1
|
Waters AR, Wheeler SB, Tan KR, Rosenstein DL, Roberson ML, Kirchhoff AC, Kent EE. Material, Psychological, and Behavioral Financial Hardship Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Cancer Survivors in the United States. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2400114. [PMID: 38991169 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Driven by anti-LGBTQ+ stigma, emerging literature suggests that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) cancer survivors experience financial hardship (FH) more frequently than heterosexual survivors. However, few studies have used nationally representative samples to estimate this inequity. METHODS National Health Interview Survey data from 2019 to 2022 were pooled and weighted. Outcomes included material, psychological, and behavioral FH. The behavioral domain was further broken down into subdomains including medical care, prescription medications, and mental health care. Multivariable logit models controlling for a variety of factors were used to generate LGB and heterosexual predicted probabilities and differential effects for each FH outcome. Stratified estimates were generated by sex and age groups. RESULTS A total of N = 374 LGB and N = 12,757 heterosexual cancer survivors were included in this analysis. In adjusted analyses, LGB cancer survivors had significantly higher material (19%, 95% CI, 15 to 24 v 12%, 95% CI, 11 to 13; P = .004), psychological (44%, 95% CI, 38 to 51 v 37%, 95% CI, 36 to 38; P = .035), and behavioral (23%, 95% CI, 18 to 28 v 13%, 95% CI, 13 to 14; P < .0001) FH than heterosexual survivors. LGB cancer survivors also had higher medical behavioral (11%, 95% CI, 7 to 15 v 7%, 95% CI, 6 to 7; P = .030), prescription medication behavioral (14%, 95% CI, 10 to 19 v 10%, 95% CI, 9 to 10; P = .032), and mental health behavioral (9%, 95% CI, 6 to 13 v 3%, 95% CI, 3 to 4; P < .0001) FH than heterosexual survivors. Stratified estimates revealed young LGB cancer survivors had the highest probability of each outcome (material: 31%, 95% CI, 23 to 40; psychological: 58%, 95% CI, 50 to 66; behavioral: 45%, 95% CI, 36 to 53). CONCLUSION In this nationally representative analysis, LGB cancer survivors experience substantial inequities in all FH outcomes. It is crucial that future FH interventional work should prioritize populations at the highest risk of FH, such as LGB cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kelly R Tan
- Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Hillman Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Donald L Rosenstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mya L Roberson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Erin E Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waters AR, Easterly CW, Turner C, Ghazal L, Tovar I, Mulvaney M, Poquadeck M, Rains SA, Cloyes KG, Kirchhoff AC, Kent EE, Warner EL. LGBTQ+ inequity in crowdfunding cancer costs: The influence of online reach and LGBTQ+ state policy. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6926. [PMID: 38275010 PMCID: PMC10905337 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging literature suggests that LGBTQ+ cancer survivors are more likely to experience financial burden than non-LGBTQ+ survivors. However, LGBTQ+ cancer survivors experience with cost-coping behaviors such as crowdfunding is understudied. METHODS We aimed to assess LGBTQ+ inequity in cancer crowdfunding by combining community-engaged and technology-based methods. Crowdfunding campaigns were web-scraped from GoFundMe and classified as cancer-related and LGBTQ+ or non-LGBTQ+ using term dictionaries. Bivariate analyses and generalized linear models were used to assess differential effects in total goal amount raised by LGBTQ+ status. Stratified models were run by online reach and LGBTQ+ inclusivity of state policy. RESULTS A total of N = 188,342 active cancer-related crowdfunding campaigns were web-scraped from GoFundMe in November 2022, of which N = 535 were LGBTQ+ and ranged from 2014 to 2022. In multivariable models of recent campaigns (2019-2022), LGBTQ+ campaigns raised $1608 (95% CI: -2139, -1077) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns. LGBTQ+ campaigns with low (26-45 donors), moderate (46-87 donors), and high (88-240 donors) online reach raised on average $1152 (95% CI: -$1589, -$716), $1050 (95% CI: -$1737, -$364), and $2655 (95% CI: -$4312, -$998) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns respectively. When stratified by LGBTQ+ inclusivity of state level policy states with anti-LGBTQ+ policy/lacking equitable policy raised on average $1910 (95% CI: -2640, -1182) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns from the same states. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Our findings revealed LGBTQ+ inequity in cancer-related crowdfunding, suggesting that LGBTQ+ cancer survivors may be less able to address financial burden via crowdfunding in comparison to non-LGBTQ+ cancer survivors-potentially widening existing economic inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R. Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
- Cancer Control and Population SciencesHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Caleb W. Easterly
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Cindy Turner
- College of NursingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Lauren Ghazal
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs (C3) LGBTQ+ Study Advisory BoardHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- School of NursingUniversity of RochesterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Ida Tovar
- College of NursingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Megan Mulvaney
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs (C3) LGBTQ+ Study Advisory BoardHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- School of Public HealthIndiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonIndianaUSA
| | - Matt Poquadeck
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs (C3) LGBTQ+ Study Advisory BoardHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- Wilmot Cancer InstituteUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Stephen A. Rains
- Department of CommunicationUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Kristin G. Cloyes
- School of NursingOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population SciencesHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Erin E. Kent
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Echo L. Warner
- Cancer Control and Population SciencesHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- College of NursingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Waters AR, Turner C, Easterly CW, Tovar I, Mulvaney M, Poquadeck M, Johnston H, Ghazal LV, Rains SA, Cloyes KG, Kirchhoff AC, Warner EL. Exploring Online Crowdfunding for Cancer-Related Costs Among LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus) Cancer Survivors: Integration of Community-Engaged and Technology-Based Methodologies. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e51605. [PMID: 37902829 PMCID: PMC10644187 DOI: 10.2196/51605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors frequently experience cancer-related financial burdens. The extent to which Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus (LGBTQ+) populations experience cancer-related cost-coping behaviors such as crowdfunding is largely unknown, owing to a lack of sexual orientation and gender identity data collection and social stigma. Web-scraping has previously been used to evaluate inequities in online crowdfunding, but these methods alone do not adequately engage populations facing inequities. OBJECTIVE We describe the methodological process of integrating technology-based and community-engaged methods to explore the financial burden of cancer among LGBTQ+ individuals via online crowdfunding. METHODS To center the LGBTQ+ community, we followed community engagement guidelines by forming a study advisory board (SAB) of LGBTQ+ cancer survivors, caregivers, and professionals who were involved in every step of the research. SAB member engagement was tracked through quarterly SAB meeting attendance and an engagement survey. We then used web-scraping methods to extract a data set of online crowdfunding campaigns. The study team followed an integrated technology-based and community-engaged process to develop and refine term dictionaries for analyses. Term dictionaries were developed and refined in order to identify crowdfunding campaigns that were cancer- and LGBTQ+-related. RESULTS Advisory board engagement was high according to metrics of meeting attendance, meeting participation, and anonymous board feedback. In collaboration with the SAB, the term dictionaries were iteratively edited and refined. The LGBTQ+ term dictionary was developed by the study team, while the cancer term dictionary was refined from an existing dictionary. The advisory board and analytic team members manually coded against the term dictionary and performed quality checks until high confidence in correct classification was achieved using pairwise agreement. Through each phase of manual coding and quality checks, the advisory board identified more misclassified campaigns than the analytic team alone. When refining the LGBTQ+ term dictionary, the analytic team identified 11.8% misclassification while the SAB identified 20.7% misclassification. Once each term dictionary was finalized, the LGBTQ+ term dictionary resulted in a 95% pairwise agreement, while the cancer term dictionary resulted in an 89.2% pairwise agreement. CONCLUSIONS The classification tools developed by integrating community-engaged and technology-based methods were more accurate because of the equity-based approach of centering LGBTQ+ voices and their lived experiences. This exemplar suggests integrating community-engaged and technology-based methods to study inequities is highly feasible and has applications beyond LGBTQ+ financial burden research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin R Waters
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Cindy Turner
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Caleb W Easterly
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Ida Tovar
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Megan Mulvaney
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs LGBT Study Advisory Board, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Matt Poquadeck
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs LGBT Study Advisory Board, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Hailey Johnston
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs LGBT Study Advisory Board, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Lauren V Ghazal
- Crowdfunding Cancer Costs LGBT Study Advisory Board, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Stephen A Rains
- Department of Communication, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Kristin G Cloyes
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Echo L Warner
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|