Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease

The reproducibility of breathing maneuvers as a vasoactive stimulus in the heart: an oxygenation-sensitive resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND

Endothelial dysfunction and impaired oxygenation of the heart is a hallmark of several diseases, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, and sleep apnea. Recent studies indicate that oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (OS-CMR) imaging combined with breathing maneuvers may allow for assessing coronary vascular responsiveness as a marker for coronary vascular function in various clinical settings. However, despite the use of OS-CMR in evaluating tissue oxygenation, the reproducibility of these standardized, combined breathing maneuvers as a vasoactive stimulus has yet to be systematically assessed or validated. In this study, we aimed to assess the reproducibility of vasoactive breathing maneuvers to assess vascular function in a population of healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. Inclusion criteria were an age over 18 years and absence of any evidence or knowledge of cardiovascular, neurological, or pulmonary disease. MRI was performed on a clinical 3 T MRI system (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The OS-CMR acquisition was performed as previously described (1 min hyperventilation followed by a maximal, voluntary breath-hold). Standard statistical tests were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS

Data from 18 healthy subjects was analyzed. The healthy volunteers had a mean age of 42 ± 15 years and a mean BMI of 25.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2, with an average heart rate of 72 ± 11 beats per minute, and ten of whom (56%) were female. There were no significant differences between global myocardial oxygenation (%[Formula: see text] SI) after hyperventilation (HV1: - 7.82 [Formula: see text] 5.2; HV2: - 7.89 [Formula: see text] 6.4, p = 0.9) or breath-hold (BH1: 5.34 [Formula: see text] 3.1; BH2: 6.0 [Formula: see text] 3.3, p = 0.5) between the repeated breathing maneuvers. The Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement (bias: 0.074, SD of bias: 2.93).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in healthy individuals, the myocardial oxygenation response to a standardized breathing maneuver with hyperventilation and a voluntary breath-hold is consistent and highly reproducible. These results corroborate previous evidence for breathing-enhanced OS-CMR as a robust test for coronary vascular function.

Safety, feasibility, and hemodynamic response of regadenoson for stress perfusion CMR

Owing to its pharmacodynamics and posology, the use of regadenoson for stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has potential advantages over other vasodilators. We sought to evaluate the safety, hemodynamic response and diagnostic performance of regadenoson stress-CMR in routine clinical practice. All regadenoson stress-CMR examinations performed between May 2017 and July 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 698 studies were included for the final analysis. A conventional stress/rest protocol was performed using a 1.5T MRI scanner (Magnetom Aera, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Adverse events, clinical symptoms, and hemodynamic response were assessed. Diagnostic accuracy of the test was evaluated in patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography. Nearly half of patients (48.5%) remained asymptomatic. Most common clinical symptoms included dyspnea (137, 19.6%), chest pain (116, 16.6%) and flushing (44, 6.3%). Two patients (0.28%) could not complete the examination due to severe hypotension or unbearable chest pain. Overall, an increase in heart rate (HR) response (36.2% [IQR: 22.5?50.9]) and a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (median systolic BP response of -5% [IQR: -11.5-0.6]; median diastolic BP response of -6.3 mmHg [IQR: -13.4-0]) was observed. Patients with symptoms induced by regadenoson showed higher HR response (40.3%, IQR: 26.4?56.1 vs. 32.4%, IQR: 19-45.6, p < 0.001), whereas a blunted HR response was observed in diabetic (29.6%, IQR: 18.4?42 p < 0.001), obese (31.7%, IQR: 20.7?46.2 p = 0.005) and patients aged 70 years or older (32.9%, IQR: 22.6?43.1 p < 0.001). Overall, regadenoson stress-CMR showed 95.65% (IQ 91.49?99.81) sensitivity, 54.84% (IQ 35.71?73.97) specificity, 86.99% (IQ 82.74?94.68) positive predictive value, and 77.27% (IQ 57.49?97.06) negative predictive value for detecting significant coronary stenosis as compared with invasive coronary angiography. Regadenoson is a well-tolerated vasodilator that can be safely employed for stress perfusion CMR, with high diagnostic performance.

Coronary Computed Tomography vs. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents a widespread burden to both individual and public health, steadily rising across the globe. The current guidelines recommend non-invasive anatomical or functional testing prior to invasive procedures. Both coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are appropriate imaging modalities, which are increasingly used in these patients. Both exhibit excellent safety profiles and high diagnostic accuracy. In the last decade, cCTA image quality has improved, radiation exposure has decreased and functional information such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve or perfusion can complement anatomic evaluation. CMR has become more robust and faster, and advances have been made in functional assessment and tissue characterization allowing for earlier and better risk stratification. This review compares both imaging modalities regarding their strengths and weaknesses in the assessment of CAD and aims to give physicians rationales to select the most appropriate modality for individual patients.

Feasibility and safety of quantitative adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Pediatric heart transplant patients require cardiac catheterization to monitor for coronary allograft vasculopathy. Cardiac catheterization has no safe and consistent method for measuring microvascular disease. Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessing microvascular disease has been performed in adults.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and safety of performing cardiac MRI with quantitative adenosine stress perfusion testing in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All pediatric heart transplant patients with coronary vasculopathy at our institution were asked to participate. Age- and gender-matched pediatric heart transplant patients without vasculopathy were recruited for comparison. Patients underwent cardiac MRI with adenosine stress perfusion testing.

RESULTS

Sixteen pediatric heart transplant patients, ages 6-22 years, underwent testing. Nine patients had vasculopathy by angiography. No heart block or other complications occurred during the study. The myocardial perfusion reserve for patients with vasculopathy showed no significant difference with comparison patients (median: 1.43 vs. 1.48; P=0.49). Values for both groups were lower than expected values based on previous adult studies. The patients were also analyzed for time after transplant and the number of rejection episodes. Patients within 6 years of transplantation had a nonsignificant trend toward a higher myocardial perfusion reserve (median: 1.57) versus patients with older transplants (median: 1.47; P=0.46). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were 97% and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial perfusion reserve is a safe and feasible method for estimating myocardial perfusion in pediatric heart transplant patients. There is no reliable way to monitor microvascular disease in pediatric patients. This method shows potential and deserves investigation in a larger cohort.

Hyperventilation/Breath-Hold Maneuver to Detect Myocardial Ischemia by Strain-Encoded CMR: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Needle-Free Stress Protocol

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a fast, needle-free test for myocardial ischemia using fast Strain-ENCoded (fSENC) cardiovascular MR (CMR) after a hyperventilation/breath-hold maneuver (HVBH).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial stress testing is one of the most frequent diagnostic tests performed. Recent data indicate that CMR first-pass perfusion outperforms other modalities. Its use, however, is limited by the need for both, a vasodilatory stress and the intravenous application of gadolinium. Both are associated with added cost, safety concerns, and patient inconvenience. The combination of 2 novel CMR approaches, fSENC, an ultrafast technique to visualize myocardial strain, and HVBH, a physiological vasodilator, may overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Patients referred for CMR stress testing underwent an extended protocol to evaluate 3 different tests: 1) adenosine-perfusion; 2) adenosine-strain; and 3) HVBH-strain. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography as reference.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients (age 66 ± 11years; 80% men) suspected of obstructive coronary artery disease were enrolled. All participants completed the protocol without significant adverse events. Adenosine-strain and HVBH-strain provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than adenosine-perfusion, both on a patient level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 82%, specificity 83%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 81%, specificity 86% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 67%, specificity 92%; p < 0.05) and territory level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 67%, specificity 93%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 63%, specificity 95% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 49%, specificity 96%; p < 0.05). However, these differences in diagnostic accuracy disappear by excluding patients with history of coronary artery bypass graft or previous myocardial infarction. The response of longitudinal strain differs significantly between ischemic and nonischemic segments to adenosine (ΔLS_ischemic = 0.6 ± 5.4%, ΔLS_nonischemic = -0.9 ± 2.7%; p < 0.05) and HVBH (ΔLS_ischemic = 1.3% ± 3.8%, ΔLS_nonischemic = -0.3 ± 1.8%; p = 0.002). Test duration of HVBH-strain (t = 64 ± 2 s) was significantly shorter compared with adenosine-strain (t = 184 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001) and adenosine-perfusion (t = adenosine-perfusion: 172 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

HVBH-strain has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis. It is not only significantly faster than any other method but also neither requires contrast agents nor pharmacological stressors.

Influence of the arterial input sampling location on the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress myocardial perfusion quantification

BACKGROUND

Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion requires sampling of the arterial input function (AIF). While variation in the AIF sampling location is known to impact quantification by CMR and positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion, there is no evidence to support the use of a specific location based on their diagnostic accuracy in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of stress MBF and MPR for different AIF sampling locations for the detection of abnormal myocardial perfusion with expert visual assessment as the reference.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with suspected or known CAD underwent vasodilator stress-rest perfusion with a dual-sequence technique at 3T. A low-resolution slice was acquired in 3-chamber view to allow AIF sampling at five different locations: left atrium (LA), basal left ventricle (bLV), mid left ventricle (mLV), apical left ventricle (aLV) and aortic root (AoR). MBF and MPR were estimated at the segmental level using Fermi function-constrained deconvolution. Segments were scored as having normal or abnormal perfusion by visual assessment and the diagnostic accuracy of stress MBF and MPR for each location was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

In both normal (300 out of 400, 75 %) and abnormal segments, rest MBF, stress MBF and MPR were significantly different across AIF sampling locations (p < 0.001). Stress MBF for the AoR (normal: 2.42 (2.15-2.84) mL/g/min; abnormal: 1.71 (1.28-1.98) mL/g/min) had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 85 %, area under the curve 0.90; p < 0.001 versus stress MBF for all other locations including bLV: normal: 2.78 (2.39-3.14) mL/g/min; abnormal: 2.22 (1.83-2.48) mL/g/min; sensitivity 91 %, specificity 63 %, area under the curve 0.81) and performed better than MPR for the LV locations (p < 0.01). MPR for the AoR (normal: 2.43 (1.95-3.14); abnormal: 1.58 (1.34-1.90)) was not superior to MPR for the bLV (normal: 2.59 (2.04-3.20); abnormal: 1.69 (1.36-2.14); p = 0.717).

CONCLUSIONS

The AIF sampling location has a significant impact on MBF and MPR estimates by CMR perfusion, with AoR-based stress MBF comparing favorably to that for the current clinical reference bLV.

Safety profile of adenosine stress cardiac MRI in a tertiary hospital in India

Background:

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in India. Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) using vasodilator agent is well established in assessing the functional significance of CAD. Adenosine is the preferred agent, but can have severe side effects including dyspnoea, chest pain, atrioventricular block or bronchospasm. The stress CMR examination is not routinely performed in many of the clinical imaging departments in India.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to establish safety of adenosine as a pharmacological stressor agent for CMR in a tertiary care radiology department in India.

Methods:

A review of all patients undergoing stress CMR in our institution from May 2018 to May 2019 was made. Records were reviewed to collect response parameters and documented adverse reactions.

Results:

A total of 1057 patients underwent stress CMR during this period. No death, myocardial infarction or atrio-ventricular block related complications were seen. Transient hypotension was seen in 20 patients (1.8') with spontaneous recovery after stopping infusion. Chest pain and breathlessness severe enough to discontinue the scan were seen in 6 (0.5') and 10 (0.9') patients, respectively. All patients with breathlessness recovered on low flow oxygen therapy with three requiring bronchodilator. Out of six patients with chest pain, three had immediate relief with sublingual nitroglycerin, and three required hospital admission for unstable angina. Of the latter three, 1 underwent revascularization on the same day and other two later in the week.

Conclusion:

Stress CMR using adenosine in appropriately selected patients is a highly safe procedure with significant side effects seen in less than 1’ of patients. Therefore, it is safe to perform stress CMR studies in a fully equipped and well-trained radiology department in India.

CMR in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has always been more often used in the last 10 years in evaluation of heart disease. Role in diagnosis of ischemia and in evaluation of myocardial infarction is well established by many scientific papers and included in current guidelines. High accuracy in evaluation of stress-induced ischemia, tissue characterization and functional parameters are the pillars the make the method widely used. In this paper are described role and techniques in diagnosis of ischemia, myocardial infarction and its sequelae.

Pharmacologic stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the pediatric population: A review of the literature, proposed protocol, and two examples in patients with Kawasaki disease

Pharmacologic stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PSCMR) is a well-established and reliable diagnostic tool for evaluation of coronary artery disease in the adult population. Stress imaging overall and PSCMR in particular is less utilized in the pediatric population with limited reported data. In this review, we highlight the potential use of PSCMR in specific pediatric cohorts with congenital and acquired heart disease, and we review the reported experience. A suggested protocol is presented in addition to two case examples of patients with Kawasaki disease where PSCMR aided decision making.

Haemodynamic effects of pharmacologic stress with adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure, downregulation of adenosine receptor gene expression and impaired adenosine-related signal transduction may result in a diminished response to adenosine. This may have implications for cardiac stress testing. We evaluated the haemodynamic response to intravenous adenosine in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) undergoing stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively examined 497 consecutive patients referred for clinical stress CMR. Blood pressure and heart rate responses with intravenous adenosine were compared in patients with normal, mild-moderately impaired and severely impaired LV systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] > 55%, 36-55% and < 35%, respectively). Following 2 min of adenosine infusion, there was a significant difference between the groups in the heart rate change from baseline, with a diminished heart rate response in patients with LVSD (p < 0.001). An increase in the dose of adenosine (up to 210 μg/kg/min) was required to achieve a sufficient haemodynamic response in more patients with severe LVSD (41%) than those with mild-moderately impaired and normal LV systolic function (24% and 19%, respectively, p < 0.001). Even with increased doses of adenosine in subjects with severe LVSD, peak haemodynamic response remained blunted. With multivariate analysis age (p < 0.001) and LVEF (p = 0.031) were independent predictors of heart rate response to adenosine.

CONCLUSION

Patients with reduced LVEF referred for stress CMR may have a blunted heart rate response to adenosine. Further study is warranted to determine whether this may be associated with reduced diagnostic accuracy and also the potential utility of further dose increases or alternative stressors.

Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Safety and Indications in Pediatrics and Young Adults

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and indications for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a cohort of children and young adults. A retrospective review of 178 children and young adults who underwent CMR with MPI was performed. Studies were categorized based on study protocols as MPI with resting perfusion only, adenosine stress MPI, exercise-induced stress MPI, and MPI for cardiac mass diagnosis. Relevant clinical history, exam indications, and adverse reactions following gadolinium-based contrast agent and adenosine administration were recorded. Studies were reviewed for the presence of myocardial perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities, and delayed myocardial enhancement. The most common indications from MPI were congenital heart disease (CHD), Kawasaki disease, anomalous coronary artery, or myocardial mass characterization. Of these, 51% were protocoled with adenosine stress, 23% without stress, 6% with exercise stress, and 20% for cardiac mass evaluation. Excluding patients for myocardial mass evaluation, MPI defects were present in 16% (14 with adenosine stress, 1 with exercise stress, 8 on resting studies only). For cardiac mass evaluation, a mass was confirmed in 58%. No adverse reactions occurred with intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Three self-limited adverse reactions, 2 patients with chest pain, and 1 patient with bradycardia, occurred following adenosine administration. MPI is a safe modality for the evaluation of pediatric and young adults with minimal adverse events. The most common indications for MPI were for the evaluation of CHD, Kawasaki disease, anomalous coronary artery, or myocardial mass characterization.

Effects of adenosine and regadenoson on hemodynamics measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Adenosine or regadenoson vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an effective non-invasive strategy for evaluating symptomatic coronary artery disease. Vasodilator injection typically precedes ventricular functional sequences to efficiently reduce overall scanning times, though the effects of vasodilators on CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function are unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 25 healthy subjects to undergo consecutive adenosine and regadenoson administration. Short axis CINE datasets were obtained on a 1.5 T scanner following adenosine (140mcg/kg/min IV for 6 min) and regadenoson (0.4 mg IV over 10 s) at baseline, immediately following administration, at 5 min intervals up to 15 min. Hemodynamic response, bi-ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were determined at each time point.

RESULTS

Peak heart rate was observed early following administration of both adenosine and regadenoson. Heart rate returned to baseline by 10 min post-adenosine while remaining elevated at 15 min post-regadenoson (p = 0.0015). Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) increased immediately following both vasodilators (p < 0.0001 for both) and returned to baseline following adenosine by 10 min (p = 0.8397). Conversely, LVEF following regadenoson remained increased at 10 min (p = 0.003) and 15 min (p = 0.0015) with a mean LVEF increase at 15 min of 4.2 ± 1.3%. Regadenoson resulted in a similar magnitude reduction in both LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) at 15 min whereas LVESVi resolved at 15 min following adenosine and LVEDVi remained below baseline values (p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson and adenosine have significant and prolonged impact on ventricular volumes and LVEF. In patients undergoing vasodilator stress CMR where ventricular volumes and LVEF are critical components to patient care, ventricular functional sequences should be performed prior to vasodilator use or consider the use of aminophylline in the setting of regadenoson. Additionally, heart rate resolution itself is not an effective surrogate for return of ventricular volumes and LVEF to baseline.

Does stress perfusion imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance for establishing the etiology of heart failure?

Background

Late gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) has excellent specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). CMR first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging (perfusion-CMR) may also play role in distinguishing heart failure of ischemic and non-ischemic origins, although the utility of additional of stress perfusion imaging in such patients is unclear. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether the addition of adenosine stress perfusion imaging to LGE-CMR is of incremental value for differentiating ICM and NICM in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) of uncertain etiology.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 100 consecutive adult patients (median age 69 years (IQR 59–73)) with severe LVSD (mean LV EF 26.6 ± 7.0%) referred for perfusion-CMR to establish the underlying etiology of heart failure. The cause of heart failure was first determined on examination of CMR cine and LGE images in isolation. Subsequent examination of complete adenosine stress perfusion-CMR studies (cine, LGE and perfusion images) was performed to identify whether this altered the initial diagnosis.

Results

On LGE-CMR, 38 patients were diagnosed with ICM, 46 with NICM and 16 with dual pathology. With perfusion-CMR, there were 39 ICM, 44 NICM and 17 dual pathology diagnoses. There was excellent agreement in diagnoses between LGE-CMR and perfusion-CMR (κ 0.968, p<0.001). The addition of adenosine stress perfusion images to LGE-CMR altered the diagnosis in only two of the 100 patients.

Conclusion

The addition of adenosine stress perfusion-CMR to cine and LGE-CMR provides minimal incremental diagnostic yield for determining the etiology of heart failure in patients with severe LVSD.

Adenosine triphosphate stress 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile gated myocardial perfusion imaging efficacy in diagnosing stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation

Coronary stent restenosis rate following implantation is considerably high. The adenosine stress gated myocardial perfusion imaging (G-MPI) method has been widely used in the diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis evaluation of coronary heart disease; however, the high cost of adenosine limits its clinical application. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stress ^99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (^99mTc-MIBI) G-MPI for diagnosis in-stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation. Data from 66 patients with typical angina pectoris symptoms who had undergone percutaneous coronary stent implantation >3 months prior to participation in the study were analyzed. All the patients underwent ATP stress ^99mTc-MIBI G-MPI and coronary artery angiography as the criterion diagnostic standard within 1 month. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ATP stress ^99mTc-MIBI G-MPI in the assessment of in-stent restenosis were calculated. In addition, Fisher's exact probability methods were used to compare differences between experimental groups. Among 66 patients with a total of 99 implanted coronary arterial branches, 39 patients (59%) with 45 coronary arteries (45%) presented in-stent restenosis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive and negative predictive value of ATP stress ^99mTc-MIBI G-MPI for assessing stent restenosis in all patients were 85, 89, 86, 92 and 80%, respectively. Similarly, these values in patients with myocardial infarction were 79, 88, 83, 88 and 78%, respectively, while in patients without myocardial infarction the values were 90, 91, 90, 95 and 83%, respectively. Therefore, the diagnostic efficacy of ATP stress ^99mTc-MIBI G-MPI in patients without myocardial infarction was higher compared with those with myocardial infarction; however, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Furthermore, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing LAD stent restenosis were higher compared with LCX and RCA stent restenosis, but with no significant differences observed (P>0.05). The present results indicated that ATP stress ^99mTc-MIBI G-MPI had a high clinical application value for diagnosing in-stent restenosis following coronary stent implantation as a non-invasive examination tool, with the advantages of safety and low cost.

Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease

This review is a historical account about purinergic signalling in the heart, for readers to see how ideas and understanding have changed as new experimental results were published. Initially, the focus is on the nervous control of the heart by ATP as a cotransmitter in sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory nerves, as well as in intracardiac neurons. Control of the heart by centers in the brain and vagal cardiovascular reflexes involving purines are also discussed. The actions of adenine nucleotides and nucleosides on cardiomyocytes, atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes, cardiac fibroblasts, and coronary blood vessels are described. Cardiac release and degradation of ATP are also described. Finally, the involvement of purinergic signalling and its therapeutic potential in cardiac pathophysiology is reviewed, including acute and chronic heart failure, ischemia, infarction, arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, syncope, hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, angina, diabetic cardiomyopathy, as well as heart transplantation and coronary bypass grafts.

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson CMR

AIMS

Knowledge of adverse events associated with regadenoson perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and patient tolerability has implications for patient safety and staff training. We sought to assess the safety and tolerability of regadenoson stress CMR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 728 consecutive patients (median age 58, 44% female) and 25 normal volunteers (median age 21, 24% female) were recruited from August 2009 to March 2012 using a prospective, cross-sectional study design. Subjects were stressed using fixed-dose regadenoson and imaged using a 1.5T MRI scanner. Symptoms and adverse events including death, myocardial infarction (MI), ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), hospitalization, arrhythmias, and haemodynamic stability were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no occurrences of death, MI, VT/VF, high-grade atrioventricular block, or stress-induced atrial fibrillation. Notable adverse events included one case of bronchospasm and one case of heart failure exacerbation resulting in hospitalization. The most common symptoms in patients were dyspnoea (30%, n = 217), chest discomfort (27%, n = 200), and headache (15%, n = 111). There was minimal change between baseline and peak systolic and diastolic blood pressure in both patients and volunteers (P > 0.05). A blunted heart rate response to regadenoson was noted in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (P < 0.001), and diabetes (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Regadenoson CMR is well tolerated and can be performed safely with few adverse events.

Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease

Purinergic signaling plays important roles in control of vascular tone and remodeling. There is dual control of vascular tone by ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from perivascular sympathetic nerves to cause vasoconstriction via P2X1 receptors, whereas ATP released from endothelial cells in response to changes in blood flow (producing shear stress) or hypoxia acts on P2X and P2Y receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, which dilates vessels. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. In this review, we stress the differences in neural and endothelial factors in purinergic control of different blood vessels. The long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides in promoting migration and proliferation of both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis and vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty are described. The pathophysiology of blood vessels and therapeutic potential of purinergic agents in diseases, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, ischemia, thrombosis and stroke, diabetes, and migraine, is discussed.

Cardiac MRI of acute coronary syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. New serological biomarkers, such as troponins, have improved the diagnosis of ACS; however, the diagnosis of ACS can still be difficult as there is marked heterogeneity in its presentation and significant overlap with other disorders presenting with chest pain. Evidence is accumulating that cardiac MRI provides information that can aid the detection and differential diagnosis of ACS, guide clinical decision-making and improve risk-stratification after an event. In this review, we present the relevant cardiac MRI techniques that can be used to detect ACS accurately, provide differential diagnosis, identify the sequelae of ACS, and determine prognostication after ACS.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic heart disease

Ischemic heart disease is the most frequent etiology for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Early detection and accurate monitoring are essential to guide optimal patient treatment and assess the individual's prognosis. In this regard, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), which entered the arena of noninvasive cardiovascular imaging over the past two decades, became a very important imaging modality, mainly due to its unique versatility. CMR has proven accuracy and is a robust technique for the assessment of myocardial function both at rest and during stress. It also allows stress perfusion analysis with high spatial and temporal resolution, and provides a means by which to differentiate tissue such as distinguishing between reversibly and irreversibly injured myocardium. In particular, the latter aspect is a unique benefit of CMR compared with other noninvasive imaging modalities such as echocardiography and nuclear medicine, and provides novel information concerning the presence, size, transmurality, and prognosis of myocardial infarction. This article is intended to provide the reader with an overview of the various applications of CMR for the assessment of ischemic heart disease from a clinical perspective.

Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance-observation unit management of patients at intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome: a possible strategy for reducing healthcare-related costs

OPINION STATEMENT

Although clear algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of patients with chest pain at low or high risk for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exist, they are less well delineated for patients presenting with chest pain with an intermediate risk for ACS. In patients presenting acutely or subacutely to emergency departments (EDs) at high risk for ACS, such as those with ST segment elevation on their 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), immediate contrast coronary angiography is performed. On the other hand, chest pain observation units (OUs) are recommended for managing those with chest pain at low risk for an ACS event. In this setting, these OUs are associated with lower healthcare resource utilization and improved cost-effectiveness. Cost-effective diagnosis and treatment options are important goals in healthcare delivery systems. The presentation of patients at intermediate risk for ACS represents an emerging source of resource utilization for EDs. These patients often exhibit pre-existing coronary artery disease, may have sustained prior myocardial infarction, and exhibit multiple comorbidities such as diabetes and hypercholesterolemia. Importantly, however, they will not have evidence of ST elevation on their 12-lead ECG nor will they exhibit serum markers (troponin or creatinine kinase elevations) indicative of ACS. As a consequence of existing co-morbidities, their management becomes time-consuming and may require inpatient monitoring, observation, and cardiac stress testing. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a powerful tool for risk stratification and prognosis determination in patients in need of stress testing at intermediate risk of ACS. For those who present with acute chest pain syndromes, the combination of CMR in an OU setting represents a potentially attractive option for reducing healthcare-related expenditures without compromising patient outcomes. Recent study results from single centers suggest that CMR-OU care may result in fewer unnecessary hospital admissions and invasive procedures in those presenting with intermediate risk ACS. Further research utilizing stress CMR testing from multiple centers in OU settings is needed to determine if this model of care improves efficiency, reduces healthcare costs, and delivers optimum care in individuals presenting to EDs with chest pain at intermediate risk of ACS.

Stress cardiovascular MR in routine clinical practice: referral patterns, accuracy, tolerance, safety and incidental findings

OBJECTIVE

The use of stress cardiovascular MR (CMR) to evaluate myocardial ischaemia has increased significantly over recent years. We aimed to assess the indications, incidental findings, tolerance, safety and accuracy of stress CMR in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined all stress CMR studies performed at our tertiary referral centre over a 20-month period. Patients were scanned at 1.5 T, using a standardised protocol with routine imaging for late gadolinium enhancement. Angiograms of patients were assessed by an interventional cardiologist blinded to the CMR data.

RESULTS

654 patients were scanned (mean age 65±29 years; 63 inpatients; 9.6%). 14% of patients had incidental extracardiac findings, the commonest being liver or renal cysts (6%) and pulmonary nodules (4%). 639 patients (97.7%) received intravenous adenosine, 10 received intravenous dobutamine and 5 patients had both. Of the 15 patients who received dobutamine, 12 had no side-effects/complications, 2 experienced nausea and 1 chest tightness. Of the 644 patients who received adenosine, 43% experienced minor symptoms, 1% had transient heart block and 0.2% had severe bronchospasm requiring termination of infusion. There were no cases of hospitalisation or myocardial infarction. 241 patients also had coronary angiography. For detecting at least moderate stenosis of ≥50%, sensitivity was 86%, specificity 98% and accuracy 89%. For detecting severe stenoses of ≥70%, sensitivity was 91%, specificity 86% and overall accuracy 90%. These results compare very favourably with previous smaller research studies and meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that stress CMR, with adenosine as the main stress agent, is well tolerated, safe and accurate in routine clinical practice.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure

Imaging has a central role in the evaluation of patients with heart failure (HF). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is rapidly evolving as a versatile imaging modality that often provides additional information to echocardiography in patients with suspected or known HF. CMR is the only imaging modality that has the ability to assess, without exposure to ionizing radiation, cardiac function, structure (tissue characterization), perfusion, and viability. Moreover, magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques can assess the pathophysiologic role of deranged cardiac energetics in HF. In this review we discuss the role of CMR in the evaluation of patients with HF giving particular emphasis to recent developments and the additional information that can be obtained with this imaging modality, over and above standard echocardiography.

The adverse events and hemodynamic effects of adenosine-based cardiac MRI

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to prospectively assess the adverse events and hemodynamic effects associated with an intravenous adenosine infusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and who were undergoing cardiac MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients (64 ± 9 years) received adenosine (140 µg/kg/min) during cardiac MRI. Before and during the administration, the heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored using a MRI-compatible system. We documented any signs and symptoms of potential adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 47 out of 168 patients (28%) experienced adverse effects, which were mostly mild or moderate. In 13 patients (8%), the adenosine infusion was discontinued due to intolerable dyspnea or chest pain. No high grade atrioventricular block, bronchospasm or other life-threatening adverse events occurred. The hemodynamic measurements showed a significant increase in the heart rate during adenosine infusion (69.3 ± 11.7 versus 82.4 ± 13.0 beats/min, respectively; p < 0.001). A significant but clinically irrelevant increase in oxygen saturation occurred during adenosine infusion (96 ± 1.9% versus 97 ± 1.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The blood pressure did not significantly change during adenosine infusion (systolic: 142.8 ± 24.0 versus 140.9 ± 25.7 mmHg; diastolic: 80.2 ± 12.5 mmHg versus 78.9 ± 15.6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the safety of adenosine infusion during cardiac MRI. A considerable proportion of all patients will experience minor adverse effects and some patients will not tolerate adenosine infusion. However, all adverse events can be successfully managed by a radiologist. The increased heart rate during adenosine infusion highlights the need to individually adjust the settings according to the patient, e.g., the number of slices of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Over the past decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has evolved into a cardiac stress testing modality that can be used to diagnose myocardial ischemia using intravenous dobutamine or vasodilator perfusion agents such as adenosine or dipyridamole. Because CMR produces high-resolution tomographic images of the human heart in multiple imaging planes, it has become a highly attractive noninvasive testing modality for those suspected of having myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical, diagnostic, and prognostic utility of stress CMR testing for patients with (or suspected of having) coronary artery disease.

Ischemic heart disease: comprehensive evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Considerable technical advances over the past decade have increased the clinical application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. A comprehensive CMR examination can accurately measure left and right ventricular size and function, identify the presence and extent of reversible versus irreversible myocardial injury, and detect inducible ischemia. Streamlined protocols allow such a CMR examination to be a time-efficient diagnostic tool in patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, edema imaging with T2-weighted CMR allows the detection of acute coronary syndromes. In this review, we present the relevant CMR methods and discuss practical uses of CMR in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease.

Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010

Noninvasive imaging modalities are often used to manage patients with cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used for diagnosing and evaluating myocardial ischemia and viability; moreover, stress CMR study results can be used to determine cardiac prognosis. In this article, we review recently published material regarding the performance of stress testing with CMR including a brief update regarding techniques, stress agents, diagnostic accuracy, prognosis, economic implications, and ongoing trials and future developments.

Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

INTRODUCTION

Adenosine is the most widely used vasodilator stress agent for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion studies. With the standard dose of 140 mcg/kg/min some patients fail to demonstrate characteristic haemodynamic changes: a significant increase in heart rate (HR) and mild decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Whether an increase in the rate of adenosine infusion would improve peripheral and, likely, coronary vasodilatation in those patients is unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the tolerance and safety of a high-dose adenosine protocol in patients with inadequate haemodynamic response to the standard adenosine protocol when undergoing CMR perfusion imaging.

METHODS

98 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CMR perfusion imaging at 1.5 Tesla. Subjects were screened for contraindications to adenosine, and an electrocardiogram was performed prior to the scan. All patients initially received the standard adenosine protocol (140 mcg/kg/min for at least 3 minutes). If the haemodynamic response was inadequate (HR increase < 10 bpm or SBP decrease < 10 mmHg) then the infusion rate was increased up to a maximum of 210 mcg/kg/min (maximal infusion duration 7 minutes).

RESULTS

All patients successfully completed the CMR scan. Of a total of 98 patients, 18 (18%) did not demonstrate evidence of a significant increase in HR or decrease in SBP under the standard adenosine infusion rate. Following the increase in the rate of infusion, 16 out of those 18 patients showed an adequate haemodynamic response. One patient of the standard infusion group and two patients of the high-dose group developed transient advanced AV block. Significantly more patients complained of chest pain in the high-dose group (61% vs. 29%, p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis, age > 65 years and ejection fraction < 57% were the only independent predictors of blunted haemodynamic responsiveness to adenosine.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of patients do not show adequate peripheral haemodynamic response to standard-dose adenosine stress during perfusion CMR imaging. Age and reduced ejection fraction are predictors of inadequate response to standard dose adenosine. A high-dose adenosine protocol (up to 210 mcg/kg/min) is well tolerated and results in adequate haemodynamic response in nearly all patients.

The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure

Noninvasive imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of heart failure, assessment of prognosis, and monitoring of therapy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a comprehensive assessment of heart failure patients and is now the gold standard imaging technique to assess myocardial anatomy, regional and global function, and viability. Furthermore, it allows assessment of perfusion and acute tissue injury (edema and necrosis), whereas in nonischemic heart failure, fibrosis, infiltration, and iron overload can be detected. The information derived from CMR often reveals the underlying etiology of heart failure, and its high measurement accuracy makes it an ideal technique for monitoring disease progression and the effects of treatment. Evidence on the prognostic value of CMR-derived parameters in heart failure is rapidly emerging. This review summarizes the advantages of CMR for patients with heart failure and its important role in key areas.