BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation analysis from a cohort of 1267 patients at high risk for breast cancer in Brazil

Germline Genetic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Patients From Latin America and the Caribbean

The importance of having region-specific data when planning health interventions has become evident in recent years. Nonetheless, several world regions, including Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), still face significant challenges. These regions need to develop strategies specifically designed to consider the inherent characteristics of their population composite and sociodemographic characteristics. More than 20% of the global cancer incidence arises in LAC. Yet, treatment, prevention, and follow-up guidelines in the area are frequently based on studies that mainly include patients from North America, Europe, and Asia. As personalized approaches become ubiquitous in medical practice, the amount of information emerging from LAC has risen considerably. In this review, we seek to present a comprehensive summary of the frequency of germline genetic variants in hereditary cancer syndromes in patients from LAC. The data highlight relevant differences in variants associated with LAC patients, including founder and recurrent variants, while showcasing potential features that might be relevant in oncology practices.

Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Utilization and Disparities in a Middle-Income Country

PURPOSE

Low rates of germline genetic testing (GGT) for breast cancer (BC) have been reported globally, with limited data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this study, we used real-world data to assess the GGT rate for BC in an LMIC and identified barriers to its use.

METHODS

We analyzed 2,974 newly diagnosed patients with BC from the AMAZONA III study, the largest Brazilian multicenter, prospective BC cohort. GGT rates were determined for the entire cohort and the high-risk hereditary BC group (HR), defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria, between 2019 and 2020. Barriers to GGT performance associated with patient characteristics and health care systems were identified using multivariable Poisson regression model. Values of P < .05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

In the AMAZONA III cohort, 1,476 (49%) were classified as HR. Genetic counseling was recommended for 521 patients (35% of HR), and 282 (19%) underwent GGT. Notably, 97% of patients with HR treated within the public health care systems and 56% in the private system did not undergo GGT. Age, education, occupation, monthly income, availability of onsite genetic counseling, and treatment at a teaching center were factors associated with GGT uptake (P < .05). Of those tested, 50 (17%) harbored a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant.

CONCLUSION

Only 9% of this robust Brazilian BC cohort underwent GGT, highlighting a considerable gap from the current recommendation to test all patients with BC under age 65 years. GGT is underused by patients with HR in both public and private health care systems, with those in the public system being more affected. The disparities and barriers identified emphasize the need for educational interventions and enhanced access to GGT. Prioritizing GGT is critical to improving BC outcomes in LMICs.

Systematic review of the molecular basis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Brazil: the current scenario

BACKGROUND

A detailed understanding of the genetic basis of cancer is of great interest to public health monitoring programs. Although many studies have been conducted in Brazil, a global view on the molecular profile related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in this large and heterogeneous population is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted in three electronic databases (PubMed, BIREME and SciELO). Brazilian studies covering molecular analysis of genes related to HBOC, published until December 2023, were considered.

RESULTS

We identified 35 original studies that met all the inclusion criteria. A total of 137 distinct mutations were found in the BRCA1 gene, but four of them corresponded to 44.5% of all mutations found in this gene. The c.5266dupC BRCA1 mutation was responsible for 26.8% of all pathogenic mutations found in the BRCA1 gene in patients with clinical criteria for HBOC from the Brazilian population. Considering all studies that track this mutation in the BRCA1 gene, we found a frequency of 2% (120/6008) for this mutation in Brazilian patients. In the BRCA2 gene, the four most frequent mutations corresponded to 29.2% of pathogenic mutations. Even though it was tracked by few studies, the c.156_157insAlu mutation was responsible for 9.6% of all pathogenic mutations reported in the BRCA2 gene. Seventeen studies found pathogenic mutations in other non-BRCA genes, the c.1010G > A mutation in the TP53 gene being the most frequent one. Considering all studies that screened for this specific mutation in patients with the clinical criteria for HBOC, the frequency of c.1010G > A was estimated at 1.83% (61/3336).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant molecular heterogeneity among mutations in HBOC patients from Brazil, three mutations deserve to be highlighted, c.5266dupC, c.156_157insAlu and c.1010G > A in the BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 genes, respectively. With more than 200 records, these three mutations play a vital role in the pathology of breast and ovarian cancer in Brazil. The data collected shed light on the subject, but there is still not enough data from certain subpopulations.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 gene variants and evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics associated with these variants in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 409 breast cancer patients were analyzed based on next-generation sequencing results, with 337 categorized as non-carriers and 72 as carriers of BRCA1/2 variants. Data on the patients' BRCA1/2 gene mutation status, clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as menstrual and reproductive information, were collected, analyzed, compared, and tabulated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between clinical characteristics and pathogenic variants.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 72 were identified as carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, while 337 had likely benign or benign mutations. The BRCA1 c.2635G > T (p. Glu879*) variant was detected at a high frequency, accounting for 12.5% (4/32) of the BRCA1 mutations, while the c.5164_5165del (p.Ser1722Tyrfs*4) variant was common among the BRCA2 mutations, accounting for 17.5% (7/40). It was observed that a higher proportion of BRCA1 carriers had the triple-negative breast cancer subtype, whereas more BRCA2 carriers exhibited estrogen receptor (ER) + and progesterone receptor (PR) + subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a family history of cancer (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.00-5.54), bilateral cancer (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 1.61-14.20), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- (OR = 8.23, 95% CI 3.25-20.84), and Ki67 ≥ 15% (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 1.41-10.65) were associated with BRCA1/2 mutations, with the age at diagnosis, age at menarche, and premenopausal status serving as covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common pathogenic variant of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer patients was c.2635G > T and c.5164_5165del, respectively. Additionally, a family history of cancer, bilateral cancer, HER2-, and Ki67 ≥ 15% were identified as independent predictors of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.