A review of time courses and predictors of lipid changes with fenofibric acid-statin combination

Human Carboxylesterase 1A Plays a Predominant Role in Hydrolysis of the Anti-Dyslipidemia Agent Fenofibrate in Humans

Fenofibrate, a marketed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, has been widely used for treating severe hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia. As a canonical prodrug, fenofibrate can be rapidly hydrolyzed to release the active metabolite (fenofibric acid) in vivo, but the crucial enzyme(s) responsible for fenofibrate hydrolysis and the related hydrolytic kinetics have not been well-investigated. This study aimed to assign the key organs and crucial enzymes involved in fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans, as well as reveal the impact of fenofibrate hydrolysis on its non-PPAR-mediated biologic activities. Our results demonstrated that fenofibrate could be rapidly hydrolyzed in the preparations from both human liver and lung to release fenofibric acid. Reaction phenotyping assays coupling with chemical inhibition assays showed that human carboxylesterase 1A (hCES1A) played a predominant role in fenofibrate hydrolysis in human liver and lung, while human carboxylesterase 2A (hCES2A) and human monoacylglycerol esterase (hMAGL) contributed to a very lesser extent. Kinetic analyses showed that fenofibrate could be rapidly hydrolyzed by hCES1A in human liver preparations, while the inherent clearance of hCES1A-catalyzed fenofibrate hydrolysis is much higher (>200-fold) than than that of hCES2A or hMAGL. Biologic assays demonstrated that both fenofibrate and fenofibric acid showed very closed Nrf2 agonist effects, but fenofibrate hydrolysis strongly weakens its inhibitory effects against both hCES2A and hNtoum. Collectively, our findings reveal that the liver is the major organ and hCES1A is the predominant enzyme-catalyzing fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans, while fenofibrate hydrolysis significantly reduces inhibitory effects of fenofibrate against serine hydrolases. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Fenofibrate can be completely converted to fenofibric acid in humans and subsequently exert its pharmacological effects, but the hydrolytic pathways of fenofibrate in humans have not been well-investigated. This study reported that the liver was the predominant organ and human carboxylesterase 1A was the crucial enzyme involved in fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans.

Fenofibrate ameliorates olanzapine's side effects without altering its central effect: emphasis on FGF-21-adiponectin axis

The present work was designed to investigate whether fenofibrate could ameliorate olanzapine deleterious effect on insulin resistance via its effect on fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21)-adiponectin axis without affecting olanzapine antipsychotic effect in postweaning socially isolated reared female rats. Treatment with olanzapine (6 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or fenofibrate (100 mg/kg, orally) have been started 5 weeks after isolation, then behavioral tests, hippocampal content of neurotransmitters, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were assessed. Moreover, insulin resistance, lipid profile, FGF-21, adiponectin, inflammatory, and oxidative stress markers of adipose tissue were assessed. Treatment of isolated-reared animals with olanzapine, or fenofibrate significantly ameliorated the behavioral and biochemical changes induced by postweaning social isolation. Co-treatment showed additive effects in improving hippocampal BDNF level. Besides, fenofibrate reduced the elevation in weight gain, adiposity index, insulin resistance, lipid profile, and FGF-21 level induced by olanzapine treatment. Also, fenofibrate increased adiponectin level which was reduced upon olanzapine treatment. Moreover, fenofibrate improved both adipose tissue oxidative stress and inflammatory markers elevation as a result of olanzapine treatment. Fenofibrate could ameliorate olanzapine-induced insulin resistance without affecting its central effect in isolated reared rats via its action on FGF-21-adiponectin axis.

Impact of fenofibrate therapy on serum uric acid concentrations: a review and meta-analysis

Fenofibrate is a marketed fibric acid derivative for lipid-lowering in patients with lipid disorders. Numerous studies have proven fenofibrate had a certain effect on serum uric acid, here we conducted this study to quantitatively assess the effect of fenofibrate intervention in modulating serum uric acid concentration and the influence on serum creatinine. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials update to January, 2020. Primary endpoints focused on serum uric acid concentration and serum creatinine concentration. The pooled effects were calculated as weighted mean difference (WMD) by a random-effects model. Finally, 9 studies representing 487 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated that fenofibrate significantly reduced serum uric acid levels (WMD -1.32 mg/dL, 95%CI -1.61 to -1.03, p < 0.001) and an elevated level in serum creatinine (WMD 0.09 mg/dL, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.15, p < 0.001) following fenofibrate therapy compared with placebo. The present study provided strong evidence that fenofibrate intervention exerted a significant reduction on serum uric acid and a mild increase on serum creatinine. Meta-analysis suggested that there were no significant association between the serum uric acid lowering effect with either dose or treatment duration. Overall, our meta-analysis ascertained that fenofibrate have potential therapeutic effects in patients with lipid metabolic abnormalities but with mid nephrotoxicity. There is strong evidence to provide future direction of practical application and clinical researches of fenofibrate.

Fenofibrate and Impaired Taste Perception in Type 2 Diabetes

Patient: Female, 65-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Type 2 diabetes

Symptoms: Loss of sweet taste

Medication: Fenofibrate

Clinical Procedure: Drug challenge/dechallenge/rechallenge

Specialty: Endocrinology and Metabolic

Effect of fenofibrate in 1113 patients at low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal but high triglyceride levels: Real-world results and factors associated with triglyceride reduction

Fibrates are used in patients with dyslipidemia and high cardiovascular risk. However, information regarding drug response to fibrate has been highly limited. We investigated treatment results and factors associated with triglyceride reduction after fenofibrate therapy using large-scale real-world data. Patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors, at low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol goal but with triglyceride level ≥150 mg/dL, and undergoing treatment with fenofibrate 135–160 mg for the first time were included in this retrospective observational study. The outcome variable was the percentage changes of TG levels. The achievement rate of triglyceride <150 mg/dL was additionally analyzed. Factors associated with treatment results were also analyzed. Among 2546 patients who were initially screened, 1113 patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years; male: 71%). After median follow-up of 4 months, the median change in triglyceride was -60%, and 49% of the patients reached triglyceride <150 mg/dL. After adjusting for confounding variables, female sex, non-diabetic status, coronary artery disease, lower baseline triglyceride, and no statin use were identified to be independently associated with achievement of triglyceride <150 mg/dL. Among them, female sex, non-diabetic status, and coronary artery disease were also related to median or greater percentage reduction of triglyceride. In conclusion, only half of the study patients reached triglyceride levels <150 mg/dL after real-world fenofibrate therapy. This study indicates that more attention is needed on some subgroups to obtain optimal triglyceride levels when treating with fenofibrate.

Effects of triptolide on pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate in rats and its potential mechanism

Triptolide and fenofibrate are often used together for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome in Chinese clinics. This study investigates the effects of triptolide on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate in rats and it potential mechanism. The pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate (20 mg/kg) with or without triptolide pretreatment (2 mg/kg/day for seven days) were investigated. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of triptolide on the metabolic stability of fenofibrate were investigated using rat liver microsome incubation systems. The results indicated that the C_max (35.34 ± 7.52 vs. 30.43 ± 6.45 μg/mL), t_1/2 (6.17 ± 1.15 vs. 4.90 ± 0.82 h) and AUC_(0-t) (468.12 ± 35.84 vs. 416.35 ± 32.68 mg h L^-1) of fenofibric acid decreased significantly (p < .05). The T_max of fenofibric acid increased significantly (p < .05) from 5.12 ± 0.36 to 6.07 ± 0.68 h. Additionally, the metabolic stability of fenofibrate was prolonged from 35.8 ± 6.2 to 48.6 ± 7.5 min (p < .05) with the pretreatment of triptolide. In conclusion, these results indicated that triptolide could affect the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, possibly by inhibiting the metabolism of fenofibrate in rat liver when they were co-administered.

Effects of PCSK9 Inhibitors on Other than Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lipid Variables

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major cardiovascular risk factor, but other lipid variables such as triglycerides (TRGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] also affect cardiovascular risk. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors significantly lower LDL-C concentration but also modestly improve the concentrations of TRGs and HDL-C and more robustly decrease Lp(a) levels. The review presents the associated mechanisms of the beneficial effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on the other than LDL-C lipid variables, including the effects on lipid/apolipoprotein secretion and clearance and the heteroexchange between lipoproteins, as well as the possible effects on other variables involved in lipid metabolism such as sortilin. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors improve the overall lipid profile, and these beneficial effects may play a role in the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Safety and efficacy of fibrate-statin combination therapy compared to fibrate monotherapy in patients with dyslipidemia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Treatment with fibrate, statins, or other lipid-lowering drugs prevents primary or recurrent cardiovascular events. However, all lipid-lowering drugs have side effects, which may become more severe if combination therapy is prescribed.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of published data to compare the safety and efficacy of fibrates alone, compared to fibrate-statin combinations, in patients with dyslipidemia. Six articles were assessed in terms of the efficacy of therapy and nine from the viewpoint of therapeutic safety.

RESULTS

In terms of efficacy, fibrate-statin combinations afforded significantly greater reductions in the levels of total cholesterol (SE=-2.248; 95% CI 1.986-2.510), LDL cholesterol (SE=-2.274; 95% CI 2.015-2.533), and triglycerides (SE=-0.465; 95% CI 0.272-0.658) compared to fibrate alone. In terms of safety, treatment with fibrate alone was associated with a significant decrease in the number of kidney-related adverse events (RR=-0.547; 95% CI 0.368-0.812), compared to treatment with fibrate-statin combinations.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that treatment with a fibrate-statin combination affords clinical benefits that are superior to treatment with fibrate alone, but increases the risk of side effects (particularly renal). Therapy should thus be carefully monitored.

The pharmacokinetic considerations and adverse effects of DPP-4 inhibitors [corrected]

INTRODUCTION

Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of anti-hyperglycemic agents with proven efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

AREAS COVERED

This review considers the pharmacokinetic profile, adverse effects and drug interactions of DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors have certain differences in their structure, metabolism, route of elimination and selectivity for DPP-4 over structurally related enzymes, such as DPP-8/DPP-9. They have a low potential for drug interactions, with the exception of saxagliptin that is largely metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A4/A5. Reports of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer have raised concerns regarding the safety of DPP-4 inhibitors and are under investigation. Post-marketing surveillance has revealed less common adverse effects, especially a number of skin- and immune-related adverse effects. These issues are covered in the present review.

EXPERT OPINION

DPP-4 inhibitors are useful and efficient drugs. DPP-4 inhibitors have similar mechanism of action and similar efficacy. However, DPP-4 inhibitors have certain differences in their pharmacokinetic properties that may be associated with different clinical effects and adverse event profiles. Although clinical trials indicated a favorable safety profile, post-marketing reports revealed certain safety aspects that need further investigation. Certainly, more research is needed to clarify if the differences among DPP-4 inhibitors could lead to a different clinical and safety profile.

Effect of polyene phosphatidylcholine combined with fenofibrate capsules in treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of polyene phosphatidylcholine combined with fenofibrate capsules in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

METHODS: A total of 124 patients with NASH were selected and divided randomly into two groups: a treatment group and two control groups. The treatment group received polyene phosphatidylcholine combined with fenofibrate capsules (n = 45) for 12 wk, while the two control groups received fenofibrate capsules and inosine (n = 43) and polyene phosphatidylcholine alone (n = 36) for the same duration, respectively. The levels of serum transaminase, clinical symptoms, blood lipids and B-mode ultrasonic imaging findings before and after treatment were compared between groups.

RESULTS: The levels of serum transaminase, clinical symptoms, blood lipids and B-mode ultrasonic imaging findings improved obviously after treatment. The response rates were 86.7%, 53.5% and 88.9% in the treatment group and the two control groups, respectively. There were significant differences between the three groups in the improvement of clinical symptoms, liver function and blood lipids (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION: Treatment of NASH with fenofibrate capsules combined with polyene phosphatidylcholine is safe and effective.

Effects of rhaponticum carthamoides versus glycyrrhiza glabra and punica granatum extracts on metabolic syndrome signs in rats

Background

Rhaponticum cathamoides (RC) is an endemic wild Siberian herb with marked medicinal properties that are still poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic potential of RC extract (ERC) compared to the effects of Glycyrrhiza glabra (EGG) and Punica granatum extracts (EPG) in a rat model with high-fat diet-(HFD)-induced signs of metabolic syndrome; therefore, this study addresses a significant global public health problem.

Methods

Six-month-old male Wistar Albino Glaxo rats were subjected to eight weeks of a standard diet (SD), HFD, or HFD in which ERC, EGG, or EPG powders were incorporated at 300 mg/kg/day. The serum lipid profile, corticosterone and cytokine concentrations, glucose tolerance, systolic blood pressure, triacylglycerol accumulation, and PPARα DNA-binding activities in the liver samples were determined.

Results

In contrast to EGG and EPG, an ERC supplement significantly reduced the weight of epididymal tissue (19.0%, p < 0.01) and basal serum glucose level (19.4%, p < 0.05). ERC improved glucose intolerance as well as dyslipidemia more efficiently than EGG and EPG. EGG but not ERC or EPG supplementation decreased systolic blood pressure by 12.0% (p < 0.05). All of the tested extracts reduced serum IL6 and corticosterone levels induced by HFD. However, the lowering effects of ERC consumption on the serum TNF-α level and its restoring effect on the adrenal corticosterone level significantly exceeded the improvements induced by EGG and EPG. ERC intake also reduced triacylglycerol accumulation and increased the PPARα DNA-binding activity in the liver more significantly than EGG and EPG.

Conclusions

ERC powder supplementation improved glucose and lipid metabolism more significantly than EGG and EPG in rats fed on HFD, supporting the strategy of R. carthamoides use for safe relief of metabolic syndrome and its related disturbances such as inflammation, stress, and hepatic steatosis.

Current role of fenofibrate in the prevention and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common health problem with a high mortality burden due to its liver- and vascular-specific complications. It is associated with obesity, high-fat diet as well as with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Impaired hepatic fatty acid (FA) turnover together with insulin resistance are key players in NAFLD pathogenesis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are involved in lipid and glucose metabolic pathways. The novel concept is that the activation of the PPARα subunit may protect from liver steatosis. Fenofibrate, by activating PPARα, effectively improves the atherogenic lipid profile associated with T2DM and MetS. Experimental evidence suggested various protective effects of the drug against liver steatosis. Namely, fenofibrate-related PPARα activation may enhance the expression of genes promoting hepatic FA β-oxidation. Furthermore, fenofibrate reduces hepatic insulin resistance. It also inhibits the expression of inflammatory mediators involved in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis pathogenesis. These include tumor necrosis factor-α, intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Consequently, fenofibrate can limit hepatic macrophage infiltration. Other liver-protective effects include decreased oxidative stress and improved liver microvasculature function. Experimental studies showed that fenofibrate can limit liver steatosis associated with high-fat diet, T2DM and obesity-related insulin resistance. Few studies showed that these benefits are also relevant even in the clinical setting. However, these have certain limitations. Namely, these were uncontrolled, their sample size was small, fenofibrate was used as a part of multifactorial approach, while histological data were absent. In this context, there is a need for large prospective studies, including proper control groups and full assessment of liver histology.

Does combination therapy with statins and fibrates prevent cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients with atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins have an established efficacy in the management of dyslipidemia primarily by decreasing the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and thus decreasing CVD risk. They also have a favorable safety profile. Despite the statin-mediated benefit of CVD risk reduction a residual CVD risk remains, especially in T2DM patients with high triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values. Fibrates decrease TG levels, increase HDL-C concentrations, and improve many other atherosclerosis-related variables. Fibrate/statin co-administration improves the overall lipoprotein profile in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and may reduce the residual CVD risk during statin therapy. However, limited data exists regarding the effects of statin/fibrate combination on CVD outcomes in patients with T2DM. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study the statin/fibrate combination did not significantly reduce the rate of CVD events compared with simvastatin/placebo in patients with T2DM. However, it did show a possible benefit in a pre-specified analysis in the subgroup of patients with high TG and low HDL-C levels. Furthermore, in the ACCORD study the simvastatin/fenofibrate combination significantly reduced the rate of progression of retinopathy compared with statin/placebo administration in patients with T2DM. The present review presents the available data regarding the effects of statin/fibrate combination in patients with T2DM and atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia.

Fenofibrate and the kidney: an overview

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate has been used for the management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia for many years. Reports of fenofibrate-associated increases in serum creatinine (SCr) levels raised concerns regarding deleterious effects on renal function.

DESIGN

In this narrative review, we discuss available literature on the effect of fenofibrate on the kidney.

RESULTS

Most clinical studies showed a rapid (within weeks) raising effect of fenofibrate on SCr levels. This was often accompanied by declined estimated glomerular filtration rate. Risk predictors of this adverse effect might include increased age, impaired renal function and high-dose treatment. Also, the concomitant use of medications affecting renal hemodynamics (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers) may predispose to fenofibrate-associated increased SCr levels. Interestingly, SCr increases by fenofibrate were transient and reversible even without treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, fenofibrate was associated with a slower progression of renal function impairment and albuminuria in a long-term basis. Also, fenofibrate might be protective against pathological changes in diabetic nephropathy and hypertensive glomerulosclerosis. In this context, it is uncertain whether fenofibrate-associated increase in SCr levels mirrors true renal function deterioration. Several theories have been expressed. The most dominant one involved the inhibition of renal vasodilatory prostaglandins reducing renal plasma flow and glomerular pressure. Increased creatinine secretion or reduced creatinine clearance by fenofibrate was also suggested. These hypotheses should be settled by further studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate may not be a nephrotoxic drug. However, a close monitoring of SCr levels is relevant especially in high-risk patients. Increases in SCr levels ≥30% can impose treatment discontinuation.