Prognostic role of echocardiographic and hematologic parameters in heart failure patients complicated with incidental pleural effusion diagnosed during echocardiographic evaluation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:907-910. [PMID: 24710708 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0421-0]

Lung Ultrasound Findings Detected During Inpatient Echocardiography Are Common and Associated With Short- and Long-term Mortality

OBJECTIVES

Although pulmonary abnormalities are easily seen with standard echocardiography or pocket-sized ultrasound devices, we sought to observe the prevalence of lung ultrasound apical B-lines and pleural effusions and their associations with inpatient, 1-year, and 5-year mortality when found in hospitalized patients referred for echocardiography.

METHODS

We reviewed 486 initial echocardiograms obtained from consecutive inpatients over a 3-month period, in which each examination included 4 supplemental images of the apex and the base of both lungs. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare mortality rates among patients with versus without lung findings. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine the relative contributions of age, sex, effusions, and B-lines to overall mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 486 studies, the mean patient age ± SD was 68 ± 17 years; the median age was 70 years (interquartile range, 27 years); and 191 (39%) had abnormal lung findings. The presence versus absence of abnormal lung findings was related to initial-hospital (8.9% versus 2.0%; P = .001), 1-year (33% versus 14%; P < .001), and 5-year (56% versus 31%; P < .001) mortality. Ultrasound apical B-lines and pleural effusions were both independently associated with increased mortality during initial hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-11.0; and HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1-6.0, respectively). Pleural effusions were also associated with increased 1-year mortality (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography, the simple addition of 4 quick 2-dimensional pulmonary views to the echocardiogram often detects abnormal findings that have important implications for short- and long-term mortality.

Nonmalignant Pleural Effusions: A Prospective Study of 356 Consecutive Unselected Patients

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusion secondary to a nonmalignant cause can represent significant morbidity and mortality. Nonmalignant pleural effusion (NMPE) is common, with congestive heart failure representing the leading cause. Despite this, there are limited data on mortality risk and associated prognostic factors.

METHODS

We recruited 782 consecutive patients presenting to a pleural service between March 2008 and March 2015 with an undiagnosed pleural effusion. Further analysis was conducted in 356 patients with NMPE. Pleural biochemical analysis, cytologic analysis, thoracic ultrasonography, and chest radiography were performed. Echocardiography, CT imaging, radiologically guided biopsy, and medical thoracoscopy were undertaken as clinically indicated. Patients were followed for a minimum duration of 12 months, with the final diagnosis decided through independent review by two respiratory consultants.

RESULTS

Of the 782 patients, 356 were diagnosed with NMPE (46%). These patients had a mean age of 68 years (SD, 17 years) with 69% of them being men. Patients with cardiac, renal, and hepatic failure had 1-year mortality rates of 50%, 46%, and 25%, respectively. Bilateral effusions (hazard ratio [HR], 3.55; 95% CI, 2.22-5.68) and transudative effusions (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.81-4.28) were associated with a worse prognosis in patients with NMPE, with a 57% and 43% 1-year mortality rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest prospectively collected series in patients with NMPE, demonstrating that cases secondary to organ dysfunction have extremely high 1-year mortality. In addition, the presence of bilateral and transudative effusions is an indicator of increased mortality. Clinicians should be aware of these poor prognostic features and guide management accordingly.

Thoracic ultrasound: A complementary diagnostic tool in cardiology

Clinical assessment and workup of patients referred to cardiologists may need an extension to chest disease. This requires more in-depth examination of respiratory co-morbidities due to uncertainty or severity of the clinical presentation. The filter and integration of ecg and echocardiographic information, addressing to the clues of right ventricular impairment, pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension, and other less frequent conditions, such as congenital, inherited and systemic disease, usually allow more timely diagnosis and therapeutic choice. The concurrent use of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is important, because, despite the evidence of the strict links between cardiac and respiratory medicine, heart and chest US imaging approaches are still separated. Actually, available expertise, knowledge, skills and training and equipment’s suitability are not equally fitting for heart or lung examination and not always already accessible in the same room or facility. Echocardiography is useful for study and monitoring of several respiratory conditions and even detection, so that this is nowadays an established functional complementary tool in pulmonary fibrosis and diffuse interstitial disease diagnosis and monitoring. Extending the approach of the cardiologist to lung and pleura will allow the achievement of information on pleural effusion, even minimal, lung consolidation and pneumothorax. Electrocardiography, pulse oximetry and US equipment are the friendly extension of the physical examination, if their use relies on adequate knowledge and training and on appropriate setting of efficient and working machines. Lacking these premises, overshadowing or misleading artefacts may impair the usefulness of TUS as an imaging procedure.

Thoracic ultrasound: An adjunctive and valuable imaging tool in emergency, resource-limited settings and for a sustainable monitoring of patients

Imaging workup of patients referred for elective assessment of chest disease requires an articulated approach: Imaging is asked for achieving timely diagnosis. The concurrent or subsequent use of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) with conventional (chest X-rays-) and more advanced imaging procedures (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) implies advantages, limitations and actual problems. Indeed, despite TUS may provide useful imaging of pleura, lung and heart disease, emergency scenarios are currently the most warranted field of application of TUS: Pleural effusion, pneumothorax, lung consolidation. This stems from its role in limited resources subsets; actually, ultrasound is an excellent risk reducing tool, which acts by: (1) increasing diagnostic certainty; (2) shortening time to definitive therapy; and (3) decreasing problems from blind procedures that carry an inherent level of complications. In addition, paediatric and newborn disease are particularly suitable for TUS investigation, aimed at the detection of congenital or acquired chest disease avoiding, limiting or postponing radiological exposure. TUS improves the effectiveness of elective medical practice, in resource-limited settings, in small point of care facilities and particularly in poorer countries. Quality and information provided by the procedure are increased avoiding whenever possible artefacts that can prevent or mislead the achievement of the correct diagnosis. Reliable monitoring of patients is possible, taking into consideration that appropriate expertise, knowledge, skills, training, and even adequate equipment’s suitability are not always and everywhere affordable or accessible. TUS is complementary imaging procedure for the radiologist and an excellent basic diagnostic tool suitable to be shared with pneumologists, cardiologists and emergency physicians.