A phantom and in vivo simulation of coronary flow to calculate fractional flow reserve using a mesh-free model

Energy loss is related to CT fractional flow reserve progression in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Background

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of energy loss (EL) and baseline CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) computed using computational fluid dynamics to predict functional progression of coronary stenosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

This single-center prospective study included 61 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age, 61 years ±9 [SD]; 43 men) showing 20-70 % stenosis who underwent serial coronary CT performed at 2-year interval between October 2015 and March 2020. A mesh-free simulation was performed to calculate the CT-FFR and EL. Functional progression was defined as ≥ 0.05 decrease in CT-FFR on the second coronary CT. Models using baseline CT-FFR and EL were compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

Of the 94 vessels evaluated, 25 vessels (27 %) showed functional progression. EL at distal stenosis (ELdis) of vessels with functional progression was higher than that of vessels without functional progression (27.6 W/m3 [interquartile range (IQR): 15.0, 53.0] vs. 5.7 W/m3 [IQR: 2.3, 10.1], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that ELdis (per unit Ln(EL); odds ratio, 11.8; 95 % CI: 4.0-34.9; p < 0.001) remained as a predictor of functional progression after adjustment for diameter stenosis and baseline CT-FFR. The area under the ROC curve using ELdis (0.89; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.96) was higher than that using baseline CT-FFR (0.71; 95 % CI: 0.59-0.83; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

When ELdis and baseline CT-FFR were considered, ELdis was a better predictor of functional progression of coronary stenosis.

Computational fluid dynamics as supporting technology for coronary artery disease diagnosis and treatment: an international survey

Background

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is emerging as an effective technology able to improve procedural outcomes and enhance clinical decision-making in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The present study aims to assess the state of knowledge, use and clinical acceptability of CFD in the diagnosis and treatment of CAD.

Methods

We realized a 20-questions international, anonymous, cross-sectional survey to cardiologists to test their knowledge and confidence on CFD as a technology applied to patients suffering from CAD. Responses were recorded between May 18, 2022, and June 12, 2022.

Results

A total of 466 interventional cardiologists (mean age 48.4 ± 8.3 years, males 362), from 42 different countries completed the survey, for a response rate of 45.9%. Of these, 66.6% declared to be familiar with the term CFD, especially for optimization of existing interventional techniques (16.1%) and assessment of hemodynamic quantities related with CAD (13.7%). About 30% of respondents correctly answered to the questions exploring their knowledge on the pathophysiological role of some CFD-derived quantities such as wall shear stress and helical flow in coronary arteries. Among respondents, 85.9% would consider patient-specific CFD-based analysis in daily interventional practice while 94.2% declared to be interested in receiving a brief foundation course on the basic CFD principles. Finally, 87.7% of respondents declared to be interested in a cath-lab software able to conduct affordable CFD-based analyses at the point-of-care.

Conclusions

Interventional cardiologists reported to be profoundly interested in adopting CFD simulations as a technology supporting decision making in the treatment of CAD in daily practice.

Coronary Artery Vorticity to Predict Functional Plaque Progression in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose

To investigate whether vorticity could predict functional plaque progression better than high-risk plaque (HRP) and lesion length (LL) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Materials and Methods

This single-center prospective study included 61 participants (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 43 male participants) who underwent serial coronary CT angiography at 2 years, with 20%-70% stenosis at initial CT between October 2015 and March 2020. The number of the following HRP characteristics was recorded: low attenuation, positive remodeling, spotty calcification, and napkin-ring sign. Vorticity was calculated using a mesh-free simulation. A decrease in CT fractional flow reserve larger than 0.05 indicated functional progression. Models using HRP and LL and vorticity were compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results

Of the 94 vessels evaluated, 25 vessels (27%) showed functional progression. Vessels with functional progression showed higher vorticity at distal stenosis (984 sec-1; IQR: 730-1253 vs 443 sec-1; IQR: 295-602; P < .001) than vessels without progression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of vorticity (0.91; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) was higher than that of HRP and LL (0.69; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.82; P < .01). Diagnostic accuracy of vorticity (85%; 80 of 94 vessels; 95% CI: 76, 92) was higher than that of HRP and LL (72%; 68 of 94 vessels; 95% CI: 62, 81; P = .004).

Conclusion

In participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, vorticity at distal stenosis was a better predictor of functional plaque progression than HRP and LL.Keywords: Coronary Artery, Vorticity, Functional Plaque Progression, Type 2 Diabetes, Vasculature, CT Angiography, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Fractional Flow Reserve Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Feasibility of CT Angiography-derived Kinetic Energy of Coronary Flow to Improve the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis

Purpose

To investigate whether coronary flow kinetic energy has incremental value over simulated fractional flow reserve (sFFR) in diagnosing hemodynamically significant stenosis assessed with coronary CT angiography and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Materials and Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 113 patients (mean age, 68 years ± 9 [SD]; 80 men) who underwent coronary CT angiography showing intermediate stenosis (30%-70% stenosis) and subsequent invasive FFR between December 2015 and March 2020. Kinetic energy was calculated using proximal coronary diameter and myocardial mass of the stenotic region. A mesh-free simulation was performed to calculate the sFFR. Invasive FFR of 0.80 or less indicated hemodynamically significant stenosis. Models using diameter stenosis, kinetic energy, and sFFR were compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

Of the 144 vessels evaluated, 53 vessels (37%) had hemodynamically significant stenosis. Kinetic energy of vessels with significant stenosis was higher than that of vessels with nonsignificant stenosis (79 mJ/kg [IQR, 58-104 mJ/kg] vs 36 mJ/kg [IQR, 23-59 mJ/kg]; P < .001). Multivariable analysis including diameter stenosis and sFFR showed that kinetic energy (per 20 mJ/kg; odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI: 1.37, 2.95; P < .001) was a predictor of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Adding kinetic energy to diameter stenosis and sFFR improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.95) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.97) (P = .04).

Conclusion

Kinetic energy had incremental value over sFFR in detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis assessed with invasive FFR.Keywords: Coronary CT Angiography, Coronary Arteries, Fractional Flow Reserve, Kinetic Energy, Cardiac Supplemental material is available for this article © RSNA, 2022.

Coronary flow disturbance assessed by vorticity as a cause of functionally significant stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Vorticity calculated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could assess the flow disturbance generated by coronary stenosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether vorticity would be an underlying cause of functionally significant stenosis assessed by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 113 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography showing intermediate stenosis and subsequent invasive FFR between December 2015 and March 2020. Vorticity at the stenosis site was calculated using a mesh-free CFD method. We also evaluated the minimum lumen area (MLA) and diameter stenosis (DS) of the lesion. Invasive FFR of ≤ 0.80 was considered functionally significant. Data were compared using Student's t-test and logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the evaluated 144 vessels, 53 vessels (37%) showed FFR ≤ 0.80. Vorticity of significant stenosis was significantly higher than non-significant stenosis (569 ± 78 vs. 328 ± 34 s^-1, p < 0.001). A significant negative relationship was present between vorticity and invasive FFR (R² = 0.31, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including MLA and DS showed that vorticity (per 100 s^-1, odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.57, p < 0.001) was a statistically significant factor to detect functional significance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistically significantly increased when vorticity was combined with DS and MLA (0.76 vs. 0.87, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vorticity had a statistically significant negative relationship with invasive FFR independent of geometric stenosis.

KEY POINTS

• Flow disturbance caused by coronary stenosis could be evaluated by calculating vorticity which is defined as the norm of the rotation of the velocity vector. • Vorticity was statistically significantly higher in stenosis with functional significance than stenosis without. • Vorticity has an additive value to detect functionally significant stenosis over geometrical stenosis.