Rationale and Design of the Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial on Efficacy of Early Initiation of Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute Heart Failure (EARLIER)

Effect of eplerenone on clinical stability of Japanese patients with acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

In the EARLIER (Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute Heart Failure) trial, eplerenone did not reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations or all-cause mortality in 300 patients admitted for acute HF (AHF). However, the trial might have been underpowered for these endpoints, and a comprehensive overview of the effect of eplerenone on diuretic doses and patients' clinical stability is warranted.

METHODS

The EARLIER trial included Japanese patients hospitalized for AHF randomly assigned to eplerenone or placebo over 6 months. Cox proportional hazards and mixed-effects models were used for analyses.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients were included (mean age, 67 ± 13 years; 73% males). The median furosemide equivalent dose was 40 (20-62) mg at randomization. Patients with higher furosemide-equivalent doses had more severe signs and symptoms of congestion and a higher risk of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization during 6-month follow-up (adjusted-hazard ratio per 10 mg/day increase = 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.49). Eplerenone significantly decreased furosemide-equivalent diuretic doses and b-type natriuretic levels throughout the follow-up (overall-joint-p < 0.05 for both) and reduced E/e' and inferior vena cava diameter at 4 weeks (both p < 0.05). Additionally, eplerenone significantly reduced left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter at 24 weeks (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Eplerenone treatment improved the clinical stability particularly during short period following hospitalization for AHF, translated by lower diuretic doses, natriuretic peptide levels, indirect markers of filling pressure and venous congestion, and a smaller LV volume.

Efficacy and safety of early initiation of eplerenone treatment in patients with acute heart failure (EARLIER trial): a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

AIMS

A mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) is effective in patients with chronic heart failure; however, the effects of the early initiation of an MRA in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) have not been elucidated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we focused on the safety and effectiveness of the treatment with eplerenone, a selective MRA in 300 patients with AHF, that is, 149 in the eplerenone group and 151 in the placebo group in 27 Japanese institutions. The key inclusion criteria were (1) patients aged 20 years or older and (2) those with left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 40%. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or first re-hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease within 6 months. The mean age of the participants was 66.8 years, 27.3% were women, and the median levels of brain natriuretic peptide were 376.0 pg/mL. The incidences of the primary outcome were 19.5% in the eplerenone group and 17.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio (HR): 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.642-1.855). In prespecified secondary outcomes, HR for the composite endpoint, cardiovascular death, or first re-hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) within 6 months was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.213 to 1.434). The safety profile for eplerenone was as expected.

CONCLUSION

The early initiation of eplerenone in patients with AHF could safely be utilized. The reduction of the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular death or first re-hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases by eplerenone is inconclusive because of inadequate power.

Reappraisal on pharmacological and mechanical treatments of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a highly frequent disorder with considerable morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality; thus, it invariably places pressure on clinical and public health systems in the modern world. There have been notable advances in the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of HF, and newly developed agents and devices have been widely adopted in clinical practice. Here, this review first summarizes the current emerging therapeutic agents, including pharmacotherapy, device-based therapy, and the treatment of some common comorbidities, to improve the prognosis of HF patients. Then, we discuss and point out the commonalities and areas for improvement in current clinical studies of HF. Finally, we highlight the gaps in HF research. We are looking forward to a bright future with reduced morbidity and mortality from HF.

Heart failure

Heart failure is common in adults, accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Its prevalence is increasing because of ageing of the population and improved treatment of acute cardiovascular events, despite the efficacy of many therapies for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and advanced device therapies. Combined angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have been associated with improvements in hospital admissions and mortality from heart failure compared with enalapril, and guidelines now recommend substitution of ACE inhibitors or ARBs with ARNIs in appropriate patients. Improved safety of left ventricular assist devices means that these are becoming more commonly used in patients with severe symptoms. Antidiabetic therapies might further improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. New drugs with novel mechanisms of action, such as cardiac myosin activators, are under investigation for patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a heterogeneous disorder that remains incompletely understood and will continue to increase in prevalence with the ageing population. Although some data suggest that spironolactone might improve outcomes in these patients, no therapy has conclusively shown a significant effect. Hopefully, future studies will address these unmet needs for patients with heart failure. Admissions for acute heart failure continue to increase but, to date, no new therapies have improved clinical outcomes.

Pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with heart failure: potential therapeutic targets

Despite the development of pharmacological inventions and new nonpharmacological techniques to prevent and treat heart failure (HF), the mortality rate in patients with symptomatic HF remains high. To conquer these difficulties, the pathophysiology of HF should be considered within a wide range of views. Given the diverse mechanisms of HF pathophysiology, renal and cardiac functions have close and complementary interconnections. Recent studies have suggested that communication between the kidney and heart through bidirectional pathways causes significant pathological changes. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) from three different viewpoints, namely, underlying chronic kidney disease, worsening renal function during hospitalization due to HF, and resistance to diuretics. We also summarize the presently available data on the pathophysiology of CRS, identify the challenges associated with some clinical approaches, and explore the potential therapeutic target for CRS.