Timely cancer genetic counseling and testing for young women with breast cancer: impact on surgical decision-making for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy

Screening Practices for Breast and Nonbreast Cancers in High-Risk Mutation Carriers

INTRODUCTION

Women with breast cancer often undergo genetic testing and may have a pathogenic variant associated with multiple cancers. This study examines the current screening practices for breast and nonbreast cancers in mutation carriers.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective chart review of patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, BARD1, BRIP1, PALB2, and TP53 mutations were identified. Adherence to recommended screening based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was analyzed.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 220 patients with BRCA1, 256 patients with BRCA2, 58 patients with PALB2, 51 patients with ATM, 48 patients with CHEK2, 14 patients with BRIP1, 10 patients with BARD1, and 5 patients with TP53. Overall, 214 (46%) of eligible patients completed recommended breast imaging. Of 106 patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening, 20 (19%) received a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and 16 (15%) received an endoscopic ultrasound. On multivariable analysis, age was associated with improved breast imaging adherence: patients in age groups 40-55 (adjusted odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.55) and age 56-70 (adjusted odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.95, P = 0.012) had better adherence than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in genetic testing and updates to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines provide an opportunity for improved cancer screening. While recommended breast cancer screenings are being completed at higher rates, there is a need for clear protocols in this high-risk population.

Integration of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for All New Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends genetic testing (GT) for all women with breast cancer (BC), but implementation and uptake of GT has not been well-described.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for newly diagnosed BC patients or patients with a newly identified recurrence of BC seen in a multidisciplinary clinic (MDBC) who were offered genetic counseling (GC) and GT.

RESULTS

The 138 women attending the MDBC had a median age of 54 years and comprised non-Hispanic whites (46%), Asians (28%), Hispanics (17%), blacks (4%), and other (5%). Of the 105 (76%) patients without prior GT, 100 (95%) accepted GC, with 93 (93%) of these 100 patients undergoing GT. The patients meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for GT were more likely to undergo GT. Testing was performed with a 67- to 84-gene panel, together with an 8- to 9-gene STAT panel if needed. Among 120 patients with reports available, including 33 patients previously tested, 15 (12%) were positive (1 BLM, 1 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 BRIP1, 1 CFTR, 1 CHEK2, 1 MUTYH, 1 PALB2, 1 PRSS1, 1 RAD50, 1 RET, and 2 TP53), 44 (37%) were negative, and 61 (51%) had an uncertain variant. The median time to STAT results (n = 50) was 8 days. The STAT results were available before surgery for 47 (98%) of the 48 STAT patients undergoing surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

New BC patients attending the MDBC demonstrated high rates of acceptance of GC and GT. The combination of GC and GT can offer timely information critical to patient risk assessment and treatment planning.

Receipt of Bilateral Mastectomy Among Women With Hereditary Breast Cancer

This case series study examines differences in surgical treatment among adult females with invasive breast cancer who have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes with high vs moderate breast cancer penetrance.

Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer

Adolescents and young women (AYA) with breast cancer represent a unique patient population, compared to the general population with breast cancer. We performed a literature review to evaluate the factors that influenced the surgical outcomes in this patient population. Fifty-two studies were identified, which evaluated breast surgery type, axillary surgery, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), surgical timing, psychological factors, disparities, and imaging use. AYA patients had equivalent oncologic outcomes with breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. CPM did not improve survival. There are limited data on axillary management in the AYA population, and while more data would be beneficial, this is currently extrapolated from the general breast cancer population. A shorter time to initiate treatment correlated to better outcomes, and disparities need to be overcome for optimal outcomes. AYA patients appreciated involvement in clinical decisions, and shared decision making should be considered whenever possible. Providers must keep these factors in mind when counseling AYA patients, regarding the surgical management of breast cancer.