Aortic dilatation and calcification in asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve: analysis in a Korean health screening population

Concomitant cardiovascular malformations in isolated bicuspid aortic valve disease: a retrospective cross-sectional study and meta-analysis

Background

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve affects up to 2% of the general population. It occurs in complex congenital heart defects or in syndromes such as Turner, Marfan, or Loeys-Dietz. However, the majority of bicuspid aortic valves are considered to manifest as isolated malformations.

Methods

We aimed to assess retrospectively associated cardiovascular malformations in 200 individuals with bicuspid aortic valve considered to occur as an isolated manifestation. All individuals underwent transthoracic echocardiography, 164 thoracoabdominal tomographic imaging, and 84 coronary artery imaging. In addition, we also performed a meta-analysis of data from the literature to assess the occurrence of associate malformations.

Results

In our retrospective cross-sectional study collective, the mean age was 45±15 years, 154 (77%) individuals were male. Anatomy of bicuspid aortic valve according to Schaefer was type 1 in 142 (71%), type 2 in 35 (18%), type 3 in 2 (1%), unicuspid in 6 (3%), and unclassified in 15 (8%) individuals. Coarctation of the aorta had 4.2% of individuals, 3.6% had coronary anomalies. No individual had a patent ductus arteriosus, 0.5% had atrial and ventricular septal defect each, 1.5% mitral valve prolapse. No individual had a tricuspid valve prolapse. Our meta-analysis identified in cohorts with isolated bicuspid aortic valve 11.8% (95% CI: 7.7–16.0%) individuals with aortic coarctation, 3.7% (95% CI: 1.2–6.1%) with coronary anomalies, 3.3% (95% CI: 0.0–6.7%) with patent ductus arteriosus, 5.9% (95% CI: 1.3–10.5%) with ventricular septal defect and 1.6% (95% CI: 1.1–2.1%) with mitral valve prolapse.

Conclusions

Individuals with isolated bicuspid aortic valve may exhibit a variety of associated cardiovascular malformations and therefore screening for associated malformations may be warranted.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Asia: Present Status and Future Perspectives

Over the last decade, based on evidence from multiple randomized clinical trials, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the established treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Despite the overwhelming expansion of TAVR in Western countries, the initial uptake and widespread adoption of this procedure have been relatively delayed in Asian countries, owing to the high cost of devices; limited local health and reimbursement policies; and lack of specific training/proctoring program, specialized heart team, or dedicated infrastructure. Furthermore, it has not yet been determined whether there are substantial interracial and ethnic differences in the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and anatomic features, as well as procedural and long-term outcomes, in patients receiving TAVR. In this review, we provide not only a comprehensive look at the current status and outcomes of TAVR in Asian populations compared with those of Western populations but also a perspective on the future of TAVR in Asia.

Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and its impact on aortic diameters-A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

AIM

To evaluate the impact of the 2 most common bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology patterns [right-left (RL) vs right-noncoronary (RN) cusp fusion] on the aortic diameters and the impact of gender, aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), and age on the observed effects.

METHODS

The PubMed databases was searched up to December 31, 2016 to identify studies investigating the morphology of BAV and aortic diameters. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the data on diameter of sinuses of Valsalva (SVD) and/or ascending aorta (AAD) and BAV morphology. The additional characteristics [gender, AS and AR (% of patients with moderate or severe AS/AR) and mean age] were collected to perform a meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with 2192 patients with indexed AAD, 15 studies with 3104 patients with nonindexed AAD and 8 studies with 1271 patients with indexed SVD, and 16 studies with 3454 patients with nonindexed SVD were included. There was no difference between RL and RN group in indexed/nonindexed AAD-mean difference (MD): 0.06 mm/m² (95% CI: -0.65 to 0.77 mm/m² , P = .87) and -0.06 mm (95% CI: 1.10-0.97 mm, P = .91). Differently, the RL BAV was associated with larger indexed/nonindexed SVD than RN phenotype-MD: 1.66 mm/m² (95% CI: 0.83-2.49 mm/m² , P < .001) and 2.03 mm (95% CI: 0.97-3.09 mm, P < .001). Age, gender, AS, and AR had no influence on observed differences.

CONCLUSIONS

RL BAV phenotype is associated with larger SVD than RN BAV, and the observed differences are independent from aortic valve dysfunction degree, age, and gender.

Diagnostic accuracy study of routine echocardiography for bicuspid aortic valve: a retrospective study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard procedure to distinguish tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) from bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Published studies assessed the accuracy of TTE for BAV under ideal conditions. Conversely, we aimed at assessing accuracy of TTE for BAV under routine conditions.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study of 216 adults included 132 men aged 62±14 years. Of these, 108 had BAV and 108 were age-matched individuals with TAV. All diagnoses were confirmed at surgery. We assessed TTE in two patient groups. First, in the (I) group of all 216 individuals, where we assessed accuracy for BAV according to the original diagnoses as documented by the primary investigators during original TTE examination. Second, we assessed accuracy for BAV according to expert re-evaluation in (II) all 158 TTE with availability of original recordings. Third, we performed a meta-analysis of published results on the accuracy of TTE for BAV according to PRISMA standards.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (I) primary investigators was 46.3%, 97.2, and 71.8% as compared to (II) expert re-evaluation with 59.7%, 93%, and 77.8%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly higher at re-evaluation (P<0.001). TTE at a non-tertiary care center (P=0.012), presence of aortic aneurysm (P=0.001) and presence of severe aortic valve calcification (P=0.003) predicted an inaccurate diagnosis of BAV. Conversely, meta-analysis of published TTE studies identified a pooled sensitivity of 87.7% and a pooled specificity of 88.3% for BAV.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that TTE yields almost ideal diagnostic accuracy when ideal investigators examine ideal patients. However, the study also shows that TTE yields suboptimal diagnostic accuracy under routine conditions. TTE in non-tertiary care settings, concomitant aortic aneurysm, and presence of severe aortic valve calcification predict an inaccurate diagnosis of BAV.

Strengths and Limitations of Current Adult Nomograms for the Aorta Obtained by Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging

Normalized measurements for the evaluation of aortic disease severity are preferred to the adoption of generic cutoff values. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the strengths and limitations of currently available aortic nomograms by echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A literature search was conducted accessing the National Library of Medicine using the keywords normal values, aorta, echocardiography, CT, and MRI. Addition of these keywords further refined the results: reference values, nomograms, aortic arch, and adults. Thirty studies were included in the final analysis. Despite the strengths noted in the recent investigations, multiple methodological and numerical limitations emerged. The numerical limitations included sample size limitation in most of the studies (only few investigations consisted of >800 subjects and many had 70-300), lack of aortic arch measurements, and paucity of data for non-Caucasian subjects. Methodological limitations consisted of lack of standardization in measurements (systole vs. diastole, internal vs. external border, axial vs. orthogonal planes), heterogeneity and data normalization issues (various age intervals used, body size often not evaluated, data expressed as observed values rather than estimated values by z-score), and study design issues. The designs were mostly retrospective with poorly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The nomograms presented range of normality with significant differences, but also with some reproducible pattern. Despite recent advances, multiple methodological or numerical limitations exist in adult nomograms for the aorta. Comprehensive nomograms of aortic dimensions at multiple levels including the aortic arch for different imaging techniques, involving a wide sample size, and using standardized methodology for measurements and data normalization are warranted. The availability of robust nomograms may encourage the use of personalized rather than generic cutoff values.