Comparison of longitudinal geometric measurement in human coronary arteries between frequency-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound

Intravascular imaging modalities in coronary intervention: Insights from 3D-printed phantom coronary models

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Several studies comparing optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have revealed that OCT consistently provides smaller area and diameter measurements. However, comparative assessment in clinical practice is difficult. Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers a unique opportunity to assess intravascular imaging modalities. We aim to compare intravascular imaging modalities using a 3D-printed coronary artery in a realistic simulator and to assess whether OCT underestimates intravascular dimensions, exploring potential corrections.

METHODS

A standard realistic left main anatomy with an ostial left anterior descending artery lesion was replicated using 3D printing. After provisional stenting and optimization, IVI was obtained. Modalities included 20 MHz digital IVUS, 60 MHz rotational IVUS (HD-IVUS) and OCT. We assessed luminal area and diameters at standard locations.

RESULTS

Considering all coregistered measurements, OCT significantly underestimated area, minimal diameter and maximal diameter measurements in comparison to IVUS and HD-IVUS (p<0.001). No significant differences were found between IVUS and HD-IVUS. A significant systematic dimensional error was found in OCT auto-calibration by comparing known reference diameter of guiding catheter (1.8 mm) to measured mean diameter (1.68 mm±0.04 mm). By applying a correction factor based on the reference guiding catheter area to OCT, the luminal areas and diameters became not significantly different compared to IVUS and HD-IVUS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that automatic spectral calibration method for OCT is inaccurate, with a systematic underestimation of luminal dimensions. When guiding catheter correction is applied the performance of OCT is significantly improved. These results may be clinically relevant and need to be validated.

Longitudinal stent elongation or shortening after deployment in the coronary arteries: which is dominant?

Background

Stent manufacturers always record stent shortening data while they do not record stent elongation data. The aim of this study is to identify both stent shortening and elongation occurring after deployment in the coronary arteries and know their percentage.

Results

The length of coronary stents was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) by (1) edge-to-edge (E-E) length, measured from the appearance of the first distal strut to the last proximal strut, and (2) area-to-area (A-A) length, measured from the first distal struts seen at more than one IVUS quadrant to the last proximal struts seen at more than one IVUS quadrant. Stent shortening was defined as both E-E and A-A lengths were shorter than the manufacturer box-stated length (shortened group). Stent elongation was defined as both E-E and A-A lengths were longer than the manufacturer box-stated length (elongated group), otherwise unchanged group. Consecutive 102 stents deployed in ischemic patients were included. Stent elongation was detected in 67.6% (69 stents), and shortening was detected in 15.7% (16 stents), while unchanged stents were detected in 16.7% (17 stents). Although the 3 groups had similar box-stated length and predicted foreshortened length, they had significantly different measurements by IVUS, p<0.001 for each comparison. Differences from box-stated length were 1.9±1.4mm, −1.4±0.4mm, and 0.4±0.3mm, respectively, p<0.001. The elongated group had significantly longer differences from the corresponding box-stated and predicted foreshortened lengths, while the shortened group had significantly shorter differences from the corresponding box-stated length and similar foreshortened length. By multinomial regression analysis, the plaque-media area and stent deployment pressure were the independent predictors of the stent length groups, p=0.015 and p=0.026, respectively.

Conclusions

Change in stent length is not only shortening—as mentioned in the manufacturer documents—but also stent elongation. Stent elongation is dominant, and the most important predictors of longitudinal stent changes are plaque-media area and stent deployment pressure.

Efficacy of coronary imaging on bifurcation intervention

During the coronary bifurcation intervention procedure, imaging including intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography is essential to provide precise anatomy of the lesion and morphological information. This consensus document between the Korean Bifurcation Club and the Japanese Bifurcation Club summarizes practical guidelines and current evidences on lesion assessment, device selection, procedural guidance, and the optimization of bifurcation intervention by the imaging.

In-vitro and in-vivo imaging of coronary artery stents with Heartbeat OCT

To quantify the impact of cardiac motion on stent length measurements with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and to demonstrate in vivo OCT imaging of implanted stents, without motion artefacts. The study consists of: clinical data evaluation, simulations and in vivo tests. A comparison between OCT-measured and nominal stent lengths in 101 clinically acquired pullbacks was carried out, followed by a simulation of the effect of cardiac motion on stent length measurements, experimentally and computationally. Both a commercial system and a custom OCT, capable of completing a pullback between two consecutive ventricular contractions, were employed. A 13 mm long stent was implanted in the left anterior descending branch of two atherosclerotic swine and imaged with both OCT systems. The analysis of the clinical OCT images yielded an average difference of 1.1 ± 1.6 mm, with a maximum difference of 7.8 mm and the simulations replicated the statistics observed in clinical data. Imaging with the custom OCT, yielded an RMS error of 0.14 mm at 60 BPM with the start of the acquisition synchronized to the cardiac cycle. In vivo imaging with conventional OCT yielded a deviation of 1.2 mm, relative to the length measured on ex-vivo micro-CT, while the length measured in the pullback acquired by the custom OCT differed by 0.20 mm. We demonstrated motion artefact-free OCT-imaging of implanted stents, using ECG triggering and a rapid pullback.

In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound

Background

What happens to stent length when deployed in a coronary artery? It is the aim of this study.

Results

Consecutive 95 balloon-expandable stents (BES) were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging. The stent length was measured from the longitudinal view in two ways: (1) edge-to-edge length (E-E) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at one IVUS quadrant and (2) area-to-area length (A-A) measured between distal and proximal stent frames located at two or more IVUS quadrants. IVUS measurements were compared with the manufacturer-stated length (M-L). The median E-E length was significantly longer than M-L, 18.76 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 15.65–23.60] versus 18.00 mm (IQR 15.00–23.00), respectively, p < 0.0001. Also, the median A-A length was significantly longer, 18.36 mm (IQR 15.19–23.47), p < 0.0001, than M-L. Moreover, the E-E length was significantly different from A-A length, p < 0.0001. Among the stent groups, the differences were significantly present in all drug-eluting stent and bare metal stent (BMS) comparisons, p < 0.0001, except the A-A length versus M-L in BMS only. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of difference in stent length were as follows: lesion length, p = 0.01; pre-intervention minimal diameter of the external elastic membrane (EEM), p = 0.03; lesions present in the left anterior descending branch, p = 0.03; and M-L, p = 0.04.

Conclusions

In the present study, the length of BES measured by IVUS was significantly different from the manufacturer-stated length. In addition to the manufacturer length, other important factors such as lesion length, pre-intervention diameter of EEM, and affected vessel determine the stent length.

Impact of the Balloon Inflation Time and Pattern on the Coronary Stent Expansion

Objectives

To assess the expansion pattern of coronary stents by using different balloon inflation times and pressures.

Background

The selection of coronary stent size and its proper deployment is crucial in coronary artery interventions, having an impact on the success of the procedure and further therapy.

Methods

Ten pairs of different stents were deployed under nominal pressure using sequential (5, 5, 10, and 10 seconds of repeated inflations, thus 30 seconds of summarized time) and continuous (30 seconds) deployment pattern. After each given time-point, intraluminal stent measurements were performed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Results

Both in-stent diameters and cross-section areas (CSA) of paired stents measured by OCT at all sequential time-points were significantly smaller compared to given manufacturers charts' values (90% to 94% for diameters and 81% to 88% for CSA, p<0.05). Significant increase of in-stent diameter and CSA was observed across the step-by-step deployment pattern. In-stent lumen measurements were significantly larger when sequential deployment pattern was applied compared to continuous deployment. Additional measurements were also done for overlapping segments of stents, showing smaller in-stent measurements of the latter compared to nonoverlapping segments. Validation of OCT and IVUS measurements using a phantom metallic tube showed perfect reproducibility with OCT and overestimation with IVUS (8% for diameters and 16% for CSA).

Conclusions

Stent diameter after deployment is time-dependent and not only pressure-dependent. Different stent expansion behavior, depending on the applied deployment pattern (sequential and nonsequential), was observed.

Contrast Volume and Decline in Kidney Function in Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may increase contrast volume. However, the impact of OCT-guided PCI on the decline in kidney function (DKF) in actual clinical practice remains unclear.Among 1,003 consecutive patients who underwent either OCT-guided or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in our institute, we identified 202 propensity score-matched pairs adjusted by baseline factors. The incidence of DKF was compared between the OCT-guided PCI group and the IVUS-guided PCI group. DKF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or a relative increase of ≥ 25% over baseline within 48 hours (acute DKF) or 1 month (sustained DKF) after PCI.Baseline characteristics, including the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (54% versus 46%, P = 0.09), were comparable between the OCT- and IVUS-guided PCI groups except for the age. The contrast volume was comparable between the two groups (153 ± 56 versus 144 ± 60 mL, P = 0.09), although it was significantly greater in the OCT-guided PCI group in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 175 ± 55 versus 159 ± 43 mL, P = 0.04). The incidence of acute DKF (0.5% versus 2.5%, P = 0.22) and sustained DKF (5.0% versus 10.4%, P = 0.31) was comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ACS (odds ratio 4.74, 95% confidence interval 2.72-8.25, P < 0.001) was a predictor of sustained DKF.Compared with IVUS-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI did not increase the incidence of DKF in actual clinical practice, although the increased contrast volume was observed in ACS cases.

Impact of stent platform on longitudinal stent deformation: an in vivo frequency domain optical coherence tomography study

Recently, longitudinal coronary stent deformation has been highlighted as a possible cause of drug-eluting stent failure. Although bench tests and in vivo studies have demonstrated difference in longitudinal stent strength among the stents with different platforms, its clinical impact is still unknown. Furthermore, it is unknown if modified stent platform favorably affect the incidence of stent deformation. The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal deformation of the everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with different stent platforms by using frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). Seventy-eight lesions treated with EES (Xience Prime: n = 26, Promus element: n = 29, Promus premier: n = 23) were studied. After successful stent implantation, FD-OCT was performed and stent length was measured using three-dimensional reconstruction of the images in vivo. Percent longitudinal stent shortening (%SS) was defined as the in vivo stent length divided by nominal stent length. Longitudinal stent deformation was defined as  %SS > 10 %. Patients' and procedural characteristics were similar among 3 EESs. There was no difference in mean  %SS between Xience Prime, Promus Element and Promus Premier (1.0 ± 5.8, 2.9 ± 6.7 and 0.8 ± 3.7 %, p = 0.322). Incidence of the longitudinal stent deformation was significantly higher in Promus Element than the other stents (0, 13.8 and 0 %, p = 0.028). Incidence of longitudinal stent deformation was different between EESs with different stent platforms. Stent material, stent design and/or stent delivery balloon may affect longitudinal stent deformation.

Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance.

METHODS AND DESIGN

The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.

Assessment and Quantitation of Stent Results by Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography

Optical coherence tomography evaluation of poststent results includes stent expansion as the absolute minimum stent area ratio by comparing the minimum stent area with the proximal and distal reference lumen areas or mean stent area defined as the total stent volume divided by the analyzed stent length; stent strut malapposition defined when the distance from the center of the blooming artifact and the surface of plaque is greater than the sum of stent thickness and polymer thickness; tissue protrusion through the stent struts; semiquantitative residual thrombus evaluation; and stent edge dissection.