1
|
Rejmer C, Dihge L, Bendahl PO, Förnvik D, Dustler M, Rydén L. Preoperative prediction of nodal status using clinical data and artificial intelligence derived mammogram features enabling abstention of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1394448. [PMID: 39050572 PMCID: PMC11266164 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer have a negative sentinel lymph node status (pN0) in approximately 75% of cases and the necessity of routine surgical nodal staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been questioned. Previous prediction models for pN0 have included postoperative variables, thus defeating their purpose to spare patients non-beneficial axillary surgery. We aimed to develop a preoperative prediction model for pN0 and to evaluate the contribution of mammographic breast density and mammogram features derived by artificial intelligence for de-escalation of SLNB. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included 755 women with primary breast cancer. Mammograms were analyzed by commercially available artificial intelligence and automated systems. The additional predictive value of features was evaluated using logistic regression models including preoperative clinical variables and radiological tumor size. The final model was internally validated using bootstrap and externally validated in a separate cohort. A nomogram for prediction of pN0 was developed. The correlation between pathological tumor size and the preoperative radiological tumor size was calculated. Results Radiological tumor size was the strongest predictor of pN0 and included in a preoperative prediction model displaying an area under the curve of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.72) in internal validation and 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.69) in external validation. Although the addition of mammographic features did not improve discrimination, the prediction model provided a 21% SLNB reduction rate when a false negative rate of 10% was accepted, reflecting the accepted false negative rate of SLNB. Conclusion This study shows that the preoperatively available radiological tumor size might replace pathological tumor size as a key predictor in a preoperative prediction model for pN0. While the overall performance was not improved by mammographic features, one in five patients could be omitted from axillary surgery by applying the preoperative prediction model for nodal status. The nomogram visualizing the model could support preoperative patient-centered decision-making on the management of the axilla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Rejmer
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Looket Dihge
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pär-Ola Bendahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Förnvik
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiations Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Magnus Dustler
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Lisa Rydén
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franklin M, Pollard D, Sah J, Rayner A, Sun Y, Dube F, Sutton A, Qin L. Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2700-2722. [PMID: 38833143 PMCID: PMC11213812 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02893-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is currently the leading cause of global cancer incidence. Breast cancer has negative consequences for society and economies internationally due to the high burden of disease which includes adverse epidemiological and economic implications. Our aim is to systematically review the estimated economic burden of breast cancer in the United States (US), Canada, Australia, and Western Europe (United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, and Switzerland), with an objective of discussing the policy and practice implications of our results. METHODS We included English-language published studies with cost as a focal point using a primary data source to inform resource usage of women with breast cancer. We focussed on studies published since 2017, but with reported costs since 2012. A systematic search conducted on 25 January 2023 identified studies relating to the economic burden of breast cancer in the countries of interest. MEDLINE, Embase, and EconLit databases were searched via Ovid. Study quality was assessed based on three aspects: (1) validity of cost findings; (2) completeness of direct cost findings; and (3) completeness of indirect cost findings. We grouped costs based on country, cancer stage (early compared to metastatic), and four resource categories: healthcare/medical, pharmaceutical drugs, diagnosis, and indirect costs. Costs were standardized to the year 2022 in US (US$2022) and International (Int$2022) dollars. RESULTS Fifty-three studies were included. Studies in the US (n = 19) and Canada (n = 9) were the majority (53%), followed by Western European countries (42%). Healthcare/medical costs were the focus for the majority (89%), followed by pharmaceutical drugs (25%), then diagnosis (17%) and indirect (17%) costs. Thirty-six (68%) included early-stage cancer costs, 17 (32%) included metastatic cancer costs, with 23% reporting costs across these cancer stages. No identified study explicitly compared costs across countries. Across cost categories, cost ranges tended to be higher in the US than any other country. Metastatic breast cancer was associated with higher costs than earlier-stage cancer. When indirect costs were accounted for, particularly in terms of productivity loss, they tended to be higher than any other estimated direct cost (e.g., diagnosis, drug, and other medical costs). CONCLUSION There was substantial heterogeneity both within and across countries for the identified studies' designs and estimated costs. Despite this, current empirical literature suggests that costs associated with early initiation of treatment could be offset against potentially avoiding or reducing the overall economic burden of later-stage and more severe breast cancer. Larger scale, national, economic burden studies are needed, to be updated regularly to ensure there is an ongoing and evolving perspective of the economic burden of conditions such as breast cancer to inform policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Franklin
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Daniel Pollard
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Janvi Sah
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| | - Annabel Rayner
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Yuxiao Sun
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - France Dube
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| | - Anthea Sutton
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Lei Qin
- Oncology Business Unit, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skarping I, Ellbrant J, Dihge L, Ohlsson M, Huss L, Bendahl PO, Rydén L. Retrospective validation study of an artificial neural network-based preoperative decision-support tool for noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) in women with primary breast cancer (ISRCTN14341750). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:86. [PMID: 38229058 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11854-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely used to reliably stage axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer (BC). However, SLNB may be associated with postoperative arm morbidities. For most patients with BC undergoing SLNB, the findings are benign, and the procedure is currently questioned. A decision-support tool for the prediction of benign sentinel lymph nodes based on preoperatively available data has been developed using artificial neural network modelling. METHODS This was a retrospective geographical and temporal validation study of the noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) model, based on preoperatively available data from 586 women consecutively diagnosed with primary BC at two sites. Ten preoperative clinicopathological characteristics from each patient were entered into the web-based calculator, and the probability of benign lymph nodes was predicted. The performance of the NILS model was assessed in terms of discrimination with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration, that is, comparison of the observed and predicted event rates of benign axillary nodal status (N0) using calibration slope and intercept. The primary endpoint was axillary nodal status (discrimination, benign [N0] vs. metastatic axillary nodal status [N+]) determined by the NILS model compared to nodal status by definitive pathology. RESULTS The mean age of the women in the cohort was 65 years, and most of them (93%) had luminal cancers. Approximately three-fourths of the patients had no metastases in SLNB (N0 74% and 73%, respectively). The AUC for the predicted probabilities for the whole cohort was 0.6741 (95% confidence interval: 0.6255-0.7227). More than one in four patients (n = 151, 26%) were identified as candidates for SLNB omission when applying the predefined cut-off for lymph node-negative status from the development cohort. The NILS model showed the best calibration in patients with a predicted high probability of healthy axilla. CONCLUSION The performance of the NILS model was satisfactory. In approximately every fourth patient, SLNB could potentially be omitted. Considering the shift from postoperatively to preoperatively available predictors in this validation study, we have demonstrated the robustness of the NILS model. The clinical usability of the web interface will be evaluated before its clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in the ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN14341750. Date of registration 23/11/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Skarping
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Julia Ellbrant
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Looket Dihge
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mattias Ohlsson
- Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Division of Computational Biology and Biological Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Linnea Huss
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Helsingborg General Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Pär-Ola Bendahl
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lisa Rydén
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hjärtström M, Dihge L, Bendahl PO, Skarping I, Ellbrant J, Ohlsson M, Rydén L. Noninvasive Staging of Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning: External Validation and Further Model Development. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e46474. [PMID: 37983068 PMCID: PMC10696498 DOI: 10.2196/46474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients diagnosed with breast cancer present with a node-negative disease. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely used for axillary staging, leaving patients with healthy axillary lymph nodes without therapeutic effects but at risk of morbidities from the intervention. Numerous studies have developed nodal status prediction models for noninvasive axillary staging using postoperative data or imaging features that are not part of the diagnostic workup. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a top-ranked predictor of nodal metastasis; however, its preoperative assessment is challenging. OBJECTIVE This paper aimed to externally validate a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model for noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) in a large population-based cohort (n=18,633) and develop a new MLP in the same cohort. Data were extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer (NKBC, 2014-2017), comprising only routinely and preoperatively available documented clinicopathological variables. A secondary aim was to develop and validate an LVI MLP for imputation of missing LVI status to increase the preoperative feasibility of the original NILS model. METHODS Three nonoverlapping cohorts were used for model development and validation. A total of 4 MLPs for nodal status and 1 LVI MLP were developed using 11 to 12 routinely available predictors. Three nodal status models were used to account for the different availabilities of LVI status in the cohorts and external validation in NKBC. The fourth nodal status model was developed for 80% (14,906/18,663) of NKBC cases and validated in the remaining 20% (3727/18,663). Three alternatives for imputation of LVI status were compared. The discriminatory capacity was evaluated using the validation area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) in 3 of the nodal status models. The clinical feasibility of the models was evaluated using calibration and decision curve analyses. RESULTS External validation of the original NILS model was performed in NKBC (AUC 0.699, 95% CI 0.690-0.708) with good calibration and the potential of sparing 16% of patients with node-negative disease from SLNB. The LVI model was externally validated (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.694-0.799) with good calibration but did not improve the discriminatory performance of the nodal status models. A new nodal status model was developed in NKBC without information on LVI (AUC 0.709, 95% CI: 0.688-0.729), with excellent calibration in the holdout internal validation cohort, resulting in the potential omission of 24% of patients from unnecessary SLNBs. CONCLUSIONS The NILS model was externally validated in NKBC, where the imputation of LVI status did not improve the model's discriminatory performance. A new nodal status model demonstrated the feasibility of using register data comprising only the variables available in the preoperative setting for NILS using machine learning. Future steps include ongoing preoperative validation of the NILS model and extending the model with, for example, mammography images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Hjärtström
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Looket Dihge
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pär-Ola Bendahl
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ida Skarping
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Julia Ellbrant
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Mattias Ohlsson
- Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Centre for Applied Intelligent Systems Research, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Lisa Rydén
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dihge L, Bendahl PO, Skarping I, Hjärtström M, Ohlsson M, Rydén L. The implementation of NILS: A web-based artificial neural network decision support tool for noninvasive lymph node staging in breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1102254. [PMID: 36937408 PMCID: PMC10014909 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To implement artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms for noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) to a decision support tool and facilitate the option to omit surgical axillary staging in breast cancer patients with low-risk of nodal metastasis. Methods The NILS tool is a further development of an ANN prototype for the prediction of nodal status. Training and internal validation of the original algorithm included 15 clinical and tumor-related variables from a consecutive cohort of 800 breast cancer cases. The updated NILS tool included 10 top-ranked input variables from the original prototype. A workflow with four ANN pathways was additionally developed to allow different combinations of missing preoperative input values. Predictive performances were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) and sensitivity/specificity values at defined cut-points. Clinical utility was presented by estimating possible sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) reduction rates. The principles of user-centered design were applied to develop an interactive web-interface to predict the patient's probability of healthy lymph nodes. A technical validation of the interface was performed using data from 100 test patients selected to cover all combinations of missing histopathological input values. Results ANN algorithms for the prediction of nodal status have been implemented into the web-based NILS tool for personalized, noninvasive nodal staging in breast cancer. The estimated probability of healthy lymph nodes using the interface showed a complete concordance with estimations from the reference algorithm except in two cases that had been wrongly included (ineligible for the technical validation). NILS predictive performance to distinguish node-negative from node-positive disease, also with missing values, displayed AUC ranged from 0.718 (95% CI, 0.687-0.748) to 0.735 (95% CI, 0.704-0.764), with good calibration. Sensitivity 90% and specificity 34% were demonstrated. The potential to abstain from axillary surgery was observed in 26% of patients using the NILS tool, acknowledging a false negative rate of 10%, which is clinically accepted for the standard SLNB technique. Conclusions The implementation of NILS into a web-interface are expected to provide the health care with decision support and facilitate preoperative identification of patients who could be good candidates to avoid unnecessary surgical axillary staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Looket Dihge
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Looket Dihge, ; Lisa Rydén,
| | - Pär-Ola Bendahl
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ida Skarping
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Malin Hjärtström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mattias Ohlsson
- Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Division of Computational Biology and Biological Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lisa Rydén
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Looket Dihge, ; Lisa Rydén,
| |
Collapse
|