Patients were classified into "consistent" (standard acceptable dose) and "inconsistent" (doses lower than acceptable dose) dose based on the minimum acceptable dose range in the landmark clinical trials. Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of dose on the survival outcomes. Results All 434 patients in SYSUCC-001 trial were enrolled in this study. Most of patients administered the anthracycline-taxane regimen accounted for 88.94%. Among patients in the "inconsistent" dose, 60.8% and 47% received lower doses of anthracycline and taxane separately. In the observation group, the "inconsistent" dose of anthracycline and taxane did not affect DFS compared with the "consistent" dose. Moreover, in the capecitabine group, the "inconsistent" anthracycline dose did not affect DFS compared with the "consistent" dose. However, patients with "consistent" taxane doses benefited significantly from extended capecitabine (P=0.014). The sufficient dose of adjuvant taxane had a positive effect of extended capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 4.06). Conclusion This study found the dose reduction of adjuvant taxane might negatively impact the efficacy of capecitabine. Therefore, the reduction of anthracycline dose over paclitaxel should be given priority during conventional adjuvant chemotherapy, if patients need dose reduction and plan for extended capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Xia Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jia-Hua Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Geng-Hang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chun-Min Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hai Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shu-Sen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Heng Huang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Lianjiang People’s Hospital, Lianjiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Guangzhou First People Hospital, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Rou-Jun Peng
- Department of Integrated Therapy in Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Lin
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Tang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jian Zeng
- Department of Breast Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Le-Hong Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Li Ke
- Department of Breast Oncology, General Hospital of PLA Guangzhou Military Area, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xian-Ming Wang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin-Mei Liu
- Department of Breast Oncology, Haikou People’s Hospital, Haikou, People’s Republic of China
| | - An-Qin Zhang
- Department of Breast Oncology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fei Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xi-Wen Bi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jia-Jia Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan-Mei Pang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Foshan First People’s Hospital, Foshan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cong Xue
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan-Xia Shi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huan-Xin Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin An
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen Xia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ye Cao
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Good Clinical Practice, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ruo-Xi Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kui-Kui Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yong-Yi Zhong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ge Zhang
- Law Sau Fai Institute for Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone and Joint Diseases (TMBJ), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
| | - Piyawan Tienchaiananda
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rangsit University, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Masahiro Oikawa
- The Department of Breast Surgery, New-wa-kai Oikawa Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Zhong-Yu Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian-Jun Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roy S, Lakritz S, Schreiber AR, Kuna EM, Bradley CJ, Kondapalli L, Diamond JR. Major cardiovascular adverse events in older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens: A SEER-medicare study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113426. [PMID: 38000217 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX). METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis. RESULTS Of the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45-0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66-75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07-2.62], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Among older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1-3 positive lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah Roy
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Stephanie Lakritz
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna R Schreiber
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth Molina Kuna
- Population Health Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cathy J Bradley
- Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lavanya Kondapalli
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roy S, Lakritz S, Schreiber AR, Molina E, Kabos P, Wood M, Elias A, Kondapalli L, Bradley CJ, Diamond JR. Clinical outcomes of adjuvant taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens in older adults with node-positive, triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:69-82. [PMID: 36965330 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer associated with an aggressive clinical course. Adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with node-positive TNBC. The benefit of anthracycline plus taxane (ATAX) regimens compared with non-anthracycline-containing, taxane-based regimens (TAX) in older women with node-positive TNBC is not well characterised. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 1106 women with node-positive TNBC diagnosed at age 66 years and older between 2010 and 2015. We compared patient clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyse OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumour characteristics. RESULTS Of the 1106 patients in our cohort, 767 (69.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX (364/767, 47.5%), TAX (297/767, 39%) or other regimens (106/767, 13.8%). Independent predictors of which patients were more likely to receive ATAX versus TAX included more extensive nodal involvement (≥4), age, marital/partner status and non-cardiac comorbidities. There was a statistically significant improvement in 3-year CSS (81.8% versus 71.4%) and OS (70.7% versus 51.3%) with the use of any chemotherapy in our cohort (P < 0.01). Three-year CSS and OS for patients who received ATAX versus TAX were similar at 82.8% versus 83.7% (P = 0.80) and 74.2% versus 72.7% (P = 0.79), respectively. There was a trend towards improved CSS and OS in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes who received ATAX versus TAX (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36-1.23, P = 0.19 and hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.14, P = 0.14, respectively). CONCLUSION Among older women with node-positive TNBC, a majority of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, which was associated with an improvement in CSS and OS. When compared with TAX chemotherapy, there was a trend towards better outcomes with ATAX for patients with ≥4 nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah Roy
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Stephanie Lakritz
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna R Schreiber
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth Molina
- Population Health Shared Resource, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter Kabos
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marie Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anthony Elias
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lavanya Kondapalli
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cathy J Bradley
- Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freedman RA, Li T, Sedrak MS, Hopkins JO, Tayob N, Faggen MG, Sinclair NF, Chen WY, Parsons HA, Mayer EL, Lange PB, Basta AS, Perilla-Glen A, Lederman RI, Wong A, Tiwari A, McAllister SS, Mittendorf EA, Miller PG, Gibson CJ, Burstein HJ. 'ADVANCE' (a pilot trial) ADjuVANt chemotherapy in the elderly: Developing and evaluating lower-toxicity chemotherapy options for older patients with breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101377. [PMID: 36163163 PMCID: PMC10080267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults with breast cancer receiving neo/adjuvant chemotherapy are at high risk for poor outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. The ADVANCE (ADjuVANt Chemotherapy in the Elderly) trial evaluated the feasibility of two neo/adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in parallel-enrolling cohorts of older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: cohort 1-triple-negative; cohort 2-hormone receptor-positive. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults age ≥ 70 years with stage I-III breast cancer warranting neo/adjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. Cohort 1 received weekly carboplatin (area under the curve 2) and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for twelve weeks; cohort 2 received weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 plus every-three-weekly cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 over twelve weeks. The primary study endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥80% of patients receiving ≥80% of intended weeks/doses of therapy. All dose modifications were applied per clinician discretion. RESULTS Forty women (n = 20 per cohort) were enrolled from March 25, 2019 through August 3, 2020 from three centers; 45% and 35% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2 were age > 75, respectively. Neither cohort achieved targeted thresholds for feasibility. In cohort 1, eight (40.0%) met feasibility (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.1-63.9%), while ten (50.0%) met feasibility in cohort 2 (95% CI = 27.2-72.8). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3-4 toxicity (cohort 1-65%, cohort 2-55%). In cohort 1, 80% and 85% required ≥1 dose holds of carboplatin and/or paclitaxel, respectively. In cohort 2, 10% required dose hold(s) for cyclophosphamide and/or 65% for paclitaxel. DISCUSSION In this pragmatic pilot examining chemotherapy regimens in older adults with breast cancer, neither regimen met target goals for feasibility. Developing efficacious and tolerable regimens for older patients with breast cancer who need chemotherapy remains an important goal. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT03858322.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tianyu Li
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Novant Health Cancer Institute / SCOR NCORP, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meredith G Faggen
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center at South Shore Hospital, South Weymouth, MA, USA
| | - Natalie F Sinclair
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center at Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, MA, USA
| | - Wendy Y Chen
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather A Parsons
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paulina B Lange
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ameer S Basta
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ruth I Lederman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Abhay Tiwari
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sandra S McAllister
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Hematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter G Miller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Gibson
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harold J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu B, Sun C, Sun X, Li X. The effect of chemotherapy on survival in oldest old patients with nonmetastatic triple negative breast cancer: A populationbased observational study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2022; 47:1826-1836. [PMID: 36175133 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Chemotherapy is the primary pharmacotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). But the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the oldest old TNBC patients remains controversial. Hence, we designed this population based observational study in order to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in oldest old TNBC patients with early-stage disease. METHODS TNBC patients aged 80 years and older that with stage I to III invasive disease were identified in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results cancer database from 2010 to 2016. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of 1611 patients enrolled, 1356 (84.17%) did not receive chemotherapy. Age, race, histology, grade, T stage, N stage, and radiation were found to be strong predictors of chemotherapy recipient by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Chemotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49-0.79, p < 0.001), but did not significantly reduce breast cancer specific death (BCSD) (HR, 0.92, 95% CI: 0.63-1.35, p = 0.675). These results were further confirmed by propensity score matching analysis. Chemotherapy was associated with better OS in the subgroup of patients aged 80-84 years old (HR, 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, p < 0.001), T2-4 stage disease (HR, 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.76, p < 0.001), or grade 3-4 disease (HR, 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.71, p < 0.001). However, chemotherapy did not reduce the cumulative incidence of BCSD in any subgroup. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Chemotherapy should be considered for TNBC patients aged 80-84 years old, T2-4 disease, or grade 3-4 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wu
- Department of Oncology, Weihai Cental Hospital, Weihai, People's Republic of China
| | - Congcong Sun
- Department of Oncology, Weihai Wendeng District People's Hospital, Weihai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqin Sun
- Department of Oncology, Weihai Wendeng District Zetou Township Health Center, Weihai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Clinical Teaching, Weihai Health School, Weihai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurian AW, Abrahamse P, Hamilton AS, Caswell-Jin JL, Gomez SL, Hofer TJ, Ward KC, Katz SJ. Chemotherapy Regimens Received by Women With BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants for Early Stage Breast Cancer Treatment. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:6611726. [PMID: 35723570 PMCID: PMC9305849 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing is widespread among breast cancer patients; however, no guideline recommends using germline genetic testing results to select a chemotherapy regimen. It is unknown whether breast cancer patients who carry pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and/or 2 (BRCA1/2) or other cancer-associated genes receive different chemotherapy regimens than noncarriers. METHODS We linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry records from Georgia and California to germline genetic testing results from 4 clinical laboratories. Patients who 1) had stages I-III breast cancer, either hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2 negative or triple negative (TNBC), diagnosed in 2013-2017; 2) received chemotherapy; and 3) were linked to genetic results were included. Chemotherapy details were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results text fields completed by registrars. We examined whether PV carriers received more intensive regimens (HR-positive,HER2-negative: ≥3 drugs including an anthracycline; TNBC: ≥4 drugs including an anthracycline and platinum) and/or less standard breast cancer agents (a platinum). All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Among 2293 patients, 1451 had HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, and 842 had TNBC. On multivariable analysis of women with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, receipt of a more intensive chemotherapy regimen varied statistically significantly by genetic results (P = .02), with platinum receipt more common among BRCA1/2 PV carriers (odds ratio = 2.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.36 to 4.38; P < .001). Among women with TNBC, chemotherapy agents did not vary significantly by genetic results. CONCLUSION BRCA1/2 PV carriers with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer had twofold higher odds than noncarriers of receiving a platinum, as part of a more intensive chemotherapy regimen. This likely represents overtreatment and emphasizes the need to monitor how genetic testing results are managed in oncology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison W Kurian
- Correspondence to: Allison W. Kurian, MD, MSc, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Alway Building, Room M121M, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Paul Abrahamse
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Scarlett L Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Hofer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan and Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guarneri V, de Azambuja E. Anthracyclines in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100461. [PMID: 35798471 PMCID: PMC9271479 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|