Efficacy relevance of PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy

Diagnostics and Screening in Breast Cancer with Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Literature

Brain and leptomeningeal metastases are complications of breast cancer with high rates of morbidity and mortality and have an estimated incidence of up to 30%. While National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend screening for central nervous system metastasis in other neurotropic cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, there are no such recommendations for asymptomatic breast cancer patients at any stage of disease. This review highlights ongoing studies into screening and diagnostics for breast cancer with brain and leptomeningeal metastasis (BCBLM) as they relate to patient outcomes and prognostication. These include imaging methods such as MRI with novel contrast agents with or without PET/CT, as well as 'liquid biopsy' testing of the cerebrospinal fluid and serum to analyze circulating tumor cells, genomic material, proteins, and metabolites. Given recent advances in radiation, neurosurgery, and systemic treatments for BCBLM, screening for CNS involvement should be considered in patients with advanced breast cancer as it may impact treatment decisions and overall survival.

Surgical outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with and without immunotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Adding pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival. The impact of adding immunotherapy to NAC on surgical outcomes is unknown. This study compares 90-day post-surgical complications (PSCs) and time to adjuvant treatment among patients undergoing NAC for TNBC with and without immunotherapy.

METHODS

Patients treated with NAC alone or with immunotherapy (NAC-I) for stage I-III TNBC between 2018 and 2022 were retrospectively identified at a single academic institution. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and Fisher's exact tests compared patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression determined odds ratios (OR) predicting PSCs.

RESULTS

Of 54 patients, 29 received NAC alone and 25 received NAC-I. Compared to NAC patients, NAC-I patients had more advanced stage tumors (p = 0.038), and had slightly higher rates of mastectomy with reconstruction (p = 0.193). 72.0% of NAC-I patients experienced a pCR, compared with 44.8% of NAC patients (p = 0.193). There were 10 PSCs (34.5%) in NAC patients compared to 9 PSCs (36.0%) in NAC-I patients (p > 0.99). Regression analysis demonstrated no association of PSCs with NAC-I (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.19-3.60). Time to adjuvant therapy was shorter for NAC-I patients (28 days vs 36 days, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TNBC receiving NAC-I have higher pCR rates and do not appear to have added 90-day PSCs or delays to adjuvant therapy despite trending toward more extensive surgical procedures compared to NAC alone. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the surgical safety of immunotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab for metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer

Background

Toliparibizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel (T+N) has excellent efficacy inmetastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but the optimal choice of sequence of therapy is unclear given the trade-offs between quality of life and cost. Cost-effectiveness analyses can quantify these tradeoffs, leading to more informed decisions. Our objective was to assess the societal cost-effectiveness of the T+N regimen for metastatic or recurrent TNBC.

Methods

Clinical data were extracted from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, TORCHLIGHT (NCT04085276). Patients were randomized into the T+N group or placebo plus nab-paclitaxel (P+N) group. 531 patients from 53 study locations were randomly assigned (T+N, n=353; P+N, n=178) into intend to treat (ITT) population; 200 and 100 patients, respectively had programmed death protein 1 (PD-L1) positive TNBC. A Markov model was established with a 21-day cycle length. Costs were acquired from local hospitals, effect parameters included quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results

The cost differences were 47,538.3 CNY in ITT population (T+N, 143,725.67 CNY; P+N group, 96,187.37 CNY) and 29,258.84 CNY in PD-L1+ subgroup (T+N, 100,128.28 CNY; P+N group, 70,869.45 CNY). Meanwhile, the IEs were 0.03409 in the ITT population (T+N, 0.55323 QALY; P+N, 0.51914 QALY) and 0.03409 in the PD-L1+ subgroup (T+N, 0.42327 QALY; P+N, 0.37628 QALY). The ICERs between T+N and P+N groups were 1,394,548.41 CNY/QALY in the ITT population and 622,663.98 CNY/QALY in the PD-L1+ subgroup. We also analyzed the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab could be received in the Chinese medical insurance catalog. If toripalimab could be reimbursed at an 80% rate, the cost differences were changed to 16,598.99 CNY in ITT population (T+N, 112,786.36 CNY; P+N group, 96,187.37 CNY) and 7,704.58 CNY in PD-L1+ subgroup (T+N, 78,574.03 CNY; P+N group, 70,869.45 CNY). Meanwhile, the IEs remained unchanged. The ICERs between T+N and P+N groups were changed to 486,935.82 CNY/QALY in the ITT population and 163,962.96 CNY/QALY in the PD-L1+ subgroup. Sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the model and the impact of utility.

Conclusion

At current drug prices, the T+N group is not more cost-effective than the P+N group, but after incorporating toripalimab into medical insurance, the T+N group will be more cost-effective for patients with PD-L1+ metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer.