Systemic treatment in advanced phyllodes tumor of the breast: a multi-institutional European retrospective case-series analyses

Genomic landscape of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals multiple targetable opportunities

BACKGROUND

Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPT) are rare fibroepithelial breast cancers with no known effective systemic therapy; metastatic progression portends a dismal prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape of MPTs through genomic profiling and immunotherapeutic biomarker analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of sequenced MPT were identified from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified, College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory (Foundation Medicine). All cases underwent genomic profiling using adaptor ligation-based, next-generation sequencing assay of 324 genes. Tumor agnostic immunotherapy biomarkers, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated. Fisher's Exact Tests and analysis of variance were used to test for differences between groups and for continuous variables as appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 135 MPT cases identified; 94 (69.6%) were localized/locally recurrent and 41 (30.4%) were metastatic. Median age was 54 years (range 14-86). The median TMB was 2.5 mut/Mb and 3 were TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb). 21.4% were PD-L1+ via Dako 22C3 assay (CPS ≥1). Most commonly altered genes included TERT-promoter (69.7%), CDKN2A (45.9%), TP53 (37.8%), NF1 (35.6%), CDKN2B (33.3%), MED12 (28.9%), MTAP (27.7%), KMT2D (22.2%), PIK3CA (20.0%), PTEN (18.5%), and RB1 (18.5%). Several tumors harboring genomic alterations with US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in other tumor types were found including NF1, PIK3CA, EGFR Exon 19/20 insertions, and BRAF V600E mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest genomic evaluation of MPT to date, multiple clinically actionable mutations were found. Routine sequencing of metastatic MPT may provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment.

Genomic Landscape of Malignant Phyllodes Tumors Identifies Subsets for Targeted Therapy

PURPOSE

Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) are rare fibroepithelial tumors of the breast with aggressive biologic behavior and high recurrence rates. Surgery remains the primary treatment modality for these tumors; however, initial investigations suggest a potential for targeted therapies in managing this disease. Therefore, we aimed to assess the molecular landscape of MPTs to reveal possible treatment opportunities.

METHODS

MPTs (n = 57) from primary and metastatic sites underwent genomic sequencing (592-gene panel or whole exome), whole-transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Immune cell fractions in the tumor microenvironment were estimated using quanTIseq. Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine significance (P < .05).

RESULTS

MPTs had low ERBB2 expression, comparable with the HER2-negative subset of a large cohort of breast adenocarcinoma samples (N = 9,926). Frequent alterations included TERT promoter; MED12, TP53, and NF1 mutations; and less frequently EGFR, PIK3CA, and BRAF. Differences in mutation prevalences were observed between primary sites, lung metastases, and nonlung metastases. One MPT specimen harbored a pathogenic TPM4:NTRK1 fusion, and treatment with larotrectinib for over 16 months suggested a clinical response to therapy. PD-L1+ status was observed in 15.2% of MPTs overall, with similar prevalence in primary sites and lung metastases. B cells, M2 macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer cells had the highest median cell fractions in MPTs.

CONCLUSION

Considering the occurrence of several actionable alterations including a TPM4:NTRK1 fusion reported herein, these results support the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) including RNA analysis for fusion detection to identify such alterations in patients with MPTs. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive NGS in MPT research to uncover potential targeted treatment options for these patients.

[Borderlines and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: From the anatomopathological challenge to the standard of care]

Phyllodes tumors, borderline (BPT) and malignant (MPT), represent a rare group of fibroepithelial breast tumors. Due to their rarity, their treatment remains poorly codified. The precise incidence of these tumors remains unknown. TPMs represent half of breast sarcomas and 1 % of breast tumors. Their treatment at the localized stage is based on surgery, that can be conservative surgery or a mastectomy. The impact of oncoplastic techniques and immediate breast reconstruction is not documented. The excision margins of the BPT and MPT must be free, a wider margin can provide a benefit in local recurrence but in also overall survival in the case of TPM. The optimal width of the excision margin is not known. In the event of positive margins, a second surgery could make up the result of an insufficient first surgery. Chemotherapy does not seem to provide any benefit on recurrence-free survival, but the available data are particularly weak. The data on adjuvant radiotherapy are more important. This allows better local control in the event of breast-conserving surgery. The benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy is less documented but can be considered in cases of poor prognostic factors. The management of TPM at the metastatic stage is based on the use of chemotherapy (anthracyclines, Ifosfamide) and local treatment of metastases in cases of oligometastatic disease. Due to the rarity of these tumors, it is essential that their management be discussed within a network of qualified professionals (NETSARC+).

Relapsing malignant phyllodes tumour presenting as isolated acrometastases

Malignant phyllodes tumours (PTs) are aggressive neoplasms with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. With no known effective chemotherapy and no approved targeted therapy in the setting of metastatic disease, prognosis is limited with an often-relapsing course of disease. We report a case of a woman in her late 30s with a diagnosis of recurrent metastatic malignant PT who was found to have acrometastases of the malignant PT to the right distal index and small digits. We emphasise the potential for atypical patterns of metastases in patients with malignant PT and the need to recognise acrometastasis as an unusual but morbid manifestation of disease. Given the high growth rate of malignant PTs, the lack of systemic treatment options, and the ensuing distress for patients, prompt diagnosis and early intervention is crucial.

Clinical outcomes and biomarkers of phyllodes tumors of the breast: A single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare neoplasms with a certain risk of recurrence and/or metastasis. In clinical practice, there is a lack of high-quality clinical studies and unified guidelines to guide the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All malignant and recurrence/metastasis PTs were retrospectively collected, which were diagnosed from 2008 to 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were enrolled, including 69 malignant and 13 borderline tumors. 96.3% (79/82) received surgical treatment. During a median follow-up of 55.5 months, 20 patients (20/82, 24.4%) had distant metastasis (DM), while 32 (32/82, 39.0%) had local recurrence (LR). Univariate analysis showed the survival of PTs was associated with surgical methods (p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.026), and biological behavior (p = 0.017), but not age at diagnosis. In relapsed borderline PTs, we did not find deaths due to disease progression. Patients with DM were all malignant PTs, with disease-progression occurring within 3 years in more than 80% of patients. Among salvage treatments, the combination of antiangiogenic drugs improved the prognosis to some extent, with a significant increase in mPFS (2.77 vs. 1.53 months), but no significant statistical results were obtained (p = 0.168). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was an independent predictor of the prognosis for malignant PTs (p = 0.001, HR = 1.203, 95%CI, 1.082-1.336).

CONCLUSION

Borderline PTs rarely metastasize, and even if LR occurs, surgical resection can lead to long-term survival. In metastatic phyllodes tumors (MPT), systemic therapy is not effective, but antiangiogenic drugs may prolong survival. LDH is an independent prognostic factor for malignant PTs to identify high-risk tumors.

Survey of recurrent diagnostic challenges in breast phyllodes tumours

BACKGROUND

Breast phyllodes tumours (PTs) are graded as benign, borderline, or malignant by analysis of multiple histological features. PT grading is often inconsistent, likely due to variation in the weighting of grading criteria by pathologists.

DESIGN

The hierarchy of use of diagnostic criteria was identified using a 20-question survey.

RESULTS

In all, 213 pathologists from 29 countries responded. 54% reported 10-50 PT cases per year. Criteria considered key to PT diagnosis were: increased stromal cellularity (84.3%), stromal overgrowth (76.6%), increased stromal mitoses (67.8%), stromal atypia (61.5%), stromal fronding (59.0%), periductal stromal condensation (58.0%), irregular tumour borders (46.3%), and/or lesional heterogeneity (33.7%). The importance of grading parameters were: mitotic activity (55.5%), stromal overgrowth (54.0%), stromal atypia (51.9%), increased stromal cellularity (41.7%), and nature of the tumour border (38.9%). 49% would diagnose malignant PT without a full array of adverse features. 89% used the term "cellular fibroepithelial lesion (FEL)" for difficult cases; 45% would diagnose an FEL with stromal fronding (but lacking other PT features) as fibroadenoma (FA), 35% FEL, and 17% PT. 59% deemed clinico-radiological findings diagnostically significant; 68% considered age (≥40 years) important in determining if an FEL was a FA or PT. In FELs from young patients, increased stromal cellularity (83%), fronding (52%), and mitoses (41%) were more common. 34% regarded differentiating cellular FA from PT as a specific challenge; 54% had issues assigning a borderline PT grade.

CONCLUSION

Criteria for grading PT lie on a spectrum, leading to interpretive variability. The survey highlights the criteria most used by pathologists, which do not completely align with WHO recommendations.

A case of malignant phyllodes tumor that responded to pazopanib and developed pneumothorax

Here, we present a 59-year-old female with recurrent malignant phyllodes tumor with multiple lung and lymph node metastases who developed a pneumothorax after the administration of pazopanib. The patient received pazopanib as the second-line chemotherapy. After 2.5 months of the therapy, computed tomography (CT) showed a decrease in the sizes and cavitation of lung lesions; however, a left pneumothorax was newly observed. It was difficult to distinguish the pneumothorax by upright chest X-ray. Typical symptom or physical finding of pneumothorax, such as dyspnea, chest pain or decreased breath sound was not observed. As the pneumothorax was small and asymptomatic, the administration of pazopanib was discontinued and follow-up chest X-ray and CT were performed. After 1 week, CT showed an improvement in the pneumothorax. Chemotherapy was switched to eribulin; however, a rapid increase in sizes of lung lesions was observed after the first administration of eribulin, pazopanib was reintroduced. Careful follow-up by chest X-ray and CT was performed and the pneumothorax has not recurred.