1
|
Palmquist E, Alvén J, Kercsik M, Larsson M, Lundqvist N, Hjelmgren O, Fagman E. NoiseNet, a fully automatic noise assessment tool that can identify non-diagnostic CCTA examinations. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 40:1493-1500. [PMID: 38748056 PMCID: PMC11258073 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Image noise and vascular attenuation are important factors affecting image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm that automatically performs noise and attenuation measurements in CCTA and to evaluate the ability of the algorithm to identify non-diagnostic examinations. The algorithm, "NoiseNet", was trained and tested on 244 CCTA studies from the Swedish CArdioPulmonary BioImage Study. The model is a 3D U-Net that automatically segments the aortic root and measures attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), noise (standard deviation of HU, HUsd) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR, HU/HUsd) in the aortic lumen, close to the left coronary ostium. NoiseNet was then applied to 529 CCTA studies previously categorized into three subgroups: fully diagnostic, diagnostic with excluded parts and non-diagnostic. There was excellent correlation between NoiseNet and manual measurements of noise (r = 0.948; p < 0.001) and SNR (r = 0.948; <0.001). There was a significant difference in noise levels between the image quality subgroups: fully diagnostic 33.1 (29.8-37.9); diagnostic with excluded parts 36.1 (31.5-40.3) and non-diagnostic 42.1 (35.2-47.7; p < 0.001). Corresponding values for SNR were 16.1 (14.0-18.0); 14.0 (12.4-16.2) and 11.1 (9.6-14.0; p < 0.001). ROC analysis for prediction of a non-diagnostic study showed an AUC for noise of 0.73 (CI 0.64-0.83) and for SNR of 0.80 (CI 0.71-0.89). In conclusion, NoiseNet can perform noise and SNR measurements with high accuracy. Noise and SNR impact image quality and automatic measurements may be used to identify CCTA studies with low image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Palmquist
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, SE-413 4, Sweden
| | - Jennifer Alvén
- Computer Vision, Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Michael Kercsik
- Department of Radiology, Alingsås Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Alingsås, Sweden
| | | | - Niklas Lundqvist
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, SE-413 4, Sweden
| | - Ola Hjelmgren
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Pediatric Heart Centre, Queen Silvias Pediatric Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Erika Fagman
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, SE-413 4, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|